Credibility and Enjoyment through Data? Effects of Statistical Information and Data Visualizations on Message Credibility and Reading Experience

References

• Appel, M., E. Koch, M. Schreier, and N. Groeben. 2002. “Aspekte des Leseerlebens: Skalenentwicklung [Aspects of Reading Experience: Scale Development].” Zeitschrift Für Medienpsychologie 14: 149–154. doi:10.1026//1617-6383.14.4.149.
   Google Scholar
• Appelman, A., and S. S. Sundar. 2016. “Measuring Message Credibility.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 93 (1): 59–79. doi:10.1177/1077699015606057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arpan, Laura M. 2009. “The Effects of Exemplification on Perceptions of News Credibility.” Mass Communication and Society 12 (3): 249–270. doi:10.1080/15205430802136721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brosius, H.-B. 2003. “Exemplars in the News: A Theory of the Effects of Political Communication.” In Communication and Emotion: Essays in Honor of Dolf Zillmann, edited by Jennings Bryant, David R. Roskos-Ewoldsen, and Joanne Cantor, 179–194. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Burmester, M., M. Mast, R. Tille, and W. Weber. 2010. How users Perceive and Use Interactive Information Graphics: An Exploratory Study. In IEEE Proceedings of the 14th International Conference Information Visualisation, 361–368. IEEE. doi:10.1109/IV.2010.57
   Google Scholar
• Bussemas, E. 2018. “Mehr als Balken und Torten. Eine Experimentelle Befragung zur Wahrnehmung von interaktiven Datenvisualisierungen im Journalismus [More than Bars and Pie Charts: An Experimental Survey on the Perception of Interactive Data Visualizations in Journalism].” Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft 66 (2): 188–216. doi:10.5771/1615-634X-2018-2-188.
   Google Scholar
• Callison, C., R. Gibson, and D. Zillmann. 2009. “How to Report Quantitative Information in News Stories.” Newspaper Research Journal 30 (2): 43–55. doi:10.1177/073953290903000205.
   Google Scholar
• Coddington, M. 2015. “Clarifying Journalism’s Quantitative Turn.” Digital Journalism 3 (3): 331–348. doi:10.1080/21670811.2014.976400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cokely, E. T., M. Galesic, E. Schulz, S. Ghazal, and R. Garcia-Retamero. 2012. “Measuring Risk Literacy: The Berlin Numeracy Test.” Judgment and Decision Making 7 (1): 25–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. 1975. Beyond Boredom and Anxiety. The Jossey-Bass Behavioral Science Series. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Cushion, S., J. Lewis, and R. Callaghan. 2017. “Data Journalism, Impartiality and Statistical Claims.” Journalism Practice 11 (10): 1198–1215. doi:10.1080/17512786.2016.1256789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eysenbach, G. 2008. “Credibility of Health Information and Digital Media: New Perspective and Implications for Youth.” In The John D. and Catherine T. Macarthur Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning. Digital Media, Youth, and Credibility, edited by M. J. Metzger and A. J. Flanagin, 132–154. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Golan, G. J. 2010. “New Perspectives on Media Credibility Research.” American Behavioral Scientist 54 (1): 3–7. doi:10.1177/0002764210376307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, M. C., and T. C. Brock. 2000. “The Role of Transportation in the Persuasiveness of Public Narratives.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79 (5): 701–721. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.79.5.701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haan, Y. de, S. Kruikemeier, S. Lecheler, G. Smit, and R. van der Nat. 2018. “Audience Uses and Evaluations of News Visualizations: When Does an Infographic Say More than a Thousand Words?” In News, Numbers and Public Opinion in a Data-Driven World, edited by A. Nguyen, 191–205. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Henke, J., L. Leissner, and W. Möhring. 2019. “How can Journalists Promote News Credibility? Effects of Evidences on Trust and Credibility.” Journalism Practice, online first. doi:10.1080/17512786.2019.1605839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, T. 2006. “Influence of Structural and Message Features on Web Site Credibility.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 57 (1): 114–127. doi:10.1002/asi.20258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalogeropoulos, A., R. Fletcher, and R. K. Nielsen. 2018. “News Brand Attribution in Distributed Environments: Do People Know Where They get Their News?” New Media & Society 21 (3): 583–601. doi:10.1177/1461444818801313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J., and A. M. Rubin. 1997. “The Variable Influence of Audience Activity on Media Effects.” Communication Research 24 (2): 107–135. doi:10.1177/2F009365097024002001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, M. 2015. “Data Journalism in the UK: A Preliminary Analysis of Form and Content.” Journal of Media Practice 16 (1): 55–72. doi:10.1080/14682753.2015.1015801.
   Google Scholar
• Koetsenruijter, A. W. M. 2011. “Using Numbers in News Increases Story Credibility.” Newspaper Research Journal 32 (2): 74–82. doi:10.1177/073953291103200207.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, E.-J., and Y. W. Kim. 2016. “Effects of Infographics on News Elaboration, Acquisition, and Evaluation: Prior Knowledge and Issue Involvement as Moderators.” New Media & Society 18 (8): 1579–1598. doi:10.1177/1461444814567982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiner, D. J. 2016. “Our Research’s Breadth Lives on Convenience Samples: A Case Study of the Online Respondent Pool “SoSci Panel”.” Studies in Communication | Media 5 (4): 367–396. doi:10.5771/2192-4007-2016-4-367.
   Google Scholar
• Link, E., D. Possler, and W. Möhring. 2017. “Neue Strategien des Journalismus auf dem Prüfstand: Die Wirkung des Trends Datenjournalismus aus Rezipientensicht [Testing new Strategies in Journalism: The Effects of the Trend Data Journalism from News Users’ Perspective].” In 100 Jahre Kommunikationswissenschaft in Deutschland: Von einem Spezialfach zur Integrationsdisziplin. [100 Years of Communication Science in Germany. From Specialty to Integrative Discipline], edited by M. Beiler and M. Bigl, 271–288. Köln: Herbert von Halem.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Y. 2003. “Developing a Scale to Measure the Interactivity of Websites.” Journal of Advertising Research 43 (2): 207–216. doi:10.2501/JAR-43-2-207-216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., and L. J. Shrum. 2009. “A Dual-Process Model of Interactivity Effects.” Journal of Advertising 38 (2): 53–68. doi:10.2753/JOA0091-3367380204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locoro, A., F. Cabitza, R. Actis-Grosso, and C. Batini. 2017. “Static and Interactive Infographics in Daily Tasks: A Value-in-use and Quality of Interaction User Study.” Computers in Human Behavior 71: 240–257. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loosen, W., J. Reimer, and F. De Silva-Schmidt. 2020. “Data-Driven Reporting: An On-Going (r)Evolution? An Analysis of Projects Nominated for the Data Journalism Awards 2013–2016.” Journalism 21 (9): 1246–1263. doi:10.1177%2F1464884917735691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier, S. R. 2018. “The Power of Numbers, Reconsidered.” In News, Numbers and Public Opinion in a Data-Driven World, edited by A. Nguyen, 133–143. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• McConway, K. 2015. “Statistics and the Media: A Statistician’s View.” Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism 17 (1): 49–65. doi:10.1177/1464884915593243.
   Google Scholar
• Metzger, M. J., and A. J. Flanagin. 2013. “Credibility and Trust of Information in Online Environments: The Use of Cognitive Heuristics.” Journal of Pragmatics 59 (B): 210–220. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2013.07.012.
   Google Scholar
• Metzger, M. J., A. J. Flanagin, K. Eyal, D. R. Lemus, and R. M. Mccann. 2003. “Credibility for the 21st Century: Integrating Perspectives on Source, Message, and Media Credibility in the Contemporary Media Environment.” Annals of the International Communication Association 27 (1): 293–335. doi:10.1080/23808985.2003.11679029.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, N., R. Fletcher, A. Schulz, S. Andi, and R. K. Nielsen. 2020. Digital News Report 2020. Oxford: Reuters Institute. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2020-06/DNR_2020_FINAL.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, A., ed. 2018). News, Numbers and Public Opinion in a Data-Driven World. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Nisbett, R. E., and L. Ross. 1980. Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment ([3rd Print.]). The Century Psychology Series. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., and J. T. Cacioppo. 1986. “The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion.” In Communication and Persuasion, edited by R. E. Petty and J. T. Cacioppo, 1–24. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, C. 2010. “Correlations among Variables in Message and Messenger Credibility Scales.” American Behavioral Scientist 54 (1): 43–56. doi:10.1177/0002764210376310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz, T., M. Ziegele, I. Jakobs, N. Jackob, O. Quiring, and C. Schemer. 2020. “Mainzer Langzeitstudie Medienvertrauen 2019: Medienzynismus weiterhin verbreitet, aber mehr Menschen widersprechen [Mainzer Long-Term Study Media Trust 2019: Media Cynicism Still Widespread, but More People Disagree].” Media Perspektiven, n.V. 6: 322–330.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, J. B. 2007. “Contested Autonomy.” Journalism Studies 8 (1): 79–95.
   Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S. 2008. “The MAIN Model: A Heuristic Approach to Understanding Technology Effects on Credibility." In The John D. and Catherine T. Macarthur Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning. Digital Media, Youth, and Credibility, edited by M. J. Metzger and A. J. Flanagin, 73–100. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tandoc, E. C., and S.-K. Oh. 2017. “Small Departures, Big Continuities?” Journalism Studies 18 (8): 997–1015. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2015.1104260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urban, J., and W. Schweiger. 2014. “News Quality from the Recipients’ Perspective.” Journalism Studies 15 (6): 821–840. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2013.856670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojdynski, B. W. 2015. “Interactive Data Graphics and Information Processing.” Journal of Media Psychology 27 (1): 11–21. doi:10.1027/1864-1105/a000127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, M. L., A. Hermida, and J. Fulda. 2018. “What Makes for Great Data Journalism?” Journalism Practice 12 (1): 115–135. doi:10.1080/17512786.2016.1270171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zillmann, D., and H.-B. Brosius. 2000. Exemplification in Communication: The Influence of Case Reports on the Perception of Issues. LEA's Communication Series Communication Theory and Methodology. New York: Erlbaum Assoc.
   Google Scholar
• Zillmann, D., C. Callison, and R. Gibson. 2009. “Quantitative Media Literacy: Individual Differences in Dealing with Numbers in the News.” Media Psychology 12 (4): 394–416. doi:10.1080/15213260903287275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar