Powering corporate citizenship: assessing corporate social responsibility of hydroelectric companies in Canada

References

• Aarons K, Vine D, Center of Climate and Energy Solutions. 2015. Canadian hydropower and the clean power plan. Arlington (VA): Center for Climate and Energy Solutions.
   Google Scholar
• Acabado DR, Branca AS, Catalão-Lopes M, Pina JP. 2020. Do distinct CSR categories have distinct determinants? The roles of market structure and firm size. Eur Manag Rev. 17(1):5–17. doi:10.1111/emre.12341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agudelo MAL, Johannsdottir L, Davidsdottir B. 2020. Drivers that motivate energy companies to be responsible. A systematic literature review of Corporate Social Responsibility in the energy sector. J Clean Prod. 247(20):119094. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker K, Hendriks R. 2019. Contested knowledges in hydroelectric project assessment: the case of Canada’s Site C Project. Water (Switzerland). 11(3):406.
   Google Scholar
• Berger RP, Wildlife Resource Consulting. 2010. Fur, feathers, fins & transmission lines: how transmission lines and rights-of-way affect wildlife. 3rd ed. Winnipeg (Manitoba): Hydro Manitoba.
   Google Scholar
• Bice S. 2015. Bridging corporate social responsibility and social impact assessment. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 33(2):160–166. doi:10.1080/14615517.2014.983710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boiral O, Heras-Saizarbitoria I, Brotherton MC. 2019. Corporate sustainability and indigenous community engagement in the extractive industry. J Clean Prod. 235:701–711. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buck B, Espinach L, Söderberg S. 2014. GRI G4 guidelines and ISO 26000 : 2010 how to use the GRI G4 guidelines and ISO 26000 in conjunction. Amsterdam (Geneva): ISO and GRI. ISO 26000 PPO http://www.iso.org/iso/iso-gri-26000_2014-01-28.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Buckland J, O’Gorman M. 2017. The Keeyask hydro dam plan in northern Canada: a model for inclusive indigenous development? Can J Dev Stud. 38(1):72–90. doi:10.1080/02255189.2016.1224969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canadian Electricity Association. 2018. A future worth investing in. Montreal: Canadian Electricity Association. https://cea-ksiu6qbsd.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/CEA_18-280_AR_E_WEB.pdf
   Google Scholar
• CEA. 2019. Overview [Internet]; [accessed 2019 Nov 7]. https://electricity.ca/about-cea/
   Google Scholar
• Colaço R, Simão J. 2018. Disclosure of corporate social responsibility in the forestry sector of the Congo Basin. For Policy Econ. 92(July):136–147. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2018.04.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demuijnck G, Fasterling B. 2016. The social license to operate. J Bus Ethics. 136(4):675–685. doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2976-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desrochers R, Montour I, Grégoire A, Choteau J, Turmel E.. 2011. Job creation and economic development opportunities in the Canadian hydropower market. Montreal (Canada): Canadian Hydropower Association.
   Google Scholar
• Dragomir VD. 2018. How do we measure corporate environmental performance? A critical review. J Clean Prod. 196:1124–1157. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Equitable Origin. 2017. EO100 TM standard [Internet]; [accessed 2019 Dec 3] 33. https://www.equitableorigin.org/eo100-for-responsible-energy/overview/
   Google Scholar
• Evans R, Siesfeld T. 2020. Measuring the business value of corporate social impact : beyond social value to enterprise performance. Deloitte Rev. 27:141–153.
   Google Scholar
• Fifka MS, Frangen-Zeitinger A. 2015. Multinational corporations in developing countries: bringers ofWorking standards or modern slaveholders. In: Idowu SO, Frederiksen CS, Mermod AY, Nielsen MEJ, editors. Corp soc responsib gov theory pract. New York and London: Springer; p. 143–158.
   Google Scholar
• Fordham AE, Robinson GM. 2019. Identifying the social values driving corporate social responsibility. Sustain Sci. 14(5):1409–1424. doi:10.1007/s11625-019-00720-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franks DM, Davis R, Bebbington AJ, Ali SH, Kemp D, Scurrah M. 2014. Conflict translates environmental and social risk into business costs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 111(21):7576–7581. doi:10.1073/pnas.1405135111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatti L, Seele P. 2014. Evidence for the prevalence of the sustainability concept in European corporate responsibility reporting. Sustain Sci. 9(1):89–102. doi:10.1007/s11625-013-0233-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gebhardt C. 2012. Corporate perception and evaluation of social movement activism: understanding interactions between corporations and social movements in the context of large infrastructure projects in the hydropower sector. SSRN Electron J. (April). doi:10.2139/ssrn.1734744.
   Google Scholar
• Gehman J, Lefsrud LM, Fast S. 2017. Social license to operate: legitimacy by another name? Can Public Adm. 60(2):293–317. doi:10.1111/capa.12218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golob U, Bartlett JL. 2007. Communicating about corporate social responsibility: a comparative study of CSR reporting in Australia and Slovenia. Public Relat Rev. 33(1):1–9. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2006.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulakov I, Vanclay F, Arts J. 2020. Modifying social impact assessment to enhance the effectiveness of company social investment strategies in contributing to local community development. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 38(5):1–15. doi:10.1080/14615517.2020.1765302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunningham N, Kagan RA, Thornton D. 2004. Social license and environmental protection: why businesses go beyond compliance. Law Soc Inq. 29(2):307–341. doi:10.1111/j.1747-4469.2004.tb00338.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey B, Bice S. 2014. Social impact assessment, social development programmes and social licence to operate: tensions and contradictions in intent and practice in the extractive sector. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 32(4):327–335. doi:10.1080/14615517.2014.950123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayeur G. 2001. Summary of knowledge acquired in northern environments from 1970 to 2000. Montreal: Hydro-Quebec.
   Google Scholar
• Hediger W. 2018. The corporate social responsibility of hydropower companies in Alpine region-theory and policy recommendations. Sustain. 10(10):3594. doi:10.3390/su10103594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann J, Kristensen ME. 2017. Sustainable oil and profitable wind. Nord Rev. 38(2):79–96. doi:10.1515/nor-2017-0404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IHA. 2019. Hydropower status report: sector trends and insights. London: International Hydropower Association. https://www.hydropower.org/sites/default/files/publications-docs/2019_hydropower_status_report_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Industry Canada. 2014. Corporate social responsibility (CSR): an implementation guide for Canadian businesses (2014). Ottawa: Government of Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins H, Yakovleva N. 2006. Corporate social responsibility in the mining industry: exploring trends in social and environmental disclosure. J Clean Prod. 14(3–4):271–284. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2004.10.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klimpt JÉ, Rivero C, Puranen H, Koch F. 2002. Recommendations for sustainable hydroelectric development. Energy Policy. 30(14):1305–1312. doi:10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00092-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolk A. 2006. Sustainability, accountability and corporate governance: exploring multinationals’ reporting practices. Bus Strateg Environ. 18: 1–15. (March 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Koskela M. 2014. Occupational health and safety in corporate social responsibility reports. Saf Sci. 68:294–308. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2014.04.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laufer WS. 2003. Social accountability and corporate greenwashing. J Bus Ethics. 43(3):253–261. doi:10.1023/A:1022962719299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loney M. 1995. Social problems, community trauma and hydro project impacts. Can J Native Stud. 15(2):231–254.
   Google Scholar
• Lu J, Ren L, Qiao J, Yao S, Strielkowski W, Streimikis J. 2019. Corporate social responsibility and corruption: implications for the sustainable energy sector. Sustainability. 11(15):4128. doi:10.3390/su11154128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manohar E. 2019. Essential alignment: corporate social responsibility and social impact assessment for sustainable development-an empirical study. J Manage. 6(3):186–191.
   Google Scholar
• McWilliams A, Siegel DS, Wright PM. 2006. Corporate social responsibility: strategic implications. J Manag Stud. 43(1):1–18. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00580.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metaxas T, Tsavdaridou M. 2012. Corporate social responsibility in Greece: a comparative analysis of the three major energy companies (case study). Management. 17(2):119–140.
   Google Scholar
• Mijares S. 2015. The global fight against foreign Bribery: is Canada a leader or a laggard? West J Leg Stud. 5(4). https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/uwojls/vol5/iss4/2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller A, Patel S, Gorzitza C, Parkins JR. 2019. Canadian renewable energy project map. Community energy West Canada insights from case stud small-scale renew energy dev [Internet]; [accessed 2020 Jan 20]. https://www.futureenergysystems.ca/resources/renewable-energy-projects-canada
   Google Scholar
• Miras-rodríguez M Del M, Carrasco-Gallego A, Escobar-Pérez B. 2015. Has the CSR engagement of electrical companies had an effect on their performance? A closer look at the environment. Bus Strateg Environ. 24(8):819–835. doi:10.1002/bse.1848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montero MJ, Araque RA, Rey JM. 2009. Occupational health and safety in the framework of corporate social responsibility. Saf Sci. 47(10):1440–1445. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2009.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon J, Vogel D. 2009. Corporate social responsibility, government, and civil society. In: Crane A, Matten D, Mcwilliams A, Moon J, Siegel DS, editors. Oxford Handb Corp Soc Responsib; online p. 1–25. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199211593.003.0013.
   Google Scholar
• Natural Resources Canada. 2020. Electricity facts [Internet]; [accessed 2019 Sep 20]. https://www.nrcan.gc.ca/electricity-facts/20068
   Google Scholar
• OPG. 2017. Sustainability report. Ontario Power Gener Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Owen DL, O’Dwyer B. 2009. Corporate social responsibility: the reporting and assurance dimension. In: Crane A, Matten D, Mcwilliams A, Moon J, Siegel DS, editors. Oxford Handb Corp Soc Responsib; online p. 1–31. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199211593.003.0017.
   Google Scholar
• Prno J. 2013. An analysis of factors leading to the establishment of a social licence to operate in the mining industry. Resour Policy. 38(4):577–590. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2013.09.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranängen H, Zobel T. 2014. Revisiting the ‘ how ’ of corporate social responsibility in extractive industries and forestry. J Clean Prod. 84:299–312. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.02.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rondinelli DA, Berry MA. 2000. Environmental citizenship in multinational corporations: social responsibility and sustainable development. Eur Manag J. 18(1):70–84. doi:10.1016/S0263-2373(99)00070-5.
   Google Scholar
• Roome NJ, Bergin R. 2000. The challenges of sustainable development: lessons from Ontario Hydro. Corp Environ Strateg. 7(1):8–19. doi:10.1016/S1066-7938(00)80111-6.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg DM, Bodaly RA, Usher PJ. 1995. Environmental and social impacts of large scale hydro- electric development: who is listening? Glob Environ Chang. 5(2):127–148. doi:10.1016/0959-3780(95)00018-J.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowan M. 2017. Aligning resettlement planning and livelihood restoration with social impact assessment: a practitioner perspective. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 35(1):81–93. doi:10.1080/14615517.2016.1271541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scace RC, Barrera-Hernández L 2013. Essential alignment: corporate social responsibility and social impact assessment. IAIA13 Conf Proc; Calgary, Alberta: IAIA. p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Siesfeld T, Evans R, Kasper G. 2018. Reimagining measurement enhancing social impact through better monitoring, evaluation, and learning. Deloitte Rev. 22:1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Singh S, Holvoet N, Pandey V. 2018. Bridging sustainability and corporate social responsibility: culture of monitoring and evaluation of CSR initiatives in India. Sustain. 10(7):7. doi:10.3390/su10072353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skouloudis A, Evangelinos K, Kourmousis F. 2009. Development of an evaluation methodology for triple bottom line reports using international standards on reporting. Environ Manage. 44(2):298–311. doi:10.1007/s00267-009-9305-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slootweg R. 2005. Biodiversity assessment framework: making biodiversity part of corporate social responsibility. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 23(1):37–46. doi:10.3152/147154605781765742.
   Google Scholar
• Sparkes S. 2014. Corporate social responsibility: benefits for youth in hydropower development in Laos. Int Rev Educ. 60(2):261–277. doi:10.1007/s11159-014-9401-9.
   Google Scholar
• Strandberg C. 2019. Corporate social responsibility in Canada: trends, barriers and opportunities. Vancouver: Strandberg Consulting. https://corostrandberg.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/csr-in-canada-trends-barriers-opportunities-report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Strangway RE, Dunn M, Erless R. 2016. Monitoring Nûtimesânân following the diversion of our river: a community-led registry in Eeyou Istchee, Northern Québec. J Environ Assess Policy Manag. 18(1):1–21. doi:10.1142/S1464333216500010.
   Google Scholar
• Szczepankiewicz EI, Mućko P. 2016. CSR reporting practices of polish energy and mining companies. Sustain. 8(2):126. doi:10.3390/su8020126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanclay F. 2003. International principles for social impact assessment. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 21(1):5–11. doi:10.3152/147154603781766491.
   Google Scholar
• Vanclay F. 2019. Reflections on social impact assessment in the 21st century. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 38(2):126–131. doi:10.1080/14615517.2019.1685807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanclay F, Baines JT, Taylor CN. 2013. Principles for ethical research involving humans: ethical professional practice in impact assessment Part I. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 31(4):243–253. doi:10.1080/14615517.2013.850307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanclayF. Hanna P. 2019. Conceptualizing company response to community protest: principles to achieve a social license to operate. Land. 8(6):101. doi:10.3390/land8060101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang C. 2012. A guide for local benefit sharing in hydropower projects a guide for local benefit sharing in hydropower projects. Soc Dev Work Pap. 128:37.
   Google Scholar
• Wanvik TI. 2016. Governance transformed into Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): new governance innovations in the Canadian oil sands. Extr Ind Soc. 3(2):517–526. doi:10.1016/j.exis.2016.01.007.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehouse L. 2006. Corporate social responsibility: views from the frontline. J Bus Ethics. 63(3):279–296. doi:10.1007/s10551-005-3243-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Q, Oo BL, Lim BTH. 2019. Drivers, motivations, and barriers to the implementation of corporate social responsibility practices by construction enterprises: a review. J Clean Prod. 210:563–584. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang R, Zhu J, Yue H, Zhu C. 2010. Corporate philanthropic giving, advertising intensity, and industry competition level. J Bus Ethics. 94(1):39–52. doi:10.1007/s10551-009-0248-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar