https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8575-2281
References
- Becklumb P, Williams T. 2012. Canada’s changing federal environmental assessment process. Ottawa (ON): Library of Parliament. No. 2012-36-E.
- Bond A, Pope J, Morrison-Saunders A, Retief F, Gunn J. 2014. Impact assessment: eroding benefits through streamlining? Environ Impact Assess Rev. 45:46–53. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2013.12.002.
- Council of Canadian Academies. 2019. Greater than the sum of its parts: toward integrated natural resource management in Canada. Ottawa (ON):The Expert Panel on the State of Knowledge and Practice of Integrated Approaches to Natural Resource Management in Canada.
- Damman D, Bruce L. 2012. CEAA 2012: the new reality for Federal Environmental Assessment. Influents. 7:81–83.
- de Kerckhove D, Minns CK, Shuter B. 2013. The length of environmental review in Canada under the Fisheries Act. Can J Aquatic Sci. 70(4):517–521. doi:10.1139/cjfas-2012-0411.
- Fischer TB, Fonseca A, Geißler G, Jha-Thakur U, Reties F, Alberts R, Jiricka-Pürrer A. 2023. Simplification of environmental and other impact assessments: results from an international online survey. Impact Assess Proj Appr. 40:355.
- Fischer TB, Sykes O. 2009. The new EU territorial agenda: indicating progress for climate change mitigation and adaptation? In: Davoudi S, Crawford, J, Mehmood, A, editors. Planning for climate change: strategies for mitigation and adaptation for spatial planners. London (UK): Earthscan; p. 111–124.
- Flaherty J 2012. Jobs, growth and long-term prosperity: economic action plan 2012; [Accessed 2022 December 02]. Government of Canada. www.budget.gc.ca/2012/plan/pdf/Plan2012-eng.pdf.
- Gibson R. 2012. In full retreat: the Canadian government’s new environmental assessment law undoes decades of progress. Impact Assess Proj Appr. 30(3):179–188. doi:10.1080/14615517.2012.720417.
- Gibson R 2019. Assessment law is still too vague to achieve lasting green goals. Policy Options; [Accessed 2022 November 28]. https://policyoptions.irpp.org/magazines/october-2019/assessment-law-is-still-too-vague-to-achieve-lasting-green-goals/.
- Gibson R, Hanna K. 2016. Progress and uncertainty: the evolution of federal environmental assessment in Canada. In: Hanna K, editor. Environmental assessment: practice and participation. Don Mills (ON): OUP. Chapter 2.
- Gibson G, Hoogeveen D, MacDonald A; The Firelight Group. 2018. Impact assessment in the Arctic: emerging practices of Indigenous-led review. Vancouver (BC): The Firelight Group.
- Joseph C. 2020. Problems and resolutions in GHG impact assessment. Impact Assess Proj Appr. 38(1):83–86. doi:10.1080/14615517.2019.1625253.
- Kirchhoff D, Gardner H, Tsuji L. 2013. The Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 2012 and associated policy: implications for aboriginal peoples. Int Indigenous Policy J. 4(3):1–14. doi:10.18584/iipj.2013.4.3.1.
- Maclean J, Noble BF, Blakley J. 2021. Strategic and regional environmental assessments. In: Doelle M, Sinclair J, editors. The next generation of impact assessment: a critical review of the Canadian Impact Assessment Act. Toronto (ON): Irwin Law. Chapter 17.
- Noble BF. 2021. Introduction to environmental assessment: a guide to principles and practice. Don Mills (ON): OUP.
- Noble B, Hanna K. 2015. Environmental assessment in the Arctic: a gap analysis and research agenda. Arctic. 68(3):341–355. doi:10.14430/arctic4501.
- Noble BF, Liu G, Hackett P. 2017. The contribution of project environmental assessment to assessing and managing cumulative effects: individually and collectively insignificant? Environ Manage. 59(4):531–545. doi:10.1007/s00267-016-0799-7.
- Noble BF, Udofia A. 2015. Protectors of the land: toward an EA process that works for Aboriginal communities and developers. Ottawa (ON): Macdonald-Laurier Institute.
- Sinclair AJ, Doelle M, Duinker P. 2017. Looking up, down, and sideways: reconceiving cumulative effects assessment as a mindset. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 62:183–194. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2016.04.007.