231
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Letter

Trust in Cash Assistance Programming: Addressing Mega Trend Changes through Disaster Management and Impact Assessment

ORCID Icon, , , , , & show all
Pages 348-351 | Received 16 Nov 2020, Accepted 31 Mar 2021, Published online: 24 Apr 2021

References

  • Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT). 2017. DFAT humanitarian strategy guidance note, cash transfers. Canberra: DFAT.
  • Bice S, Fischer TB. Mar 2020. Impact assessment for the 21st century – what future? Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 38(2):89–93. doi:10.1080/14615517.2020.1731202.
  • Fischer TB. 2018. Editorial: IA, alternative facts and fake news – is the post-factual turn starting to turn? Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 36(2):129–130. doi:10.1080/14615517.2018.1426846.
  • Gotzmann N, Vanclay F, Seier F. 2016. Social and human rights impact assessments: what can they learn from each other? Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 34(1):14–23. doi:10.1080/14615517.2015.1096036.
  • Government of Vanuatu. 2003. Local government (area council divisions). Order 41 of 2003. Vanuatu: The Pacific Legal Information Institute (PacLII), Laws of the Government of Vanuatu.
  • Government of Vanuatu. 2011–2012. Environmental impact assessment regulations order 175; and amendment, order 102. [accessed 2021 Jan 6].
  • Harrison J. 2011. Human rights measurement: reflections on the current practice and future potential of human rights impact assessment. J Hum Rights Pract. 3(2):162–187. doi:10.1093/jhuman/hur011.
  • Human Rights Council. 2018 Dec 19. Guiding principles on human rights impact assessments of economic reforms: report of the independent expert on the effects of foreign debt and other related international financial obligations of States on the full enjoyment of human rights, particularly economic, social and cultural rights. UN Doc A/HRC/40/57.
  • Künnemann R, Leonhard R. 2008. A human rights view on the potential of social cash transfers for achieving the millennium development goals. Stuttgart (Germany): Brot für die Welt.
  • Oxfam. 2020. Unblocked cash: TC Harold and Covid-19 recovery & response program quarterly monitoring report. Timeframe: 15 Oct–22 Dec. Oxfam.
  • Partidario MR. 2020. Transforming the capacity of impact assessment to address persistent global problems. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 38(2):146–150. doi:10.1080/14615517.2020.1724005.
  • Rawlings GE. 1999. Foundations of urbanisation: Port Vila town and Pango village, Vanuatu. Oceania. 70(1):72–86. doi:10.1002/j.1834-4461.1999.tb02990.x.
  • Retief F, Bond A, Pope J, Morrison-Saunders A, King N. 2016. Global megatrends and their implications for environmental assessment practice. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 61:52–60. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2016.07.002.
  • Tajima R, Gore T, Fischer TB. 2014. Policy integration between environmental assessment and disaster management. J Environ Assess Policy Manage. 16(3):1450028. doi:10.1142/S1464333214500288.
  • UNEP & OHCHR. 2020. Human rights, the environment and COVID: key messages. [accessed 2021 Feb 1]. https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/33510/HRE1.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
  • Wairiu M. 2006. 23. Governance and livelihood realities in Solomon Islands. IN THE PACIFIC ISLANDS. 409.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.