The Politics of Interfield Antagonisms

REFERENCES

• Bampton, Roberta, and Christopher J. Cowton. 2002. “The e-interview. FQS: Forum: Qualitative Social Research.” 3. Accessed February 27, 2011. http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/848.
   Google Scholar
• Beaver, David I. 2004. “Five ‘Only’ Pieces.” Theoretical Linguistics 30 (1): 45–64. doi: 10.1515/thli.2004.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benson, Rodney. 2005. “Mapping Field Variation: Journalism in France and the United States.” In Bourdieu and the Journalistic Field, edited by R. Benson and E. Neveu, 85–112. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Benson, Rodney, and Daniel C. Hallin. 2007. “How States, Markets and Globalization Shape the News The French and US National Press, 1965–97.” European Journal of Communication 22 (1): 27–48. doi: 10.1177/0267323107073746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benson, Rodney, and Erik Neveu. 2005. “Introduction: Field Theory as a Work in Progress.” In Bourdieu and the Journalistic Field, edited by R. Benson and E. Neveu, 1–25. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Bernanke, Judith. 2012. “Fundamental Malpractice: Editorial Shaping of Arts Policy and Perception by a New Zealand Newspaper.” The International Journal of the Arts in Society 6 (6): 83–98.
   Google Scholar
• Bernanke, Judith. 2013. “ Interfield Antagonisms: An Examination of the New Zealand Journalistic and Visual Arts Fields in the Case of the Mainstream Media Coverage of et al. and the 2005 Venice Biennale.” Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massey University, Wellington, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre. 1990. The Logic of Practice. Translated by R. Nice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre. 1991. Language & Symbolic Power. Translated by G. Raymond and M. Adamson. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre. 2000. Pascalian Meditations. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre. 2005. “The Political Field, the Social Science Field and the Journalistic Field.” In Bourdieu and the Journalistic Field, edited by R. Benson & E. Neveu, 29–47. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre, and Loic Wacquant. 1992. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Broersma, Marcel. 2008. “The Discursive Strategies of a Subversive Genre: The Introduction of the Interview in U.S. and European Journalism.” In Vision in text and image: The Cultural Turn in the Study of the Arts, edited by H. W. Hoen & M. G. Kemperink, 143–158. Leuven: Peeters.
   Google Scholar
• Broersma, Marcel. 2010a. “Journalism as Performative Discourse: The Importance of Form and Style in Journalism.” In Journalism and Meaning-making: Reading the Newspaper, edited by V. Rupar, 15–35. Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Broersma, Marcel. 2010b. “The Unbearable Limitations of Journalism: On Press Critique and Journalism's Claim to Truth.” International Communication Gazette 72 (1): 21–33. doi: 10.1177/1748048509350336
   Google Scholar
• Butler, Judith. 1993. Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of “Sex”. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chouliaraki, Lilie, and Norman Fairclough. 1999. Discourse in Late Modernity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clayman, Steven E. 2002. “Tribune of the People: Maintaining the Legitimacy of Aggressive Journalism.” Media, Culture & Society 24 (2): 197–216. doi: 10.1177/016344370202400203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clayman, Steven, and John Heritage. 2002. The News Interview: Journalists and Public Figures on the Air. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Couldry, Nick. 2001. “The Hidden Injuries of Media Power.” Journal of Consumer Culture 1 (2): 155–177. doi: 10.1177/146954050100100203
   Google Scholar
• Couldry, Nick. 2003. “Media Meta-capital: Extending the Range of Bourdieu’s Field Theory.” Theory and Society 32 (5/6): 653–677. doi: 10.1023/B:RYSO.0000004915.37826.5d
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couldry, Nick. 2014. “Medatization and the Future of Field Theory.” In Mediatization of Communication, edited by K. Lundby, 227–245. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Crow, Thomas E. 1996. Modern Art in the Common Culture. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dickinson, Roger, and Bashir Memon. 2012. “Press Clubs, the Journalistic Field and the Practice of Journalism in Pakistan.” Journalism Studies 13 (4): 616–632. doi: 10.1080/1461670X.2011.629109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Docherty, Thomas. 2014. Confessions: The Philosophy of Transparency. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• et al. 2003. Arguments for Immortality. New Plymouth, NZ: Govett-Brewster Gallery.
   Google Scholar
• Evaluating New Zealand’s Participation in the Venice Art Biennale: Final Report. 2006. [prepared for Creative New Zealand]. Surry Hills, N.S.W: SGS Economics and Planning Pty.
   Google Scholar
• Field, Michael. 2015. “Eleanor Catton’s Problem with New Zealand.” Stuff.co.nz, January 28. http://www.stuff.co.nz/entertainment/books/65463098/eleanor-cattons-problem-with-new-zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer-Lichte, Erika. 2008. The Transformative Power of Performance: A New Aesthetics. Translated by S. I. Jain. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzsimons, Tom. 2009. “Artwork with Fly Undone a Letdown.” The Dominion Post, March 30. http://www.stuff.co.nz/entertainment/arts/2300058/Artwork-with-fly-undone-a-letdown.
