Developing key performance indicators for strategic environmental assessment effectiveness: a systematic framework

References

• Abreu A, Piedade R. 2018. Decision support model in the strategic management of the Portuguese air force alpha jet fleet. Asian Journal Of Social Sciences And Management Studies. 5(3):72–81. doi: 10.20448/journal.500.2018.53.72.81.
   Google Scholar
• Acharibasam JB, Noble BF. 2014. Assessing the impact of strategic environmental assessment. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 32(3):177–187. doi: 10.1080/14615517.2014.927557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balaras CA, Droutsa KG, Dascalaki EG, Kontoyiannidis S, Moro A, Bazzan E. 2020. A transnational multicriteria assessment method and tool for sustainability rating of the built environment. Earth And Environmental Science. 410:012068. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/410/1/012068.
   Google Scholar
• Bentaleb F, Mabrouki C, Semma A. 2015. Key performance indicators evaluation and performance measurement in dry port-seaport system: A multi criteria approach. Journal Of ETA Maritime Science. 3(2):97–116. doi: 10.5505/jems.2015.88597.
   Google Scholar
• Bina O, Jing W, Brown L, Partidario MR. 2011. An inquiry into the concept of SEA effectiveness: Towards criteria for Chinese practice. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 31:572–581. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2011.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond A, Pope J, Morrison-Saunders A, Retief F. 2022. Exploring the relationship between context and effectiveness in impact assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 97:106901. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond A, Retief F, Cave B, Fundingsland M, Duinker PN, Verheem R, Brown AL. 2018. A contribution to the conceptualization of quality in impact assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 68:49–58. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2017.10.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cape L, Retief F, Lochner P, Fischer T, Bond A. 2018. Exploring pluralism – Different stakeholder views of the expected and realised value of strategic environmental assessment (SEA). Environ Impact Assess Rev. 69:32–41. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2017.11.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cashmore M, Bond A, Cobb D. 2008. The role and functioning of environmental assessment: theoretical reflections upon an empirical investigation of causation. Journal Of Environmental Management. 88:1233–1248. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.06.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CEC (Commission of the European Communities). 2001. Directive 2001/42/EC on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment. [accessed 14 Sep 2023]. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32001L0042.
   Google Scholar
• Chan APC, Chan APL. 2004. Key performance indicators for measuring construction success. Benchmarking: Int J. 11(2):203–221. doi: 10.1108/14635770410532624.
   Google Scholar
• Chanchitpricha C, Bond A. 2013. Conceptualising the effectiveness of impact assessment processes. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 43:65–72. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2013.05.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalal-Clayton DB, Sadler B. 2017. A methodology for reviewing the quality of strategic environmental assessments in development cooperation. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 35(3):257–267. doi: 10.1080/14615517.2017.1322811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Da Silva AWL, Netto M, Selig PM, de Ávila Lerípio A, de Ávila Lerípio A. 2019. A framework for governance of sustainability indicator systems in strategic environmental assessment processes. J Environ Assess Policy Manage. 21(1):1950007. doi: 10.1142/S1464333219500078.
   Google Scholar
• De Menna F, Dietershagen J, Loubiere M, Vittuari M. 2018. Life cycle costing of food waste: A review of methodological approaches. Waste Manage (Oxford). 73:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.12.032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djordjevic B, Krmac E. 2016. Key performance indicators for measuring the impacts of ITS on transport. ISEP Conference. [accessed 14 Sep 2023]. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/302909689_Key_performance_indicators_for_measuring_the_impacts_of_its_on_transport.
   Google Scholar
• Donnelly A, Jones M, O’Mahony T, Byrne B. 2007. Selecting environmental indicator for use in strategic environmental assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 27(2):161–175. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2006.10.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwyer N, O’Mahony T, O’Regan B, Moles R. 2014. Developing key performance indicators for the effectiveness of strategic environmental assessment in Ireland. Conference proceedings of International Association for Impact Assessment conference 2014, Viña del Mar; [accessed 14 Sep 2023]; Chile. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.565.6259&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Eales RP, Sheate WR. 2011. Effectiveness of policy level environmental and sustainability assessment: Challenges and lessons from recent practice. J Environ Assess Policy Manage. 13(1):39–65. doi: 10.1142/S146433321100378X.
   Google Scholar
• Enshassi AA, El Shorafa F. 2015. Key performance indicators for the maintenance of public hospitals buildings in the Gaza Strip. Facilities. 33(3/4):206–228. doi: 10.1108/F-07-2013-0053.
   Google Scholar
• EPA. 2015. Developing and assessing alternatives in strategic environmental assessment. Ireland: EPA; [accessed 14 Sep 2023]. https://www.epa.ie/publications/monitoring–assessment/assessment/strategic-environmental-assessment/developing-and-assessing-alternatives-in-strategic-environmental-assessment-sea.php.
   Google Scholar
• EPA. 2020. Second review of strategic environmental assessment effectiveness in Ireland. Report Nº 306. EPA Research Programme 2014–2020. [accessed 14 Sep 2023]. http://www.epa.ie/publications/research/environmental-technologies/Research_Report_306.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). 2012. Review of Effectiveness of SEA in Ireland. Ireland: EPA; [accessed 14 Sep 2023]. https://www.epa.ie/publications/monitoring–assessment/assessment/strategic-environmental-assessment/review-of-effectiveness-of-sea-in-ireland—main-report.php.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer TB, Gazzola P. 2006. SEA effectiveness criteria—equally valid in all countries? The case of Italy. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 26(4):396–409. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2005.11.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González A, Donnelly A, Jones M, Klostermann J, Groot A, Breil M. 2011. Community of practice approach to developing urban sustainability indicators. J Environ Assess Policy Manage. 13(4):591–617. doi: 10.1142/S1464333211004024.
   Google Scholar
• Hanna K, Noble BF. 2015. Using a Delphi study to identify effectiveness criteria for environmental assessment. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 33(2):116–125. doi: 10.1080/14615517.2014.992672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holliday M. 2021. How to choose the right KPIs for your business. [accessed 14 Sep 2023]. https://www.netsuite.com.au/portal/au/resource/articles/business-strategy/how-to-choose-kpis.shtml.
   Google Scholar
• Huang Y, Fischer TB, Xu H. 2017. The stakeholder analysis for SEA of Chinese foreign direct investment: the case of ‘one belt, one road’ initiative in Pakistan. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 35(2):158–171. doi: 10.1080/14615517.2016.1251698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahangirian M, Taylor SJE, Young T, Robinson S. 2017. Key performance indicators for successful simulation projects. J Oper Res Soc. 68:747–765. doi: 10.1057/jors.2016.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jha-Thakur U, Gazzola P, Peel D, Fischer TB, Kidd S. 2009. Effectiveness of strategic environmental assessment – the significance of learning. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 27(2):133–144. doi: 10.3152/146155109X454302.
   Google Scholar
• Li T, Want H, Dent B, Ren W, Xu H. 2016. Strategic environmental assessment performance factors and their interaction: An empirical study in China. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 59:55–60. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2016.03.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGinley O, Moran P, Goggins J. 2022. An assessment of the key performance indicators (KPIs) of energy efficient retrofits to existing residential buildings. Energies. 15(1):334. doi: 10.3390/en15010334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Regan B, Moles R, O’Mahoney T. 2016. A proposed framework for measuring SEA effectiveness in Ireland using key performance indicators, report. Science, Technology, Research And Innovation For The Environment (STRIVE) Programme 2007–2013.
   Google Scholar
• Pichler R. 2015. 10 tips for using key performance indicators. [accessed 14 Sep 2023]. https://www.romanpichler.com/blog/10-tips-for-product-key-performance-indicators-kpis/.
   Google Scholar
• Pope J, Bond A, Cameron C, Retief F, Morrison-Saunders A. 2018. Are current effectiveness criteria fit for purpose? Using a controversial strategic assessment as a test case. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 70:34–44. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2018.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rockart J. 1979. Chief executives define their own data needs. Harv Bus Rev. 52(2):81–93.
   Google Scholar
• Runhaar H, Driessen PJ. 2007. What makes strategic environmental assessment successful environmental assessment? The role of context in the contribution of SEA to decision-making. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 25(1):2–14. doi: 10.3152/146155107X190613.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler B. 1996. Environmental assessment in a changing world: Evaluating practice to improve performance. Ottawa: minister of supply and services Canada. [accessed 14 Sep 2023]. https://trid.trb.org/view/653262.
   Google Scholar
• Say N, Herberg A. 2016. The contribution of public participation to good-quality strategic environmental assessment. Fresenius Environ Bull. 25(12a):5751–5757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schomaker M. 1997 Jan 25–26. Development of environmental indicators in UNEP. Paper presented at the land quality indicators and their use in sustainable agriculture and rural development. 35–36. accessed 14 Sep 2023, Rome. FAO. http://www.fao.org/docrep/W4745E/w4745e07.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Sukman D. 2016. The institutional level of war. The strategy bridge. [accessed 14 Sep 2023]. https://thestrategybridge.org/the-bridge/2016/5/5/the-institutional-level-of-war.
   Google Scholar
• Therivel R, González A. 2019. Introducing SEA effectiveness. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 37(3–4):181–187. doi: 10.1080/14615517.2019.1601432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Buuren A, Nooteboom S. 2009. Evaluating strategic environmental assessment in the Netherlands: content, process and procedure as indissoluble criteria for effectiveness. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 27(2):145–154. doi: 10.3152/146155109X454311.
   Google Scholar
• Wang H, Bai H, Liu J, Xu H. 2012. Measurement indicators and an evaluation approach for assessing strategic environmental assessment effectiveness. Ecol Indic. 23:413–420. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.04.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Christensen P, Kørnøv L. 2013. Review of critical factors for SEA implementation. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 38:88–98. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2012.06.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zvelo. 2021. The strategic, operational and tactical levels of cyber threat intelligence. [accessed 14 Sep 2023]. https://zvelo.com/strategic-operational-tactical-cyber-threat-intelligence/.
   Google Scholar