References
- Ackoff R 2004. Exploring systems thinking: how can we learn new ways of thinking? Presentation at Learning Together conference, Pratt and Whitney Rocketdyne, Canoga Park, CA. [accessed 2021 May 6]. (pt 1): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IJxWoZJAD8k; (pt 2) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UdBiXbuD1h4; (pt 3) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MBrEJjT-dWU
- Ackoff RL, Emery FE. 1972. On purposeful systems: an interdisciplinary analysis of individual and social behavior as a system of purposeful events. London: Tavistock Publications.
- Alberta Education. 2005. Our Words, Our ways; Teaching First Nations, Metis and Inuit Learners. Edmonton. Government of Alberta.
- Allen W, Kilvington M 2021. An introduction to systems thinking to address complex problems. Presentation at Redesign for a Sustainable Future course, United Nations Systems Staff College, Turin, Italy. [accessed 2021 Sept 20]. https://learningforsustainability.net/pubs/unsa-presentation-systems-thinking.pdf
- Allendorf FW. 2018. Zen and deep evolution: the optical delusion of separation. Evol Appl. 11(8):1212–1218. 2018 Sep. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.12620.
- Arnold RD, Wade JP. 2015. A definition of systems thinking: a systems approach. Procedia Comput Sci. 44:669–678. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.03.050.
- Beanlands GE, Duinker PN. 1983. An ecological framework for environmental impact assessment in Canada. Institute for resource and environmental studies. Nova Scotia: Dalhousie University.
- Berkes F, Folke C. 1998. Linking social and ecological systems: management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Canter L, Ross WA. 2014. A basic need for integration – bringing focus to the scoping process. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 32(1):21–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2013.872848.
- World Bank Group; Cardinale P, Greig L. 2013. Good practice handbook: cumulative impact assessment and management - guidance for the private sector in emerging markets. Washington (D.C):IFC E&S.
- De Beers Canada, 2010. Environmental impact statement- Gahcho Kue Project. Yellowknife. [accessed 2021 May 6]. https://reviewboard.ca/upload/project_document/EIR0607-001_EIS_Section_6__Assessment_Approach_and_Methods.PDF
- Dominion Diamond Corp. 2014. Developer’s assessment report- Jay Project. Yellowknife. [accessed 2021 May 6] https://reviewboard.ca/upload/project_document/EA1314-01_S_06_Environmental_Assessment_Approach.PDF
- Ehrlich A 2011. Scoping to prioritize. Proceeding of the 31st IAIA Annual International Conference, Puebla, Mexico. [accessed 2021 May 6] https://reviewboard.ca/reference_material/conference_papers_and_articles
- Ehrlich A, Ross WA. 2015. The significance spectrum and EIA significance determinations. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 33(2):87–97. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2014.981023.
- Fischer. TB. 2014. Impact assessment: there can be strength in diversity! Impact Assess. Project Appraisal. 32(1):9–10
- First Nations Health Authority. 2021. First Nations perspective on health and wellness. [accessed 2021 May 6]. https://www.fnha.ca/wellness/wellness-and-the-first-nations-health-authority/first-nations-perspective-on-wellness
- Fischer T, Muthoora T, Chang M, Sharpe C. 2021. Health impact assessment in spatial planning in England –types of application and quality of documentation. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 90:106631. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106631.
- Fortune Minerals Ltd. 2011. NICO project developer’s assessment report. [accessed 2021 May 6] https://reviewboard.ca/upload/project_document/EA0809-004_06_Assessment_Approach.PDF
- Gibson RB. 2006. Sustainability assessment: basic components of a practical approach. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 24(3):170–182. doi:https://doi.org/10.3152/147154606781765147.
- Gibson RB, Hassan S, Holtz S, Tansey J, Whitelaw G. 2005. Sustainability assessment: criteria and processes. London: Earthscan.
- Government of Canada. 1998. Bill C-6: mackenzie Valley Resource Management Act, 1998. Part 5. Ottawa
- Government of Canada. 2005. Bill C-14: the Tlicho Land Claims and Self-Government Act. 2005. Ottawa
- Greig L, Duinker P. 2014. Strengthening impact assessment: what problems do integration and focus fix? Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 32(1):23–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2013.872849.
- Gunderson L, Kinzig A, Quinlan A, Walker B 2010. Assessing resilience in social-ecological systems: workbook for practitioners. V 2.0. Resilience Alliance.
- Gunderson LH, Holling CS. 2002. Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Washington D.C: Island Press.
- Hegmann G, Cocklin C, Creasey R, Dupuis A, Kennedy A, Kingsley L, Ross W, Spaling H, Stalker D 1999. Cumulative effects assessment practitioner’s guide. Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency. Hull (Quebec)
- Holling CS. 1973. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 4(1):1–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245.
- Holling CS. ed. 1978. Adaptive environmental assessment and management. Chichester: Wiley.
- Holling CS. 1986. The resilience of terrestrial ecosystems: local Surprise and global change. In: Clark WC, Munn RE, editors. Sustainable development of the biosphere. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press, UK; p. 292–317.
- Impact Assessment Agency of Canada. 2020. Practitioner’s guide to federal impact assessments under the Impact Assessment Act. Ottawa; (s. 1.2, 2.3) [accessed 2021 May 6]. https://www.canada.ca/en/impact-assessment-agency/services/policy-guidance/practitioners-guide-impact-assessment-act.html
- Indian and Northern Affairs Canada [INAC], 2010. Giant mine remediation project: developer’s assessment report. Ottawa. [accessed 2021 May 6] https://reviewboard.ca/upload/project_document/EA0809-001_Giant_DAR.PDF
- Indigenous Corporate Training Inc. 2017. What does indigenous connectivity mean? Port Coquitlam (BC). [accessed 2021 May 6]. https://www.ictinc.ca/blog/what-does-indigenous-connectivity-mean
- International Association for Impact Assessment and Institute of Environmental Assessment, UK. 1999. Principles of environmental impact assessment best practice. [accessed 2021 May 6] https://www.iaia.org/uploads/pdf/Principles%20of%20IA%2019.pdf
- Jones C F. 2016. Cumulative effects assessment: theoretical underpinnings and big problems. Environ. Rev. 24(2):187–204.
- Kaiser R. 1987. Chief Seattle’s speech(es): American origins and European reception. In: Swann B, Krupat A, editors. Recovering the word: essays on native American literature. Berkeley: University of California Press; p. 527.
- Kaminski J 2013. First Nations Pedagogy: interconnectedness. [accessed 2021 May 6]. https://firstnationspedagogy.com/interconnection.html
- Kennedy A, Ross WA. 1992. An approach to integrate impact scoping with environmental impact assessment. Environ Manage. 16(4):475–484. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02394123.
- Kim M, Wolf C. 2014. The impact assessment we want. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 32(1):19–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2013.872847.
- Liu J, Dietz T, Carpenter SR, Alberti M, Folke C, Moran E, Pell PN, Deadman P, Kratz T, Lubchenco J, et al. 2007. Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science. 317(5844):1513–1516. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1144004.
- Ludwig D, Walker B, Holling CS. 1997. Sustainability, stability, and resilience. Conserv Ecol. 1(1):7. [accessed 2021 May 6]. http://www.consecol.org/vol1/iss1/art7/
- Mackenzie Valley Environmental Impact Review Board [MVEIRB]. 2004. Environmental impact assessment guidelines. Yellowknife. [accessed 2021 May 6]. https://reviewboard.ca/file/614/download?token=3dz7s5gt
- Mackenzie Valley Environmental Impact Review Board [MVEIRB]. 2010. Report of environmental assessment and reasons for decision EA0708-007: Dezé Energy Corporation Ltd. Taltson Hydroelectric Expansion Project. Yellowknife. [accessed 2021 May 6]. https://reviewboard.ca/upload/project_document/EA0708-007_Mackenzie_Valley_Review_Board_s_Report_of_Environmental_Assessment_for_Deze_Energy_Corp__Ltd__s_Taltson_Hydroelectric_Expansion_Project.PDF
- Mackenzie Valley Environmental Impact Review Board [MVEIRB]. 2016. Report of environmental assessment and reasons for decision- dominion diamond Ekati Corp. Jay Project (EA1314-01). Yellowknife. [accessed 2021 May 6]. https://reviewboard.ca/upload/project_document/EA1314-01_Report_of_Environmental_Assesment_and_Reasons_for_Decision.PDF
- Mackenzie Valley Environmental Impact Review Board [MVEIRB]. 2018. Report of environmental assessment and reasons for decision – GNWT Tłı̨chǫ All‐Season Road Project - EA1617‐01. Yellowknife. [accessed 2021 May 6] https://reviewboard.ca/upload/project_document/Final%20TASR%20REA%20April%2003.pdf
- Mackenzie Valley Environmental Impact Review Board [MVEIRB]. 2020. Report of environmental assessment and reasons for decision- Diavik Diamond Mines Inc.- Depositing processed kimberlite into pits and underground (EA 0607-003). Yellowknife. [accessed 2021 May 6]. https://reviewboard.ca/upload/project_document/EA1819-01%20Diavik%20Report%20of%20Environmental%20Assessment_FINAL%20%281%29.pdf
- Mackenzie Valley Environmental Impact Review Board [MVEIRB]. 2020b. Evolving environmental impact assessments in the Mackenzie Valley and Beyond. Yellowknife. [accessed 2021 May 6] https://reviewboard.ca/file/1592/download?token=rE8A9X6M
- Meadows D. 2008. Thinking in systems: a primer. Vermont: Chelsea Green Publishing. Sustainability Institute.
- Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Current State and Trends, Vol. 1. Washington, DC:Island Press.
- Morrison-Saunders A 2018. Holistic impact assessment- A view from the west. Presentation at Reimagining Approvals- Strategic Approaches to Support Impact Assessment conference. Melbourne. Feb. 15, 2018. [accessed 2021 Jun 3]. https://www.eianz.org/document/item/4338
- Morrison-Saunders A, Arts J 2021. Smartening IA through follow-up: 50 years of learning. Paper presented at 30th IAIA Annual International Conference- Smartening impact assessment in challenging times. Virtual conference; Seville. May 19.
- Morrison-Saunders A, Baily J. 2000. Transparency in environment impact assessment decision-making: recent developments in Western Australia. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 18(4):260–270. doi:https://doi.org/10.3152/147154600781767321.
- Morrison-Saunders A, Pope J. 2013. Conceptualising and managing trade-offs in sustainability assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 38:54–63. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2012.06.003.
- Morrison-Saunders A, Pope J, Gunn J, Bond A, Retief F. 2014. Strengthening impact assessment: a call for integration and focus. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 32(1):2–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2013.872841.
- NeOlé Inc. 2021. Resource co-management in the Mackenzie Valley Workshop 2021 - Well-being and the Mackenzie Valley Resource Management Act: making good co-management decisions in the Mackenzie Valley. Workshop report. Toronto. [accessed 2021 May 6] https://reviewboard.ca/file/1592/download?token=rE8A9X6M
- Ostrom E 2007. A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 104, 39, 15181–15187.
- Partidario M. 2007. Strategic environmental assessment good practices guide - methodological guidance. Amadora: Portuguese Environment Agency.
- Rahula W. 1974. What the Buddha taught. 2nd ed. New York (NY): Grove Press.
- Roche C, Brueckner M, Walim N, Sindnada H, John E, and the Venembeli Community. 2021. Understanding why impact assessment fails; a case study of theory and practice from Wafi-Golpu, Papua New Guinea. EIA Review. 89.
- Ross WA. 1998. Cumulative effects assessment: learning from Canadian case studies. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 16(4):267–276. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.1998.10600137.
- Ross WA, Morrison-Saunders A, Marshall R, Sánchez LE, Weston J, Au E, Morgan RK, Fuggle R, Sadler B, Ross WA. 2006. Common sense in environmental impact assessment: it is not as common as it should be. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 24(1):3–10. doi:https://doi.org/10.3152/147154606781765354.
- Sanchez LE. 2014. From neighbors to future generations: we are all together! On integration in impact assessment practice. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 32(1):14–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2013.872845.
- Schindler D 2008. State of science of cumulative effects assessment and management. Keynote address, International Association for Impact Assessment Special Meeting on Cumulative Effects, Calgary. Nov 6
- Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America [SHRUSA]. 1969. The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. [accessed 2021 May 6] https://www.energy.gov/nepa/downloads/national-environmental-policy-act-1969
- Slootweg R. 2015. Ecosystem services in SEA: are we missing the point of a simple concept?. Impact Assess. Project Appraisal. 34(1):79–86.
- Sinclair AJ, Doelle M, Duinker P. 2017. Looking up, down and sideways: reconceiving cumulative effects assessment as a mindset. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 62:183–194. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2016.04.007.
- Stewart IG, Harding ME 2021. One pipeline and two nations: co-production, impact assessments and Canada’s trans mountain expansion project. Forthcoming. Science, Technology and Human Values.
- United States Council on Environmental Quality [US CEQ]. 1997. Considering cumulative effects under the National Environmental Policy Act. Executive Office of the President. Washington (DC).
- Vanclay F. 2014. Integration and focus from the perspective of social impact assessment: a response to Morrison-Saunders et al. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 32(1):11–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2013.872851.
- Walker B, Holling CS, Carpenter SR, Kinzig A. 2004. Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social–ecological systems. Ecol Soc. 9(2):5. doi:https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-00650-090205.
- Western Australian Government. 2016. Environmental impact assessment (Part IV Decisions 1 and 2) administrative procedures 2016. Perth [accessed 2021 Jun 1] https://www.epa.wa.gov.au/sites/default/files/Policies_and_Guidance/Gg223.pdf