Environmental assessments and sustainable finance frameworks: will the EU Taxonomy change the mindset over the contribution of EIA to sustainable development?

References

• Atici H. 2021. ‘EU taxonomy is greenwashing tactic, say NGOs’. Accessed 2021 Oct 27. https://greencentralbanking.com/2021/04/21/eu-taxonomy-is-greenwash-say-ngos/.
   Google Scholar
• BBOP - Business and Biodiversity Offsets Program. 2012. Standard on biodiversity offsets. Accessed 2018 Feb 28th. http://www.forest-trends.org/documents/files/doc_3078.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bice S, Fischer TB. 2020. Impact assessment for the 21st century–what future? Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 38(2):89–93. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2020.1731202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloomberg. 2021. applying the EU taxonomy to your investments, how to start? bloomberg professional services january 11, 2021. Accessed 2021 Oct 27. https://www.bloomberg.com/professional/blog/applying-the-eu-taxonomy-to-your-investments-how-to-start/.
   Google Scholar
• Bond A, Pope J, Fundingsland M, Morrison-Saunders A, Retief F, Hauptfleisch M. 2020. Explaining the political nature of environmental impact assessment (EIA): a neo-Gramscian perspective. J Clean Prod. 244:118694. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond A, Pope J, Morrison-Saunders A, Retief F. 2021. Taking an environmental ethics perspective to understand what we should expect from EIA in terms of biodiversity protection. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 86:106508. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond A, Pope J, Morrison-Saunders A, Retief F, Gunn JAE. 2014. Impact assessment: eroding benefits through streamlining? Environ Impact Assess Rev. 45:46–53. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2013.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradford A. 2015. Exporting standards: the externalization of the EU’s regulatory power via markets. Int Rev Law Econ. 42:158–173. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2014.09.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownlie S, Botha M. 2009. Biodiversity offsets: adding to the conservation estate, or ‘no net loss’? Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 27(3):227–231. doi:https://doi.org/10.3152/146155109X465968.
   Google Scholar
• Bull JW, Strange N. 2018. The global extent of biodiversity offset implementation under no net loss policies. Nat Sustainability. 1(12):790. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0176-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caldwell LK. 1988. Environmental impact analysis (EIA): origins, evolution, and future directions. Policy Stud Rev. 8(1):75–83. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1988.tb00917.x.
   Google Scholar
• Cardinale BJ, Duffy JE, Gonzalez A, Hooper DU, Perrings C, Venail P, Narwani A, MacE GM, Tilman D, Wardle DA, et al. 2012. Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature. 486(7401):59–67. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornillie J, Delbeke J, Vis P, Zeilina L. 2021. ‘Will the EU sustainable finance rules deliver?’, STG Policy Papers, 2021/13: 8.
   Google Scholar
• Daly HE, Jacobs M, Skolimowski H. 1995. On Wilfred Beckerman’s critique of sustainable development. Environ Values. 4(1):49–55. doi:https://doi.org/10.3197/096327195776679583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehlers T, Gao D, Packer F. 2021. ‘A taxonomy of sustainable finance taxonomies: principles for effective taxonomies and proposed policy actions. Bank for International Settlements; Accessed 2021 Oct 27. https://www.bis.org/publ/bppdf/bispap118.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2021a. Commission notice: technical guidance on the application of “do no significant harm” under the recovery and resilience facility regulation. European Commission; Accessed 2021 Oct 27. https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/c2021_1054_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Union. 2019. Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2019 on sustainability‐related disclosures in the financial services sector. Off J European Communities. L317:1–16.
   Google Scholar
• European Union (2020), ”Regulation (EU) 2020/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2020 on the establishment of a framework to facilitate sustainable investment, and amending Regulation (EU) 2019/2088”, Official Journal of the European Communities, L198, pages 13–43.
   Google Scholar
• Fang K. 2022. Moving away from sustainability. Nat Sustainability 5:5–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fanning AL, O’Neill DW, Hickel J, Roux N. 2022. The social shortfall and ecological overshoot of nations. Nat Sustainability 5 . 26–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farmer A, Thompson S. 2020. The ripple effect of EU taxonomy for sustainable investments in US Financial sector. Accessed 2021 Oct 20. https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2020/06/10/the-ripple-effect-of-eu-taxonomy-for-sustainable-investments-in-u-s-financial-sector/.
   Google Scholar
• Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero. 2021. Amount of finance committed to achieving 1.5°C now at scale needed to deliver the transition. Accessed 2021 Nov 25. https://www.gfanzero.com/press/amount-of-finance-committed-to-achieving-1-5c-now-at-scale-needed-to-deliver-the-transition/
   Google Scholar
• Gyonyorova L, Stachoň M, Stašek D. 2021. ESG ratings: relevant information or misleading clue? evidence from the S&P global 1200. J Sustainable Finance Investment. 36 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2021.1922062.
   Google Scholar
• Hooper DU, Carol Adair E, Cardinale BJ, Byrnes JEK, Hungate BA, Matulich KL, Andrew Gonzalez JED, Gamfeldt L, O’Connor MI, O’Connor MI. 2012. A global synthesis reveals biodiversity loss as a major driver of ecosystem change. Nature. 486(7401):105. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, Pirani A, Connors SL, Péan C, Berger S, Caud N, Chen Y, Goldfarb L, Gomis MI, et al. (ed.) in Press. Climate change 2021: the physical science basis. contribution of working group i to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge).
   Google Scholar
• International Association for Impact Assessment. 2019. ‘IAIA19 Brisbane Australia. 39th Annual Conference of the International Association for Impact Assessment’, IAIA, Accessed 2021 Nov 29. https://conferences.iaia.org/2019/index.php.
   Google Scholar
• International Atomic Energy Agency. 2018. Strategic Environmental Assessment for Nuclear Power Programmes: guidelines. IAEA:Vienna.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins B. 2020. resilience considerations related to water resource management: the Case of Te Waihora/Lake Ellesmere. IAIA symposium, our interconnected world: impact assessment, health and the environment. Online: IAIA
   Google Scholar
• Jiang Y. 2015. China’s water security: current status, emerging challenges and future prospects. Environ Sci Policy. 54:106–125. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.06.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones H, Abnett K, Jessop S. 2021. Analysis: investors face myriad green investing rules. Accessed 2021 Nov 29. https://www.reuters.com/business/sustainable-business/one-taxonomy-rule-them-all-investors-face-myriad-green-investing-rules-2021-10-19/.
   Google Scholar
• McGlone C. 2021. Adapt or die’: EA warns people will die unless UK does more to prepare for climate change, Environmental Data Services. Accessed 2021 Oct 13. https://www.endsreport.com/article/1730210/adapt-die-ea-warns-people-will-die-unless-uk-does-prepare-climate-change.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2017. Mobilising bond markets for a low-carbon transition, green finance and investment. Paris: OECD Publishing. Accessed 2021 Nov 24. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264272323-en
   Google Scholar
• OECD (2020), ”Developing Sustainable Finance Definitions and Taxonomies, Green Finance and Investment”, available at last accessed 27 October 2021.
   Google Scholar
• PBC. 2021. green bond endorsed projects catalogue (2021 edition). People’s Bank of China; 2021 Apr 21, Accessed 2021 Nov 30. http://www.pbc.gov.cn/goutongjiaoliu/113456/113469/4342400/2021091617180089879.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira HM, Leadley PW, Proença V, Alkemade R, Scharlemann JPW, Fernandez-Manjarrés JF, Araújo MB, Balvanera P, Biggs R, Cheung WWL. 2010. Scenarios for global biodiversity in the 21st century. Science. 330(6010):1496–1501. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1196624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson Å, Chapin FS, Lambin EF, Lenton TM, Scheffer M, Folke C, Schellnhuber HJ, et al. 2009. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature. 461(7263):472–475. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/461472a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler B. 1996. International study of the effectiveness of environmental assessment final report - environmental assessment in a changing world: evaluating practice to improve performance. Vol. 248. Ottawa: Minister of Supply and Services Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Sandbrook C, Fisher JA, Holmes G, Luque-Lora R, Keane A. 2019. The global conservation movement is diverse but not divided. Nat Sustainability. 2(4):316–323. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0267-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America. 1969. The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969’, US Government; Accessed 2019 Oct 15. https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/nepapub/nepa_documents/RedDont/Req-NEPA.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• SFWG. 2021. ‘G20 sustainable finance working group - 2021 synthesis report. 2021 Oct 7, Accessed 2021 Oct 27. https://g20sfwg.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/G20-SFWG-Synthesis-Report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Therivel R. 2020. Impact assessment: from whale to shark. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 38(2):118–121. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2019.1676070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tripathy A, Mok L, House K. 2020. Defining Climate-Aligned Investment: an Analysis of Sustainable Finance Taxonomy Development. J Environ Investing. 10(1): 80–96 .
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 2019. Water security and the sustainable development goals. UNESCO international centre for water security and sustainable management, Accessed 2021 Oct 15. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/3807832.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 1992. Report of the United Nations Conference on environment and development. UNCED Report A/CONF.151/5/Rev.1’, United Nations. Accessed 2021 Oct 13. https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/generalassembly/docs/globalcompact/A_CONF.151_26_Vol.I_Declaration.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Van Loon L, Driessen PPJ, Kolhoff AJ, Runhaar HAC. 2010. An analytical framework for capacity development in EIA - the case of Yemen. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 30(2):100–107. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2009.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanDeveer SD, Dabelko GD. 2001. It’s capacity, stupid: international assistance and national implementation. Global Environl Polit. 1(2):18–29. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/152638001750336569.
   Google Scholar
• Wende W, Bond A, Bobylev N, Stratmann L. 2012. Climate change mitigation and adaptation in strategic environmental assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 32(1):88–93. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2011.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu EP-Y, Van Luu B, Huirong Chen C. 2020. Greenwashing in environmental, social and governance disclosures. Res Int Bus Finance. 52:101192. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2020.101192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar