The role of and challenges facing non-governmental organizations in the environmental impact assessment process in Punjab, Pakistan

References

• Aftab S. 1994. NGO’s and the environment in Pakistan. Islamabad, Pakistan: Sustainable Development Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Aguilar-Støen M, Hirsch C. 2017. Bottom-up responses to environmental and social impact assessments: a case study from Guatemala. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 62:225–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahammed R, Harvey N. 2004. Evaluation of environmental impact assessment procedures and practice in Bangladesh. Impact Assess Proj A. 22(1):63–78.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmad B, Wood C. 2002. A comparative evaluation of EIA systems in Egypt, Turkey and Tunisia. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 22:213–234.
   Google Scholar
• Asfaw TS, Botes V, Mengesha LG. 2017. The role of NGOs in corporate environmental responsibility practice: evidence from Ethiopia. Int J Corp Soc Responsib. 2(1):2.
   Google Scholar
• Atoyan G 2016. EIA and public participation in development decisions in Armenia [Dissertation]. England: Newcastle University
   Google Scholar
• Badr EA. 2009. Evaluation of the environmental impact assessment system in Egypt. Impact Assess Proj A. 27(3):193–203.
   Google Scholar
• Badr EA, Zahran AA, Cashmore M. 2011. Benchmarking performance: environmental impact statements in Egypt. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 31(3):279–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee A, Chaudhury S. 2010. Statistics without tears: populations and samples. Ind Psychiatry J. 19(1):60–65.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Borzel T, Buzogany A. 2010. Environmental organizations and the Europeanisation of public policy in central and Eastern Europe: the case of biodiversity governance. Environ Pol. 19:708–735.
   Google Scholar
• Briffett C, Obbard JP, Mackee J. 2003. Towards SEA for the developing nations of Asia. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 23(2):171–196.
   Google Scholar
• Brombal D, Moriggi A, Marcomini A. 2017. Evaluating public participation in Chinese EIA. An integrated public participation index and its application to the case of the New Beijing Airport. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 62:49–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buesgen M. 2008. Environmental NGOs’ role in expanding social spaces–diversification with Chinese characteristics: a case study of ENGOs’ opposition to the Nujiang dam in China’s Yunnan Province. China J Soc Work. 1(2):160–171.
   Google Scholar
• Bull R, Petts J, Evans J. 2010. The importance of context for effective public engagement: learning from the governance of waste. J Environ Plan Manag. 53(8):991–1009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi CS, Xu J, Xue L. 2014. Public participation in environmental impact assessment for public projects: a case of non-participation. J Environ Plan Manag. 57(9):1422–1440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai J, Spires AJ. 2018. Advocacy in an authoritarian state: how grassroots environmental NGOs influence local governments in China. China J. 79(1):62–83.
   Google Scholar
• de Jong AAD, Runhaar HA, Runhaar PR, Kolhoff AJ, Driessen PP. 2012. Promoting system-level learning from project-level lessons. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 33(1):23–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon L, Sellers C, Underhill V, Shapiro N, Ohayon JL, Sullivan M, Brown P, Harrison J, Wylie S, “EPA Under Siege” Writing Group. 2018. The environmental protection agency in the early Trump administration: prelude to regulatory capture. Am J Public Health. 108(S2): S89–S94.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Durden JM, Lallier LE, Murphy K, Jaeckel A, Gjerde K, Jones DO. 2018. Environmental impact assessment process for deep-sea mining in ‘the Area’. Mar Policy. 87:194–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagan A, Sircar I. 2010. Compliance without governance: the role of NGOs in environmental impact assessment processes in Bosnia–herzegovina. Environ Polit. 19(4):599–616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer TB. 2014. Environmental impact assessment (EIA) handbook for Pakistan. Islamabad: IUCN Pakistan.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer TB, Nadeem O. 2014. Environmental impact assessment (EIA) course curriculum for higher education institutions in Pakistan. Islamabad: IUCN Pakistan.
   Google Scholar
• Foltz RC. 2001. Environmental initiatives in contemporary Iran. Centr Asian Surv. 20(2):155–165.
   Google Scholar
• Fonseca A, Sánchez LE, Ribeiro JCJ. 2017. Reforming EIA systems: a critical review of proposals in Brazil. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 62:90–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasson J, Salvador NNB. 2000. EIA in Brazil: a procedures–practice gap. A comparative study with reference to the European Union, and especially the UK. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 20(2):191–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goddard MA, Dougill AJ, Benton TG. 2010. Scaling up from gardens: biodiversity conservation in urban environments. Trends Ecol Evol. 25(2):90–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government of Pakistan. 1997. Guidelines for the public consultation, participation and preparation and review of environmental reports.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Pakistan. 2017. Pakistan bureau of statistic. [accessed 2019 Jul 12]. http://www.pbs.gov.pk/content/provisional-summary-results-6th-population-and-housing-census-2017-0.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Pakistan. 2018. Pakistan economic survey. [accessed 2018 Dec 7]. http://www.finance.gov.pk/survey/chapters_18/16-Climate_change.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Punjab. 2000. Punjab environmental protection agency. Review of IEE and EIA regulations.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Punjab. 2012. Punjab environmental protection agency. Punjab environmental protection act 1997 (Amended 2012)
   Google Scholar
• Government of Punjab. 2013. Punjab environmental protection agency. [accessed 2019 Aug 1]. https://epd.punjab.gov.pk/tenders.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Punjab. 2018a. Punjab small industries corporation. [accessed 2018 Dec 7]. http://www.psic.gop.pk/index.php/about/achievements/industrial-estates.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Punjab. 2018b. Punjab industrial estates. [accessed 2018 Dec 7]. http://pie.com.pk/projects/.
   Google Scholar
• Gulakov I, Vanclay F. 2019. Social impact assessment and stakeholder engagement in the Russian Federation: representativeness, deliberativeness and influence. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 75:37–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasan MA, Nahiduzzaman KM, Aldosary AS. 2018. Public participation in EIA: A comparative study of the projects run by government and non-governmental organizations. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 72:12–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hege E, Demailly D 2018. How do NGOs mobilize around the SDGs and what are the ways forward? [accessed 2017 Mar 12]. http://www.iddri.org/Publications/Collections/Idees-pour-le-debat/WORKING%20PAPER%20SDGs%20and%20NGOs.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hesp PA. 1995. The environmental impact assessment process in Singapore with particular respect to coastal environments and the role of NGOs. J Coast Conserv. 1(2):135–144.
   Google Scholar
• Janya S. 2007. The study on developing and roles of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) of Thailand. J Environ Manag. 3:85–116.
   Google Scholar
• Kågström M. 2016. Between ‘best’ and ‘good enough’: how consultants guide quality in environmental assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 60:169–175. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2016.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kakonge JO. 2006. Environmental planning in Sub-Saharan Africa: environmental impact assessment at the Crossroads. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Karakitapoglu EB 2015. Public participation in EIA process of small hydro power plants (HES) in Turkey [master’s thesis]. Uppsala: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
   Google Scholar
• Khan M, Chaudhary MN, Ahmad SR, Saif S, Mehmood A. 2018. Challenges to EIA consultants whilst dealing with stakeholders in Punjab, Pakistan. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 73:201–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khosravi F, Jha-Thakur U, Fischer TB. 2019. Enhancing EIA systems in developing countries: a focus on capacity development in the case of Iran. Sci Total Environ. 670:425–432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolhoff AJ, Driessen PP, Runhaar HA. 2013. An analysis framework for characterizing and explaining development of EIA legislation in developing countries—illustrated for Georgia, Ghana and Yemen. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 38:1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolhoff AJ, Driessen PP, Runhaar HA. 2018. Overcoming low EIA performance- A diagnostic tool for the deliberate development of EIA system capacities in low and middle income countries. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 68:98–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolhoff AJ, Runhaar HA, Gugushvili T, Sonderegger G, Van der Leest B, Driessen PPD. 2016. The influence of actor capacities on EIA system performance in low and middle income countries—cases from Georgia and Ghana. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 57:167–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li G, He Q, Shao S, Cao J. 2018. Environmental non-governmental organizations and urban environmental governance: evidence from China. J Environ Manage. 206:1296–1307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund-Thomsen P. 2004. Towards a critical framework on corporate social and environmental responsibility in the South: the case of Pakistan. Development. 47(3):106–113.
   Google Scholar
• Marara M, Okello N, Kuhanwa Z, Douven W, Beevers L, Leentvaar J. 2011. The importance of context in delivering effective EIA: case studies from East Africa. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 31(3):286–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald D. 2004. Environmental justice in South Africa. [Place Unknown]: Juta and Company Ltd. Athens (OH): Ohio University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moghimi SM, Alambeigi A. 2012. Organizational learning as the requirement of forming enviropreneurship in environmental non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in Iran. Int J Environ Res. 6:409–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumtaz M, de Oliveira JAP, Ali SH. 2019. Climate change impacts and adaptation in agricultural sector: the case of local responses in Punjab, Pakistan. In: Climate change and agriculture. London, UK: IntechOpen; p 1–14. https://www.intechopen.com/online-first/climate-change-impacts-and-adaptation-in-agricultural-sector-the-case-of-local-responses-in-punjab-p.
   Google Scholar
• Nadeem O 2010. Public participation in Environmental Impact Assessment of development projects in Punjab, Pakistan [Dissertation]. PhD Thesis. University of Engineering and Technology Lahore.
   Google Scholar
• Nadeem O, Fischer TB. 2011. An evaluation framework for effective public participation in EIA in Pakistan. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 31:36–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadeem O, Hameed R. 2008a. Evaluation of environmental impact assessment system in Pakistan. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 28:562–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadeem O, Hameed R. 2008b. A critical review of the adequacy of EIA reports-evidence from Pakistan. World Acad Sci Technol. 2(11):146–153.
   Google Scholar
• Nadeem O, Hameed R. 2010. Exploring the potential and constraints to implementing the international best practice principles of EIA follow-up: the case of Pakistan. J Am Sci. 6(12):108–121.
   Google Scholar
• Naveed A, Khan SA 2018. Widening disparities: public sector spending and poverty across districts in Punjab.
   Google Scholar
• O’Faircheallaigh C. 2010. Public participation and environmental impact assessment: purposes, implications, and lessons for public policy making. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 30(1):19–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okello N, Beevers L, Douven W, Leentvaar J. 2009. The doing and un-doing of public participation during environmental impact assessments in Kenya. Impact Assess Proj A. 27(3):217–226.
   Google Scholar
• Palerm JR. 1999. Public participation in EIA in Hungary: analysis through three case studies. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 19(2):201–220.
   Google Scholar
• Paliwal R. 2006. EIA practice in India and its evaluation using SWOT analysis. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 26(5):492–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pande R. 2018. The role of women in the early environmental movement in India. Narratives of environmental challenges in Brazil and India: losing nature. [Place Unknown]: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Purnama D. 2003. Reform of the EIA process in Indonesia: improving the role of public involvement. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 23(4):415–439.
   Google Scholar
• Rebelo C, Guerreiro J. 2017. Comparative evaluation of the EIA systems in Kenya, Tanzania, Mozambique, South Africa, Angola, and the European Union. J Environ Prot. 8(05):603.
   Google Scholar
• Rodela R, Udovč A, Boström M. 2017. Developing environmental NGO power for domestic battles in a multilevel context: lessons from a Slovenian case. Environ Pol Gov. 27(3):244–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runhaar H, Gommers A, Verhaegen K, Cooman K, Corens P. 2019. The effectiveness of environmental assessment in Flanders: an analysis of practitioner perspectives. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 76:113–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryu J, Walmsley JD, Slinn P, Harashina S. 2004. The role of environmental non-governmental organizations in the environmental impact assessment process in Japan. Impact Assess Proj A. 22(4):283–293.
   Google Scholar
• Saarikoski H. 2000. Environmental impact assessment (EIA) as collaborative learning process. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 20(6):681–700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saeed R, Sattar A, Iqbal Z, Imran M, Nadeem R. 2012. Environmental impact assessment (EIA): an overlooked instrument for sustainable development in Pakistan. Environ Monit Assess. 184:1909–1919.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saif S, Mehmood A, Chaudhry MN, Akhtar S. 2015. Evaluating the adequacy and quality of environmental impact assessment (EIA) reports in Punjab. Pakistan J Environ Assess Pol Manag. 17(3):1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Shah N 2013. Role of EIA practitioners in improving EIA reporting quality-challenges and solutions: A case study of EIA system in Punjab Pakistan. Paper presented at: IAIA 13, Impact Assessment the Next Generation. Proceedings of the 33rd annual meeting of the International Association for Impact Assessment; Calgary: Alberta, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Sharmin S, Khan NA, Belal AR. 2018. Governance capabilities and sustainability concerning “corporate-NGO” collaboration: the case of lifebuoy friendship hospital in Bangladesh. Global Social Welfare; p. 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Tang SY, Tang CP, Lo CWH. 2005. Public participation and environmental impact assessment in mainland China and Taiwan: political foundations of environmental management. J Dev Stud. 41(1):1–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang SY, Zhan X. 2008. Civic environmental NGOs, civil society, and democratization in China. J Dev Stud. 44(3):425–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Loon L, Driessen PP, Kolhoff A, Runhaar HA. 2010. An analytical framework for capacity development in EIA—the case of Yemen. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 30(2):100–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wayakone S, Makoto I. 2012. Evaluation of environmental impacts assessment system (EIA) in Lao PDR. J Environ Prot. 3:1655–1670.
   Google Scholar
• Wells-Dang A, Soe KN, Inthakoun L, Tola P, Socheat P, Van TT, Chabada A, Youttananukorn W. 2016. A political economy of environmental impact assessment in the Mekong Region. Water Altern. 9(1):33–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu J, Chang IS, Yilihamu Q, Zhou Y. 2017. Study on the practice of public participation in environmental impact assessment by environmental non-governmental organizations in China. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 74:186–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zinia NJ, McShane P. 2018. Ecosystem services management: an evaluation of green adaptations for urban development in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Landsc Urban Plan. 173:23–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zubair S, Bowen D, Elwin J. 2011. Not quite paradise: inadequacies of environmental impact assessment in the Maldives. Tourism Manage. 32(2):225–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuhair MH, Kurian PA. 2016. Socio-economic and political barriers to public participation in EIA: implications for sustainable development in the Maldives. Impact Assess Proj A. 34(2):129–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zvijáková L, Zeleňáková M, Purcz P. 2014. Evaluation of environmental impact assessment effectiveness in Slovakia. Impact Assess Proj A. 32(2):150–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar