Improved SIA through DRA integration: lessons from a South African legislative comparison

References

• Arts J, Runhaar HAC, Fischer TB, Jha-Thakur U, Van Laerhoven F, Driessen PPJ, Onyango V. 2012. The effectiveness of EIA as an instrument for environmental governance: reflecting on 25 years of EIA practice in the Netherlands and in the UK. J Environ Plan Manage. 14(4):1–40.
   Google Scholar
• Aucamp I, Retief FP, King ND. 2018. Chapter 23: the social dimensions of environmental management. In: King ND, Strydom HA, Retief FP, editors. Environmental management in South Africa. 3rd ed. Cape Town: Juta; p. 1177–1212.
   Google Scholar
• Aucamp I, Woodborne S, Perold J, Bron A, Aucamp S-M. 2011. Looking beyond impact assessment to social sustainability. In: Vanclay F, Esteves AM, editors. New directions in social impact assessment: conceptual and methodological advances. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; p. 38–57.
   Google Scholar
• Aucamp IC 2015. Social impact assessment as a tool for social development in South Africa: an exploratory study [PhD thesis]. Pretoria (South Africa): University of Pretoria.
   Google Scholar
• Baines JT, Taylor N. 2011. Ethical issues and dilemmas. In: Vanclay F, Esteves AM, editors. New directions in social impact assessment: conceptual and methodological advances. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; p. 96–113.
   Google Scholar
• Barbour T. 2005. Social impact assessment guidelines. Prepared for the Department of Water Affairs and Forestry. Environmental Evaluation Unit, University of Cape Town.
   Google Scholar
• Barbour T. 2007. Guideline for involving social assessment specialists in EIA processes. Western Cape Province (South Africa): Prepared for the Department of Environmental Affairs and Development Planning.
   Google Scholar
• Barrow CJ. 2000. Social impact assessment: an introduction. London (UK): Arnold Publishers; p. 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Barrow CJ. 2006. Environmental management for sustainable development. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barrow CJ. 2010. How is environmental conflict addressed by SIA? Environmental Impact Assess Rev. 30(2010):293–301.
   Google Scholar
• Becker HA. 1997. Social impact assessment: method and experience in Europe, North America and the developing World. London: ULC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benson C, Twigg J 2007. Tools for mainstreaming disaster risk reduction: guidance notes for development organisations. ProVention Consortium. Switzerland: Geneva. http://www.preventionweb.net.
   Google Scholar
• Bice S. 2017. Corporate social responsibility as institution: a social mechanisms framework. J Bus Ethics. 143:17–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowd R, Quinn NW, Kotze DC. 2015. Toward an analytical framework for understanding complex social-ecological systems when conducting environmental impact assessment in South Africa. Ecology Society. 20(1):41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burdge RJ. 2002. Why is social impact assessment the orphan of the assessment process? Impact Assess Proj Appraisal. 20(1):3–9.
   Google Scholar
• Burdge RJ. 2003. Benefiting from practice of social impact assessment. Impact Assess Proj Appraisal. 21(3):225–229.
   Google Scholar
• Chadwick A. 2002. Socio-economic impacts: are they still the poor relations in UK environmental assessments?. J Environ Plan Manage. 45(1):3–24.
   Google Scholar
• Cottrell A, King K. 2011. Disasters and climate change. In: Vanclay F, Esteves AM, editors. New directions in social impact assessment: conceptual and methodological advances. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; p. 154–167.
   Google Scholar
• Domínguez-Gómez JA. 2016. Four conceptual issues to consider in integrating social and environmental factors in risk and impact assessments. Environmental Impact Assess Rev. 56(2016):113–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du Pisani JA, Sandham LA. 2006. Assessing the performance of SIA in the EIA context: A case study of South Africa. Environmental Impact Assess Rev. 26(2006):707–724.
   Google Scholar
• Esteves AM, Franks D, Vanclay F. 2012. Social Impact Assessment: the state of the art. Impact Assess Proj Appraisal. 30(1):34–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esteves AM, Vanclay F. 2009. Social development needs analysis as a tool for SIA to guide corporate-community investment: applications in the minerals industry. Environmental Impact Assess Rev. 29(2009):137–145.
   Google Scholar
• Finsterbusch K. 1995. In praise of SIA – A personal review of the field of social impact assessment: feasibility, justification, history, methods, issues. Impact Assess. 13(3):229–252.
   Google Scholar
• Freudenburg WR. 1986. Social impact assessment. Annual Rev Sociol. 12(1986):451–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardiner R 2002. Towards earth summit 2002. Earth Summit 2002: Briefing Paper. www.earthsummit2002.org/ES2002.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Glasson J, Heaney D. 1993. Socio-economic impacts: the poor relations in British environmental impact statements. J Environ Plan Manage. 36(3):335–343.
   Google Scholar
• Hildebrandt L 2012. The significance and status of Social Impact Assessment (SIA) in a South African context [master’s dissertation]. Potchefstroom (South Africa): North-West University.
   Google Scholar
• Hildebrandt L, Sandham LA. 2014. Social impact assessment: the lesser sibling in the South African EIA process?. Environmental Impact Assess Rev. 48(2014):20–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [IAIA] International Association for Impact Assessment. 1999. Principles of environmental impact assessment best practice. http://www.iaia.org/uploads/pdf/principlesEA_1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• [IAIA] International Association for Impact Assessment. 2003. International principles for social impact assessment. Impact Assess Proj Appraisal. 21(1):5–11.
   Google Scholar
• Imperiale AJ, Vanclay F. 2016. Experiencing local community resilience in action: learning from post-disaster communities. J of Rural Stud. 47(2016):204–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Interorganizational Committee. 1994. Guidelines and principles for social impact assessment. http://www.st.nmfs.noaa.gov/tm/spo16.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• [ISDR] International Strategy for Disaster Reduction. 2005. Hyogo framework for action 2005–2015. Building the resilience of nations and communities to disasters. https://www.unisdr.org/2005/wcdr/intergover/official-doc/L-docs/Hyogo-framework-for-action-english.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp D. 2011. Understanding the organizational context. In: Vanclay F, Esteves AM, editors. New directions in social impact assessment: conceptual and methodological advances. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; p. 20–35.
   Google Scholar
• Kidd M, Retief F, Alberts R. 2018. Chapter 24: integrated environmental assessment and management. In: King ND, Strydom HA, Retief FP, editors. Environmental management in South Africa. 3rd ed. Cape Town: Juta; p. 1213–1278.
   Google Scholar
• Kruger L, Sandham LA. 2018. Social impact assessment: practitioner perspectives of the neglected status in South African SIA. S Afr Geographical J. 100(3):394–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmoudi H, Renn O, Vanclay F, Hoffman V, Karami E. 2013. A framework for combining social impact assessment and risk assessment. Environmental Impact Assess Rev. 43(2013):1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Momtaz S. 2005. Institutionalizing social impact assessment in Bangladesh resource management: limitations and opportunities. Environmental Impact Assess Rev. 25(2005):33–45.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison-Saunders A, Pope J, Gunn JAE, Bond A, Retief F. 2014. Strengthening impact assessment: a call for integration and focus. Impact Assess Proj Appraisal. 32(1):2–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oosthuizen M, Van der Linde M, Basson E. 2018. Chapter 4: National Environmental Management Act 107 of 1998 (NEMA). In: King ND, Strydom HA, Retief FP, editors. Environmental management in South Africa. 3rd ed. Cape Town: Juta; p. 125–207.
   Google Scholar
• Pope J, Bond AJ, Morrison-Saunders A, Retief FP. 2013. Advancing the theory and practice of impact assessment: setting the research agenda. Environmental Impact Assess Rev. 41(2013):1–9.
   Google Scholar
• [RSA] Republic of South Africa. 1989. Environment Conservation Act, No. 73 of 1989. Cape Town: Government Gazette.
   Google Scholar
• [RSA] Republic of South Africa. 1996. Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, No. 108 of 1996. Cape Town: Government Gazette.
   Google Scholar
• [RSA] Republic of South Africa. 1998a. National Environmental Management Act, No. 107 of 1998. Cape Town: Government Gazette.
   Google Scholar
• [RSA] Republic of South Africa. 1998b. National Water Act, No. 36 of 1998. Cape Town: Government Gazette.
   Google Scholar
• [RSA] Republic of South Africa. 1999. National Heritage Resources Act, No. 25 of 1999. Cape Town: Government Gazette.
   Google Scholar
• [RSA] Republic of South Africa. 2000a. Promotion of Administrative Justice Act, No. 3 of 2000. Cape Town: Government Gazette.
   Google Scholar
• [RSA] Republic of South Africa. 2000b. Local Government: Municipal Systems Act, No. 32 of 2000. Cape Town: Government Gazette.
   Google Scholar
• [RSA] Republic of South Africa. 2002a. Disaster Management Act, No. 57 of 2002. Pretoria: Government Printer.
   Google Scholar
• [RSA] Republic of South Africa. 2002b. Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act. Cape Town: Government Gazette.
   Google Scholar
• [RSA] Republic of South Africa. 2004. National Environmental Management: Air Quality Act, No. 39 of 2004. Cape Town: Government Gazette.
   Google Scholar
• [RSA] Republic of South Africa. 2005. National Disaster Management Framework. Pretoria:Government Printer.
   Google Scholar
• [RSA] Republic of South Africa. 2008. National Environmental Management: Waste Act, No. 59 of 2008. Cape Town: Government Gazette.
   Google Scholar
• [RSA] Republic of South Africa. 2015. Disaster Management Amendment Act, No. 16 of 2015. Pretoria: Government Printer.
   Google Scholar
• [RSA] Republic of South Africa. 2017. Amendments to the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations, 2014. General Notice No. 326. Cape Town: Government Gazette.
   Google Scholar
• Sandham LA, Siphugu MV, Tshivhandekano TR. 2005. Aspects of environmental impact assessment (EIA) practice in the Limpopo Province – South Africa. Afr J Environ Assess Manage. 10:50–65.
   Google Scholar
• Suopajärvi L. 2013. Social impact assessment in mining projects in Northern Finland: comparing practice to theory. Environmental Impact Assess Rev. 42(2013):25–30.
   Google Scholar
• Tajima R, Gore T, Fischer TB. 2014. Policy integration of environmental assessment and disaster management. J Environ Assess Policy Manage. 16(3): 1450028-1–1450028-28.
   Google Scholar
• [UN] United Nations. 1992. United nations conference on environment and development. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Agenda 21. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/Agenda21.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• [UNDP] United Nations Development Programme. 2016. Sustainable development goals. http://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/sustainable-development-goals/goals-11-sustainable-cities-and-communities.html.
   Google Scholar
• [UNESCO] United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. 1992. The rio declaration on environment and development (1992). www.unesco.org/education/nfsunesco/pdf/RIO-E.PDF.
   Google Scholar
• [UNISDR] United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction. 2009. UNISDR Terminology of Disaster Risk Reduction. Switzerland (Geneva). www.unisdr.org/publications.
   Google Scholar
• [UNISDR] United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. 2015. Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015–2030. https://www.unisdr.org/files/43291_sendaiframeworkfordrren.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Usman RA, Olorunfemi FB, Awotayo GP, Tunde AM, Usman BA. 2013. Disaster risk management and social impact assessment: understanding preparedness, response and recovery in community projects. Environmental Change and Sustainability. IntechOpen.
   Google Scholar
• Van Niekerk D. 2006. Disaster risk management in South Africa: the function and the activity–towards an integrated approach. Polit. 25(2):96–116.
   Google Scholar
• Van Niekerk D. 2014. A critical analysis of the South African Disaster Management Act and policy framework. Disasters. 38(4):858–877.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanclay F. 2014. Integration and focus from the perspective of social impact assessment: a response to Morrison-Saunders et al. Impact Assess Proj Appraisal. 32(1):11–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanclay F. 2019. Reflections on Social Impact Assessment in the 21st century. Impact Assess Proj Appraisal. 2019:1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Vanclay F, Esteves AM, Aucamp I, Franks D. 2015. Social Impact Assessment: guidance for assessing and managing the social impacts of projects. Fargo ND: International Association for Impact Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Wisner B, Gaillard JC, Kelman I. 2012. Introduction to Part I. In: Wisner B, Gaillard JC, Kelman I, editors. The Routledge Handbook of Hazards and Disaster Risk Reduction. New York: Routledge; p. 11–17.
   Google Scholar