References
- Aslomov, G. (2014) ‘Natural disasters and alternative modes of governance: The role of social networks and crowdsourcing platforms in Russia’, in S. Livingston and G. Walter-Drop (eds.), Bits and Atoms: Information and Communication Technology in Areas of Limited Statehood, New York: Oxford University Press. 30–46.
- Bauman, Z. (2013) ‘Solidarity: A word in search of flesh’, Eurozine https://www.eurozine.com/solidarity-a-word-in-search-of-flesh/ [Retrieved at: 2022. February 23rd].
- Belicza, É (2004) Egészségügyi Ellátórendszer. [The System of Healthcare Provision] NEJ/2004 Expert version, Johan Béla Országos Epidemiológiai Központ, Budapest.
- Bocz, J. and Kmetty, Z. (2008) ‘Egészségügyi nonprofit szervezetek. [NGOs in healthcare]’, Civil Szemle (Civic Review) 1-2: 39–60.
- Brkovic, C. (2017) Decentering Humanitarinism. AllegraLab. Anhrpology for Radical Optimism https://allegralaboratory.net/vernacular-humanitarianisms/ [Retrieved at: 2022. February 23rd].
- Della Porta, D. and Steinhilper, E. (2022) ‘Shrinking spaces and civil society contestations: an introduction’, in D. Della Porta and E. Steinhilper (eds.), Contentious Migrant Solidarity. Shrinking Spaces and Civil Society Contestations, Abingdon: Routledge. pp. 1-18.
- Eliasoph, N. (2013) The Politics of Volunteering, Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Fassin, D. (2012) Humanitarian Reason. A Moral History of the Present, Berkeley – Los Angeles – London: University of California Press.
- Feischmidt, M. and Zakariás, I. (2019) ‘Politics of care and compassion: civic help for refugees and Its political implications in Hungary. A mixed method approach’, in M. Feischmidt, L. Pries, and C. Cantat (eds.) Refugee Protection and Civil Society in Europe. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 59-100.
- Fejős, A. and Szikra, D. eds. (2020) (Támogatás és Támadás - Női Civil Szervezetek az Illiberális Demokráciában [Support and Attack. Women’s NGO’s in the Illiberal Democracy], Budapest: Társadalomtudományi Kutatóközpont.
- Firmin, A., Pousadela, I. M. and Tiwana, M. eds. (2020) Solidarity in the Time of COVID-19. Civil Society Responses to the Pandemic. CIVICUS.
- Gerő, M. (2020) ‘Elzárkózás és Fojtogató ölelés. A civil szervezetek és az állam átalakuló kapcsolata az erősödő kontroll korszakában’ [Isolation and Choking Embrace. The changing relations of civil organozations and the state in and Era of increasing control]’, in A. Fejős and D. Szikra (eds.), Támogatás és Támadás - Női Civil Szervezetek az Illiberális Demokráciában [Support and Attack. Women’s NGO’s in the Illiberal Democracy], Budapest: Társadalomtudományi Kutatóközpont. 8–30.
- Gerő, M., Susánszky, P., Kopper, Á and Tóth, G. (2020) ‘Strategies for survival: human rights organizations’ responses to the closing of political opportunity structures in Hungary.”‘, Politologicky Casopis 27(2): 119–39.
- Hartley, K. and Jarvis, D. S. L. (2020) ‘Policymaking in a Low-trust state: legitimacy, state capacity, and responses to COVID-19 in Hong Kong’, Policy and Society 39(3): 403–23.
- Jacobsson, K. and Korolczuk, E. (2020) ‘Mobilizing grassroots in the city: lessons for civil society research in central and Eastern Europe’, International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society 33: 125–42.
- Jessop, B. (2010) ‘Cultural political economy and critical policy Studies’, Critical Policy Studies 3(3/4): 336–56.
- Klein, N. (2007) The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism, New York: Metropolitan Books/Henry Holt.
- Koos, S. (2019) ‘Crises and the reconfiguration of solidarities in Europe – origins, scope, Variations’, European Societies 21(5): 629–48.
- Koos, S. and Seibel, V. (2019) ‘Solidarity with refugees across Europe. A comparative analysis of public support for helping forced migrants’, European Societies 21(5): 704–28.
- Krizsán, A. and Roggeband, C. (2021) ‘Reconfiguring state–movement relations in the context of de-democratization’, Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 28(3): 604–628. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxab027
- Körösényi, A., Szabó A. and Böcskei, B. (2020) ‘Előszó [Foreword]’, in A. Körösényi, A. Szabó and B. Böcskei, (eds.), Vírusba Oltott Politika: Világjárvány és Politikatudomány [Politics Injected Into the Virus: Pandemic and Political Science], Budapest: Napvilág Kiadó, pp. 7-15.
- Ökotárs (2021) Második Hullám. Civil szervezeti jó gyakorlatok a koronavírus-járványban. [The Second wave. Civil organization good practices in the coronavirus epidemic. 2020]. https://okotars.hu/sites/default/files/downloads/masodik_hullam_jogyakorlatok.pdf [Retrieved at: 2022. February 23rd].
- Kövér, Á (2021) ‘The relationship between government and civil society in the Era of COVID-19’, Nonprofit Policy Forum 12(1): 1–24.
- Mikecz, D. and Oross, D. (2020) ‘Hol szükség, jön a segítség? Politikai részvétel, önkénteskedés a COVID-19-járvány idején. [Where does help come from? political participation, volunteering during the COVID-19 epidemic]’, In: A. Körösényi, A. Szabó, and B. Böcskei (eds.), Vírusba Oltott Politika: Világjárvány és Politikatudomány [Politics Injected Into the Virus: Pandemic and Political Science], Budapest: Napvilág, pp. 185-200.
- Najam, A. (2000) ‘The four C’s of government third sector-government Relations’, Nonprofit Management and Leadership 10(4): 375–95.
- Neumann, E. (2021) ‘Társadalmi szolidaritás és otthonoktatás a koronavírus első hullámában’, Regio 29(2): 105–29.
- NIOK (2021) 200 millió feletti adomány gyűlt össze társadalmi ügyekre - A koronavírus megnyitotta a pénztárcákat [Over 200 million have been raised in donations for social affairs - The coronavirus has opened wallets) https://www.nonprofit.hu/hirek/ [Retrieved at: 2022. February 23rd].
- OECD (2017) Magyarország Egészségügyi Országprofil 2017 [Hungary. State of Health in 2017]. https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/health/files/state/docs/chp_hu_hungary.pdf [Retrieved at: 2022. February 23rd].
- Pirro, A. L. P. and della Porta, D. (2021) ‘On corruption and state capture: The struggle of anti-corruption activism in Hungary’, Europe-Asia Studies 73(3): 433–50.
- Shachar, I. (2020) Revisiting Solidarity: Developing Exit Strategies from a Post-political Pandemic’, Society + Space. July 20th, https://www.societyandspace.org/articles/revisiting-solidarity-developing-exit-strategies-from-a-post-political-pandemic [Retrieved at: 2022. February 23rd].
- Sik, D. and Zakariás, I. (2021) ‘The field of solidarity in times of a pandemic. results of an online survey in Hungary’, Intersections. East European Journal of Society and Politics 7(3): 36–58.
- Solnit, R. (2009) A Paradise Built in Hell: The Extraordinary Communities That Arise in Disaster, New York: Penguin.
- Spear, R., Erdi, G., Parker, M. A. and Anastasiadis, M. (2020) Innovations in Citizen Response to Crises: Volunteerism & Social Mobilization During COVID-19’ in: Interface: a journal for and about social movements. https://www.interfacejournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Spear-et-al.pdf [Retrieved at: 2022. February 23rd].
- Swiney, C. F. (2019) The Counter-Associational Revolution: The Rise, Spread, and Contagion of Restrictive Civil Society Laws in the World’s Strongest Democratic States, 43 Fordham Int’l L.J.
- Szombati, K. (2017) From Authoritarian Populism to Authoritarian Statism in Hungary: A model for ruling the semi-periphery’, Paper presented at the 16th Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association, Washington D. C., November 29-December 3.
- Ticktin, M. (2011) Casualities of Care. Immigration and the Politics of Humanitarianism in France, Berkley – Los Angeles – London: University of California Press.
- Vandevoordt, R. and Verschraegen, G. (2019) ‘The European refugee controversy: civil solidarity, cultural imaginaries and political change’, Social Inclusion 7(2): 48–52.
- Youngs, R. ed. (2020) Global Civil Society in the Shadow of Coronavirus, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. https://carnegieendowment.org/files/Youngs-Coronavirus_Civil_Society_final.pdf [Retrieved at: 2022. February 23rd].
- Zentai, V. (2020) ‘Szolidaritási kezdeményezések a gazdaság és a munka világában. [Solidarity initiatives in the world of economy and work]’, Regio 29(3): 130–55.