Advanced search
Publication Cover
Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal Volume 38, 2020 - Issue 2: Impact Assessment for the 21st century – what future?
Submit an article Journal homepage
1,232
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Letter

Strategicness – the core issue of environmental planning and assessment of the 21st century

Gernot StoeglehnerDepartment of Spatial, Landscape and Infrastructure Sciences, Institute of Spatial Planning, Environmental Planning and Land Rearrangement, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, Wien, AustriaCorrespondence[email protected]
Pages 141-145 | Received 19 Jul 2019, Accepted 04 Oct 2019, Published online: 13 Oct 2019

References

  • Abart-Hersiszt L, Stoeglehner G. 2019. Das Sachbereichskonzept Energie. Ein Beitrag zum Örtlichen Entwicklungskonzept. Leitfaden. Version 2.0. Im Auftrag der Steiermärkischen Landesregierung, Abteilung 13, 15 und 17. [accessed 2019 Jul 15]. https://www.verwaltung.steiermark.at/cms/dokumente/12663031_144381826/6a64edd4/20190125_Leitfaden_2.0.pdf
  • Argyris C. 1992. Knowledge for action: a guide to overcoming barriers to institutional change. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
  • Bidstrup M, Hansen AM. 2014. The paradoxof strategic environmental assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 47:29–35.
  • Brown AL, Thérivel R. 2000. Principles to guide the development of strategic environmental assessment methodology. Impact Assess Proj Appraisl. 18(3):183–189.
  • Cherp A, Watt A, Vinichenko V. 2007. SEA and strategy formation theories: from three Ps to five Ps. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 27:624–644.
  • Erker S, Stangl R, Stöglehner G. 2017. Resilience in the light of energy crises. Part II: application of the regional energy resilience assessment. J Clean Prod. 164:495–507.
  • Faludi A. 2006. The performance of spatial planning. Plann Pract Res. 15(4):299–318.
  • Fischer TB. 2004. Transport policy-SEA in Liverpool, Amsterdam and Berlin - 1997 and 2002. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 24(3):319–336.
  • Innes J, Booher DE. 2000. Collaborative dialogue as a policy making strategy. Institute of urban and rural development. Working Paper Series. Berkeley: University of California; [accessed 2019 Jul 15]. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/8523r5zt#page-7
  • Jänicke M, Jörgens H. 2004. Neue Steuerungskonzepte in der Umweltpolitik. ZfU. 3/2004:297–348.
  • Lobos V, Partidario M. 2014. Theory versus practice in strategic environmental assessment (SEA). Environ Impact Assess Rev. 48(2014):34–46.
  • McDonald GT, Brown L. 1995. Going beyond environmental impact assessment: environmental input to planning and design. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 15:483–495.
  • Narodoslawsky M, Stoeglehner G. 2010. Planning for local and regional energy strategies with the ecological footprint. J Environ Policy Plann. 12(4):363–379.
  • Noble BF. 2000. Strategic environmental assessment: what is it? & what makes it strategic? J Environ Assess Policy Manage. 2/2000:203–224.
  • Noble BF, Gunn J, Martin J. 2012. Survey of current methods and guidance for strategic environmental assessment. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 30(3):139–147.
  • Scharpf F. 2000. Interaktionsformen. Akteurszentrierter Institutionalismus in der Politikforschung. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.
  • Scholles F. 2001. Zielsysteme in der Planung. In: Fürst D, Scholles F, editors. Handbuch Theorien + Methoden der Raum- und Umweltplanung. Dortmund: Dortmunder Vertrieb für Bau- und Planungsliteratur; p. 139–148.
  • Stoeglehner G. 2010. Enhancing SEA effectiveness: lessons learnt from Austrian experiences in spatial planning. Impact Assess Proj Appraisl. 28(3):217–231.
  • Stoeglehner G, Brown AL, Kornov L. 2009. SEA and planning: ‘ownership’ of SEA by the planners is the key to its effectiveness. Impact Assess Proj Appraisl. 27(2):111–120.
  • Stoeglehner G, Neugebauer G, Erker S, Narodoslawsky M. 2016. Integrated spatial and energy planning: supporting climate protection and the energy turn with means of spatial planning. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  • Stöglehner G. 2014. SUP-Qualität im Planungsalltag – Überlegungen zur Planungs- und Prüfmethodik. UVP Rep. 28(3+4):107–112.
  • Stöglehner G. 2018. Zum Verhältnis von Strategischer Umweltprüfung, Raumverträglichkeitsprüfung und Umweltverträglichkeitsprüfung. Der Öffentliche Sektor. 44/3:25–28.
  • Stöglehner G. 2019. Conceptualizing quality in spatial planning. Raumforsch Raumordn. 77(1):1–15.
  • Tang Z, Bright E, Brody S. 2009. Evaluating California local land use plan´s environmental impact reports. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 29:96–106.
  • Therivel R. 2004. Strategic environmental assessment in action. Earthscan: London.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.