731
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The gendered maths confidence gap, social influence and social integration

&
Received 12 Jun 2023, Accepted 18 Apr 2024, Published online: 31 May 2024

References

  • Akerlof, G. A. and Kranton, R. E. (2000) ‘Economics and identity’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 115(3): 715–53. doi:10.1162/003355300554881.
  • Alon, S. and DiPrete, T. A. (2015) ‘Gender differences in the formation of a field of study choice set’, Sociological Science 2: 50–81. doi:10.15195/v2.a5.
  • Bandura, A. and Walters, R. H. (1977) Social Learning Theory. Vol. 1, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Barone, C. (2011) ‘Some things never change: gender segregation in higher education across eight nations and three decades’, Sociology of Education 84(2): 157–76. doi:10.1177/0038040711402099.
  • Blakemore, J. E. O. (2003) ‘Children’s beliefs about violating gender norms: boys shouldn’t look like girls, and girls shouldn’t act like boys’, Sex Roles 48(9–10): 411–19. doi:10.1023/a:1023574427720.
  • Boda, Z. (2018) ‘Social influence on observed race’, Sociological Science 5: 29–57. doi:10.15195/v5.a3.
  • Brechwald, W. A. and Prinstein, M. J. (2011) ‘Beyond homophily: a decade of advances in understanding peer influence processes’, Journal of Research on Adolescence 21(1): 166–79. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00721.x.
  • Brown, B. B., Clasen, D. R. and Eicher, S. A. (1986) ‘Perceptions of peer pressure, peer conformity dispositions, and self-reported behavior among adolescents’, Developmental Psychology 22(4): 521–30. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.22.4.521.
  • Burgess, R. L. and Akers, R. L. (1966) ‘A differential association-reinforcement theory of criminal behavior’, Sociology of Education 14(2): 128–47. doi:10.2307/798612.
  • Bussey, K. and Bandura, A. (1984) ‘Influence of gender constancy and social power on sex-linked modeling', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 47(6): 1292–1302. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.47.6.1292.
  • Ceci, S. J. and Williams, W. M. (2010) ‘Sex differences in math-intensive fields’, Current Directions in Psychological Science 19(5): 275–9. doi:10.2307/41038585.
  • Cho, S.-Y. (2017) ‘Explaining gender differences in confidence and overconfidence in math’, SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2902717.
  • Correll, S. J. (2001) ‘Gender and the career choice process: the role of biased self-assessments’, American Journal of Sociology 106(6): 1691–730. doi:10.1086/321299.
  • Correll, S. J. (2004) ‘Constraints into preferences: gender, status, and emerging career aspirations’, American Sociological Review 69(1): 93–113. doi:10.2307/3593076.
  • Dai, D. Y. and Rinn, A. N. (2008) ‘The big-fish-little-pond effect: what do we know and where do we go from here?', Educational Psychology Review 20(3): 283–317. doi:10.1007/s10648-008-9071-x.
  • Dasgupta, N., Scircle, M. M. and Hunsinger, M. (2015) ‘Female peers in small work groups enhance women’s motivation, verbal participation, and career aspirations in engineering’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112(16): 4988–93. doi:10.1073/pnas.1422822112.
  • Deaux, K. and Major, B. (1987) ‘Putting gender into context: an interactive model of gender-related Behavior’, Psychological Review 94(3): 369–89. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.94.3.369.
  • Drury, K., Bukowski, W. M., Velásquez, A. M. and Stella-Lopez, L. (2013) ‘Victimization and gender identity in single-sex and mixed-sex schools: examining contextual variations in pressure to conform to gender norms’, Sex Roles 69(7–8): 442–54. doi:10.1007/s11199-012-0118-6.
  • Dryler, H. (1998) ‘Parental role models, gender and educational choice’, The British Journal of Sociology 49(3): 375–98.
  • Ellis, J., Fosdick, B. K. and Rasmussen, C. (2016) ‘“Women 1.5 times more likely to leave STEM pipeline after calculus compared to men: lack of mathematical confidence a potential culprit” edited by E. Manalo’, PLoS One 11(7): e0157447. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0157447.
  • Else-Quest, N. M., Hyde, J. S. and Linn, M. C. (2010) ‘Cross-national patterns of gender differences in mathematics: a meta-analysis’, Psychological Bulletin 136(1): 103–27. doi:10.1037/a0018053.
  • Fagot, B. I. (1977) ‘Consequences of moderate cross-gender behavior in preschool children’, Child Development 48(3): 902. doi:10.2307/1128339.
  • Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., Dunson, D. B., Vehtari, A. and Rubin, D. B. (2013) Bayesian Data Analysis, New York: CRC Press.
  • Gerber, T. P. and Cheung, S. Y. (2008) ‘Horizontal stratification in postsecondary education: forms, explanations, and implications’, Annual Review of Sociology 34(1): 299–318. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134604.
  • German Federal Statistical Office (2020) ‘Studierende. Deutschland, Semester, Nationalität, Geschlecht, Studienfach (21311-0003)’.
  • Geven, S. and van de Werfhorst, H. G. (2020) ‘The role of intergenerational networks in students’ school performance in two differentiated educational systems: a comparison of between- and within-individual estimates’, Sociology of Education 93(1): 40–64. doi:10.1177/0038040719882309.
  • Hyde, J. S., Fennema, E. and Lamon, S. J. (1990) ‘Gender differences in mathematics performance: a meta-analysis’, Psychological Bulletin 107(2): 139–55. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.139.
  • Hyde, J. S., Lindberg, S. M., Linn, M. C., Ellis, A. B. and Williams, C. C. (2008) ‘Gender similarities characterize math performance’, Science 321(5888): 494–5. doi:10.1126/science.1160364.
  • Hyde, J. S., Mertz, J. E. and Schekman, R. (2009) ‘Gender, culture, and mathematics performance’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106(22): 8801–7. doi:10.2307/40482769.
  • Jacobs, J. E., Lanza, S., Wayne Osgood, D., Eccles, J. S. and Wigfield, A. (2002) ‘Changes in children’s self-competence and values: gender and domain differences across grades one through twelve’, Child Development 73(2): 509–27. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00421.
  • Jansen, M., Boda, Z. and Lorenz, G. (2022) ‘Social comparison effects on academic self-concepts—which peers matter most?', Developmental Psychology 58(8): 1541–56. doi:10.1037/dev0001368.
  • Jonsson, J. O. (1999) ‘Explaining sex differences in educational choice: an empirical assessment of a rational choice model’, European Sociological Review 15(4): 391–404. doi:10.2307/522765.
  • Jonsson, J. O., Grusky, D. B., Di Carlo, M., Pollak, R. and Brinton, M. C. (2009) ‘Microclass mobility: social reproduction in four countries’, American Journal of Sociology 114(4): 977–1036. doi:10.1086/596566.
  • Kågesten, A., Gibbs, S., Blum, R. W., Moreau, C., Chandra-Mouli, V., Herbert, A. and Amin, A. (2016) ‘Understanding factors that shape gender attitudes in early adolescence globally: a mixed-methods systematic review’, PLoS One 11(6): e0157805. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0157805.
  • Kalter, F., Heath, A. F., Hewstone, M., Jonsson, J. O., Kalmijn, M., Kogan, I. and van Tubergen, F. (2014) ‘Children of immigrants longitudinal survey in four European countries (CILS4EU)’. doi:10.4232/cils4eu.5353.1.1.0.
  • Kalter, F., Heath, A. F., Hewstone, M., Jonsson, J. O., Kalmijn, M., Kogan, I. and van Tubergen, F. (2015) ‘Children of immigrants longitudinal survey in four European countries (CILS4EU)’. doi:10.4232/cils4eu.5353.2.1.0.
  • Keller, C. (2001) ‘Effect of teachers’ stereotyping on students’ stereotyping of mathematics as a male domain’, The Journal of Social Psychology 141(2): 165–73. doi:10.1080/00224540109600544.
  • Kessels, U. and Hannover, B. (2008) ‘When being a girl matters less: accessibility of gender-related self-knowledge in single-sex and coeducational classes and its impact on students’ physics-related self-concept of ability’, British Journal of Educational Psychology 78(2): 273–89. doi:10.1348/000709907(215938.
  • Koskinen, J. and Snijders, T. A. B. (2022) ‘Multilevel longitudinal analysis of social networks’. ArXiv. doi:10.48550/arxiv.2201.12713.
  • Koskinen, J. and Snijders, T. A. B. (2023) ‘Multilevel longitudinal analysis of social networks’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A, (Statistics in Society) 186(3): 376–400. doi:10.1093/jrsssa/qnac009.
  • Kretschmer, D. and Kruse, H. (2019) ‘Neighbourhood effects on acculturation attitudes among minority and majority adolescents in Germany’, Urban Studies 57(16): 3363–80. doi:10.1177/0042098019897890.
  • Kruse, H. (2017) ‘The SES-specific neighbourhood effect on interethnic friendship formation. The case of adolescent immigrants in Germany’, European Sociological Review 33(2): 182–94. doi:10.1093/esr/jcw056.
  • Kruse, H. and Jacob, K. (2014) Children of Immigrants Longitudinal Survey in Four European Countries. Sociometric Fieldwork Report. Wave 1–2010/2011, v1.1.0, Mannheim: Mannheim University.
  • Leaper, C. and Smith, T. E. (2004) ‘A meta-analytic review of gender variations in children’s language use: talkativeness, affiliative speech, and assertive speech’, Developmental Psychology 40(6): 993–1027. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.40.6.993.
  • Legewie, J. and DiPrete, T. A. (2014) ‘The high school environment and the gender gap in science and engineering’, Sociology of Education 87(4): 259–80. doi:10.1177/0038040714547770.
  • Levanon, A. and Grusky, D. B. (2016) ‘The persistence of extreme gender segregation in the twenty-first century’, American Journal of Sociology 122(2): 573–619. doi:10.1086/688628.
  • Lewis, K. and Kaufman, J. (2018) ‘The conversion of cultural tastes into social network ties’, American Journal of Sociology 123(6): 1684–742. doi:10.1086/697525.
  • Li, Q. (1999) ‘Teachers’ beliefs and gender differences in mathematics: a review’, Educational Research 41(1): 63–76. doi:10.1080/0013188990410106.
  • Lindberg, S. M., Hyde, J. S., Petersen, J. L. and Linn, M. C. (2010) ‘New trends in gender and mathematics performance: a meta-analysis’, Psychological Bulletin 136(6): 1123–35. doi:10.1037/a0021276.
  • Litzler, E., Samuelson, C. C. and Lorah, J. A. (2014) ‘Breaking It down: engineering student STEM confidence at the intersection of race/ethnicity and gender’, Research in Higher Education 55(8): 810–32. doi:10.1007/s11162-014-9333-z.
  • Lomi, A., Snijders, T. A. B., Steglich, C. E. G. and Torló, V. J. (2011) ‘Why are some more peer than others? Evidence from a longitudinal study of social networks and individual academic performance’, Social Science Research 40: 1506–20. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2011.06.010.
  • Maccoby, E. E. (1998) The Two Sexes: Growing up Apart, Coming Together, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Manski, C. F. (1993) ‘Identification of endogenous social effects: the reflection problem’, The Review of Economic Studies 60(3): 531–42. doi:10.2307/2298123.
  • Marsh, H. W. (1987) ‘The big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept’, Journal of Educational Psychology 79(3): 280–95. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.79.3.280.
  • Marsh, H. W. and Parker, J. W. (1984) ‘Determinants of student self-concept: is it better to be a relatively large fish in a small pond even if you don’t learn to swim as well?', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 47(1): 213–31. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.47.1.213.
  • Marsh, H. W., Seaton, M., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Hau, K. T., O’Mara, A. J. and Craven, R. G. (2008) ‘The big-fish–little-pond-effect stands up to critical scrutiny: implications for theory, methodology, and future research’, Educational Psychology Review 20(3): 319–50. doi:10.1007/s10648-008-9075-6.
  • McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L. and Cook, J. M. (2001) ‘Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks’, Annual Review of Sociology 27: 415–44. doi:10.2307/2678628.
  • Moakler, M. W. and Kim, M. M. (2014) ‘College major choice in STEM: revisiting confidence and demographic factors’, The Career Development Quarterly 62(2): 128–42. doi:10.1002/j.2161-0045.2014.00075.x.
  • Niederle, M. and Vesterlund, L. (2010) ‘Explaining the gender gap in math test scores: the role of competition’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 24(2): 129–44. doi:10.1257/jep.24.2.129.
  • Nollenberger, N., Rodríguez-Planas, N. and Sevilla, A. (2016) ‘The math gender gap: the role of culture’, American Economic Review 106(5): 257–61. doi:10.1257/aer.p20161121.
  • Olivetti, C., Patacchini, E. and Zenou, Y. (2018) ‘Mothers, peers and gender-role Identity’, SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3230441.
  • Raabe, I. J., Boda, Z. and Stadtfeld, C. (2019) ‘The social pipeline: how friend influence and peer exposure widen the STEM gender gap’, Sociology of Education 92(2): 105–23. doi:10.1177/0038040718824095.
  • Riegle-Crumb, C. and King, B. (2010) ‘Questioning a white male advantage in STEM examining disparities in college major by gender and race/ethnicity’, Educational Researcher 39(9): 656–64. doi:10.3102/0013189X10391657.
  • Ripley, R. M., Snijders, T. A. B., Boda, Z., Vörös, A. and Preciado, P. (2022) Manual for RSiena (Version November 27, 2022), University of Oxford, Department of Statistics, Nuffield College. http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/siena/.
  • Salikutluk, Z. and Heyne, S. (2017) ‘Do gender roles and norms affect performance in maths? The impact of adolescents’ and their peers’ gender conceptions on maths grades’, European Sociological Review 33(3): 368–81. doi:10.1093/esr/jcx049.
  • Schaefer, D. R., Kornienko, O. and Fox, A. M. (2011) ‘Misery does not love company’, American Sociological Review 76(5): 764–85. doi:10.1177/0003122411420813.
  • Schneeweis, N. and Zweimüller, M. (2012) ‘Girls, girls, girls: gender composition and female school choice’, Economics of Education Review 31(4): 482–500. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2011.11.002.
  • Shalizi, C. R. and Thomas, A. C. (2011) ‘Homophily and contagion are generically confounded in observational social network studies’, Sociological Methods & Research 40(2): 211–239. doi:10.1177/0049124111404820.
  • Sinclair, S. and Carlsson, R. (2013) ‘What will I be when I grow up? The impact of gender identity threat on adolescents’ occupational preferences’, Journal of Adolescence 36(3): 465–74. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.02.001.
  • Snijders, T. A. B. (2001) ‘The statistical evaluation of social network dynamics’, Sociological Methodology 31(1): 361–95. doi:10.1111/0081-1750.00099.
  • Snijders, T. A. B. (2011) ‘Statistical models for social networks’, Annual Review of Sociology 37(1): 131–53. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102709.
  • Snijders, T. A. B., Koskinen, J. and Schweinberger, M. (2010) ‘Maximum likelihood estimation for social network dynamics’, The Annals of Applied Statistics 4(2): 567–88. doi:10.1214/09-aoas313.
  • Stark, T. H. and Flache, A. (2012) ‘The double edge of common interest: ethnic segregation as an unintended byproduct of opinion homophily’, Sociology of Education 85(2): 179–99. doi:10.1177/0038040711427314.
  • Steglich, C. E. G., Snijders, T. A. B. and Pearson, M. (2010) ‘Dynamic networks and behaviour: separating selection from influence’, Sociological Methodology 40: 329–93. doi:10.2307/41336888.
  • Veenstra, R., Dijkstra, J. K., Steglich, C. E. G. and Van Zalk, M. H. W. (2013) ‘Network-behavior dynamics’, Journal of Research on Adolescence 23(3): 399–412. doi:10.1111/jora.12070.
  • Vleuten, M. v. d., Jaspers, E., Maas, I. and van der Lippe, T. (2016) ‘Boys’ and girls’ educational choices in secondary education. The role of gender ideology’, Educational Studies 42(2): 181–200. doi:10.1080/03055698.2016.1160821.
  • Vleuten, M. v. d., Steinmetz, S. and van de Werfhorst, H. G. (2018) ‘Gender norms and STEM: the importance of friends for stopping leakage from the STEM pipeline’, Educational Research and Evaluation 24(6–7): 417–36. doi:10.1080/13803611.2019.1589525.
  • Vörös, A., Block, P. and Boda, Z. (2019) ‘Limits to inferring status from friendship relations', Social Networks 59: 77–97. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2019.05.007.
  • Werfhorst, H. G. v. d. and Luijkx, R. (2010) ‘Educational field of study and social mobility: disaggregating social origin and education’, Sociology 44(4): 695–715. doi:10.1177/0038038510369362.
  • Youniss, J. and Smollar, J. (1985) Adolescent Relations with Mothers, Fathers, and Friends, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.