Consequences of Politicians’ Perceptions of the News Media

REFERENCES

• Aalberg, Toril, and Jesper Strömbäck. 2011. “Media-Driven Men and Media-Critical Women? An Empirical Study of Gender and MPs Relationships with the Media in Norway and Sweden.” International Political Science Review 32 (2): 167–187. doi:10.1177/0192512110378902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altheide, David L., and Robert P. Snow. 1979. Media Logic. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bergkvist, Lars, and John R. Rossiter. 2009. “Tailor-Made Single-Item Measures of Doubly Concrete Constructs.” International Journal of Advertising 28(4): 607–621. doi:10.2501/S0265048709200783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binder, Jens F., Hanna Zagefka, Rupert Brown, Friedrich Funke, Thomas Kessler, and Amélie Mummendey. 2009. “Does Contact Reduce Prejudice or Does Prejudice Reduce Contact? A Longitudinal Test of the Contact Hypothesis among Majority and Minority Groups in Three European Countries.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 96 (4): 843–856. doi:10.1037/a0013470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumler, Jay G., and Michael Gurevitch. 1981. “Politicians and the Press: An Essay in Role Relationship.” In Handbook of Political Communication, edited by Dan D. Nimmo and Keith R. Sanders, 467–493. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Brants, Kees, Claas H. de Vreese, Judith Möller, and Philip van Praag. 2010. “The Real Spiral of Cynicism? Symbiosis and Mistrust Between Politicians and Journalists.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 15 (1): 25–40. doi:10.1177/1940161209351005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniller, Andrew, Douglas Allen, Ashley Tallevi, and Diana C. Mutz. 2017. “Measuring Trust in the Press in a Changing media Environment.” Communication Methods and Measures 11 (1): 76–85. doi:10.1080/19312458.2016.1271113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, Aeron. 2007. The Mediation of Power. A Critical Introduction. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Domke, David, Mark D. Watts, Dhavan V. Shah, and David P. Fan. 1999. “The Politics of Conservative Elites and the ‘Liberal Media’ Argument.” Journal of Communication 49 (4): 35–58. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02816.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmelund-Præstekær, Christian, David N. Hopmann, and Asbjørn S. Nørgaard. 2011. “Does Mediatization Change MP-Media Interaction and MP Attitudes Toward the Media? Evidence From a Longitudinal Study of Danish MPs.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 16 (3): 382–403. doi:10.1177/1940161211400735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giner-Sorolla, Roger, and Shelly Chaiken. 1994. “The Causes of Hostile Media Judgments.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 30 (2): 165–180. doi:10.1006/jesp.1994.1008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graber, Doris. 2003. “The Media and Democracy: Beyond Myths and Stereotypes.” Annual Review of Political Science 6 (1): 139–160. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.6.121901.085707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunther, Albert, Cindy T. Christen, Janice L. Liebhart, and Stella C.-Y. Chia. 2001. “Congenial Public, Contrary Press, and Biased Estimates of the Climate of Opinion.” Public Opinion Quarterly 65 (3): 295–320. doi:10.1086/322846.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunther, Albert C., Nicole Miller, and Janice L. Liebhart. 2009. “Assimilation and Contrast in a Test of the Hostile Media Effect.” Communication Research 36 (6): 747–764. doi:10.1177/0093650209346804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunther, Albert C., and Kathleen Schmitt. 2004. “Mapping Boundaries of the Hostile Media Effect.” Journal of Communication 54(1): 55–70. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02613.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallin, Daniel C., and Paolo Mancini, 2004. Comparing Media Systems. Cambridge: CUP
   Google Scholar
• Higley, John, and Michael Burton. 2006. Elite Foundations of Liberal Democracy. Lanham, Boulder, New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Huge, Michael, and Carroll J. Glynn. 2010. “Hostile Media and the Campaign Trail: Perceived Media Bias in the Race for Governor.” Journal of Communication 60 (1): 165–181. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01473.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kepplinger, Hans M. 2007. “Reciprocal Effects: Toward a Theory of Mass Media Effects on Decision Makers.” Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 12 (2): 3–23. doi:10.1177/1081180X07299798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriesi, Hanspeter. 2012. “The relationship with the media.” Unpublished manuscript., University of Zurich.
   Google Scholar
• Kriesi, Hanspeter, Sandra Lavenex, Frank Esser, Jörg Matthes, Marc Bühlmann, and Daniel Bochsler. 2013. Democracy in the age of Globalization and Mediatization. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Lehmbruch, G. 1996. “Die Korporative Verhandlungsdemokratie in Westmitteleuropa.” Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Politische Wissenschaft 2 (4): 19–41.
   Google Scholar
• Lijphart, A. 1999. Patterns of Democracy: Government Form and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven, London: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, Niklas. 1979. Trust and Power. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Matthes, Jörg. 2013a. “The Affective Underpinning of Hostile Media Perceptions: Exploring the Distinct Effects of Affective and Cognitive Involvement.” Communication Research 40 (3): 360–387. doi:10.1177/0093650211420255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthes, Jörg. 2013b. “Do Hostile Opinion Environments Harm Political Participation? The Moderating Role of Generalized Social Trust.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 25 (1): 23–42. doi:10.1093/ijpor/eds006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthes, Jörg, and Audun Beyer. 2015. “Toward a Cognitive-Affective Process Model of hostile media Perceptions: A Multi-Country Structural Equation Modeling Approach.” Communication Research. onlinefirst. doi:10.1177/0093650215594234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthes, Jörg, Andrew F. Hayes, Hernando Rojas, Fei Shen, S.J. Min, and Ivan Dylko. 2012. “Exemplifying a Dispositional Approach to Cross-Cultural Spiral of Silence Research: Fear of Social Isolation and the Inclination of Self-Censor.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 24 (3): 287–305. doi:10.1093/ijpor/eds015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maurer, Peter. 2011. “Explaining Perceived Media Influence in Politics: An Analysis of the Interplay of Context and Attitudes in Four European Democracies.” Publizistik 56: 27–50. doi:10.1007/s11616-010-0104-3.
   Google Scholar
• Maurer, Peter, and Markus Beiler. 2017. “Networking and Political Alignment as Strategies to Control the News: Interaction Between Journalists and Politicians.” Journalism Studies, advance access.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maurer, Peter, and Barbara Pfetsch. 2014. “News Coverage of Politics and Conflict Levels.” Journalism Studies 15 (3): 339–355. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2014.889477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misztal, Barbara. 1996. Trust in Modern Societies: The Search for the Bases of Social Order. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moritz, Simon. 2010. “Political Support and Democratic Performance in Old and New Democracies.” In Democracy Under Scrutiny. Elites, Citizens, Cultures, edited by Ursula J. van Beek, 147–172. Opladen, Farmington Hills, MI: Barbara Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Moyser, George, and Margaret Wagstaffe, eds. 1987. Research Methods for Elite Studies. London: Allan & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Mutz, Diana C., and Byron Reeves. 2005. “The New Videomalaise: Effects of Televised Incivility on Political Trust.” American Political Science Review 99 (1): 1–15. doi:10.1017/S0003055405051452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagy, Mark S. 2002. “Using a Single-Item Approach to Measure Facet Job Satisfaction.” Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 75 (1): 77–86. doi:10.1348/096317902167658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nir, Lilach. 2005. “Ambivalent Social Networks and Their Consequences for Participation.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 17 (4): 422–442. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edh069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nir, Lilach. 2011. “Disagreement and Opposition in Social Networks: Does Disagreement Discourage Turnout?” Political Studies 59 (3): 674–692. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00873.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh, Hyun J., Jongmin Park, and Wayne Wanta. 2011. “Exploring Factors in the Hostile Media Perception: Partisanship, Electoral Engagement, and Media Use Patterns.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 88 (1): 40–54. doi:10.1177/107769901108800103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pattie, Charles J., and Ronald J. Johnston. 2009. “Conversation, Disagreement and Political Participation.” Political Behavior 31 (2): 261–285. doi:10.1007/s11109-008-9071-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfetsch, Barbara, ed. 2014. Political Communication Cultures in Western Europe: Attitudes of Political Actors and Journalists in Nine Countries. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Rojas, Hernando. 2010. “‘Corrective’ Actions in the Public Sphere: How Perceptions of Media Effects Shape Political Behaviors.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 22 (3): 343–363. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edq018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellers, Patrick. 2000. “Manipulating the Message in the U.S. Congress.” Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 5 (1): 22–31. doi: 10.1177/1081180X00005001003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strömbäck, Jesper. 2008. “Four Phases of Mediatization: An Analysis of the Mediatization of Politics.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 13(3): 228–246. doi:10.1177/1940161208319097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strömbäck, Jesper, and Peter van Aelst. 2013. “Why Political Parties Adapt to the Media: Exploring the Fourth Dimension of Mediatization.” International Communication Gazette, 75 (4): 341–358. doi:10.1177/1748048513482266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsfati, Yariv. 2007. “Hostile Media Perceptions, Presumed Media Influence and Minority Alienation: The Case of Arabs in Israel.” Journal of Communication 57: 632–651. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00361.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsfati, Yariv, and Jonathan Cohen. 2005a. “Democratic Consequences of Hostile Media Perceptions: The Case of Gaza Settlers.” Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 10 (4): 28–51. doi:10.1177/1081180X05280776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsfati, Yariv, and Jonathan Cohen. 2005b. “The Influence of Presumed Media Influence on Democratic Legitimacy: The Case of Gaza Settlers.” Communication Research 32 (6): 794–821. doi:10.1177/0093650205281057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsfati, Yariv, and Yoram Peri. 2006. “Mainstream Media Skepticism and Exposure to Extra-National and Sectorial News Media: The Case of Israel.” Mass Communication and Society 9 (2): 165–187. doi:10.1207/s15327825mcs0902_3.
   Google Scholar
• Vallone, Robert P., Lee Ross, and Mark R. Lepper. 1985. “The Hostile Media Phenomenon: Biased Perception and Perceptions of Media Bias in Coverage of the Beirut Massacre.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 49 (3): 577–585. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.49.3.577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Aelst, Peter, and Toril Aalberg. 2011. “Between Trust and Suspicion. A Comparative Study of the Relationship Between Politicians and Political Journalists in Belgium, Norway and Sweden.” Javnost – The Public 18 (4): 73–88. doi:10.1080/13183222.2011.11009068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Aelst, Peter, Kees Brants, Philip van Praag, Claes de Vreese, Michiel Nuytemans, and Arjen van Dalen. 2008. “The Fourth Estate as Superpower? An Empirical Study of Perceptions of Media Power in Belgium and the Netherlands.” Journalism Studies 9 (4): 494–511. doi:10.1080/14616700802114134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar