Social stratification in science: the ultra-elite in the UK

References

• Allison, P. D., Long, J. S. and Krauze, T. (1982) ‘Cumulative advantage and inequality in science’, American Sociological Review 47: 615–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annan, N. (1955) ‘The intellectual aristocracy’, in J. H. Plumb (ed.), Studies in Social History: A Tribute to G. M. Trevelyan, London: Longmans, pp. 241-287.
   Google Scholar
• Annan, N. (1999) The Dons: Mentors, Eccentrics and Geniuses, London: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Azoulay, P., Stuart, T. and Wang, Y. (2014) ‘Matthew effect or fable?’, Management Science 60: 92–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bask, M. and Bask, M. (2015) ‘Cumulative (dis)advantage and the Matthew effect in life-course analysis’, PLoS One 10: e0142447. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0142447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bektas, M. Y. and Crosland, M. (1992) ‘The Copley medal: the establishment of a reward system in the Royal Society, 1731–1839’, Notes and Records: The Royal Society Journal of the History of Science 46: 43–76.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, A., Chetty, R., Jaravel, X., Petkova, N. and Van Reenen, J. (2019) ‘Who becomes an inventor in America? The importance of exposure to innovation’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 134: 647–713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bol, T., de Vaan, M. and van de Rijt, A. (2018) ‘The Matthew effect in science funding’, PNAS 115: 4887–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, S. (2001) My Life in Science, London: BioMed Central.
   Google Scholar
• Bukodi, E., Goldthorpe, J. H. and Steinberg, I. (2022) ‘The social origins and schooling of a scientific elite: fellows of the Royal Society born from 1900’, British Journal of Sociology 73: 484–504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bukodi, E., Goldthorpe, J. H. and Steinberg, I. (2023) ‘Continuing complexity: The university careers of a scientific elite in relation to their class origins and schooling’, British Journal of Sociology 74: 547–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cathcart, B. (2005) The Fly in the Cathedral: How a small group of cambridge scientists won the race to split the atom, London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, W. (2008) ‘The pursuit of the prosopography of science’, in R. Porter (ed.), The Cambridge History of Science, Vol. 4, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp 211-238.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran, W. G. (1977) Sampling Techniques, 3rd ed., New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, E. (1992) Nationalism and Internationalism in Science, 1880–1939, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crick, F. (1988) What Mad Pursuit: A Personal View of Scientific Discovery, New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• DiPrete, T. A. and Eirich, G. M. (2006) ‘Cumulative advantage as a mechanism for inequality: a review of theoretical and empirical developments’, Annual Review of Sociology 32: 271–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erikson, R. (1984) ‘Social class of men, women and families’, Sociology 18: 500–14.
   Google Scholar
• Ferry, G. (2007) Max Perutz and the Secret of Life, London: Chatto & Windus.
   Google Scholar
• Finch, J. (2008) A Nobel Fellow on Every Floor: A History of the Medical Research Council Laboratory of Molecular Biology, London: Medical Research Council Laboratory of Molecular Biology.
   Google Scholar
• Goldthorpe, J. H. (2016) Sociology as a Population Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hansson, N. and Schlich, T. (2022) ‘Beyond the Nobel Prize: scientific recognition and awards in North America since 1900’, Notes and Records. doi:10.1098/rsnr.2022.0015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedström, P. and Bearman, P. (2009) The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, R. (2017) Available from: http://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/chemistry/2017/henderson/biographical.
   Google Scholar
• Horvitz, H. R. (2002) Available from: http://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/medicine/2002/horvitz/biographical.
   Google Scholar
• Keats-Rohan, K. S. B. (ed.). (2007). Prosopography Approaches and Applications: A Handbook, Oxford: Oxford Unit for Prosopographical Research.
   Google Scholar
• Lange, E. F. and Buyers, R. F. (1955) ‘Medals of the Royal Society of London’, The Scientific Monthly 81: 85–90.
   Google Scholar
• Levitt, M. (2013) Available from: http://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/chemistry/2013/levitt/biographical.
   Google Scholar
• MacLeod, R. M. (1971) ‘Of medals and men: a reward system in Victorian science, 1826–1914’, Notes and Queries of the Royal Society 26: 81–105.
   Google Scholar
• Markel, H. (2023) The Secret of Life. Rosalind Franklin, James Watson, Francis Crick, and the Discovery of DNA's Double Helix, New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Medawar, P. (1977) ‘The “ultra-elite” of science’, Minerva 15: 105–14.
   Google Scholar
• Merton, R. K. (1960) ‘“Recognition” and “excellence”: instructive ambiguities’, in A. Yarmolinsky (ed.), Recognition and Excellence: Working Papers, New York: Free Press, pp. 297-328.
   Google Scholar
• Merton, R. K. (1968) ‘The Matthew effect in science’, Science 159: 56–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merton, R. K. (1973) The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Milstein, C. (1984) Available from: http://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/medicine/1984/milstein//biographical.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, A. C., LeBerge, N., Larremore, D. B., Galesic, M., Brand, J. E. and Clauset, A. (2022) ‘Socioeconomic roots of academic faculty’, Nature Human Behaviour 6: 1625–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office of National Statistics (2005) The National Statistics Socio-Economic Classification, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Perc, M. (2014) ‘The Matthew effect in empirical data’, Journal of the Royal Society: Interface 11: 20140378. doi:10.1098/rsif.2014.0378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramakrishnan, V. (2009) Available from: http://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/chemistry/2009/ramakrishnan/biographical.
   Google Scholar
• Rayleigh, L. (1942) The Life of Sir J. J. Thomson, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rigney, D. (2010) The Matthew Effect: How Advantage Begets Further Advantage, New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Royal Society (2023) Available from: https://royalsociety.org/fellows/election/.
   Google Scholar
• Stahnisch, F. W. (2022) ‘Emigré neurophysiologists’ situated knowledge economies and their roles in forming international cultures of scientific excellence’, Notes and Records. doi:10.1098/rsnr.2021.0049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, L. (1971) ‘Prosopography’, Daedalus 100: 46–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sulston, J. and Ferry, G. (2003) The Common Thread; Science, Politics, Ethics and the Human Genome, London: Corgi.
   Google Scholar
• Zuckerman, H. (1995 [1977]) Scientific Elite: Nobel Laureates in the United States, New York: Free Press. 2nd ed. Transaction.
   Google Scholar