Establishing international best practice principles for impact assessment teaching and training

References

• Andrews RNL. 1976. Agency responses to NEPA: a comparison and implications. Nat Resour J. 16:301–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annandale D, Morrison-Saunders A. 2007. Teaching Process Sustainability: A Role-playing Case Focused on Finding New Solutions to a Waste-water Management Problem. In: Galea, C editor. Teaching Business Sustainability Volume 2: Cases, Simulations and Experiential Approaches. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing; pp.180–198.
   Google Scholar
• Arksey H, Knight P. 1999. Achieving a successful interview. In: Arksey H, Knight P, editors. Interviewing for social scientists: an introductory resource with examples. London: SAGE; p. 89–109.
   Google Scholar
• Bisset R, Tomlinson P. 1985. EIA training courses organized by the centre for environmental management and planning, University of Aberdeen: an analysis of experience. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 5(3):279–281. doi:10.1016/0195-9255(85)90009-5.
   Google Scholar
• Bloomberg L Volpe M, 2008. Completing Your Qualitative Dissertation: A Roadmap from Beginning to End. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Bloomberg LD, Volpe M. 2012. Completing your qualitative dissertation: a roadmap from beginning to end. 2nd ed. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Bryan RL, Kreuter MW, Brownson RC. 2009. Integrating adult learning principles into training for public health practice. Health Promot Pract. 10(4):557–563. doi:10.1177/1524839907308117.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Canter L, Sadler B. 1997. A tool kit for effective EIA practice – review of methods and perspectives on their application: a supplementary report of the international study of the effectiveness of environmental assessment. International Association for impact assessment. [accessed 2020 Mar 29]. https://www.iaia.org/pdf/EIA/SRPEASEIS01.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter R, Maragos J. 1989. How to assess environmental impacts on tropical islands and coastal areas; A Training Manual Prepared for South Pacific Regional Environmental Programme. Honolulu: Environment and Policy Institute East-West Center; [accessed 2020 Mar 29]. https://www.sprep.org/attachments/Publications/how-assess-environmental-impacts-tropical-islands-coastal-areas.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chaibva S. 2000. EIA training for urban local authorities in Africa. Local Environ. 5(1):97–106. doi:10.1080/135498300113291.
   Google Scholar
• Cherp A. 2008. Teaching environmental assessment in the context of postgraduate environmental courses - challenges for environmental postgraduate education and five mindsets for sustainability. In: Fischer TB, Gazzola P, Jha-Thakur U, Belcakova I, Aschemann R, editors. Environmental assessment lecturers’ handbook. ROAD Bratislava; Chapter 4 and chap 4–9, p. 24–31. [accessed 2019 July 16]. https://fischersite.files.wordpress.com/2016/04/02.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Clark BD. 1999. Capacity building. In: Petts J, editor. Handbook of environmental impact assessment volume 2 environmental impact assessment in practice: impact and limitations. Oxon: Blackwell Science; p. 35–54.
   Google Scholar
• Clegg S, Stevenson J. 2013. The interview reconsidered: context, genre, reflexivity and interpretation in sociological approaches to interviews in higher education research. Higher Educ Res Dev. 32(1):5–16. doi:10.1080/07294360.2012.750277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Environmental Protection. 1990. Who decides? Role play exercise: resource kit. Perth: Western Australia Department of Environmental Protection.
   Google Scholar
• Diduck A, Sinclair AJ. 1997. The concept of critical environmental assessment (EA) education. Can Geogr. 41(3):294–307. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0064.1997.tb01315.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumont H, Istance D, Benavides F. 2010. The nature of learning: using research to inspire practice, practitioner guide from the innovative learning environments project. Centre for Educational Research and Innovation, OECD. http://www.oecd.org/education/ceri/thenatureoflearningusingresearchtoinspirepractice.htm
   Google Scholar
• Ecaat J. 2001. Environmental impact assessment training resource manual, forum for energy and development. DANIDA Fellowship Programme. [accessed 2019 July 16]. http://www.inforse.org/doc/FinalEIA Training Resource Manual (a).pdf
   Google Scholar
• Elliott J. 2005. Using narrative in social research: qualitative and quantitative approaches. London: Sage Publications Inc; p. 220.
   Google Scholar
• Enríquez-de-Salamanca A. 2019. Environmental assessment: a third division subject at the university. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 37(5):452–454. doi:10.1080/14615517.2019.1589773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer TB. 2014. Development of an EIA curriculum for tertiary level institutions in Pakistan: baseline, development needs, curriculum outline and suggestions for further action. IUCN [International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources] Pakistan (National Impact Assessment Program). Islamabad: Hamadard Press; [accessed 2020 Mar 29]. https://www.commissiemer.nl/docs/mer/diversen/pos722-development-eia-curriculum.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fischer TB, Gazzola P, Jha-Thakur U, Belcakova I, Aschemann R, eds. 2008. Environmental assessment lecturers’ handbook. ROAD Bratislava; [ chap 1–3]. [accessed 2019 Jul 16]. https://fischersite.files.wordpress.com/2016/04/02.pdf [chap 4–9] https://fischersite.files.wordpress.com/2016/04/03.pdf [chap 10–12]. https://fischersite.files.wordpress.com/2016/04/01.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fischer TB, Jha-Thakur U. 2013. Environmental assessment and management related master level degree programmes in the EU: baseline, trends, challenges and opportunities. J Environ Assess Policy Manage. 15(4):1350020 (26 pages). doi:10.1142/S1464333213500208.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer TB, Jha-Thakur U, Belčáková I, Aschemann R. undated. Enhancing Attractiveness of Environmental Assessment and Management Higher Education – TwoEA-M – A Report on East and South East Asian Higher Education Post-graduate Environmental Assessment and Management Requirements and Interests. University of Liverpool.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer TB, Nadeem O. 2014. Environmental impact assessment course curriculum for higher education institutions in Pakistan. Pakistan: IUCN. [accessed 2018 Mar 1]. http://cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/niap___eia_curriculum_for_hei.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fowler K, Engel-Cox J. 2007. Getting out there: incorporating site visits and industry assessment in pollution prevention and sustainability education. In: Galea C, editor. Teaching business sustainability volume 2: cases, simulations and experiential approaches. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing; p. 18–25.
   Google Scholar
• [IAIA & IEA] International Association for Impact Assessment and Institute for Environmental Assessment UK. 1999. Principles of environmental impact assessment best practice. [accessed 2019 Jan 21]. http://www.iaia.org/uploads/pdf/principlesEA_1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fox M, Martin P, Green G. 2007. Doing practitioner research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller K. 1994. Training in environmental impact assessment. Environ Assess. 2(4):136–137.
   Google Scholar
• Gazzola P, Fischer T. 2008. Core module 1 – environmental assessment. In: Fischer TB, Gazzola P, Jha-Thakur U, Belčáková I, Aschemann R, editors. Environmental assessment lecturers’ handbook. ROAD Bratislava University Press; p. 42–62.
   Google Scholar
• Gazzola P. 2008a. Trends in education in environmental assessment: a comparative analysis of European EA-related master programmes. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 26(2):148–158. doi:10.3152/146155108X316397.
   Google Scholar
• Gazzola P. 2008b. Existing EA-related master degree programmes in the EU: an analysis – concepts, principles and key modules. In: Fischer TB, Gazzola P, Jha-Thakur U, Belčáková I, Aschemann R, editors. Environmental assessment lecturers’ handbook. ROAD Bratislava University Press; p. 32–40.
   Google Scholar
• Gazzola P, Jha-Thakur U. 2009. Internationalisation and standardisation of European environmental assessment – relevance to India. Environ Educ Res. 15(6):625–641. doi:10.1080/13504620903225653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant MJ, Booth A. 2009. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Info Libr J. 26(2):91–108. doi:10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobson J, Morrison-Saunders A. 2013. Re-framing teaching relationships: from student centered to subject centered learning. Teach Higher Educ. 18(7):773–783. doi:10.1080/13562517.2013.836095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabera T. 2017. Environmental impact assessment in higher education institutions in East Africa: the case of Rwanda. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 24(8):7852–7864. doi:10.1007/s11356-017-8525-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo D, Miner K. 2010. Outcome-based workforce development and education in public health. Annu Rev Public Health. 31(1)::253–69. doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.012809.103705.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee N. 1988. Training requirements for environmental impact assessment. In: Wathern P, editor. Environmental impact assessment: theory and practice. London: Unwin Hyman; p. 143–158.
   Google Scholar
• Lee N, Wood C. 1985. Training for environmental impact assessment within the European economic community. J Environ Manage. 21:271–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewandowski SC, Bolt SE. 2010. Box-and-whisker plot. In: Salkind N, editor. Encyclopedia of research design. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; p. 105–108.
   Google Scholar
• Miazga A, Dusik J, Sadler B. 2003. EIA training resource manual for South Eastern Europe. The Regional Environmental Center for Central and Eastern Europe. https://www.iaia.org/eia-training-resource-manual-south-eastern-europe.php
   Google Scholar
• Montaño M, de Souza M. 2015. Impact assessment research in Brazil: achievements, gaps and future directions. J Environ Assess Policy Manage. 17(1):1550009 (8). doi:10.1142/S146433321550009X.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan RK. 2017. Conceptualising best practice in impact assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 66:78–85. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2017.06.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan RK, Hart A, Freeman C, Coutts B, Colwill D, Hughes A. 2012. Practitioners, professional cultures, and perceptions of impact assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 32(1):11–24. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2011.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison-Saunders A, Hobson J. 2013a. Being subject-centred: A philosophy of teaching and implications for higher education. In special issue: teaching and learning in higher education: Western Australia’s TL forum. Issues Educ Res. 23(2):212–226.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison-Saunders A, Hobson J. 2013b. Subject-centred learning enables effective tertiary teaching. Presented at: Design, develop, evaluate - the core of the learning environment; teaching and learning forum 2013; Feb 7–8; Murdoch University. http://www.roger-atkinson.id.au/tlf2013/refereed/morrison-saunders.html
   Google Scholar
• Neuman WL. 2014. Social research methods: qualitative and quantitative approaches. 7th ed. Harlow: Pearson Education Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• O’Riordan T. 1976. Beyond environmental impact assessment. In: O’Riordan T, Hey RD, editors. Environmental impact assessment. Westmead: Saxon House; p. 202–221.
   Google Scholar
• Onorio K, Morgan RK. 1995. In-country EIA training in the South Pacific: an interim review and evaluation of the South Pacific regional environment programme’s EIA program. Impact Assess. 13(1):87–99. doi:10.1080/07349165.1995.9726080.
   Google Scholar
• Park J, Chung C, Lee M. 2002. A scheme to develop national qualification items for environmental impact assessment in Korea. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 20(2):71–76. doi:10.3152/147154602781766834.
   Google Scholar
• Partidário MR. undated. Course Manual: strategic environmental assessment (SEA) current practices, future demands and capacity-building needs. International Association for Impact Assessment IAIA Training Courses. https://www.iaia.org/pdf/EIA/SEA/SEAManual.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Petts J, Brooks C. 2006. Expert conceptualisations of the role of lay knowledge in environmental decision-making: challenges for deliberative democracy. Environ Plann A. 38(6):1045–1059. doi:10.1068/a37373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollack KM, Dannenberg AL, Botchwey ND, Stone CL, Seto E. 2015. Developing a model curriculum for a university course in health impact assessment in the USA. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 33(1):80–85. doi:10.1080/14615517.2014.960213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pope J, Morrison-Saunders A. 2018. Teaching impact assessment. Fargo (USA): International Association for Impact Assessment. Special Publication Series No. 10. https://www.iaia.org/uploads/pdf/SP10Teaching IA.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ramos T, Cecílio T, Melo JJ. 2008. Environmental impact assessment in higher education and training in Portugal. J Clean Prod. 16(5):639–645. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.02.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramos TB, Montaño M, Joanaz De Melo J, Souza MP, Carvalho de Lemos C, Domingues AR, Polido A. 2015. Strategic environmental assessment in higher education: Portuguese and Brazilian cases. J Clean Prod. 106:222–228. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie J. 2003. The applications of qualitative methods to social research. In: Ritchie J, Lewis J, editors. Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage; p. 24–45.
   Google Scholar
• Rundle W. 1986. Teaching negotiation skills: a simulation game for low level radwaste facility siting. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 6(3):255–263. doi:10.1016/0195-9255(86)90017-X.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan GW, Bernard HR. 2003. Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods. 15(1):85–109. doi:10.1177/1525822X02239569.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler B, McCabe M. 2002. EIA training resource manual. 2nd ed. United Nations Environment Programme UNEP Training Manual. Geneva: UNEP, Economics and Trade Branch.
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez L, Morrison-Saunders A. 2010. Teaching impact assessment: results of an international survey. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 28(3):245–250. doi:10.3152/146155110X12791029734641.
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez LE. 2010. Environmental impact assessment teaching at the University of São Paulo: evolving approaches to different needs. J Environ Assess Policy Manage. 12(3):245–262. doi:10.1142/S1464333210003668.
   Google Scholar
• Schuchter J, Rutt C, Satariano WA, Seto E. 2015. Building capacity for health impact assessment: training outcomes from the United States. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 50:190–195. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2014.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinclair J, Diduck A. 1995. Public education: an undervalued component of the environmental assessment public involvement process. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 15(3):219–240. doi:10.1016/0195-9255(95)00006-Z.
   Google Scholar
• Smith DWBiswas N. 2002. Environmental engineering education in Canada. Journal of Environmental Engineering Science. 1:1–7. doi:110.1139/s02-001.
   Google Scholar
• [UNU-INWEH] United Nations University International Network on Water, Environment and Health. 2008. Course report: training workshop on environmental impact assessment for coastal and marine areas, 20–23 January 2008. Dubai: UAE. Special Report 2.1-3. [accessed 2018 June 20]. http://inweh.unu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Training_Workshop_Environmental_Impact_Coastal_Marine.pdf
   Google Scholar
• [UNECE] United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. 2012. Resource manual to support application of the UNECE protocol on strategic environmental assessment. New York: United Nations. https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/env/documents/2011/eia/ece.mp.eia.17.e.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Spricis A. 2001. The study programme ‘environmental protection and impact assessment’ at the University of Latvia. Int J Sustainability Higher Educ. 2(4):339–348. doi:10.1108/EUM0000000006029.
   Google Scholar
• Stelmack CM, Sinclair AJ, Fitzpatrick P. 2005. An overview of the state of environmental assessment education at Canadian universities. Int J Sustainability Higher Educ. 6(1):36–53. doi:10.1108/14676370510573122.
   Google Scholar
• Strohmann CH. 1998. Training approaches in environmental technology assessment (EnTA). In: Porter AL, Fittipaldi JJ, editors. Environmental methods review: retooling impact assessment for the new century. Fargo (North Dakota): The Press Club; p. 186–192.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas I. 1992. Imbibing wisdom of environmental impact assessment. Aust J Environ Educ. 8:33–43. doi:10.1017/S0814062600003293.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas S. 2004. Using web and paper questionnaires for data-based decision making. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• US EPA [United State Environmental Protection Agency]. 1998a. Principles of environmental impact assessment: an international training course. Washington: US EPA. [accessed 2020 Mar 29]. https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi/50000I6K.PDF?Dockey=50000I6K.PDF
   Google Scholar
• US EPA [United States Environmental Protection Agency]. 1998b. Facilitator’s manual for principles of environmental impact assessment review. Washington: US EPA. [accessed 2020 Mar 29]. https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi/900C0L00.PDF?Dockey=900C0L00.PDF
   Google Scholar
• Weiland U. 2012. Teachings on environmental impact assessments in geography reflecting demands of the working practice: a German case study. J Environ Assess Policy Manage. 14(3):1250019 (14). doi:10.1142/S1464333212500196.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf C. 1975. Social impact assessment: the state of the art. In: Carson DH, editor. Man-environment interactions: evaluations and applications, Part 1. New York: Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross; p. 1–44.
   Google Scholar
• Wood C. 1985. The adequacy of training for EIA in the United States of America. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 5(4):321–337. doi:10.1016/0195-9255(85)90027-7.
   Google Scholar
• Wood CM, Lee N, eds. 1987. Environmental impact assessment: five training case studies. Department of Town and Country Planning, University of Manchester. Occasional paper 19.
   Google Scholar