The Accountability and Transparency of Whistleblowing Platforms Issues of Networked Journalism and Contested Boundaries

References

• Ananny, Mike, and Kate Crawford. 2015. “A Liminal Press.” Digital Journalism 3 (2): 192–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardoel, Jo, and Leen d’Haenens. 2004. “Media Responsibility and Accountability: New Conceptualizations and Practices.” Communications 29 (1): 5–25.
   Google Scholar
• Beckett, Charlie. 2008. SuperMedia: Saving Journalism So It Can Save the World. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Borges-Rey, Eddy. 2017. “Towards an Epistemology of Data Journalism in the Devolved Nations of the United Kingdom: Changes and Continuities in Materiality, Performativity and Reflexivity.” Journalism 21 (7): 915–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brants, Kees. 2013. “Trust, Cynicism, and Responsiveness: The Uneasy Situation of Journalism in Democracy.” In Rethinking Journalism: Trust and Participation in a Transformed News Landscape, edited by Chris Peters, and Marcel Broersma, 15–27. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brants, Kees, and Yael De Haan. 2010. “Taking the Public Seriously: Three Models of Responsiveness in Media and Journalism.” Media, Culture & Society 32 (3): 411–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brevini, Elisabetta. 2017. "WikiLeaks: Between Disclosure and Whistle-Blowing in Digital Times." Sociology Compass 11 (30). https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12457.
   Google Scholar
• Briant, Emma L., and Alicia Wanless. 2018. “A Digital Ménage à Trois: Strategic Leaks, Propaganda and Journalism.” In Countering Online Propaganda and Violent Extremism: The Dark Side of Digital Diplomacy, edited by Corneliu Bjola, and James Pamment, 44–65. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bruns, Axel. 2014. “Media Innovation, User Innovations, Societal Innovations.” The Journal of Media Innovations 1 (1): 13–27.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, Matt. 2015. “Introduction: The Many Boundaries of Journalism.” In Boundaries of Journalism: Professionalism, Practices and Participation, edited by Matt Carlson, and Seth C. Lewis, 1–19. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, Matt, and Seth C Lewis, eds. 2015. Boundaries of Journalism: Professionalism, Practices and Participation. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chadwick, Andrew. 2013. The Hybrid Media System. Politics and Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, Gabriella. 2019. “How has the Fight for Anonymity and Privacy Advanced Since Snowden’s Whistle-Blowing?” Media, Culture & Society 41 (4): 565–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, Joseph. 2016. “How ‘Kind of Everything Went Wrong’ With the Turkey Data Dump.” Motherboard, July 28. https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/kb7pgw/what-went-wrong-with-the-turkey-data-dump.
   Google Scholar
• De Haan, Yael, and Jo Bardoel. 2011. “From Trust to Accountability: Negotiating Media Performance in the Netherlands, 1987–2007.” European Journal of Communication 26 (3): 230–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Haan, Yael, and Jo Bardoel. 2012. “Accountability in the Newsroom: Reaching Out to the Public or a Form of Window Dressing?” Studies in Communication Sciences 12: 17–21.
   Google Scholar
• Di Salvo, Philip. 2017. “Hacking/Journalism.” Limn 8: 1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Di Salvo, Philip. 2020. Digital Whistleblowing Platforms in Journalism. Encrypting Leaks. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Fengler, Susanne, Tobias Eberwein, Gianpietro Mazzoleni, Colin Porlezza, and Stephan Russ-Mohl. 2014. Journalists and Media Accountability: An International Study of News People in the Digital Age. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Fereday, J., and E. Muir-Cochrane. 2006. “Demonstrating Rigor Using Thematic Analysis: A Hybrid Approach of Inductive and Deductive Coding and Theme Development.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 5 (1): 80–92.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, Chris. 2013. "WikiLeaks and the Public Interest Dilemma: A View from Inside the Media." In Beyond WikiLeaks. Implications for the Future of Communications, Journalism, and Society, edited by Benedetta Brevini, Arne Hintz, and P. McCurdy, 78–84. Houndmills: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, Barney G. and Anselm L. Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Gibney, Alex. 2016. “Can We Trust Julian Assange and WikiLeaks?” The New York Times, August 8. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/08/opinion/can-we-trust-julian-assange-and-wikileaks.html?mcubz=3.
   Google Scholar
• Gieryn, Thomas F. 1983. “Boundary-work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists.” American Sociological Review 48 (6): 781–795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanna, Paul. 2012. “Using Internet Technologies (Such as Skype) as a Research Medium: A Research Note.” Qualitative Research 12 (2): 239–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heikkilä, Heikki, David Domingo, Judith Pies, Michal Glowacki, Michal Kus, and Olivier Baisnée. 2012. “Media Accountability Goes Online. A Transnational Study on Emerging Practices and Innovations.” Working Paper. http://www.mediaact.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/WP4_Outcomes/WP4_Report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, Tim. 2007. Hacking. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Landert, Daniela and Gianluca Miscione. 2017. "Narrating the Stories of Leaked Data: The Changing Role of Journalists after Wikileaks and Snowden." Discourse, Context & Media 19: 13–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marlin, Randal. 2011. "Propaganda and the Ethics of WikiLeaks." Global Media Journal 5(1): 1-8.
   Google Scholar
• Marmura, Stephen ME. 2018. The WikiLeaks Paradigm. Cham: Palgrave Pivot.
   Google Scholar
• McQuail, Dennis. 1997. “Accountability of Media to Society: Principles and Means.” European Journal of Communication 12 (4): 511–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McQuail, Dennis. 2003. Media Accountability and Freedom of Publication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McQuail, Dennis. 2010. McQuail’s Mass Communication Theory. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Miceli, Marcia P., and Janet P. Near. 1992. Blowing the Whistle: The Organizational and Legal Implications for Companies and Their Employees. New York: Lexington.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, Andrea. 2016. “Snowden and WikiLeaks Clash Over Leaked Democratic Party Emails.” The Washington Post, July 28. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2016/07/28/a-twitter-spat-breaks-out-between-snowden-and-wikileaks/?utm_term=.c7dc9035be02.
   Google Scholar
• Plaisance, Patrick L. 2000. “The Concept of Media Accountability Reconsidered.” Journal of Mass Media Ethics 15 (4): 257–268.
   Google Scholar
• Porlezza, Colin, and Sergio Splendore. 2016. “Accountability and Transparency of Entrepreneurial Journalism.” Journalism Practice 10 (2): 196–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, Walter W. 1990. “Neither Market Nor Hierarchy: Network Forms of Organization.” Research in Organizational Behavior 12: 295–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prior, Lindsay. 2003. Using Documents in Social Research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pritchard, David. 2000. Holding the Media Accountable. Citizens, Ethics and the law. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Siles, Ignacio, and Pablo J. Boczkowski. 2012. “Making Sense of the Newspaper Crisis: A Critical Assessment of Existing Research and an Agenda for Future Work.” New Media & Society 14 (8): 1375–1394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Splendore, Sergio, Philip Di Salvo, Tobias Eberwein, Harmen Groenhart, Michal Kus, and Colin Porlezza. 2016. “Educational Strategies in Data Journalism.” Journalism 17 (1): 138–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterne, Jonathan. 2003. “Bourdieu, Technique and Technology.” Cultural Studies 17 (3/4): 367–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomass, Barbara. 2011. “WikiLeaks and the Question of Responsibility Within a Global Democracy.” European View 10 (1): 17–23.
   Google Scholar
• Transparency International Netherlands. 2019. “Mapping the EU on Legal Whistleblowing Protection Assessment Before the Implementation of the EU Whistleblowing Directive.” https://www.transparency.nl/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Mapping-the-EU-on-Whistleblower-Protection-TI-NL.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Tufecki, Zeynep. 2016. “WikiLeaks Put Women in Turkey in Danger, for No Reason.” Huffington Post, July 27. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/zeynep-tufekci/wikileaks-erdogan-emails_b_11158792.html.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, Adrienne. 2016. Journalism as Activism: Recoding Media Power. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Uricchio, William. 2014. “True Confessions: WikiLeaks, Contested Truths, and Narrative Containment.” The International Journal of Communication 8 (12): 2567–2573.
   Google Scholar
• van der Velden, Peter, Mauro Pecoraro, Mijke S. Houwerzijl, and Erik van der Meulen. 2018. “Mental Health Problems Among Whistleblowers: A Comparative Study.” Psychological Reports 122 (2): 632–644.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vegh, Sandor. 2005. “The Media’s Portrayal of Hacking, Hackers and Hacktivism Before and After September 11.” First Monday 10: 2. doi:10.5210/fm.v10i2.1206.
   Google Scholar
• Wahl-Jorgensen, Karin. 2014. “Is WikiLeaks Challenging the Paradigm of Journalism? Boundary Work and Beyond.” International Journal of Communication 8 (12): 2581–2592.
   Google Scholar
• Wahl-Jorgensen, Karin, and Joanne Hunt. 2012. “Journalism, Accountability and the Possibilities for Structural Critique: A Case Study of Coverage of Whistleblowing.” Journalism 3 (4): 399–416.
   Google Scholar
• Witzel, Andreas. 2000. “Das Problemzentrierte Interview.” Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung 1: 1. http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1132/2519.
   Google Scholar
• Zelizer, Barbie, and Stuart Allan. 2010. Keywords in News and Journalism Studies. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar