2,401
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Cleavage politics in ordinary reasoning: How common sense divides

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Abts, K., Dalle Mulle, E., Kessel, S. and Michel, E. (2021) ‘The welfare agenda of the populist radical right in Western Europe: combining welfare chauvinism, producerism and populism’, Swiss Political Science Review 27(1): 21–40.
  • Achen, C. and Bartels, L. (2016) Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Achterberg, P. and Houtman, D. (2009) ‘Ideologically illogical? Why do the lower-educated Dutch display so little value coherence?’, Social Forces 87(3): 1649–70.
  • Althaus, S. L. (2003) Collective Preferences in Democratic Politics: Opinion Surveys and the Will of the People, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bartolini, S. and Mair, P. (1990) Identity, Competition, and Electoral Availability: The Stabilisation of European Electorates, 1885–1985, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Beck, L. and Westheuser, L. (2022) ‘Verletzte Ansprüche. Zur Grammatik des politischen Bewusstseins von ArbeiterInnen’, Berliner Journal für Soziologie 32(2): 279–316.
  • Beramendi, P., Häusermann, S., Kitschelt, H. and Kriesi, H. (eds.). (2015). The Politics of Advanced Capitalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Berger, P. L. and Luckmann, T. (1990) The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge, New York: Anchor Books.
  • Bohnsack, R. (2014) ‘Documentary method’, in U. Flick (ed.), The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis, London: Sage, pp. 217–33.
  • Bornschier, S. (2010) Cleavage Politics and the Populist Right: The New Cultural Conflict in Western Europe, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
  • Bornschier, S., Häusermann, S., Zollinger, D. and Colombo, C. (2021) ‘How ‘us’ and ‘them’ relates to voting behavior—social structure, social identities, and electoral choice’, Comparative Political Studies 54(12): 2087–122.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1984) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1986) ‘The forms of capital’, in J. G. Richardson (ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, Westport: Greenwood, pp. 241–58
  • Bourdieu, P. (1989) ‘Social space and symbolic power’, Sociological Theory 7(1): 14–25.
  • Boyer, P. (2018) Minds Make Societies: How Cognition Explains the World Humans Create, New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Brady, H. E. and Collier, D. (2010) Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards, Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  • Brensinger, J. and Sotoudeh, R. (2022) ‘Party, race, and neutrality: investigating the interdependence of attitudes toward social groups’, American Sociological Review 87(6): 1049–93.
  • Broćić, M. and Miles, A. (2021) ‘College and the ‘culture war’: assessing higher education’s influence on moral attitudes’, American Sociological Review 86(5): 856–95.
  • Brodkin, E. Z. (2017) ‘The ethnographic turn in political science: reflections on the state of the art’, Political Science & Politics 50(1): 131–4.
  • Calhoun, C. (2002) ‘The class consciousness of frequent travelers. Toward a critique of actually existing cosmopolitanism’, South Atlantic Quarterly 101(4): 869–97.
  • Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E. and Stokes, D. E. (1960) The American Voter, New York: John Wiley.
  • Colombo, C. and Steenbergen, M. R. (2020) ‘Heuristics and biases in political decision making’, in P. Redlawsk (ed.), Oxford Encyclopedia of Political Decision Making, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Converse, P. E. (1964) ‘The nature of belief systems in mass publics’, in D. E. Apter (ed.), Ideology and Discontent, New York: The Free Press, pp. 206–261.
  • Cramer, K. J. (2016) The Politics of Resentment: Rural Consciousness in Wisconsin and the Rise of Scott Walker, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Czarniawska, B. (2004) Narratives in Social Science Research, London: Sage.
  • Damhuis, K. (2020) Roads to the Radical Right: Understanding Different Forms of Electoral Support for Radical Right-Wing Parties in France and the Netherlands, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Davis, D. W. and Wilson, D. C. (2022) Racial Resentment in the Political Mind, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Della Carpini, M. X. and Keeter, S. (1996) What Americans Know About Politics and Why It Matters, New Haven, London: Yale University Press.
  • De Vries, C. E. and Hobolt, S. B. (2020) Political Entrepreneurs: The Rise of Challenger Parties in Europe, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • De Wilde, P., Koopmans, R., Merkel, W., Strijbis, O. and & Zürn, M. (eds.), (2019) The Struggle Over Borders: Cosmopolitanism and Communitarianism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • De Wilde, P., Langsaether, P. E. and Özdemir, S. (2022) ‘Critical junctures and the crystallization of cosmopolitanism and communitarianism’, European Political Science Review 15: 157–76.
  • Duchesne, S., Frazer, E., Haegel, F. and Van Ingelgom, V. (2013) Citizens’ Reactions to European Integration: Overlooking Europe, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Duvoux, N. (2009) L’Autonomie des Assistés, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
  • Elchardus, M. and Spruyt, B. (2009) ‘The culture of academic disciplines and the sociopolitical attitudes of students: a test of selection and socialization effects.’, Social Science Quarterly 90(2): 446–60.
