Influential Indigenous voices? Evaluating cultural impact assessment effectiveness in Aotearoa New Zealand

References

• Bishop R. 1997. Interviewing as collaborative storying. Education Research And Perspectives. 24(1):28–47.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop R. 2016. Freeing ourselves: an Indigenous response to neo-colonial dominance in research, classrooms, schools and education systems. In: Denzin N, and Giardina M, editors Qualitative inquiry outside the academy. New York: Routledge; pp. 146–163.
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 3(2):77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Bruce AS, Hume E. 2015. The Squamish Nation assessment process: getting to consent. Vancouver, Canada: Ratcliff & Company LLP.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant E. 2011. Innovation or degradation: an analysis of Hawaiʻi’s cultural impact assessment process as a vehicle of environmental justice for Kanaka Maoli. Asian-Pacific Law And Policy Journal. 13:230–299.
   Google Scholar
• Cashmore M, Gwilliam R, Morgan R, Cobb D, Bond A. 2004. The interminable issue of effectiveness: substantive purposes, outcomes and research challenges in the advancement of environmental impact assessment theory. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 22(4):295–310. doi: 10.3152/147154604781765860.
   Google Scholar
• Cashmore M, Richardson T, Hilding-Rydevik T, Emmelin L. 2010. Evaluating the effectiveness of impact assessment instruments: theorising the nature and implications of their political constitution. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 30(6):371–379. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2010.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chanchitpricha C, Bond A. 2013. Conceptualising the effectiveness of impact assessment processes. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 43:65–72. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2013.05.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chetham J. 2018. The mitigation dilemma. NZAIA Impact Connector. 5:11–12. https://www.nzaia.org.nz/impact-connector-5.html/
   Google Scholar
• Chua-Oon Rinfret P, Connelly S, Thompson-Fawcett M. 2022. Practising impact assessment: a content analysis of 20 cultural impact assessment reports in Aotearoa New Zealand. AlterNative: An International Journal Of Indigenous Peoples. 18(1):155–162. doi: 10.1177/11771801221085290.
   Google Scholar
• Cocklin C, Kelly B. 1992. Large-scale energy projects in New Zealand: whither social impact assessment? Geoforum. 23(1):41–60. doi: 10.1016/0016-7185(92)90035-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole AO, Me Ōna T, Apatu M, Black M, Te Huia B, Brown J, O’Reilly T 2019. Tātari Tauutuutu: moving beyond ‘cultural impact assessment’ in search of Māori cultural survival outcomes. Kōrero Māori Report 22. iPansophy Limited Digital Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Darling S, Harvey B, Hickey GM. 2023. From ‘stakeholders’ to rights holders: how approaches to impact assessment affect indigenous participation in the Yukon Territory, Canada. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 99:107025. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2022.107025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson C, Tolich M. 2003. Social science research in New Zealand: many paths to understanding. New Zealand: Pearson Education New Zealand Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon JE. 1993. The integration of EIA and planning in New Zealand - changing process and practice. J Environ Plan Manag. 36(2):239–251. doi: 10.1080/09640569308711942.
   Google Scholar
• Drawson AS, Toombs E, Mushquash CJ. 2017. Indigenous research methods: a systematic review. Int Indig Policy J. 8(2). doi: 10.18584/iipj.2017.8.2.5.
   Google Scholar
• Fookes TW. 1980. Monitoring social and economic impacts (a New Zealand case study). Environ Impact Assess Rev. 1(1):72–76. doi: 10.1016/S0195-9255(80)80075-8.
   Google Scholar
• Freshwater Iwi Leaders Group. 2015. Iwi/Hapū rights and interests in freshwater. Recognition work-stream: Research Report. Freshwater Iwi Leaders Group, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson G. 2017. Culture and rights impact assessment: a survey of the field. Prepared by the Firelight Group, for the Mikisew Cree First Nation.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson G, Hoogeveen D, MacDonald A. 2018. Impact assessment in the Arctic: emerging practices of indigenous-led review. Prepared by the Firelight Group, for the Gwich’in Council International. Edmonton: Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Howlett C. 2010. Indigenous agency and mineral development: a cautionary note. Studies In Political Economy. 85(1):99–123. doi: 10.1080/19187033.2010.11675035.
   Google Scholar
• Hura NA 2021. The day is new, but this road is old. The Spinoff. [ accessed May 30]. https://thespinoff.co.nz/atea/30-05-2021/the-day-is-new-but-this-road-is-old.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson C, Matunga H, Ross H, Carter RW. 2016. Mainstreaming indigenous perspectives: 25 years of New Zealand’s Resource Management Act. Australasian Journal Of Environmental Management. 23(4):331–337. doi: 10.1080/14486563.2016.1259201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolly D, Thompson-Fawcett M. 2018. Cultural impact assessment. NZAIA Impact. Connector, Issue 5. https://www.nzaia.org.nz/impact-connector-5.html
   Google Scholar
• Jolly D, Thompson-Fawcett M. 2021. Enhancing Indigenous impact assessment: lessons from Indigenous planning theory. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 87:106541. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawakami AJ, Kanani A, Cram F, Morris KL, Porima L. 2008. Improving the practice of evaluation through indigenous values and methods: decolonizing evaluation practice - returning the gaze from Hawaiʻi and Aotearoa. In: Smith N, and Brandon P, editors Fundamental issues in evaluation. New York: Guilford Press; pp. 219–242.
   Google Scholar
• Kovach M. 2009. Indigenous methodologies: characteristics, conversations, and contexts. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kovach M. 2010. Conversational method in Indigenous research. First Peoples Child & Family Review. 5(1):40–48. doi: 10.7202/1069060ar.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen RK. 2018. Impact assessment and indigenous self-determination: a scalar framework of participation options. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 36(3):208–219. doi: 10.1080/14615517.2017.1390874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence R, Larsen RK. 2017. The politics of planning: assessing the impacts of mining on Sami lands. Third World Q. 38(5):1164–1180. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2016.1257909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love MTW 2001. Ten Years of the resource management act for Māori. Paper presented to the Resource Management and Law Association. Auckland, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Lyhne I, van Laerhoven F, Cashmore M, Runhaar H. 2017. Theorising EIA effectiveness: a contribution based on the Danish system. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 62:240–249. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2015.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maguire M, Delahunt B. 2017. Doing a thematic analysis: a practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars. All Ireland Journal Of Higher Education. 8(3):3351–3514.
   Google Scholar
• Matunga H. 2013. Theorizing Indigenous planning. In: Walker R, Jojola T Natcher D, editors. Reclaiming Indigenous planning. McGill-Queen’s University Press; pp. 3–32. doi:10.1515/9780773589933-004.
   Google Scholar
• Matunga H 2018. Strategic Indigenous impact assessment? A case for extending beyond CIA. NZAIA Impact Connector, Issue 5. https://www.nzaia.org.nz/impact-connector-5.html
   Google Scholar
• Morgan RK. 1983. The evolution of environmental impact assessment in New Zealand.Journal of. Environ Manage. 16:139–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan RK. 2012. Environmental impact assessment: the state of the art. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 30(1):5–14. doi: 10.1080/14615517.2012.661557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan TKKB 2018. CIA – enhancing or diminishing mauri? NZAIA Impact Connector, Issue 5.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan TKKB, Fa’aui TN. 2018. Empowering indigenous voices in disaster response: applying the Mauri Model to New Zealand’s worst environmental maritime disaster. Eur J Oper Res. 268(3):984–995. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2017.05.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamura N. 2008. An ‘effective’ involvement of Indigenous people in environmental impact assessment: the cultural impact assessment of the Saru River region, Japan. Aust Geogr. 39(4):427–444. doi: 10.1080/00049180802419179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nottingham I. 1990. Social impact reporting: a Māori perspective - the Taharoa case. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 10(1–2):175–184. doi: 10.1016/0195-9255(90)90017-T.
   Google Scholar
• O’Faircheallaigh C. 2009. Effectiveness in social impact assessment: aboriginal peoples and resource development in Australia. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 27(2):95–110. doi: 10.3152/146155109X438715.
   Google Scholar
• O’Faircheallaigh C. 2016. Negotiations in the Indigenous world: aboriginal peoples and the extractive industry in Australia and Canada. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• O’Faircheallaigh C. 2017. Shaping projects, shaping impacts: community-controlled impact assessments and negotiated agreements. Third World Q. 38(5):1181–1197. doi: 10.1080/01436597.2017.1279539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Faircheallaigh C. 2021. Explaining outcomes from negotiated agreements in Australia and Canada. Resour Policy. 70:101922. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101922.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Faircheallaigh C, MacDonald A. 2022. Indigenous impact assessment: a quiet revolution in EIA? In: Routledge handbook of environmental impact assessment. Routledge; pp. 221–238.
   Google Scholar
• Pope J, Bond A, Morrison-Saunders A, Retief F. 2013. Advancing the theory and practice of impact assessment: setting the research agenda. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 41:1–9. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2013.01.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter L, Barry J. 2016. Planning for co-existence? recognising Indigenous rights through land-use planning in Canada and Australia. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ruckstuhl K, Thompson-Fawcett M, Rae H. 2014. Māori and mining: indigenous perspectives on reconceptualising and contextualising the social licence to operate. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 32(4):304–314. doi: 10.1080/14615517.2014.929782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith LT. 2012. Decolonising methodologies: research and Indigenous peoples. London, England: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Solomon R 2018. CIA and decision-making. NZAIA Impact Connector. Issue 5. https://www.nzaia.org.nz/impact-connector-5.html//
   Google Scholar
• Tribunal W. 2011. Ko Aotearoa tenei: a report into claims concerning New Zealand law and policy affecting Māori culture and identity. Report No. Wai 262. Legislation Direct.
   Google Scholar
• Vanstone A, Thompson-Fawcett M, Morgan RK. 2004. Cultural impact assessment: a collaborative management tool with potential. Planning Quarterly. 155:6–8.
   Google Scholar
• Wells C, Fookes TW. 1988. Resource management law reform: impact assessment in resource management. Ministry for the environment. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry for the Enviornment.
   Google Scholar
• Whetu J 2018. Achieving sustainability through the use of CIAs. NZAIA Impact Connector, Issue 5. https://www.nzaia.org.nz/impact-connector-5.html///
   Google Scholar