Don’t Shoot the Messenger – Reflections on streamlining and simplification of Environmental Assessment in the Netherlands

References

• Arcadis. 2020. Milieueffectrapporten in Nederland: kwaliteit en kwantiteit, in opdracht van Ministerie Infrastructuur & Waterstaat. Amersfoort: Arcadis.
   Google Scholar
• Arts J. 1998. EIA follow-up – on the role of ex post evaluation in environmental impact assessment. Groningen: Geo Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arts J. 2007. Nieuwe Wegen? Planningsbenaderingen voor Duurzame Infrastructuur, Inaugural Speech. Groningen: Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.
   Google Scholar
• Arts J. 2010. Streamlining infrastructure planning and impact assessment in the Netherlands, Proceedings IAIA South-Africa 2010 National Conference, 22-25 August 2010, Pretoria.
   Google Scholar
• Arts J, Niekerk F. 2010. Impact assessment and management of infrastructure projects: from risk source to risk control. In: Hull A, Alexander E, Khakee A Woltjer J, editors. Evaluation for participation: fitting evaluation to planning contexts and sustainability in planning. London: Routledge; pp. 149–171.
   Google Scholar
• Arts J, Runhaar H, Fischer TB, Jha-Thakur U, van Laerhoven F, Driessen P, Onyango V. 2012. The effectiveness of EIA as an instrument for environmental governance – a comparison of 25 years of EIA practice in the Netherlands and the UK. J Environ Assess Policy Manage. 14(4):40. doi:10.1142/S1464333212500251.
   Google Scholar
• Arts J, Tomlinson P, Voogd H. 2011. Planning in tiers: tiering as a way of linking EIA and SEA. In: Sadler B, Aschemann R, Dusik J, Fischer TB, Partidario P Verheem R, editors. Handbook of strategic environmental assessment. London: Earthscan; pp. 415–433.
   Google Scholar
• Balkende (CDA, VVD, D66). 2003. Meedoen, meer werk, minder regels – Regeerakkoord Kabinet Balkenende II, [accessed 6 November 2022]. http://www.parlement.com/9291000/d/regak03.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Berenschot. 2012. Doorwerking m.e.r. – Onderzoek naar de doorwerking van adviezen Commissie voor de m.e.r. en het MER in besluitvorming, in opdracht van Ministerie Infrastructuur & Milieu. Utrecht: Berenschot.
   Google Scholar
• Berenschot. 2017. Evaluatie Tarievenwet Commissie, in opracht van Ministerie van Infrastructuur & Milieu. Utrecht: Berenschot.
   Google Scholar
• Bond A, Pope J, Morrison-Sanders A, Retief F, Gunn J. 2014. Impact assessment: eroding benefits through streamlining? EIA Rev. 45:45–53. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2013.12.002.
   Google Scholar
• Committee Elverding (‘Commissie Versnelling Besluitvorming Infrastructurele Projecten’). 2008. Sneller en Beter; advies Commissie Versnelling Besluitvorming Infrastructurele Projecten. The Hague: SDU.
   Google Scholar
• de Vries H, Nuesink J, Eijssen P, Arts J. 2016. Survival of the fittest? – adaptive strategies in impact assessment in a “darwinistic” perspective, Proceedings IAIA 2016 Conference Nagoya, IAIA, Fargo, https://conferences.iaia.org/2016/Final-Papers/De%20Vries,%20Johan%20-%20Survival%20of%20the%20Fittest.pdf
   Google Scholar
• de Vries H, Weertman J, Arts J. 2013. The long road to shorter planning and improving SEA/EIA: a reality check. Proceedings IAIA 2013 Conference Calgary, IAIA, Fargohttps://conferences.iaia.org/2013/pdf/Final%20papers%20review%20process%2013/The%20long%20road%20to%20shorter%20planning%20and%20improving%20SEA%20EIA%20-%20a%20reality%20check.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dutch Parliament (‘Tweede Kamer der Staten Generaal’). 2005. Wijziging Wet milieubeheer i.v.m. EU richtlijn 2001/42/EG – Nota naar aanleiding van verslag, Vergaderjaar 2004-2005, 29811 no.7. The Hague: SDU.
   Google Scholar
• ECW, Evaluation Commission for the Environmental Management Act. 1990. Naar een volwaardige plaats. Evaluatiecommissie Wet algemene bepalingen milieuhygiëne. The Hague: SDU.
   Google Scholar
• ECW, Evaluation Commission for the Environmental Management Act. 1996. Naar een duurzame milieu-effectrapportage, tweede advies over de regeling milieu-effectrapportage. Evaluatiecommissie Wet milieubeheer. Den Haag.
   Google Scholar
• Faith-Ell C, Fischer TB. 2021. Chapter 11: Strategic Environmental Assessment in Transport Planning. In: Fischer TB, Gonzalez A, editors. Handbook on Strategic Environmental Assessment. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar; p. 164–181.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer TB. 2002. Strategic environmental assessment – transport and land-use planning. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer TB. 2005. Having an impact? – context elements for effective SEA application in transport policy, plan and programme making. J Environ Assess Policy Manage. 7(3):407–432. doi:10.1142/S1464333205002158.
   Google Scholar
• Glasson J, Therivel R, Chadwick A. 1994. Introduction to Environmental Impact Assessment. In: Natural and built environment series 1. London: UCL Press. Natural and Built Environment Series 1.
   Google Scholar
• Government of the Netherlands. 2022. Revision of Environment and Planning Laws, [accessed 6 November 2022]. https://www.government.nl/topics/spatial-planning-and-infrastructure/revision-of-environment-planning-laws.
   Google Scholar
• Infomil. 2022. Hoe is m.e.r. ontstaan? - Kenniscentrum InfoMil, https://www.infomil.nl/onderwerpen/integrale/mer/procedurehandleiding/index/ontwikkelingen/ [accessed 6 November 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Leroy P. 1996. De effecten van m.e.r.: een evaluatie. In: Bonte R, Leroy P Mooren R, editors. Milieu-effectrapportage, methoden, effecten en resultaat. Best: Aeneas; p 127–137.
   Google Scholar
• Marseille AT. 2014. Crisis- en herstelwet: tweede evaluatie procesrechtelijke bepalingen. Groningen/Tilburg: University of Groningen and Tilburg Universty.
   Google Scholar
• Marseille AT. 2022. Versnelling van rechtsbescherming in het omgevingsrecht: de procedure bij de bestuursrechter. Groningen: University of Groningen.
   Google Scholar
• Mottee L, Arts J, Vanclay F, Miller F, Howitt R. 2020. Metro infrastructure planning in Amsterdam: how are social issues managed in the absence of environmental and social impact assessment? Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 38(4):320–335. doi:10.1080/14615517.2020.1741918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldenziel HA, de Vos HW. 2018. Totstandkoming, systeem en doelen van de Omgevingswet. Tijdschrift voor Omgevingsrecht. 18(3). doi:10.5553/TO/156850122018018003008.
   Google Scholar
• Runhaar H, Arts J, van Laerhoven F, Driessen P. 2011. Naar een toekomstbestendige m.e.r., lessen uit 25 jaar m.e.r. in Nederland en een verkenning van kansen en bedreigingen voor de m.e.r. in de nabije toekomst. Utrecht/Groningen: in opdracht van: Ministerie van Infrastructuur & Milieu, Universiteit Utrecht/Rijksuniversiteit Groningen. available from: www.rug.nl/frw/onderzoek/duurzamewegen/25jaarmer/].
   Google Scholar
• Runhaar H, van Laerhoven F, Driessen P, Arts J. 2013. Environmental assessment in the Netherlands: effectively governing environmental protection? A discourse analysis. EIA Rev. 39:13–25. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2012.05.003.
   Google Scholar
• Rutte (VVD, CDA). 2010. Vrijheid en verantwoordelijkheid – Regeerakkoord Kabinet Rutte I, https://open.overheid.nl/repository/ronl-archief-4e7b0c5c-dd87-4c73-9799-01e0894ac9ba/1/pdf/regeerakkoord-vvd-cda.pdf [accessed 6 November 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Sadler B. 1996. Environmental assessment in a changing world, evaluating practice to improve performance, final report of the international study of the effectiveness of environmental assessment. Ottawa: Ministry of Supply & Services Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler B, Verheem R. 1996. Strategic environmental assessment, status, challenges and future directions. The Hague: Ministerie van VROM. EIA-series 53.
   Google Scholar
• ten Heuvelhof E, Nauta C. 1996. (M)erkenning, onderzoek naar de doorwerking van m.e.r. Den Haag: Evaluatiecommissie Wet Milieubeheer.
   Google Scholar
• ten Heuvelhof E, Nauta C. 1997. The effects of environmental impact assessment in the Netherlands. Project Appraisal. 12(1):25–30. doi:10.1080/02688867.1997.9727034.
   Google Scholar
• Tolsma HD, de Graaf KJ. 2016. Bending the rules: a Dutch approach to improving the flexible application of environmental standards. Ger Law J. 17(4):691–704. doi:10.1017/S2071832200021404.
   Google Scholar
• UNECE, United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. 1991. Process and systems of environmental impact assessment. Geneva: United Nations. Environmental series no.4.
   Google Scholar
• van Kessel H, Boer T, Roelofs N, Klein Koerkamp KA. 2003. Evaluatie m.e.r. 2003, in opdracht van Ministerie van VROM. Nijmegen: NovioConsult.
   Google Scholar
• Verschuuren J. 2010. The Dutch crisis and recovery act: economic recovery and legal crisis? Potchefstroom Electron Law J. 13(5):5–25. doi:10.4314/pelj.v13i5.65049.
   Google Scholar
• Wathern P. 1990. Environmental impact assessment – theory and practice. London: Unwin Hyman.
   Google Scholar
• Wood CM. 1995. Environmental impact assessment – a comparative review. Harlow: Longman Scientific & Technical.
   Google Scholar