Welfare stigma in a social democratic welfare regime during a decade of national public debate: production, contestation and continuities

References

• References to media retrieved from the A-tekst database
   Google Scholar
• Andresen, A. (2011) Somaliske snøengler i barsk vinter[Somali snow angels in hard winter], Sarpsborg arbeiderblad, 22 January, p. 2.
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z. (1998) Work, Consumerism, and the New Poor, Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baumberg, B. (2016) ‘The stigma of claiming benefits: a quantitative study’, Journal of Social Policy 45(2): 181–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjørnstad, S. and Hornburg, T. B. (2011) ‘Beskylder NHO for svartmaling [Accusing NHO of black painting]’, Aftenposten 6 January, p. 2.
   Google Scholar
• Blix, M. C. (2017) De eneste late her er politikerne som stigmatiserer [The only lazy here are the politicians who stigmatize], Morgenbladet, 20 January, p. 23.
   Google Scholar
• Bolton, R., Whelan, J. and Dukelow, F. (2022) ‘What can welfare stigma Do?’, Social Policy and Society 21(4): 632–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brox, J. and Kristjansen, M. (2011) ‘NHO går i faktafella [NHO into the facttrap]’, Klassekampen 5 January, p. 6.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. (2012) Social Research Methods (4th ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Capucha, L., Estevao, P., Calado, A. and Capucha, A. R. (2014) ‘The role of stereotyping in public policy legitimation: the case of the pig’s label’, Comparative Sociology 13(4): 482–502.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, L. C. (2017) FRP mobber unge på sosialhjelp [The progress party bully youth on social assistance]. Fredriksstad blad, 12 January, pp. 8–9.
   Google Scholar
• Dagbladet editorial (2017) ‘Aktivitetsplikt og rett [Activation duty and right]’, Dagbladet 12 January: 2.
   Google Scholar
• Danielsen, S. (2019) ‘Du ser ikke syk ut [You do not look ill]’, Bergensavisen 26 October: 35.
   Google Scholar
• Dencker-Larsen, S. and Lundberg, K. G. (2016) ‘Depicted welfare recipient stereotypes: a photo-elicitation study’, Nordic Journal of Social Research 7: 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Dukelow, F., Whelan, J. and Bolton, R. (2022) ‘Introduction: interrogating welfare Stigma’, Social Policy and Society 21(4): 627–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eberl, J. M., Meltzer, C. E., Heidenreich, T., Herrero, N. T., Lind, F., Berganza, R., Boomgaarden, H. G., Schemer, C. and Strömbäck, J. (2018) ‘The European media discourse on immigration and its effects: a literature review’, Annals of the International Communication Association 42(3): 207–23.
   Google Scholar
• Edseth, O. B. (2017) ‘Bildet handler ikke om å kalle ungdom late [The depiction was not about labelling youth as lazy]’, Aftenposten 17 January, p. 15.
   Google Scholar
• Ellingsæter, A. L., Hatland, A., Haave, P. and Stjernø, S. (2020) Den nye velferdsstatens historie. Ekspansjon og omdanning etter 1966 [The history of the New Welfare State Expansion and restructuring], Oslo: Gyldendal.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksen, O. E. (2017) ‘Nei jeg er ikke lat, og dette bildet er ikke bra [No, I am not lazy, and this depiction is not good]’, Aftenposten 13 January, p. 20.
   Google Scholar
• Esmark, A. and Schoop, S. R. (2017) ‘Deserving social benefits? Political framing and mediaframing of ‘deservingness’ in two welfare reforms in Denmark’, Journal of European Social Policy 27(5): 417–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G. E. (1985) Politics Against Markets. The Social Democratic Road to Power, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G. E. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. and Gordon, L. (1994) ‘A genealogy of dependency: tracing a keyword of the US welfare state’, Signs 19(2): 309–36. https//www.jstor.org/stable/13174801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbrant, J. (2019) ‘Regjeringen avslører seg selv [The government reveals itself]’, Dagbladet 17 October, p. 6.
   Google Scholar
• Gilens, M. (1999). Why Americans Hate Welfare. Race, Media, and the Politics of Antipoverty Policy, Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Githmark, H. (2010a) ‘Ulikhet er velferdstatens fiende [Inequality is the enemy of the welfare state]’, Dagsavisen 30 December: 12.
   Google Scholar
• Githmark, H. (2010b) ‘Sager over greina [Saw through the branch]’, Dagsavisen 31 December, p. 8.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1963) Stigma. Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity, London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Golding, P and Middleton, S (1982) Images of Welfare: Press and Public Attitudes to Poverty, Oxford: Martin Robertson.
   Google Scholar
• Greve, B. (2022) ‘Constantly changing Nordic welfare states: a Bermuda triangle?’, Social Policy & Administration 56(4): 543–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gubrium, E. (2015) ‘No one should be poor’: social shaming in Norway’, in E. Chase and G. Bantebya-Kyomuhendo (eds.), Poverty and Shame: Global Experiences, Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 21.
   Google Scholar
• Haugan, B. (2015a) Sylvi Listhaugs (FRP) nye og beinharde regler [Sylvi Listhaug (The Progress Party) new and hard rules], VG, 29 December, p. 6.
   Google Scholar
• Haugan, B. (2015b) ‘Listhaug stemples som uegnet [Listhaug labelled as unfit]’, VG 30 December, p. 6.
   Google Scholar
• Hedegaard, T. F. (2014) ‘Stereotypes and welfare attitudes: a panel survey of how ‘poor carina’ and ‘lazy Robert’ affected attitudes towards social assistance in Denmark’, Nordic Journal of Social Research 5(1): 139–60.
   Google Scholar
• Helmers, A. (2010) Skiller seg, men bor sammen [Divorce, but live together], VG, 19 August, p. 4.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, T. and Tyler, I. (2015) ‘Benefits broods’: the cultural and political crafting of anti-welfare commonsense’, Critical Social Policy 35(4): 470–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koos, S. (2019) ‘Crisis and the reconfiguration of solidarities in Europe-origins, scope, variations’, European Societies 21(5): 629–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamont, M. (1992) Money, Morals, and Manners. The Culture of the French and American Upper Middle Class, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lamont, M. (2016) Getting Respect. Responding to Stigma and Discrimination in the United States, Brazil and Israel, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lamont, M. (2018) ‘Addressing recognition gaps: destigmatization and the reduction of inequality’, American Sociological Review 83(3): 419–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamont, M. and Mizrachi, N. (2011) ‘Ordinary people doing extraordinary things: responses to stigmatization in comparative perspective’, Ethnic and Racial Studies 35(3): 365–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamont, M. and Molnár, V. (2002) ‘The study of boundaries across the social sciences’, Annual Review of Sociology 28: 167–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen, C. A. (2008a) ‘The institutional logic of welfare attitudes. How welfare regimes influence public support’, Comparative Political Studies 41(2): 145–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen, C. A. (2008b) ‘The political logic of labour market reforms and popular images of target groups’, Journal of European Social Policy 18(1): 50–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen, C. A. and Dejgaard, T. E. (2013) ‘The institutional logic of images of the poor and welfare recipients: a comparative study of British Swedish and Danish Newspapers’, Journal of European Social Policy 23(3): 287–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Link, B. G. and Phelan, J. (2014) ‘Stigma power’, Social Science & Medicine 103: 24–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund, K. S. (2010) Velferdsfellen [The welfare trap], Aftenposten, 10 December, p. 7.
   Google Scholar
• Lundberg, K. G. and Syltevik, L. J. (2016) ‘Everyday interaction at the front-line: the case of the Norwegian all-in-one bureaucracy’, Journal of Organizational Ethnography 2: 152–66. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108JOE-12-2015- 0026/full/html.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, S., Schofield, T. and Butterworth, P. (2022) ‘News media representations of people receiving income support and the production of stigma power: an empirical analysis of reporting on two Australian welfare payments’, Critical Social Policy 42(4): 648–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meese, H., Baker, T. and Sisson, A. (2020) ‘#Wearebeneficiaries: contesting poverty stigma through social media’, Antipode 52(4): 1152–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, L. (2018) ‘Reconfiguring rights in austerity Britain: boundaries, behaviours and contestable margins’, Journal of Social Policy 48(2): 271–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, C. (1984) Losing Ground: American Social Policy, 1950-1980, New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• NOU (2017) Offentlig støtte til barnefamiliene [Public support to families with children]. NOU 2017:6. Oslo: Barne – og likestillingsdepartmentet.
   Google Scholar
• Pinker, R. (1971) Social Theory and Social Policy, London: Heinemann Educational Books Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers-Dillon, R. (1995) ‘The dynamics of welfare Stigma’, Qualitative Sociology 18(4): 439–56.
   Google Scholar
• Rønning, M. and Kristiansen, H. C. (2011) Stoltenberg mener NHO svartmaler [Stoltenberg thinks NHO is black painting], NTB tekst, 5 January.
   Google Scholar
• Rothstein, B. (1998) Just Institutions Matter: The Moral and Political Logic of the Universal Welfare State, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schofield, T., Suomi, A. and Butterworth, P. (2022) ‘One ‘welfare recipient’ stereotype or many? Using the stereotype content model to examine the stereotypes of different categories of benefit recipients’, International Journal of Social Welfare 31(3): 280–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scrambler, G. (2020) A Sociology of Shame and Blame. Insiders Versus Outsiders, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Skjervheim, V. (2012a) En «trygdesnylters» bekjennelse [A “welfare scrounger’s” confession], Dagbladet, 31 March, p. 64.
   Google Scholar
• Skjervheim, V. (2012b) Det en «trygdesnylter» fortjener [What a “welfare scrounger” deserves], Dagbladet, 5 May, p. 64.
   Google Scholar
• Sperstad, K. T. (2010) Slakter Kadra varsel [Attacks Kadra warning], VG, 19 August, p. 13.
   Google Scholar
• Spincker, P. (1984) Stigma and Social Welfare, CA: Mountain View, Croom Helm.
   Google Scholar
• Sæther, J. M. (2019) ‘Nav ansatte «nesten sjokkert» over regjeringens nye AAP kutt [Employees in Nav “nearly shocked” by the Government’s new AAP cuts]’, Dagsavisen 9. October, pp. 12–13.
   Google Scholar
• Thorsen, E. (2019a) ‘Regjeringens politikk er slem [The Government’s policy is mean]’, Dagbladet 4 November, p. 29.
   Google Scholar
• Thorsen, E. (2019b) ‘Dere må høre nå, Nordby Lunde [You must listen now, Nordby Lunde]’, Dagsavisen 5 November, p. 33.
   Google Scholar
• Titmuss, R. M. (1969) ‘The social division of welfare’, in R. M. Titmuss (ed.), Essays on ‘The Welfare State’, London: Unwin University Books, pp. 34–55.
   Google Scholar
• Trønderavisa editorial (2015) Innholdet betre enn retorikken [Content better than rhetoric], Trønderavisa, 31 December, p. 2.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, I. (2020) Stigma. The Machinery of Inequality, London: Zed Books Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, I. and Slater, T. (2018) ‘Rethinking the sociology of stigma’, The Sociological Review 66(4): 721–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Oorschot, W. (2000) ‘Who should get what, and why? On deservingness criteria and the conditionality of solidarity among the Public’, Policy & Politics 28(1): 33–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Oorschot, W. (2006) ‘Making the difference in social Europe: deservingness perceptions among citizens of European welfare States’, Journal of European Social Policy 16(1): 23–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VG editorial (2015) ‘Godt innhald, dårlig stil [Good content, bad style]’, VG 30 December, p. 2.
   Google Scholar
• Yusuf, K. (2010) Til velferdsstaten skiller oss ad [Till the welfare state divides us], VG, 18 August.
   Google Scholar