No evidence of direct peer influence in upper-secondary track choice—evidence from Hungary

References

• Abadie, A., Athey, S., Imbens, G. and Wooldridge, J. (2017) When should you adjust standard errors for clustering? In National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series (Issue Working Paper 24003). National Bureau of Economic Research. http://www.nber.org/papers/w24003.
   Google Scholar
• Abrams, D. and Hogg, M. A. (1990) ‘Social identification, self-categorization and social Influence’, European Review of Social Psychology 1(1): 195–228. doi:10.1080/14792779108401862.
   Google Scholar
• Alwin, D. F. and Otto, L. B. (1977) ‘High school context effects on Aspirations’, Sociology of Education 50(4): 259–273. doi:10.2307/2112499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anelli, M. and Peri, G. (2019) ‘The effects of high school peers’ gender on college major, college performance and Income', The Economic Journal 129(618): 553–602. doi:10.1111/ecoj.12556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arcidiacono, P. and Nicholson, S. (2005) ‘Peer effects in medical school’, Journal of Public Economics 89(2–3): 327–350. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2003.10.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. and Vincent, C. (1998) ‘I heard It on the grapevine’: ‘hot’ knowledge and school choice’, British Journal of Sociology of Education 19(3): 377–400. doi:10.1080/0142569980190307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barone, C., Assirelli, G., Abbiati, G., Argentin, G. and De Luca, D. (2018) ‘Social origins, relative risk aversion and track choice’, Acta Sociologica 61(4): 441–459. doi:10.1177/0001699317729872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F. and Leary, M. R. (1995) 'The Need to Belong: Desire for Interpersonal Attachments as a Fundamental Human Motivation', Psychological Bulletin 117(3): 497–529. doi:10.4324/9781351153683-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bettinger, E. P., Long, B. T., Oreopoulos, P. and Sanbonmatsu, L. (2012) ‘The role of application assistance and information in college decisions: results from the H&R block fafsa experiment*’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics 127(3): 1205–1242. doi:10.1093/qje/qjs017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchmann, C. and Dalton, B. (2002) ‘Interpersonal influences and educational aspirations in 12 countries: The importance of institutional context’, Sociology of Education 75(2): 99–122. doi:10.2307/3090287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosnoe, R., Cavanagh, S. and Elder, G. H. (2003) ‘Adolescent friendships as academic resources: The intersection of friendship, race, and school disadvantage’, Sociological Perspectives 46(3): 331–352. doi:10.1525/sop.2003.46.3.331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, J. A. (1966) ‘The campus as a frog pond: An application of the theory of relative deprivation to career decisions of college Men’, American Journal of Sociology 72(1): 17–31. doi:10.1086/224257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Giorgi, G., Pellizzari, M. and Redaelli, S. (2010) ‘Identification of social interactions through partially overlapping peer groups’, American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 2(2): 241–275. doi:10.1257/app.2.2.241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deutsch, M. and Gerard, H. B. (1955) ‘A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment’, The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 51(3): 629–636. doi:10.1037/h0046408.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ehlert, M., Finger, C., Rusconi, A. and Solga, H. (2017) ‘Applying to college: Do information deficits lower the likelihood of college-eligible students from less-privileged families to pursue their college intentions?’, Social Science Research 67: 193–212. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2017.04.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, J. M. (2012) ‘Similarity in peer college preferences: New evidence from Texas’, Social Science Research 41(2): 321–330. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2011.11.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, J. M. (2015) ‘Social interactions and college enrollment: A combined school fixed effects/instrumental variables approach’, Social Science Research 52: 494–507. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.03.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gale, D. and Shapley, L. S. (1962) ‘College admissions and the stability of Marriage’, The American Mathematical Monthly 69(1): 9–15. doi:10.2307/2312726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. S. (1973) ‘The strength of weak Ties’, American Journal of Sociology 78(6): 1360–1380. doi:10.1086/225469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamm, J. V. (2000) ‘Do birds of a feather flock together? The variable bases for african American, Asian American, and European American adolescents’ selection of similar friends’, Developmental Psychology 36(2): 209–219. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.36.2.209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn, D., Keller, T. and Róbert, P. (2016) 'Early tracking and competition – a recipe for major inequalities in Hungary', in Hans-Peter Blossfeld , S. Buchholz, J. Skopek, and M. Triventi (eds.), Models of secondary education and social inequality: An international comparison (EduLIFE Lifelong Learning Series, 3), Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 129–147.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, M. (2013) 'Determined to succeed?. In Michelle Jackson (eds.), Performance versus choice in educational attainment, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jonsson, J. O. and Mood, C. (2008) ‘Choice by contrast in Swedish schools: How peers’ achievement affects educational Choice’, Social Forces 87(2): 741–765. doi:10.1353/sof.0.0135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandel, D. B. (1978) ‘Homophily, selection, and socialization in adolescent Friendships’, American Journal of Sociology 84(2): 427–436. doi:10.1086/226792.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, T. and Takács, K. (2019) ‘Peers that count: The influence of deskmates on test scores’, Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 62(May): 1–14. doi:10.1016/j.rssm.2019.05.003.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, T., Takács, K. and Elwert, F. (2022) ‘Yes, You Can! effects of transparent admission standards on high school track choice: A randomized field Experiment’, Social Forces 101(1): 341–368. doi:10.1093/sf/soab111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley, H. H. (1952). Two functions of reference groups. In G. E. Swanson, T. M. Newcomb, & E. L. Hartley (Eds.), Readings in Social Psychology (pp. 410–14). Holt: Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, S. P., Pekkarinen, T., Sarvimäki, M. and Uusitalo, R. (2020) ‘Post-secondary education and information on labor market prospects: A randomized field experiment’, Labour Economics 66(January): 1–14. doi:10.1016/j.labeco.2020.101888.
   Google Scholar
• Kogan, Irena, Gebel, Michael and Noelke, Clemens (2012) 'Educational Systems and Inequalities in Educational Attainment in Central and Eastern European Countries', Studies of Transition States and Societies 4(1): 69–83.
   Google Scholar
• Lauen, D. L. (2007) ‘Contextual explanations of school Choice’, Sociology of Education 80(3): 179–209. doi:10.1177/003804070708000301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyle, D. S. (2007) ‘Estimating and interpreting peer and role model effects from randomly assigned social groups at west Point’, Review of Economics and Statistics 89(2): 289–299. doi:10.1162/rest.89.2.289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manski, C. F. (1993) ‘Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection Problem’, The Review of Economic Studies 60(3): 531–542.doi:10.2307/2298123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W. (1987) ‘The Big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-Concept’, Journal of Educational Psychology 79(3): 280–295. doi:10.1037//0022-0663.79.3.280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W. and Parker, J. W. (1984) ‘Determinants of student self-concept: Is it better to be a relatively large fish in a small pond even if you don't learn to swim as well?’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 47(1): 213–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, S. E. (2002) ‘How economic segregation affects children’s educational Attainment’, Social Forces 81(1): 153–176. doi:10.1353/sof.2002.0053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W. (1970) ‘High school effects on college intentions’, American Journal of Sociology 76(1): 59–70. doi:10.1086/224906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD (2008) Education at a Glance 2008: OECD Indicators. In Education. OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/eag-2008-en.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenqvist, E. (2018) ‘Two functions of peer influence on upper-secondary education application Behavior’, Sociology of Education 91(1): 72–89. doi:10.1177/0038040717746113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacerdote, B. I. (2001) ‘Peer effects with random assignment: results for dartmouth roommates’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics 116(2): 681–704. doi:10.1162/00335530151144131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slack, K., Mangan, J., Hughes, A. and Davies, P. (2014) ‘‘Hot’, ‘cold’ and ‘warm’ information and higher education decision-making’, British Journal of Sociology of Education 35(2): 204–223. doi:10.1080/01425692.2012.741803.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Berg, Y. H. M. and Cillessen, A. H. N. (2015) ‘Peer status and classroom seating arrangements: A social relations analysis’, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 130: 19–34. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2014.09.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Keyserlingk, L., Becker, M., Jansen, M. and Maaz, K. (2020) ‘Leaving the pond—choosing an ocean: effects of student composition on STEM major choices at university’, Journal of Educational Psychology 112(4): 751–764. doi:10.1037/edu0000378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zölitz, U. and Feld, J. (2021) ‘The effect of peer gender on major choice in business school’, Management Science 67(11): 6963–6979. doi:10.1287/mnsc.2020.3860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar