Effects of Civility and Reasoning in User Comments on Perceived Journalistic Quality

REFERENCES

• Anderson, Ashley A., Dominique Brossard, Dietram A. Scheufele, Michael A. Xenos, and Peter Ladwig. 2014. “The ‘Nasty Effect’: Online Incivility and Risk Perceptions of Emerging Technologies.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 19 (3): 373–387. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ash, Erin, Kristie Hettinga, and Daniel Halpern. 2009. “Effects of a Trend: The Influence of User Comments on Readers’ Perceptions of Online Newspapers.” Paper presented at the AEJMC annual conference, Boston, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Ash, Erin, Andrew Peeling, and Kirstie Hettinga. 2010. “Does Content Matter? The Effects of Type and Number of User-generated Comments on News Stories.” Paper presented at the AEJMC annual conference, Denver, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, Deborah J., and John G. Geer. 2007. “Beyond Negativity: The Effects of Incivility on the Electorate.” American Journal of Political Science 51 (1): 1–16. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00233.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgoon, Judee K., Michael Burgoon, and David B. Buller. 1986. “Newspaper Image: Dimensions and Relation to Demographics, Satisfaction.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 63 (4): 771–781.
   Google Scholar
• Canter, Lily. 2013. “The Misconception of Online Comment Threads.” Journalism Practice 7 (5): 604–619. doi:10.1080/17512786.2012.740172.
   Google Scholar
• Chaiken, Shelly. 1980. “Heuristic Versus Systematic Information Processing and the Use of Source Versus Message Cues in Persuasion.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39 (5): 752–766. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coe, Kevin, Kate Kenski, and Stephen A. Rains. 2014. “Online and Uncivil? Patterns and Determinants of Incivility in Newspaper Website Comments.” Journal of Communication 64 (4): 658–679. doi:10.1111/jcom.12104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costera Meijer, Irene. 2013. “Valuable Journalism: A Search for Quality From the Vantage Point of the User.” Journalism 14 (6): 754–770. doi:10.1177/1464884912455899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, Lincoln. 2001. “Democracy via Cyberspace: Mapping the Rhetorics and Practices of Three Prominent Camps.” New Media & Society 3 (2): 157–177. doi:10.1177/14614440122226038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diakopoulos, Nicholas, and Mor Naaman. 2011. “Towards Quality Discourse in Online News Comments.” In Proceedings of the ACM 2011 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, edited by Pamela J. Hinds, John C. Tang, Jian Wang, Jakob E. Bardram, and Nicolas Ducheneaut, 133–142. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Ferree, Myra M., William A. Gamson, Jürgen Gerhards, and Dieter Rucht. 2002. Shaping Abortion Discourse: Democracy and the Public Sphere in Germany and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fichter, Christian, and Klaus Jonas. 2008. “Image Effects of Newspapers.” Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology 216 (4): 226–234. doi:10.1027/0044-3409.216.4.226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freelon, Deen. 2015. “Discourse Architecture, Ideology, and Democratic Norms in Online Political Discussion.” New Media & Society 17 (5): 772–791. doi:10.1177/1461444813513259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, Emma. 2013. “Online Comment Moderation: Emerging Best Practices.” http://www.wan-ifra.org/reports/2013/10/04/online-comment-moderation-emerging-best-practices.
   Google Scholar
• Govier, Trudy. 2010. A Practical Study of Argument. 7th ed. Belmont: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Grieve, Tim. 2014. “Why We’re Changing Our Comments Policy.” http://www.nationaljournal.com/congress/2014/05/16/why-were-changing-our-comments-policy.
   Google Scholar
• Houston, Brian, Glenn J. Hansen, and Gwendelyn S. Nisbett. 2011. “Influence of User Comments on Perceptions of Media Bias and Third-Person Effect in Online News.” Electronic News 5 (2): 79–92. doi:10.1177/1931243111407618.
   Google Scholar
• Hovland, Carl I., Irving L. Janis, and Harold H. Kelley. 1966. Communication and Persuasion: Psychological Studies of Opinion Change. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karlsson, Michael, Annika Bergström, Christer Clerwall, and Karin Fast. 2015. “Participatory Journalism – the (R)Evolution That Wasn’t Content and User Behavior in Sweden 2007–2013.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 20 (3): 295–311. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krei, Alexander. 2014. “Online-IVW im Juli: WM hilft News-Sites, starkes Debüt für ‘Heftig.co’.” [Online-IVW in July: World Championship helps news-sites, strong debut for “heftig.co”]. http://www.dwdl.de/zahlenzentrale/47078/wm_hilft_newssites_starkes_debuet_fuer_heftigco_/.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson, Anders O. 2011. “Interactive to Me – Interactive to You? A Study of Use and Appreciation of Interactivity on Swedish Newspaper Websites.” New Media & Society 13 (7): 1180–1197. doi:10.1177/1461444811401254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Eun-Ju. 2012. “That’s Not the Way it is: How User-Generated Comments on the News Affect Perceived Media Bias.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 18 (1): 32–45. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01597.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McQuail, Denis. 2013. Journalism and Society. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Meltzer, Kimberly. 2015. “Journalistic Concern About Uncivil Political Talk in Digital News Media: Responsibility, Credibility, and Academic Influence.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 20 (1): 85–107. doi:10.1177/1940161214558748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzger, Miriam J., Andrew J. Flanagin, and Ryan B. Medders. 2010. “Social and Heuristic Approaches to Credibility Evaluation Online.” Journal of Communication 60 (3): 413–439. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01488.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchelstein, Eugenia. 2011. “Catharsis and Community: Divergent Motivations for Audience Participation in Online Newspapers and Blogs.” International Journal of Communication 5: 2014–2034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutz, Diana C., and Byron Reeves. 2005. “The New Videomalaise: Effects of Televised Incivility on Political Trust.” American Political Science Review 99 (1): 1–15. doi: 10.1017/S0003055405051452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nandan, Shiva. 2005. “An Exploration of the Brand Identity–Brand Image Linkage: A Communications Perspective.” Journal of Brand Management 12 (4): 264–278. doi:10.1057/palgrave.bm.2540222.
   Google Scholar
• Neuberger, Christoph. 2014. “The Journalistic Quality of Internet Formats and Services.” Digital Journalism 2 (3): 419–433. doi:10.1080/21670811.2014.892742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, Carolyn E. 2014. “Coproduction or Cohabitation: Are Anonymous Online Comments on Newspaper Websites Shaping News Content?” New Media & Society 16 (3): 470–487. doi:10.1177/1461444813487958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, Daniel J. 2003. “Message Properties, Mediating States, and Manipulation Checks: Claims, Evidence, and Data Analysis in Experimental Persuasive Message Effects Research.” Communication Theory 13 (3): 251–274. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2003.tb00292.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Zizi. 2004. “Democracy Online: Civility, Politeness, and the Democratic Potential of Online Political Discussion Groups.” New Media & Society 6 (2): 259–283. doi:10.1177/1461444804041444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, Richard E., and John T. Cacioppo. 1986. “The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 19: 123–205. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60214-2
   Google Scholar
• Reich, Zvi. 2011. “User Comments: The Transformation of Participatory Space.” In Participatory Journalism: Guarding Open Gates at Online Newspapers, edited by Jane B. Singer, Alfred Hermida, David Domingo, Ari Heinonen, Steve Paulussen, Thorsten Quandt, Zvi Reich, and Marina Vujnovic, 96–117. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, Ian. 2015. “Civility 2.0: A Comparative Analysis of Incivility in Online Political Discussion.” Information, Communication & Society 18 (2): 121–138. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2014.940365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz, Carlos, David Domingo, Josep L. Mico, Javier Díaz-Noci, Koldo Meso, and Pere Masip. 2011. “Public Sphere 2.0? The Democratic Qualities of Citizen Debates in Online Newspapers.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 16 (4): 463–487. doi:10.1177/1940161211415849.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweiger, Wolfgang. 2014. “Reader Discussions on News Websites and Facebook. How do platform characteristics influence deliberativeness?” Paper presented at the 5th European Communications Conference, Lisbon, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Shi, Rui, Paul Messaris, and Joseph N. Cappella. 2014. “Effects of Online Comments on Smokers’ Perception of Antismoking Public Service Announcements.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 19 (4): 975–990. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12057.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Springer, Nina, Ines Engelmann, and Christian Pfaffinger. 2015. “User Comments: Motives and Inhibitors to Write and Read.” Information, Communication & Society 18 (7): 798–815. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2014.997268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroud, Natalie J., Joshua M. Scacco, Ashley Muddiman, and Alexander L. Curry. 2015. “Changing Deliberative Norms on News Organizations’ Facebook Sites.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 20 (2): 188–203. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toulmin, Stephen E. 2003. The Uses of Argument. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tsfati, Yariv, Oren Meyers, and Yoram Peri. 2006. “What is Good Journalism? Comparing Israeli Public and Journalists’ Perspectives.” Journalism 7 (2): 152–173. doi:10.1177/1464884906062603.
   Google Scholar
• Urban, Juliane, and Wolfgang Schweiger. 2014. “News Quality From the Recipients’ Perspective.” Journalism Studies 15 (6): 821–840. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2013.856670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valenzuela, Sebastián, Yonghwan Kim, and Homero Gil de Zúñiga. 2012. “Social Networks That Matter: Exploring the Role of Political Discussion for Online Political Participation.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 24 (2): 163–184. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edr037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Wurff, Richard, and Klaus Schönbach. 2014. “Civic and Citizen Demands of News Media and Journalists: What Does the Audience Expect From Good Journalism?” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 91 (3): 433–451. doi:10.1177/1077699014538974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther, Joseph B., David DeAndrea, Jinsuk Kim, and James C. Anthony. 2010. “The Influence of Online Comments on Perceptions of Antimarijuana Public Service Announcements on YouTube.” Human Communication Research 36 (4): 469–492. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01384.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, Patrick. 2014. “Discussions in the Comments Section: Factors Influencing Participation and Interactivity in Online Newspapers’ Reader Comments.” New Media & Society 16 (6): 941–957. doi:10.1177/1461444813495165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinreich, Harald, Hartmut Obendorf, Eelco Herder, and Matthias Mayer. 2008. “Not Quite the Average: An Empirical Study of Web Use.” ACM Transactions on the Web 2 (1): 1–31. doi:10.1145/1326561.1326566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendelin, Manuel, Ines Engelmann, and Julia Neubarth. 2015. “User Rankings and Journalistic News Selection.” Journalism Studies 1–19. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2015.1040892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wessler, Hartmut. 2008. “Investigating Deliberativeness Comparatively.” Political Communication 25 (1): 1–22. doi:10.1080/10584600701807752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegele, Marc, and Oliver Quiring. 2013. “Conceptualizing Online Discussion Value: A Multidimensional Framework for Analyzing User Comments on Mass-Media Websites.” In Communication Yearbook 37, edited by Elisia L. Cohen, 125–155. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar