When Does an Infographic Say More Than a Thousand Words?

REFERENCES

• Adam, Pegie S., Sara Quinn, and Rick Edmonds. 2007. Eyetracking the News: A Study of Print and Online Reading. St. Petersburg, FL: Poynter Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Behkit, Elsayed 2009. “Infographics in the United Arab Emirates Newspapers.” Journalism 10 (4): 492–508. doi: 10.1177/1464884909104952
   Google Scholar
• Beymer, David, Daniel Russel, and Peter Orton. 2007. “An Eye Tracking Study of How Font Size, Font Type, and Pictures Influence Online Reading.” BCS-HCI ‘08 Proceedings of the 22nd British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: Culture, Creativity, Interaction, 2: 15-18.
   Google Scholar
• Bakker, Piet, Yael de Haan, and Carel Kuitenbrouwer. 2013. Wat werkt? Een verkenning van de praktische en wetenschappelijke kennis over informatievisualisaties [What works? An inventarization of the practical and academic knowledge on information visualizations]. University of Applied Sciences Utrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Boucheix, Jean-Michel and Richard K. Lowe, R. 2010. “An Eye Tracking Comparison of External Pointing Cues and Internal Continuous Cues in Learning with Complex Animations.” Learning and Instruction 2 (20): 123–135. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brescani, Sabrina, and Martin J. Eppler. 2009. “The Risks Of Visualizations: A Classification of Disadvantages Associated With Graphic Representations Of Information.” ICA working paper 1/2. University of Lugano.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, Alan. 2012. “The Nature of Qualitative Research.” Chap. 17 In Social Research Methods, 379–414. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bucher, Hans-Jurgen, and Peter Schumacher. 2006. “The Relevance of Attention for Selecting News Content. An eye-Tracking Study on Attention Patterns in the Reception of Print and Online Media.” Communications 31(3): 347–368. doi: 10.1515/COMMUN.2006.022
   Google Scholar
• Burmester, Michael, Marcus Mast, Ralph Tille, and Wibke Weber. 2010. How Users Perceive and Use Interactive Information Graphics: An Exploratory Study. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference Information Visualization (IV 2010), London, United Kingdom, July 2010, 361–368.
   Google Scholar
• Butcher, Kirsten R. 2006. “Learning From Text with Diagrams: Promoting Mental Model Development and Inference Generation.” Journal of Educational Psychology 98: 182–197. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cairo, Albert. 2013. The Functional art: an Introduction to Information Graphics and Visualization. Berkeley, CA: New Riders.
   Google Scholar
• De Koning, Bjorn, Huib Tabbers, Remy Rikers, and F. Paas. 2007. “Attention Cueing as A Means to Enhance Learning From an Animation.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 21: 731–746. doi: 10.1002/acp.1346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzin, Norman K. 1978. Sociological Methods: A Source Book. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Dick, Murray. 2014. “Interactive Infographics and News Values.” Digital Journalism 2 (4): 490–506. doi: 10.1080/21670811.2013.841368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duchowski, Andrew. 2007. Eye Tracking Methodology: Theory and Practice. London: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, Rirchard, Damian Radcliffe, David Levy, Rasmus Klein Nielsen, and Nic Newman. 2015. Reuters Institute digital news report 2015: supplementary report. Reuters Institute for the study of journalism. http://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/Supplementary%20Digital%20News%20Report%202015.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, Bob. 2014. “The Future of Journalism: in an age of Digital Media and Economic Uncertainty.” Journalism Practice 8 (5): 469–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2014.942090
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, Mario, and Pegie S. Adam. 1991. Eyes on the News. St. Petersburg, FL: The Poynter Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Geldens, P. M., and Marjoribanks, T. (2015). "A Few Years Ago I Thought it was Fairly Dead in the Water’: Newspaper Printing, new Media and job Insecurity in Australia." Labour & Industry: a journal of the social and economic relations of work 25 (2): 134–149. doi: 10.1080/10301763.2015.1060813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giardina, Marco, and Pablo Medina. 2013. “Information Graphics Design Challenges and Workflow Management.” Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies 3 (1): 108–124.
   Google Scholar
• Holmqvist, Kenneth, Jana Holsanova, Maria Barthelson, and Daniel Lundqvist. 2003. “Reading or Scanning? A Study of Newspaper and Net Paper Reading.” In The Mind’s Eye: Cognitive and Applied Aspects of Eye Movement Research. Section 5: Eye Movements in Media Applications and Communication, edited by Jukka Hyönä, Karina Radach and Heiner Deubel, 657–670. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• Holmqvist, Kenneth, and Constanze Wartenberg. 2005. “The Role of Local Design Factors For Newspaper Reading Behaviour: An Eye Tracking Perspective.” Lund University Cognitive Studies 127.
   Google Scholar
• Holsanova, Jana, Nils Holmberg, and Kenneth Holmqvist. 2008. “Reading Information Graphics: The Role of Spatial Contiguity and Dual Attentional Guidance.” Applied cognitive psychology 22: 1–12. doi:10.1002/acp.1525 doi: 10.1002/acp.1361
   Google Scholar
• Holsanova, Jana, Henrik Rahm, and Kenneth Holmqvist. 2006. “Entry Points and Reading Paths on Newspaper Spreads: Comparing A Semiotic Analysis with eye-Tracking Measurements.” Visual communication 5 (1): 65–93. doi: 10.1177/1470357206061005
   Google Scholar
• Kleis Nielsen, Rasmus. 2016. “Folk Theories of Journalism: The Many Faces of A Local Newspaper.” Journalism Studies 17 (7): 840–848. doi: 10.1080/1461670X.2016.1165140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Eun-Ju, and Ye Weon Kim. 2016. “Effects of Infographics on News Elaboration, Acquisition, and Evaluation: Prior Knowledge and Issue Involvement as Moderators." New Media & Society 18 (8): 1579–1598. doi: 10.1177/1461444814567982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lester, Paul. M. 2000. Visual Communication: Images with Messages. New York: Whatsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Lewenstein, Marion, Greg Edwards, Deborah Tatar, and Andrew De Vigal. 2000. “The Stanford-Poynter Eyetracking Study”, [http://www.poynter.org/eyetrack2000 – access via the Internet Archive].
