Impact assessment publishing – observations and reflections after 7 years of being editor of impact assessment and project appraisal

References

• Adler JR, Chan TM, Blain B, Thomas B, Atkinson P. 2019. #openaccess: free online, open-access crowdsource-reviewed publishing is the future; traditional peer-reviewed journals are on the way out. Can J Emerg Med. 21(1):11–14. doi:10.1017/cem.2018.481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bice S, Fischer TB. 2020. Editorial – evolution, revolution, climate change and current EIA. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 37(5):369–370. doi:10.1080/14615517.2019.1641778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bice S, Fischer TB. 2020. Impact assessment for the 21st century – what future?. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 38(2):89–93. doi:10.1080/14615517.2020.1731202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond A, Fischer TB. 2022. Characterising the collaboration between academia and practice in UK environmental assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 97:106899. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond A, Fischer TB, Fothergill J. 2017. Progressing quality in environmental impact assessment: the IEMA Quality Mark as an example of voluntary accreditation. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 63:160–171. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2016.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caratti P, Dalkmann H, Jiliberto R, eds. 2004. Analysing strategic environmental assessment. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Clement S, Fischer TB. 2020. Editorial [green infrastructure and IA. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 38(6):447–448. doi:10.1080/14615517.2020.1847473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downing TE, Shi G, Zaman M, Garcia-Downing C. 2021. Improving post-relocation support for people resettled by infrastructure development. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 39(5):357–365. doi:10.1080/14615517.2021.1980277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson S, Helgesson G. 2016. The false academy: predatory publishing in science and bioethics. Med Health Care Philos. 20(2):163–170. doi:10.1007/s11019-016-9740-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fire M, Guestrin C. 2019. Over-optimization of academic publishing metrics: observing Goodhart’s Law in action. GigaScience. 8(6):1–20. doi:10.1093/gigascience/giz053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer TB. 2022. Editorial: meeting metrics-based performance targets is important, but not everything – on the necessity for journals to keep focusing on the needs of the community they are serving and on quality. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 40(1):1. doi:10.1080/14615517.2022.2033925.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer TB, Cave B. 2018. Health in impact assessments – introduction to a special issue. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 36(1):1–4. doi:10.1080/14615517.2017.1363976.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer TB, Fonseca A, Geißler G, Jha-Thakur U, Retief F, Alberts R, Jiricka-Pürrer A. 2023. Simplification of environmental and other impact assessments – results from an international online survey. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 30(4):1–9. doi:10.1080/14615517.2023.2198839.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer TB, González A. 2021. Conclusions - towards a theory of strategic environmental assessment? In: Fischer TB, and González A eds . Handbook on strategic environmental assessment, (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar: 425–437
   Google Scholar
• Fischer TB, Jha-Thakur U. 2013. Environmental assessment and management related higher education master level degree programmes in the EU – an analysis. J Environ Assess Policy Manage. 15(4):1350020. doi:10.1142/S1464333213500208.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer TB, Jha-Thakur U, Hayes S. 2015. Environmental impact assessment and strategic environmental assessment research in the UK. J Environ Assess Policy Manage. 17(1):1550016 (12 pages. doi:10.1142/S1464333215500167.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer TB, Montaño M. 2019. Editorial: experiences with developing guidelines for effective impact assessment. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 37(2):19. doi:10.1080/14615517.2019.1575473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer TB, Noble B. 2015. Impact assessment research – achievements, gaps and future directions. J Environ Assess Policy Manage. 17(1):1501001 (12 pages. doi:10.1142/S1464333215010012.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer TB, Onyango V. 2012. Strategic environmental assessment-related research projects and journal articles: an overview of the past 20 years. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 30(4):253–263. doi:10.1080/14615517.2012.740953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Götzmann N, Bainton N. 2021. Embedding gender-responsive approaches in impact assessment and management. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 39(3):171–182. doi:10.1080/14615517.2021.1904721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kågström M, Kørnøv L, Lyhne I. 2023. Collaboration between researchers and practitioners in environmental assessment: introduction to the special issue. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 100:107061. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107061.
   Google Scholar
• Pope J, Bond A, Morrison-Saunders A, Retief F. 2013. Advancing the theory and practice of impact assessment: setting the research agenda. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 41:1–9. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2013.01.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Therivel R, González A. 2019. Introducing SEA effectiveness. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 37(3–4):181–187. doi:10.1080/14615517.2019.1601432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres A, Patterson C, Jaeger JAG. 2022. Advancing the consideration of ecological connectivity in environmental assessment: synthesis and next steps forward. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 40(6):451–459. doi:10.1080/14615517.2022.2134619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanclay F, Kemp D. 2017. Displacement, resettlement and livelihoods. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 35(1):2. doi:10.1080/14615517.2016.1272212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar