Gender and Generational Differences in Political Reporters’ Interactivity on Twitter

REFERENCES

• Artwick, Claudette G. 2014. “News Sourcing and Gender on Twitter.” Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism 15 (8): 1111–1127. doi: 10.1177/1464884913505030
   Google Scholar
• Barzilai-Nahon, Karine. 2011. “Gatekeeping: A Critical Review.” Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 43 (1): 1–79. doi: 10.1002/aris.2009.1440430117
   Google Scholar
• Blaagaard, Bolette B. 2013. “Shifting Boundaries: Objectivity, Citizen Journalism and Tomorrow’s Journalists.” Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism 14 (8): 1076–1090. doi: 10.1177/1464884912469081
   Google Scholar
• Broersma, Marcel, and Todd Graham. 2012. “Social Media as Beat: Tweets as a News Source During the 2010 British and Dutch Elections.” Journalism Practice 6 (3): 403–419. doi: 10.1080/17512786.2012.663626
   Google Scholar
• Byrnes, James P., David C. Miller, and William D. Schafer. 1999. “Gender Differences in Risk Taking: A Meta Analysis.” Psychological Bulletin 125 (3): 367–383. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.125.3.367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, Deborah S. 2007. “Profits and Perils: Online News Producers’ Perceptions of Interactivity and Uses of Interactive Features.” Convergence: The International Journal of Research Into New Media Technologies 13 (1): 43–61. doi: 10.1177/1354856507072856
   Google Scholar
• Cozma, Raluca, and Kuan-Ju Chen. 2013. “What’s in a Tweet? Foreign Correspondents’ use of Social Media.” Journalism Practice 7 (1): 33–46. doi: 10.1080/17512786.2012.683340
   Google Scholar
• Domingo, David. 2008. “Interactivity in the Daily Routines of Online Newsrooms: Dealing with an Uncomfortable Myth.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13 (3): 680–704. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2008.00415.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fry, Richard. 2016. “Millennials Overtake Baby Boomers as America’s Largest Generation.” Pew Research Center. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/04/25/millennials-overtake-baby-boomers/.
   Google Scholar
• Gillis, Tamara L., and Kristen Johnson. 2015. “Younger Journalists More Likely to use Social Media.” Newspaper Research Journal 36 (2): 184–196. doi: 10.1177/0739532915587293
   Google Scholar
• Gleason, Stephanie. 2010. “Harnessing Social Media.” American Journalism Review 32 (1): 6–7.
   Google Scholar
• Granado, Antonio. 2011. “Slaves to Journals, Serfs to the Web: The Use of the Internet in Newsgathering among European Science Journalists.” Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism 12 (7): 794–813. doi: 10.1177/1464884911412702
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, Jens F. 1998. “Interactivity: Tracking a New Concept in Media and Communication Studies.” Nordicom Review 19 (1): 185–204.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Thomas J., and Barbara K. Kaye. 2016. “Some Like it Lots: The Influence of Interactivity and Reliance on Credibility.” Computers in Human Behavior 61: 136–145. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiousis, Spiro. 2002. “Interactivity: A Concept Explication.” New Media & Society 4 (3): 355–383. doi: 10.1177/146144480200400303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson, Anders O. 2012. “Interactivity on Swedish Newspaper Websites: What Kind, How Much and Why?” Convergence: The International Journal of Research Into New Media Technologies 18 (2): 195–213. doi: 10.1177/1354856511430184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasorsa, Dominic L. 2012. “Transparency and Other Journalistic Norms on Twitter: The Role of Gender.” Journalism Studies 13 (3): 402–417.
   Google Scholar
• Lasorsa, Dominic L., Seth C. Lewis, and Avery E. Holton. 2012. “Normalizing Twitter Journalism Practice in an Emerging Communication Space.” Journalism Studies 13 (1): 19–36. doi: 10.1080/1461670X.2011.571825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchionni, Doreen M. 2013. “Journalism-as-a-Conversation: A Concept Explication.” Communication Theory 23 (2): 131–147. doi: 10.1111/comt.12007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClure, Jennifer. 2008. “Middleberg/SNCR Survey of Journalists Reveals Generational Gap.” New Communications Review. http://www.newcommreview.com/?p=1368
   Google Scholar
• McMillan, Sally J. 2002. “A Four-Part Model of Cyber-Interactivity: Some Cyber-Places are More Interactive Than Others.” New Media & Society 14 (2): 271–291. doi: 10.1177/14614440222226370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nee, Rebecca C., and Judith Fusco. 2015. “Tweets During a Crisis Follow One-Way Communication.” Newspaper Research Journal 36 (2): 197–211. doi: 10.1177/0739532915587295
   Google Scholar
• Newhagen, John, and Clifford Nass. 1989. “Differential Criteria for Evaluating Credibility of Newspaper and TV News.” Journalism Quarterly 66 (2): 277–284. doi: 10.1177/107769908906600202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otterbacher, Jahna, Matthew A. Shapiro, and Libby Hemphill. 2012. “Tweeting Vertically? Elected Officials’ Interactions with Citizens on Twitter.” CeDEM (Conference for EDemocracy and Open Government) Asia. Retrieved from http://share.iit.edu/bitstream/handle/10560/2889/CeDEM_share.pdf?sequence=1.
   Google Scholar
• Parmelee, John H. 2013. “Political Journalists and Twitter: Influences on Norms and Practices.” Journal of Media Practice 14 (4): 291–305. doi: 10.1386/jmpr.14.4.291_1
   Google Scholar
• Parmelee, John H., and David Deeley. 2017. “Florida Political Reporters Interact Rarely Online.” Newspaper Research Journal 38 (1): 104–118. doi: 10.1177/0739532917698438
   Google Scholar
• Parmelee, John H., Nataliya Roman, Berrin Beasley, and Stephynie C. Perkins. Forthcoming . “Comparing Interactivity on Twitter by Political Reporters at TV Networks, Online-Only News Websites, and Newspapers.” Electronic News.
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. 2015. August 19. “The Demographics of Social Media Users.” Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/08/19/the-demographics-of-social-media-users/.
   Google Scholar
• Poindexter, Paula M. 2012. Millennials, News, and Social Media: Is News Engagement a Thing of the Past? New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Rafaeli, Sheizaf, and Fay Sudweeks. 1997. “Networked Interactivity.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 2 (4), http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00201.x/full. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00201.x
   Google Scholar
• Russell, Frank, M. Marina A, Heesook Choi Hendricks, and Elizabeth C. Stephens. 2015. “Who Sets the News Agenda on Twitter?” Digital Journalism 3 (6): 925–943. doi: 10.1080/21670811.2014.995918
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz, Brad, and Mary Lou Sheffer. 2010. “An Exploratory Study of How Twitter is Affecting Sports Journalism.” International Journal of Sport Communication 3 (2): 226–239. doi: 10.1123/ijsc.3.2.226
   Google Scholar
• Seib, Philip. 2002. Going Live: Getting the News Right in a Real-Time Online World. Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, Jane B. 2005. “The Political J-Blogger: ‘Normalizing’ a New Media Form to Fit Old Norms and Practices.” Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism 6 (2): 173–198. doi: 10.1177/1464884905051009
   Google Scholar
• Song, Ji Hee, and George M. Zinkhan. 2008. “Determinants of Perceived Web Site Interactivity.” Journal of Marketing 72 (2): 99–113. doi: 10.1509/jmkg.72.2.99
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twitter. 2016. About. Retrieved from https://about.twitter.com/company.
   Google Scholar
• Walton, S. Courtney, and Ronald Rice. 2013. “Mediated Disclosure on Twitter: The Roles of Gender and Identity in Boundary Impermeability, Valence, Disclosure, and Stage.” Computers in Human Behavior 29 (4): 1465–1474. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willnat, Lars, and David H. Weaver. 2014. The American Journalist in the Digital Age: Key Findings. Bloomington, IN: School of Journalism, Indiana University. http://www.news.indiana.edu/releases/iu/2014/05/2013-american-journalist-key findings.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, Weiai W., and Miao Feng. 2014. “Talking to the Broadcasters on Twitter: Networked Gatekeeping in Twitter Conversations with Journalists.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 58 (3): 420–437. doi: 10.1080/08838151.2014.935853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar