Sharing Native Advertising on Twitter: Content Analyses Examining Disclosure Practices and Their Inoculating Influence

References

• Amazeen, M. A. 2020a. “Resisting Covert Persuasion in Digital News: Comparing Inoculation and Reactance in the Processing of Native Advertising Disclosures and in Article Engagement Intentions.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1077699020952131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amazeen, M. A. 2020. “News in an era of Content Confusion: Effects of News use Motivations and Context on Native Advertising and Digital News Perceptions.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 97 (1): 161–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amazeen, M. A., and E. P. Bucy. 2019. “Conferring Resistance to Digital Disinformation: The Inoculating Influence of Procedural News Knowledge.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 63 (3): 415–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amazeen, M. A., and A. R. Muddiman. 2018. “Saving Media or Trading on Trust? The Effects of Native Advertising on Audience Perceptions of Legacy and Online News Publishers.” Digital Journalism 6 (2): 176–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amazeen, M. A., and B. W. Wojdynski. 2019. “Reducing Native Advertising Deception: Revisiting the Antecedents and Consequences of Persuasion Knowledge in Digital News Contexts.” Mass Communication and Society 22 (2): 222–247. doi:10.1080/15205436.2018.1530792.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amazeen, M. A., and B. W. Wojdynski. 2020. “The Effects of Disclosure Format on Native Advertising Recognition and Audience Perceptions of Legacy and Online News Publishers.” Journalism 21 (12): 1965–1984. doi:10.1177/1464884918754829.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An, S., H. Kang, and S. Koo. 2019. “Sponsorship Disclosures of Native Advertising: Clarity and Prominence.” Journal of Consumer Affairs 53 (3): 998–1024. doi:10.1111/joca.12212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arndt, J. 1967. “Role of Product-Related Conversations in the Diffusion of a new Product.” Journal of Marketing Research 4 (3): 291–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin, S., and N. Newman. 2015. “Attitudes to Sponsored and Branded Content (Native Advertising).” In Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2015: Tracking the Future of News, edited by N. Newman, D. A. L. Levy, and R. K. Nielsen, 100–107. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
   Google Scholar
• Banas, J. A., and G. Miller. 2013. “Inducing Resistance to Conspiracy Theory Propaganda: Testing Inoculation and Metainoculation Strategies.” Human Communication Research 39: 184–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bi, N. C., R. Zhang, and L. Ha. 2019. “Does Valence of Product Review Matter? The Mediating Role of Self-Effect and Third-Person Effect in Sharing YouTube Word-of-Mouth (vWOM).” Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing 13 (1): 79–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boerman, S. C., N. Helberger, G. van Noort, and C. J. Hoofnagle. 2018. “Sponsored Blog Content: What do the Regulations say? And What do Bloggers say?” JIPITEC 9: 146–159.
   Google Scholar
• Boerman, S. C., and E. A. Van Reijmersdal. 2016. “Informing Consumers About Hidden Advertising. A Literature Review of the Effects of Disclosing Sponsored Content.” In Advertising in new Formats and Media: Current Research and Implications for Marketers, edited by De Pelsmacker, 115–146. London, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bright, J. 2016. “The Social News gap: How News Reading and News Sharing Diverge.” Journal of Communication 66 (3): 343–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, G. T., and P. A. Curtain. 1995. “Tracking Sources of Information Pollution: A Survey and Experimental Test of Print Media’s Labeling Policy for Feature Advertising.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 72 (1): 178–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, C., and P. E. Grimm. 2019. “The Challenges Native Advertising Poses: Exploring Potential FTC Responses and Identifying Research Needs.” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 38 (1): 110–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, C., L. E. Pitt, M. Parent, and P. R. Berthon. 2011. “Understanding Consumer Conversations Around ads in a web 2.0 World.” Journal of Advertising 40 (1): 87–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, M. 2015. “When News Sites go Native: Redefining the Advertising-Editorial Divide in Response to Native Advertising.” Journalism 16 (7): 849–865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coddington, M. 2015. “The Wall Becomes a Curtain: Revisiting Journalism’s News-Business Boundary.” In Boundaries of Journalism: Professionalism, Practices and Participation, edited by M. Carlson, and S. C. Lewis, 67–82. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Compton, J. A., and M. Pfau. 2005. “Inoculation Theory of Resistance to Influence at Maturity: Recent Progress in Theory Development and Application and Suggestions for Future Research.” In Communication Yearbook Vol. 29, edited by P. J. Kalbfleisch, 97–145. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Compton, J., and M. Pfau. 2009. “Spreading Inoculation: Inoculation, Resistance to Influence, and Word-of-Mouth Communication.” Communication Theory 19 (1): 9–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Swert, K. 2012. Calculating inter-coder reliability in media content analysis using Krippendorff’s alpha. University of Amsterdam. http://www.bwgriffin.com/gsu/courses/edur9131/content/Swert_Kalpha_explained.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Einstein, M. 2016. Black ops Advertising: Native ads, Content Marketing, and the Covert World of the Digital Sell. New York, NY: O/R Books.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Trade Commission. 2015. Commission enforcement policy statement on deceptively formatted advertisements. https://www.ftc.gov/public-statements/2015/12/commission-enforcement-policy-statement-deceptively-formatted.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrer Conill, R. 2016. “Camouflaging Church as State: An Exploratory Study of Journalism’s Native Advertising.” Journalism Studies 17 (7): 904–914. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2016.1165138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrer Conill, R., and M. Karlsson. 2019. “Native Advertising and the Appropriation of Journalistic Clout.” In The Routledge Handbook of Developments in Digital Journalism Studies, edited by S. Eldridge II, and B. Franklin, 463–474. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foux, G. 2006, May 8. “Consumer-generated Media: Get Your Customers Involved.” Brand Strategy, 38–39.
   Google Scholar
• Fransen, M. L., P. W. J. Verlegh, A. Kirmani, and E. G. Smit. 2015. “A Typology of Consumer Strategies for Resisting Advertising, and a Review of Mechanisms for Countering Them.” International Journal of Advertising 34 (1): 6–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friestad, M., and P. Wright. 1994. “The Persuasion Knowledge Model: How People Cope with Persuasion Attempts.” Journal of Consumer Research 21 (June): 1–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabielkov, M., A. Ramachandran, A. Chaintreau, and A. Legout. 2016. Social clicks: What and who gets read on Twitter? ACM Sigmetrics/IFIP Performance, Antibes Juan-les-Pins, France.
   Google Scholar
• Garfield, B. 2014, February 25. If native advertising is so harmless, why does it rely on misleading readers? The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/feb/25/yahoo-opens-gemini-native-advertising.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, J. L., G. Golan, B. Britt, and J. Applequist. 2019. “How Advertising Relevance and Consumer-Brand Relationship Strength Limit Disclosure Effects of Native ads on Twitter.” International Journal of Advertising, doi:10.1080/02650487.2019.1596446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennig-Thurau, T., K. P. Gwinner, G. Walsh, and D. D. Gremler. 2004. “Electronic Word of Mouth via Consumer-Opinion Platforms: What Motivates Consumers to Articulate Themselves on the Internet.” Journal of Interactive Marketing 18 (1): 38–52.
   Google Scholar
• Hovland, C. I., and W. Weiss. 1951. “The Influence of Source Credibility on Communication Effectiveness.” Public Opinion Quarterly 15 (4): 635–650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh, J., Y. Hsieh, and Y. Tang. 2012. “Exploring the Disseminating Behaviors of eWOM Marketing: Persuasion in Online Video.” Electronic Commerce Research 12 (2): 201–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanov, B., J. D. Sims, J. Compton, C. H. Miller, K. A. Parker, J. L. Parker, … J. M. Averbeck. 2015. “The General Content of Post Inoculation Talk: Recalled Issue-Specific Conversations Following Inoculation Treatments.” Western Journal of Communication 79 (2): 218–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacks, J. Z., and K. A. Cameron. 2003. “Strategies for Resisting Persuasion.” Basic and Applied Social Psychology 25: 145–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, S. A., and J. Phua. 2014. “Following Celebrities’ Tweets About Brands: The Impact of Twitter-Based Electronic Word-of-Mouth on Consumers’ Source Credibility Perception, Buying Intention, and Social Identification with Celebrities.” Journal of Advertising 43 (2): 181–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, E., and P. F. Lazarsfeld. 1955. Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keib, K., and M. Tatge. 2016. Is that news story an ad? News homepage design may mislead consumers into sponsored content. Paper presented at the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication annual conference, Minneapolis, MN.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, A. E., H. M. Hansen, J. Murphy, A. K. Richards, J. Duke, and J. A. Allen. 2013. “Methodological Considerations in Analyzing Twitter Data.” JNCI Monographs 47: 140–146.
   Google Scholar
• Krouwer, S., K. Poels, and S. Paulussen. 2019. “Exploring Readers’ Evaluations of Native Advertisements in a Mobile News app.” Journal of Media Business Studies 16 (2): 77–94. doi:10.1080/16522354.2019.1573396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krouwer, S., K. Poels, and S. Paulussen. 2020. “Moving Towards Transparency for Native Advertisements on News Websites: A Test of More Detailed Disclosures.” International Journal of Advertising 39 (1): 51–73. doi:10.1080/02650487.2019.1575107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y. 2019. “Contest Over Authority.” Journalism Studies 20 (4): 523–541. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2017.1397531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangold, W. G., and D. J. Faulds. 2009. “Social Media: The new Hybrid Element of the Promotion mix.” Business Horizons 52 (4): 357–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCreadie, R., I. Soboroff, J. Lin, C. Macdonald, I. Ounis, and D. McCullough. 2012, August. “On Building a Reusable Twitter Corpus.” In Proceedings of the 35th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 1113–1114. ACM.
   Google Scholar
• McGuire, W. J. 1964. “Inducing Resistance to Persuasion: Some Contemporary Approaches.” In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, edited by L. Berkowitz, 191–229. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neil, J., and M. Eisenmann. 2017. “An Examination of how Source Classification Impacts Credibility and Consumer Behavior.” Public Relations Review 43: 278–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, C., and T. Lee. 2009. “Information Direction, Website Reputation and eWOM Effect: A Moderating Role of Product Type.” Journal of Business Research 62 (1): 61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., and J. T. Cacioppo. 1977. “Forewarning, Cognitive Responding, and Resistance to Persuasion.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 35: 645–655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., and J. T. Cacioppo. 1986. “The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion.” In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 19, edited by L. Berkowitz, 123–205. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, B., and N. C. Gross. 1943. “The Diffusion of Hybrid Seed Corn in two Iowa Communities.” Rural Sociology 8 (March): 15–24.
   Google Scholar
• Serazio, M. 2019. “The Other “Fake” News: Professional Ideals and Objectivity Ambitions in Brand Journalism.” Journalism, doi:10.1177/1464884919829923.
   Google Scholar
• Sirrah, A. 2019, September 6. Guide to native advertising. Columbia Journalism Review. Retrieved from https://www.cjr.org/tow_center_reports/native-ads.php.
   Google Scholar
• Skowronski, J. J., and D. E. Carlston. 1989. “Negativity and Extremity in Impression Formation: A Review of Explanations.” Psychological Bulletin 105 (1): 131–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stavrakantonakis, I., A. Gagiu, H. Kasper, I. Toma, and A. Thalhammer. 2012. “An Approach for Evaluation of Social Media Monitoring Tools.” Common Value Management 52: 52–64.
   Google Scholar
• Sweetser, K. D., S. J. Ahn, G. J. Golan, and A. Hochman. 2016. “Native Advertising as a new Public Relations Tactic.” American Behavioral Scientist 60 (12): 1442–1457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twitter. n.d. Optimize Tweets with cards. https://developer.twitter.com/en/docs/tweets/optimize-with-cards/overview/abouts-cards.
   Google Scholar
• van der Goot, M. J., S. Zandbergen, and E. A. van Reijmersdal. 2019, May. Sponsorship disclosures in online sponsored content: Practitioners’ considerations. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the International Communication Association, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• van Reijmersdal, E. A., P. C. Neijens, and E. G. Smit. 2010. “Customer Magazines: Effects of Commerciality on Readers’ Reactions.” Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising 32 (1): 59–67.
   Google Scholar
• Vargo, C., H. Gangadharbatla, and T. Hopp. 2019. “eWOM Across Channels: Comparing the Impact of Self-Enhancement and Positivity Bias on Facebook and Twitter.” Journal of International Advertising 38 (8): 1153–1172.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, M. 2018. “Tweets of a Native son: The Quotation and Recirculation of James Baldwin from Black Power to #BlackLivesMatter.” American Quarterly 70 (3): 531–559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., and Y. Li. 2017. “Understanding “Native Advertising” from the Perspective of Communication Strategies.” Journal of Promotion Management 23 (6): 913–929.
   Google Scholar
• Wojdynski, B. W. 2016. “The Deceptiveness of Sponsored News Articles: How Readers Recognize and Perceive Native Advertising.” American Behavioral Scientist 60 (12): 1475–1491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojdynski, B. W., and N. J. Evans. 2016. “Going Native: Effects of Disclosure Position and Language on the Recognition and Evaluation of Online Native Advertising.” Journal of Advertising 45 (2): 157–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojdynski, B. W., and N. J. Evans. 2020. “The Covert Advertising Recognition and Effects (CARE) Model: Processes of Persuasion in Native Advertising and Other Masked Formats.” International Journal of Advertising 39 (1): 4–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojdynski, B. W., N. J. Evans, and M. G. Hoy. 2018. “Measuring Sponsorship Transparency in the age of Native Advertising.” The Journal of Consumer Affairs 52 (1): 115–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, M., Y. Huang, R. Li, D. S. Bortree, F. Yang, A. Xiao, and R. Wang. 2016. “A Tale of two Sources in Native Advertising: Examining the Effects of Source Credibility and Priming on Content, Organizations, and Media Evaluations.” American Behavioral Scientist 60 (12): 1492–1509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, W. W., and C. Zhang. 2018. “Sentiment, Richness, Authority, and Relevance Model of Information Sharing During Social Crises—the Case of #MH370 Tweets.” Computers in Human Behavior 89: 199–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar