1,251
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Editorial

Transformation towards a sustainable world – the pivotal role of impact assessments

ORCID Icon

References

  • Biermann F, Hickmann T, Sénit C-A, Beisheim M, Bernstein S, Chasek P, Grob L, Kim RE, Kotzé LJ, Nilsson M, et al. 2022. Scientific evidence on the political impact of the sustainable development goals. Nat Sustainability. doi:10.1038/s41893-022-00909-5.
  • Bowen KJ, Cradock-Henry NA, Koch F, Patterson J, Häyhä T, Vogt J, Barbi F. 2017. Implementing the “Sustainable development goals”: towards addressing three key governance challenges—collective action, trade-offs, and accountability. Curr Opin Environ Sustainability. 26-27:90–96. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2017.05.002.
  • Dipper B. 1998. Monitoring and post-auditing in environmental impact assessment: a review. J Environ Plan Manag. 41(6):731–747. doi:10.1080/09640569811399.
  • Dusík J, Bond A. 2022. Environmental assessments and sustainable finance frameworks: will the EU Taxonomy change the mindset over the contribution of EIA to sustainable development? Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 40(2):1–9.
  • Fischer TB. 2003. Environmental assessment of the EU structural funds regional development plans and operational programmes – a case study of the German objective 1 areas. Eur Environ. 13(5):245–257. doi:10.1002/eet.325.
  • Fischer TB. 2007. Theory and practice of strategic environmental assessment – towards a more systematic approach. London: Earthscan.
  • Fischer TB. 2020. Embedding the sustainable development goals (SDGs) in IAPA’s remit. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 38(4):269–271. doi:10.1080/14615517.2020.1772474.
  • Fischer TB. 2022. Taxonomies of sustainable investment and existing decision support approaches of EIA, SEA and CBA – a silver bullet for sustainable development? A response to Dusík and Bond. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 2:118–122. doi:10.1080/14615517.2022.2033926.
  • Fischer TB, González A, eds. 2021. Handbook on strategic environmental assessment. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Fischer TB, Retief FP. 2021. Does strategic environmental assessment lead to more environmentally sustainable decisions? Reflections on its substantive effectiveness. In: Fischer TB, and Gonzalez A Handbook on Strategic Environmental Assessment. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; p. 126–139.
  • Fonseca A. 2022. Handbook of environmental impact assessment. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Geneletti D. 2016. Handbook on biodiversity and ecosystem services in impact assessment. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • IEMA. 2011. The state of environmental impact assessment in the UK. Lincoln:IEMA.
  • Jones R, Fischer TB. 2016. EIA follow-up in the UK – a 2015 update. J Environ Assess Policy Manag. 18(1):22.
  • Kørnøv L, Lyhne I, Davila JG. 2020. Linking the UN SDGs and environmental assessment: towards a conceptual framework. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 85:106463. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106463.
  • Morrison-Saunders A, Pope J, Bond A. 2015. Handbook of sustainability assessment. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Rega C, Singer JP, Geneletti D. 2018. Investigating the substantive effectiveness of strategic environmental assessment of urban planning: evidence from Italy and Spain. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 73:60–69. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2018.07.004.
  • Sachs JD, Schmidt-Traub G, Mazzucato M, Messner D, Nakicenovic N, Rockström J. 2019. Six Transformations to achieve the sustainable development goals. Na Sustainability. 2:805–814. doi:10.1038/s41893-019-0352-9.
  • Stafford-Smith M, Griggs D, Gaffney O, Ullah F, Rezers B, Kanie N, Stigson B, Shrivastava P, Leach M, O’Connell D. 2017. Integration: the key to implementing the sustainable development goals. Sustainability Sci. 12:911–918. doi:10.1007/s11625-016-0383-3.
  • Van Eck M, Scholten JJ. 1997. Effectiveness of environmental impact assessment. Briefing Paper by the Dutch EIA Commission. Utrecht.
  • Wende W. 2002. Evaluation of the effectiveness and quality of environmental impact assessment in the Federal Republic of Germany. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 20(2):93–99. doi:10.3152/147154602781766735.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.