   Google Scholar
• Gans, Herbert J. 1979. Deciding What’s News: A Study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek and Time. New York: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hesmondhalgh, David. 2002. The Cultural Industries. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, Tom. 2014. “Hager's Book Empowers Venice-bound Artist.” Stuff, August 19. http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/10396695/Hagers-book-empowers-Venice-bound-artist.
   Google Scholar
• Keane, Pip ( Executive Producer). 2004, July 14. Holmes [Television broadcast]. Auckland, NZ: TVNZ.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, Tracy L. M. 2000. “An Exploratory Study of Feminist Experiences in Cyberspace.” CyberPsychology & Behavior 3 (5): 707–719. doi: 10.1089/10949310050191719
   Google Scholar
• Kester, Grant H. 2004. Conversation Pieces: Community and Communication in Modern Art. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krause, Monika. 2011. “Reporting and the Transformations of the Journalistic Field: US News Media, 1890–2000.” Media, Culture & Society 33 (1), 89–104. doi: 10.1177/0163443710385502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantal Mouffe. 2001. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. 2nd ed. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Lingard, Bob, and Shaun Rawolle. 2004. “Mediatizing Educational Policy: The Journalistic Field, Science Policy, and Cross-field Effects.” Journal of Education Policy 19 (3): 361–380. doi: 10.1080/0268093042000207665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchetti, Dominique. 2005. “Subfields of Specialized Journalism.” In Bourdieu and the Journalistic Field, edited by R. Benson & E. Neveu, 64–82. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, Philip. 2015. “School of Thought: On the Dangers of Intellectualism.” The Press, February 15. http://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/christchurch-life/art-and-stage/66191857/School-of-thought-On-the-dangers-of-intellectualism.
   Google Scholar
• McLean, Robyn. 2005a. “Art of the Unspeakable.” Dominion Post, June 23, p. A1.
   Google Scholar
• McLean, Robyn. 2005b. “Dodge Tactics.” Dominion Post, June 23, p. A4.
   Google Scholar
• McLean, Robyn. 2005c. “More Bull from Donkey Dunny Artists?” Dominion Post, June 25, p. A9.
   Google Scholar
• McLean, Robyn. 2005d. “PM May Become et al. Target.” Dominion Post, June 25, p. A9.
   Google Scholar
• McLean, Robyn. 2005e. “Feeling Fundamentally Ripped off.” Dominion Post, June 27, p. A4.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, Thomas. 2002. Media Democracy: How the Media Colonize Politics. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Muhlmann, Geraldine. 2010. Journalism for Democracy. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Negus, Keith. 2002. “The Work of Cultural Intermediaries and the Enduring Distance between Production and Consumption.” Cultural Studies 16 (4): 501–515. doi: 10.1080/09502380210139089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phelan, Sean. 2011. “Media Critique, Agonistic Respect and the (Im)possibility of a ‘Really Quite Pretentious’ Liminal Space.” Journalism Practice 5 (3): 272–286. doi: 10.1080/17512786.2010.530981
   Google Scholar
• Phelan, Sean. 2014. Neoliberalism, Media and the Political. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Pihlainen, Kalle. 2002. “Of Closure and Convention: Surpassing Representation through Performance and the Referential.” Rethinking History 6 (2): 179–200. doi: 10.1080/13642520210145635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rupar, Verica. 2007. “ Investigating the Journalistic Field: The Influence of Objectivity as a Journalistic Norm on the Public Debate on Genetic Engineering in New Zealand.” Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Schudson, Michael. 1995. The Power of News. London: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, Ida. 2007. “The Journalistic Gut Feeling: Journalistic Doxa, News Habitus and Orthodox News Values.” Journalism Practice 1 (2): 190–207. doi: 10.1080/17512780701275507
   Google Scholar
• Szántó, András. 2001. “Don’t Shoot the Messenger: Why the Art World and the Press don’t Get Along.” In Unsettling “Sensation”: Arts-policy Lessons from the Brooklyn Museum of Art Controversy, edited by L. Rothfield, 181–197. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tuchman, Gaye. 1972. “Objectivity as Strategic Ritual: An Examination of Newsmen's Notions of Objectivity.” American Journal of Sociology 77 (4): 660–679. doi: 10.1086/225193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Two Artists Selected for Venice Biennale.” 2008. The Dominion Post, June 26. http://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/news/our-communities/503438/Two-artists-selected-for-Venice-Biennale.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, Joshua R., and John C. Tang. 2003. “When Can I Expect an Email Response? A Study of Rhythms in Email Usage.” Paper presented at the Eighth European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Helsinki, Finland, 14–18 September 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Vicente, M. 2005. “Et al. The Fundamental Practice.” Contemporary Visual Arts & Culture Broadsheet 34 (2): 77–79.
   Google Scholar