  • Elder, E. M. and O’Brian, N. A. (2022) ‘Social groups as the source of political belief systems: fresh evidence on an old theory’, American Political Science Review 116(4): 1407–1424.
  • Epstein, S. (2010) ‘Demystifying intuition: what it is, what it does, and how it does It’, Psychological Inquiry 21(4): 295–312.
  • Fitzgerald, J. (2018) Close to Home: Local Ties and Voting Radical Right in Europe, New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Flemmen, M. P., Jarness, V. and Rosenlund, L. (2022) ‘Intersections of class, lifestyle and politics: new observations from Norway’, Berliner Journal für Soziologie 32(2): 243–77.
  • Ford, R. and Jennings, W. (2020) ‘The changing cleavage politics of Western Europe’, Annual Review of Political Science 23(1): 295–314.
  • Gamson, W. A. (1992) Talking Politics, New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Gaxie, D. (1978) Le Cens Caché: Inégalités Culturelles et Ségrégation Politique, Paris: Le Seuil.
  • Gaxie, D. (2011) ‘What we know and do not know about citizens’ attitudes towards Europe’, in D. Gaxie, N. Hubé and J. Rowell (eds.), Perceptions of Europe: A Comparative Sociology of European Attitudes, Colchester: ECPR Press, pp. 1–16.
  • Gaxie, D. (2013) ‘Retour sur les modes de production des opinions politiques’, in P. Coulangeon and J. Duval (eds.), Trente ans après La Distinction de Pierre Bourdieu, Paris: La Découverte, 293-306.
  • Geertz, C. (1974) ‘‘From the native’s point of view’. On the nature of anthropological understanding’, Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 28(1): 26–45.
  • Geertz, C. (1983) ‘Common sense as a cultural system. In Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology, New York: Basic Books, pp. 73–93.
  • Gest, J. (2016) The New Minority: White Working Class Politics in an Age of Immigration and Inequality, New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Gidron, N., Adams, J. and Horne, W. (2020) American Affective Polarization in Comparative Perspective (Elements in American Politics), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Global Migration Data Portal (2023) Migration Shares. [Online]. Available at: https://www.migrationdataportal.org/dashboard/compare-geographic (Accessed: 21 July 2023).
  • Gramsci, A. (1971) ‘Selections from the prison notebooks’, in Q. Hoare and G. Nowell-Smith (eds.), London: Lawrence & Wishart.
  • Haidt, J. (2012) The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion. New York: Pantheon Books.
  • Hall, P. A., Evans, G. and Kim, S. I. (2023) Political Change and Electoral Coalitions in Western Democracies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Häusermann, S. and Kriesi, H. (2015) ‘What do voters want? Dimensions and configurations in individual-level preferences and party choice’, in P. Beramendi, S. Häusermann, H. Kitschelt and H. Kriesi (eds.), The Politics of Advanced Capitalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 202–230.
  • Helbling, M. and Jungkunz, S. (2020) ‘Social divides in the age of globalization’, West European Politics 43: 1187–210.
  • Hochschild, A. (1979) ‘Emotion work, feeling rules, and social structure’, American Journal of Sociology 85(3): 551–75.
  • Hochschild, J. L. (1986) What’s Fair. American Beliefs About Distributive Justice, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Hochschild, A. (2016) Strangers in Their Own Land: Anger and Mourning on the American Right, New York: New Press.
  • Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2018) ‘Cleavage theory meets Europe’s crises: Lipset, Rokkan, and the transnational cleavage’, Journal of European Public Policy 25(1): 109–35.
  • Hooghe, L., Marks, G. and Kamphorst, J. (2022) “Field of Education and the Transnational Cleavage.” Paper Presented at the Conference “Cleavage Formation in the 21st Century,” University of Zurich, July 18/19th 2022.
  • Igarashi, H. and Saito, H. (2014) ‘Cosmopolitanism as cultural capital: exploring the intersection of globalization, education and stratification’, Cultural Sociology 8(3): 222–39.
  • Inglehart, R. (1990) Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Ivaldi, G. and Mazzoleni, O. (2019) ‘Economic populism and sovereigntism: the economic supply of European radical rightwing populist parties’, European Political Science Review 11(3): 335–355.
  • Iyengar, S., Lelkes, Y., Levendusky, M., Malhotra, N. and Westwood, S. J. (2019) ‘The origins and consequences of affective polarization in the United States’, Annual Review of Political Science 22(1): 129–46.
  • Jarness, V., Flemmen, M. P. and Rosenlund, L. (2019) ‘From class politics to classed politics’, Sociology 53(5): 879–99.
  • Jarness, V. and Friedman, S. (2017) ‘‘I’m not a snob, but … ’: class boundaries and the downplaying of difference’, Poetics 61: 14–25.
  • Jost, J. T., Federico, C. M. and Napier, J. L. (2009) ‘Political ideology: its structure, functions, and elective affinities’, Annual Review of Psychology 60(1): 307–37.
  • Kelle, U. (2001) ‘Sociological explanations between micro and macro and the integration of qualitative and quantitative methods’, Forum Qualitative Social Research 2(1): 95–117.
  • Kelle, U. and Kluge, S. (2010) Vom Einzelfall zum Typus, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
  • Kinder, D. R. (2006) ‘Belief systems today’, Critical Review 18(1–3): 197–216.
  • Kinder, D. R. and Kalmoe, N. P. (2017) Neither Liberal, nor Conservative: Ideological Innocence in the American Public, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Kitschelt, H. and Rehm, P. (2014) ‘Occupations as a site of political preference formation’, Comparative Political Studies 47(12): 1670–706.
  • Kochuyt, T. and Abts, K. (2017) Ongehoord Populisme: Gesprekken Met Vlaams Belang-Kiezers Over Stad, Migranten, Welvaartsstaat, Integratie En Politiek, Brussel: ASP.
  • Kohn, M. (1977) Class and Conformity. A Study in Values, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Koning, E. E. and Puddister, K. (2022) ‘Common sense justice? Comparing populist and mainstream right positions on law and order in 24 countries’, Party Politics, Online First. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688221131983.
  • Kriesi, H., et al. (2008) West European Politics in the Age of Globalization, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kriesi, H. (2010) ‘Restructuration of partisan politics and the emergence of a new cleavage based on values’, West European Politics 33(3): 673–85.
  • Kriesi, H., et al. (2012) Political Conflict in Western Europe, Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kurer, T. and Palier, B. (2019) ‘Shrinking and shouting: the political revolt of the declining middle in times of employment polarization’, Research & Politics 6(1): 1–6.
  • Kusow, A. M. and deLisi, M. (2021) ‘Attitudes toward immigration as a sense of group position’, Sociological Quarterly 62(2): 323–42.
  • Lakoff, G. (2016) Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Lamont, M. (1987) ‘Cultural capital and the liberal political attitudes of professionals’, American Journal of Sociology 92(6): 1501–6.
  • Lamont, M. (2000) The Dignity of Working Men: Morality and the Boundaries of Race, Class, and Immigration, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Langsæther, P. E. and Stubager, R. (2019) ‘Old wine in new bottles? Reassessing the effects of globalization on political preferences in Western Europe’, European Journal of Political Research 58(4): 1213–33.
  • Lévi-Strauss, C. (1962) La Pensée Sauvage, Paris: Plon.
  • Lipset, S. M. and Rokkan, S. (1967) ‘Cleavage structures, party systems, and voter alignments: An introduction’, in S. M. Lipset and S. Rokkan (eds.), Party Systems and Voter Alignments, New York: Free Press, pp. 1–64.
  • Lux, T., Mau, S. and Jacobi, A. (2022) ‘Neue Ungleichheitsfragen, neue Cleavages? Ein internationaler Vergleich der Einstellungen in vier Ungleichheitsfeldern’, Berliner Journal für Soziologie 32(2): 173–212.
  • Mason, L. (2018) Uncivil Agreement: How Politics Became Our Identity, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Mau, S. (2009) ‘Who are the globalizers? The role of education and educational elites’, in L. Meier and H. Lange (eds.), The New Middle Classes. Globalizing Lifestyles, Consumerism and Environmental Concern, Wiesbaden: Springer VS, 65–79.
  • Mercier, H. (2020) Not Born Yesterday: The Science of Who We Trust and What We Believe, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Miles, A. and Vaisey, S. (2015) ‘Morality and politics. Comparing alternate theories’, Social Science Research 53: 252–69.
  • Moore, E. G. (1993) ‘A defense of common sense’, in T. Baldwin (ed.), G.E. Moore Selected Writings, New York: Routledge, pp. 106–133.
  • Mouffe, C. (2013) Agonistics. Thinking the World Politically, London: Verso.
  • Oesch, D. (2012) ‘The class basis of the cleavage between the new left and the radical right. An analysis for Austria, Denmark, Norway and Switzerland’, in J. Rydgren (ed.), Class Politics and the Radical Right, London: Routledge, pp. 31–51.
  • Oesch, D. and Rennwald, L. (2018) ‘Electoral competition in Europe’s new tripolar political space: class voting for the left, centre-right and radical right’, European Journal of Political Research 57(4): 783–807.
  • Ollrogge, R. and Sawert, T. (2022) ‘The cultural dimension of the globalization divide. Do lifestyle signals affect cosmopolitans’ willingness to interact?’, Zeitschrift für Soziologie 51(3): 263–77.
  • Patton, M. Q. (1990) Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  • Popkin, S. L. (1992) The Reasoning Voter. Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns, Chicago and London: Chicago University Press.
  • Prasad, M., et al. (2009) ‘The undeserving rich: ‘moral values’ and the white working class’, Sociological Forum 24(2): 225–53.
  • Prieur, A. and Savage, M. (2013) ‘Emerging forms of cultural capital’, European Societies 15(2): 246–67.
  • Rathgeb, P. (2021) ‘Makers against takers: The socio-economic ideology and policy of the Austrian freedom party’, West European Politics 44(3): 635–60.
  • Reckwitz, A. (2020) The Society of Singularities, Cambridge: Polity.
  • Rennwald, L. and Evans, G. (2014) ‘When supply creates demand: social democratic party strategies and the evolution of class voting’, West European Politics 37(5): 1108–35.
  • Roosens, E. (2000) ‘National identity, social order and political system in Western Europe: primordial autochthony’, in E. Scheuch and D. Sciulli (eds.), Societies, Corporations and the Nation State, Leiden: Brill, 162–80
  • Rovny, J. and Polk, J. (2019) ‘Still blurry? Economic salience, position and voting for radical right parties in Western Europe’, European Journal of Political Research 59(2): 248–68.
  • Runciman, W. G. (1966) Relative Deprivation and Social Justice : A Study of Attitudes to Social Inequality in Twentieth-Century England. Reports of the Institute of Community Studies, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • Ryan, G. W. and Bernard, H. R. (2003) ‘Techniques to identify themes’, Field Methods 15(1): 85–109.
  • Sakslind, R. and Skarpenes, O. (2014) ‘Morality and the middle class’, Journal of Social History 48(2): 313–40.
  • Schmidt, V. A. (2008) ‘Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse’, Annual Review of Political Science 11: 303–326.
  • Schmidt, V. A. (2016) ‘The roots of neo-liberal resilience: Explaining continuity and change in background ideas in Europe's political economy’, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 18(2): 318–34.
  • Schütz, A. (1953) ‘Common-sense and scientific interpretation of human action’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 14(1): 1–38.
  • Sobolewska, M. and Ford, R. (2020) Brexitland. Identity, Diversity and the Reshaping of British Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Spicker, P. (1994) ‘Understanding particularism’, Critical Social Policy 13(39): 5–20.
  • Spire, A. (2018) Résistances à L’impôt, Attachement à L’État: Enquête Sur Les Contribuables Français, Paris: Seuil.
  • Steiner, N. D., Mader, M. and Schön, H. (2023) ‘Subjective losers of globalization’, European Journal of Political Research, Online First. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12603.
  • Stoekel, F. (2013) ‘Ambivalent or indifferent? Reconsidering the structure of EU public opinion’, European Union Politics 14(1): 23–45.
  • Strijbis, O., Helmer, J. and de Wilde, P. (2020) ‘A cosmopolitan-communitarian cleavage around the world? Evidence from ideological polarization and party-voter linkages’, Acta Politica 55(4): 408–31.
  • Stubager, R. (2009) ‘Education-based group identity and consciousness in the authoritarian-libertarian value conflict’, European Journal of Political Research 48(2): 204–33.
  • Teney, C., Lacewell, O. P. and de Wilde, P. (2013) ‘Winners and losers of globalization in Europe: attitudes and ideologies’, European Political Science Review 6(4): 575–95.
  • Van Oorschot, W. (2008) ‘Popular deservingness perceptions and conditionality of solidarity in Europe’, in W. Van Oorschot, M. Opielka and B. Pfau-Effinger (eds.), Culture and Welfare State: Values and Social Policy in Comparative Perspective, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 268–288.
  • Van Oorschot, W., Gielens, E. and Roosma, F. (2022) ‘Conditionality of solidarity in The Netherlands: An analysis of three waves of the European values study’, in R. Luijkx, T. Reeskens and I. Sieben (eds.), Reflections on European Values, Tilburg: Open Press TiU, pp. 404–16.
  • Wedeen, L. (2010) ‘Reflections on ethnographic work in political science’, Annual Review of Political Science 13(1): 255–72.
  • Westheuser, L (2021) Pre-Political Bases of a New Cleavage? Social Identities, Moral Economy, and Classed Politics in Germany, PhD Thesis. Florence: Scuola Normale Superiore.
  • Wright, E. O. (1997) Class Counts, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wright Mills, C. (1959) The Sociological Imagination, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Zaller, J. (1992) The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Zollinger, D. (2022) ‘Cleavage identities in voters’ own words: harnessing open-ended survey responses’, American Journal of Political Science, Online First. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12743.