366
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Motivation in the dynamics of European youth migration

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 829-858 | Received 16 Sep 2020, Accepted 17 Feb 2023, Published online: 28 Feb 2023

References

  • Alwin, D. F. and Hauser, R. M. (1975) ‘The decomposition of effects in path analysis’, American Sociological Review 40(1): 37–47.
  • Arnold, K. F., Harrison, W. J., Heppenstall, A. J. and Gilthorpe, M. S. (2019) ‘DAG-informed regression modelling, agent-based modelling and microsimulation modelling: a critical comparison of methods for causal inference’, International Journal of Epidemiology 48(1): 243–53. doi:10.1093/ije/dyy260.
  • Austin, J. T. and Vancouver, J. B. (1996) ‘Goal constructs in psychology: structure, process, and content’, Psychological Bulletin 120(3): 338–75. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.120.3.338.
  • Azose, J. J. and Raftery, A. E. (2019) ‘Estimation of emigration, return migration, and transit migration between all pairs of countries’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116(1): 116–22. doi:10.1073/pnas.172233411.
  • Beenstock, M., Ramos, R. and Suriñach, J. (2015) ‘Migration, human capital and social capital: lessons for the EU neighbouring countries’, International Journal of Manpower 36(4): 434–40.
  • Benedict, R. (1960[1934]) Patterns of Culture, London: Routledge and Kegan.
  • Benson, M. and O'Reilly, K. (eds.). (2009). Lifestyle Migration: Expectations, Aspirations and Experiences, Farnham: Ashgate.
  • Boneva, B. S. and Frieze, I. H. (2001) ‘Toward a concept of a migrant personality’, Journal of Social Issues 57(3): 477–91. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00224.
  • Bygnes, S. (2017) ‘Are they leaving because of the crisis? The sociological significance of anomie as a motivation for migration’, Sociology 51(2): 258–73. doi:10.1177/0038038515589300.
  • Cassarino, J. P. (2004) ‘Theorising return migration: the conceptual approach to return migrants revisited’, International Journal on Multicultural Societies (IJMS) 6(2): 253–79.
  • Ciobanu, R. O. (2015) ‘Multiple migration flows of Romanians’, Mobilities 10(3): 466–85. doi:10.1080/17450101.2013.863498.
  • Clark, W. A. (2013) ‘Life course events and residential change: unpacking age effects on the probability of moving’, Journal of Population Research 30: 319–34. doi:10.1007/s12546-013-9116-y.
  • Clark, W. A. and Maas, R. (2015) ‘Interpreting migration through the prism of reasons for moves’, Population, Space and Place 21: 54–67. doi:10.1002/psp.1844.
  • Clarke, A. E. (2008) ‘Sex/gender and race/ethnicity in the legacy of Anselm Strauss’, in N. K. Denzin, J. Salvo, and M. Washington, (eds.), Studies in Symbolic Interaction, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 161–76.
  • De Haas, H. (2010) ‘The internal dynamics of migration processes: A theoretical inquiry’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 36(10): 1587–617. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2010.489361.
  • De Jong, G. F. and Fawcett, J. T. (1981) ‘Motivations for migration: an assessment and a value-expectancy research model’, in G. F. De Jong and R. W. Gardner (eds.), Migration Decision Making: Multidisciplinary Approaches to Microlevel Studies in Developed and Developing Countries, New York: Pergamon, pp. 13–58.
  • Docquier, F., Peri, G. and Ruyssen, I. (2014) ‘The cross-country determinants of potential and actual migration’, International Migration Review 48(1): 37–99. doi:10.1111/imre.12137.
  • Dommermuth, L. and Klüsener, S. (2019) ‘Formation and realisation of moving intentions across the adult life course’, Population, Space and Place 25(5): e2212. doi:10.1002/psp.2212.
  • Favell, A. (2008) Eurostars and Eurocities. Free Movement and Mobility in an Integrating Europe, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Findlay, A., McCollum, D., Coulter, R. and Gayle, V. (2015) ‘New mobilities across the life course: A framework for analysing demographically linked drivers of migration’, Population, Space and Place 21(4): 390–402.
  • Fischer-Souan, M. (2019) ‘Between ‘labour migration’and ‘new European mobilities’: motivations for migration of southern and eastern Europeans in the EU’, Social Inclusion 7(4): 7–17.
  • Gemi, E. and Triandafyllidou, A. (2021) Rethinking Migration and Return in Southeastern Europe: Albanian Mobilities to and from Italy and Greece, London: Taylor and Francis.
  • Gosnell, H. and Abrams, J. (2011) ‘Amenity migration: diverse conceptualizations of drivers, socioeconomic dimensions, and emerging challenges’, GeoJournal 76: 303–22. doi:10.1007/s10708-009-9295-4.
  • Hagan, J. M. and Thomas Wassink, J. (2020) ‘Return migration around the world: an integrated agenda for future research’, Annual Review of Sociology 46(1): 533–52. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-120319-015855.
  • Hox, J., Moerbeek, M. and van de Schoot, R. (2010) Multilevel Analysis: Techniques and Applications, (2nd ed.) Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203852279.
  • King, R. (2018) ‘Theorising new European youth mobilities’, Population, Space and Place 24(1): e2117. doi:10.1002/psp.2117.
  • King, R. and Kuschminder, K. (2022) ‘Introduction: definitions, typologies and theories of return migration’, in R. King and K. Kuschminder (eds.), Handbook of Return Migration, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 1–22.
  • Lee, E. S. (1966) ‘A theory of migration’, Demography 3(1): 47–57.
  • Massey, D. S. (1986) ‘The settlement process among Mexican migrants to the United States’, American Sociological Review 51(5): 670–84. doi:10.2307/2095492.
  • Massey, D. S., Arango, J., Hugo, G., Kouaouci, A. and Pellegrino, A. (1999) Worlds in Motion: Understanding International Migration at the End of the Millennium, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Paasi, A. (2002) ‘Place and region: regional worlds and words’, Progress in Human Geography 26: 802–11. doi:10.1191/0309132502ph404pr.
  • Pahl, R. and Spencer, L. (2004) ‘Personal communities: not simply families of “fate” or “choice”’, Current Sociology 52: 199–221. doi:10.1177/0011392104041808.
  • Petersen, W. (1958) ‘A general typology of migration’, American Sociological Review 23(3): 256–66.
  • Sandu, D. and De Jong, G. F. (1998) ‘Political change, ideology, and migration Intentions’, Romanian Journal of Sociology 9(1): 24–35.
  • Sandu, D., Toth, G. and Tudor, E. (2018) ‘The nexus of motivation–experience in the migration process of young Romanians’, Population, Space and Place 24: e2114. doi:10.1002/psp.2114.
  • Schwartz, S. H. and Sortheix, F. (2018) ‘Values and subjective wellbeing’, in S. E. Diener, Oishi and L. Tay (eds.), Handbook of Well-Being, Salt Lake City: DEF Publishers, pp. 1–25.
  • Tartakovsky, E. and Schwartz, S. H. (2001) ‘Motivation for emigration, values, wellbeing, and identification among young Russian Jews’, International Journal of Psychology 36(2): 88–99.
  • Thomas, S. and Znaniecki, F. (1918) The Polish Peasant in Europe and America, Vol. 1, part. 1: Univ of Illinois Pr.
  • Toth-Bos, A., Wisse, B. and Farago, K. (2019) ‘Goal pursuit during the three stages of the migration process’, International Journal of Intercultural Relations 73: 25–42. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2019.07.008.
  • Treiman, D. J. (2014) Quantitative Data Analysis: Doing Social Research to Test Ideas, San Francisco: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Ullmann, S. H., Goldman, N. and Massey, D. S. (2011) ‘Healthier before they migrate, less healthy when they return? The health of returned migrants in Mexico’, Social Science and Medicine 73: 421–8. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.05.037.
  • Urry, J. (2012) ‘Social networks, mobile lives and social Inequalities’, Journal of Transport Geography 21: 24–30. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.10.003.
  • Westreich, D. and Greenland, S. (2013) ‘The table 2 fallacy: presenting and interpreting confounder and modifier coefficients’, American Journal of Epidemiology 177(4): 292–8. doi:10.1093/aje/kws412.
  • Williams, A. M., Jephcote, C., Janta, H. and Li, G. (2018) ‘The migration intentions of young adults in Europe: a comparative, multilevel analysis’, Population, Space and Place 24: e2123. doi:10.1002/psp.2123.
  • Winchie, D. B. and Carment, D. W. (1989) ‘Migration and motivation: the migrant's perspective’, International Migration Review 23: 96–104. doi:10.1177/019791838902300105.
  • Zelinsky, W. (1971) ‘The hypothesis of the mobility transition’, Geographical Review 61: 219–49. doi:10.2307/213996.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.