   Google Scholar
• Lowrey, Wilson. 2002. “Word People. Vs Picture People: Normative Differences and Strategies for Control Over Work among Newsroom Subgroups.” Mass Communication & Society 5 (4): 411–432. doi: 10.1207/S15327825MCS0504_03
   Google Scholar
• Lunt, Peter, and Sonia Livingstone. 1996. “Rethinking the Focus Group in Media and Communications Research.” Journal of Communication 46 (2): 79–98. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1996.tb01475.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyra, Kamila, Seiji Isotani, Rachel Reis, Leonardo Marques, Laiz Pedro, Patricia Jacques, and Ibert Bitencourt. 2016. “Infographics or Graphics + Text: Which Material is Best for Robust Learning?” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT).
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, Richard. E. 2005. “Principles for Managing Essential Processing in Multimedia Learning: Coherence, Signaling, Redundancy, Spatial Contiguity and Temporal Contiguity Principles.” Chapter 11 In Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCloud, Scott. 1994. Understanding Comics: the Invisible art. New York: HarperPerennial.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno, Roxana, and Alfred Valdez. 2005. “Cognitive Load and Learning Effects of Having Students Organize Pictures and Words in Multimedia Environments: The Role of Student Interactivity and Feedback." Educational Technology Research and Development 53: 35–45. doi: 10.1007/BF02504796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, Nic, David Levy, and Rasmus Klein Nielsen. 2015. Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2015. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, Michael Q. 1990. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Poynter Institute. 2004. Eyetrack III: What News Websites Look Like Through Readers’ Eyes. http://www.poynter.org/uncategorized/24963/eyetrack-iii-what-news-websites-look-like-through-readers-eyes.
   Google Scholar
• Radach, Ralph, Stefanie Lemmer, Christina Vorstius, Dieter Heller, and Karina Radach. 2003. Eye Movements in the Processing of Print Advertisements. In The Mind’s eye: Cognitive and Applied Aspects of eye Movement Research, edited by Jukka Hyon, Ralph Radach, and Heinder Deubel, 609–632. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, Roland. 2004. “Interactive Info Graphics in Europe—Added Value to Online Mass Media: A Preliminary Survey.” Journalism studies 5 (4): 563–570. doi: 10.1080/14616700412331296473
   Google Scholar
• Segel, Edward, and Jeffrey Heer. 2010. “Narrative Visualization: Telling Stories with Data." IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 16 (6): 1139–1148. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2010.179
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siricharoen, Waralak.V. 2013. "Infographics: The New Communication Tools in Digital Age." Paper presented at The International Conference on E-Technologies and Business on the Web (EBW2013), Thailand. http://sdiwc.net/digital-library/infographics-the-new-communication-tools-in-digital-age.
   Google Scholar
• Siles, Ignacio, and Pablo J. Boczkowski. 2012. “Making Sense of the Newspaper Crisis: A Critical Assessment of Existing Research and an Agenda for Future Work.” New Media & Society 14 (8): 1375–1394. doi:1461444812455148 doi: 10.1177/1461444812455148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smit, Gerard, Yael de Haan, and Laura Buijs. 2014. “Working With or Next to Each Other? Boundary Crossing in the Field of Information Visualisation.” The journal of media innovations 1 (2): 36–51. doi: 10.5617/jmi.v1i2.875
   Google Scholar
• Smit, Gerard, Yael de Haan, and Renee Van der Nat. 2015. De Nieuwswaarde van Visualisaties [The news values of visualizations]. Final Report of research project. http://www.journalismlab.nl/eindrapportage-de-nieuwswaarde-van-datavisualisaties/
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, Anselm. L., and Juliet Corbin. 1990. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newburg Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sung, Eunmo, and Richard Mayer. 2012. “When Graphics Improve Liking but not Learning From Online Lessons.” Computers in Human Behavior 28 (5): 1618–1625. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.03.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vansteenkiste, Pieter, Greet Cardon, and Matthieu Lenoir. 2013. “Dealing with Head-Mounted Eye-Tracking Data: Comparison of a Frame-By-Frame and a Fixation-Based Analysis.” Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Eye Tracking South Africa, 55–57.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, Wibke, and Hannes Rall. 2012. “Data Visualization in Online Journalism and Its Implications for the Production Process”. The 16 International Conference on Information Visualization. Montpellier, 11-13 July 2012. doi: 10.1109/IV.2012.65
   Google Scholar
• Wester, Fred, and Vincent Peters. 2004. Kwalitatieve Analyse. Uitgangspunten en Procedures [ Qualitative analysis: starting point and procedures]. Bussum: Coutinho.
   Google Scholar
• Westlund, Oscar. 2015. “News Consumption in an age of Mobile Media: Patterns, People, Place, and Participation.” Mobile Media & Communication 3 (2): 151–159. doi: 10.1177/2050157914563369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, Dona M. 2010. The Wall Street Journal: Guide to Information Graphics: the Do’s and Don’ts of Presenting Data, Facts and Figures. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar