Expanding evidence and expertise in impact assessment: informing Canadian public policy with the knowledges of invisible communities

References

• Altmann, Philipp. 2014. Good life as a social movement proposal for natural resource use: the indigenous movement in Ecuador. Consilience. 2014(12):82–94. doi:10.7916/D8GF0T6G.
   Google Scholar
• Amor, Bani. 2018. Queering the environmental movement. Earth Island Journal. 2018(Autumn):45–46.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, John Lee. 2019 Nov 11. Blood gold in the Brazilian rainforest. The New Yorker. 95(46):1–17. [accessed 2020 March 15]. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/11/11/blood-gold-in-the-brazilian-rain-forest
   Google Scholar
• Baker, Janelle Marie; Westman, Clinton N. 2018. Extracting knowledge: social science, environmental impact assessment, and indigenous consultation in the oil sands of Alberta, Canada. The Extractive Industries and Society. 5(1):144–153. doi:10.1016/j.exis.2017.12.008.
   Google Scholar
• Bashwira, Mary-Rose; Cuvelier, Jeroen; Hilhorst, Dorothea; van der Haar, Gemma. 2014. Not only a man’s world: women’s involvement in artisanal mining in eastern DRC. Resources Policy. 40:109–116. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2013.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broad, Robin; Fischer-Mackey, Julia. 2017. From extractivism towards buen vivir: mining policy as an indicator of a new development paradigm prioritising the environment. Third World Q. 38(6):1327–1349. doi:10.1080/01436597.2016.1262741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodeur, Caroline; Tamir, Irit; Zoen, Sarah. 2019. Community-based HRIA: presenting an alternative view to the company narrative. In: Götzmann N, editor. Handbook on human rights impact assessment. Cheltenham (UK): Edward Elgar Publishing; p. 49–65. doi:10.4337/9781788970006.00011.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, Natalie. 2016. Red intersectionality and violence-informed witnessing praxis with indigenous girls. Girlhood Studies. 9(2):46–64. doi:10.3167/ghs.2016.090205.
   Google Scholar
• Clow, Barbara; Stienstra, Deborah; Baikie, Gail; Stinson, Jane; Manning, Susan M. 2016. Gender-based analysis meets environmental assessment: aligning policy mechanisms to address the resource development in Canada’s North. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Research Institute for the Advancement of Women.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, Nina; Woodley, Alan. 2013. Social water assessment protocol: a step towards connecting mining, water and human rights. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 31(2):158–167. doi:10.1080/14615517.2013.774717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, Patricia Hill; Bilge, Sirma. 2016. Intersectionality. Cambridge (UK): Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• CRIAW; DAWN Canada. 2014. Diversity through inclusive practice: an evolving toolkit for creating inclusive processes, spaces & events. [accessed 2020 March 15]. http://fnn.criaw-icref.ca/images/userfiles/files/InclusivePracticesToolkit.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Deer, Sarah; Warner, Elizabeth Ann Kronk. 2019. Raping Indian country. Columbia J Gend Law. 38(1):31–95. [accessed 2020 March 15]. https://journals.library.columbia.edu/index.php/cjgl/article/view/4603/2055
   Google Scholar
• Department of Environment, Climate Change and Municipalities. 2020. Environmental assessment: a guide to the process. Government of Newfoundland and Labrador. [accessed 2021 March 1].https://www.gov.nl.ca/eccm/files/env-assessment-a-guide-to-the-process.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Environment and Climate Change Canada. 2017. Review of environmental assessment process: expert panel terms of reference. Environment and Climate Change Canada, Government of Canada. [accessed 2020 March 15]. https://www.canada.ca/en/services/environment/conservation/assessments/environmental-reviews/environmental-assessment-processes/final-terms-reference-ea.html
   Google Scholar
• Expert Panel. 2017. Building common ground: a new vision for impact assessment in Canada. The final report of the expert panel for the review of environmental assessment processes. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency. [accessed 2020 March 15]. https://www.canada.ca/content/dam/themes/environment/conservation/environmental-reviews/building-common-ground/building-common-ground.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hankivsky, Olena; Mussell, Linda. 2018. Gender-based analysis plus in Canada: problems and possibilities of integrating intersectionality. Canadian Public Policy. 44(4):303–316. doi:10.3138/cpp.2017-058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, Christina; Namara, Charity; Orcaya, Jane; Bogrand, Andrew; Sellwood, Scott A. 2021. Hidden in plain sight: gender analysis of the environmental and social impact assessment of the East African Crude Oil Pipeline. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 39(3):229–239. doi:10.1080/14615517.2021.1904696.
   Google Scholar
• Himley, Matthew. 2014. Monitoring the impacts of extraction: science and participation in the governance of mining in Peru. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space. 46(5):1069–1087. doi:10.1068/a45631.
   Google Scholar
• Holden, William N; Jacobson, R Daniel. 2008. Civil society opposition to nonferrous metals mining in Guatemala. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. 19(4):325–350. doi:10.1007/s11266-008-9073-9.
   Google Scholar
• [IAA] Impact Assessment Act. 2019. (S.C.) c. 28, s. 1 (Can.). [accessed 2020 March 15]. https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/PDF/I-2.75.pdf
   Google Scholar
• [IAAC] Impact Assessment Agency of Canada. 2020a. Interim guidance: collaboration with indigenous peoples in impact assessments. Impact Assessment Agency of Canada, Government of Canada. [accessed 2020 Nov 20]. https://www.canada.ca/en/impact-assessment-agency/services/policy-guidance/practitioners-guide-impact-assessment-act/collaboration-indigenous-peoples-ia.html
   Google Scholar
• [IAAC] Impact Assessment Agency of Canada. 2020b. 2020–2021 departmental plan: disclosure of transfer payment programs of $5 million or more. Impact Assessment Agency of Canada, Government of Canada. [accessed 2020 Aug 13]. https://www.canada.ca/en/impact-assessment-agency/corporate/transparency/accountability-performance-financial-reporting/2020-2021-departmental-plan/disclosure-transfer-payment-programs-5-million-more.html
   Google Scholar
• Janzen, David W. 2018. Subject to a new law: historicizing rights and resistance in Maya anti-mining activism. Identities. 25(6):724–743. doi:10.1080/1070289X.2017.1305220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keenan, Julia C; Kemp, Deanna L; Ramsay, Rebecca B. 2016. Company–community agreements, gender and development. Journal of Business Ethics. 135(4):607–615. doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2376-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laplante, JP; Nolin, Catherine. 2014. Consultas and socially responsible investing in Guatemala: a case study examining Maya perspectives on the indigenous right to free, prior, and informed consent. Soc Nat Resour. 27(3):231–248. doi:10.1080/08941920.2013.861554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, R; Larsen, RK. 2017. The politics of planning: assessing the impacts of mining on Sami lands. Third World Q. 38(5):1164–1180. doi:10.1080/01436597.2016.1257909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leuenberger, Andrea; Kihwele, Fadhila; Lyatuu, Isaac; Kengia, James T; Farnham, Andrea; Winkler, Mirko S; Merten, Sonja. 2021. Gendered health impacts of industrial gold mining in northwestern Tanzania: perceptions of local communities. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 39(3):183–195. doi:10.1080/14615517.2021.1904697.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, Susan; Nash, Patricia; Levac, Leah; Stienstra, Deborah; Stinson, Jane. 2018a. A literature synthesis report on the impacts of resource extraction for Indigenous women. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Research Institute for the Advancement of Women.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, Susan M; Nash, Patricia; Levac, Leah; Stienstra, Deborah; Stinson, Jane. 2018b. Strengthening impact assessments for Indigenous women. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Research Institute for the Advancement of Women.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, Susan M; Levac, Leah. (n.d.). Exaggerated tensions, fierce resistance, little understanding: the incorporation of intersectional analysis in Canadian impact assessment legislation. Manuscript in preparation.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, Corinne L. 2019. Buzzwords and fuzzwords: flattening intersectionality in Canadian aid. Canadian Foreign Policy Journal. 25(2):203–219. doi:10.1080/11926422.2019.1592002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morales, Sarah. 2017. Braiding the incommensurable: indigenous legal traditions and the duty to consult. In UNDRIP implementation: Braiding international, domestic and Indigenous laws: Special report; p. 63–80. Centre for International Governance Innovation. [accessed 2020 March 15]. https://www.cigionline.org/publications/undrip-implementation-braiding-international-domestic-and-indigenous-laws
   Google Scholar
• O’Faircheallaigh, Ciaran. 2013. Extractive industries and indigenous peoples: a changing dynamic?. J Rural Stud. 30:20–30. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2012.11.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson, Stephanie. 2010. What’s the problem with gender-based analysis?: gender mainstreaming policy and practice in Canada. Canadian Public Administration. 53(3):395–416. doi:10.1111/j.1754-7121.2010.00134.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, Ashley Nancy. 2021. Women at work and war: integrating gender and conflict into impact assessment. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 39(3):196–205. doi: 10.1080/14615517.2021.1904375.
   Google Scholar
• Roche, Charles; Sindana, Howard; Walim, Nawasio; Wafi and Watut Communities. 2019. Extractive dispossession: 'I am not happy our land will go, we will have no better life'. The Extractive Industries and Society. 6(3): 977–992. doi:10.1016/j.exis.2019.05.006.
   Google Scholar
• Sauer, Arn; Stieß, Immanuel. 2021. Accounting for gender in climate policy advice: adapting a gender impact assessment tool to issues of climate change. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 39(3):262–273. doi:10.1080/14615517.2021.1904710.
   Google Scholar
• Status of Women Canada. 2018. GBA+ course, introduction to GBA+. Government of Canada, Status of Women Canada. [accessed 2020 March 10]. https://cfc-swc.gc.ca/gba-acs/course-cours/eng/mod00/mod00_02_01.html
   Google Scholar
• Status of Women Canada. 2020. What is GBA+. Government of Canada, Status of Women Canada. [accessed 2020 March]. https://cfc-swc.gc.ca/gba-acs/index-en.html
   Google Scholar
• Stienstra, Deborah. 2017. Lost without way-finders? Disability, gender and Canadian foreign and development policy. In: Baranyi S, Tiessen R, editors. Actions, omissions and obligations: Canada’s commitments to gender and development in the global south. Montreal (QC): McGill-Queens University Press; p. 115–138.
   Google Scholar
• Stienstra, Deborah; Levac, Leah; Baikie, Gail; Stinson, Jane; Clow, Barbara; Manning, Susan. 2016. Gendered and intersectional implications of energy and resource extraction in resource-based communities in Canada’s North. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Research Institute for the Advancement of Women.
   Google Scholar
• Stienstra, Deborah; Manning, Susan; Levac, Leah. 2020. More promise than practice: GBA+, intersectionality and impact assessment. Guelph (ON): Live Work Well Research Centre, University of Guelph.
   Google Scholar
• Stinson, Jane; Levac, Leah. 2016. Requiring gender-based analysis plus (GBA+) and participatory research principles in environmental assessments. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Research Institute for the Advancement of Women.
   Google Scholar