Exploring Audience Perceptions of, and Preferences for, Online News Videos

References

• Abdenour, J., and D. Riffe. 2019. “Digging for (Ratings) Gold: The Connection between Investigative Journalism and Audiences.” Journalism Studies 20 (16): 2386–2403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, K., D. Reineck, and C. Schubert. 2010. Journalistische Qualität in der Wirtschaftskrise. Konstanz: UVK Verlagsgesellschaft.
   Google Scholar
• Belt, T. L., and M. R. Just. 2008. “The Local News Story: Is Quality a Choice?” Political Communication 25 (2): 194–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlo, D. K., J. B. Lemert, and R. J. Mertz. 1969. “Dimensions for Evaluating the Acceptability of Message Sources.” Public Opinion Quarterly 33 (4): 563–576.
   Google Scholar
• Bloor, M., and F. Wood. 2006. “Group Interviews.” In Keywords in Qualitative Methods: A Vocabulary of Research Concepts, edited by M. Bloor, and F. Wood, 99–101. London, Thousand Oaks, Calif: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Bock, M. A. 2016. “Showing versus Telling: Comparing Online Video from Newspaper and Television Websites.” Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism 17 (4): 493–510.
   Google Scholar
• Bogart, L. 1989. Press and Public: Who Reads What, When, Where, and Why in American Newspapers. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Bogart, L. 2004. “Reflections on Content Quality in Newspapers.” Newspaper Research Journal 25 (1): 40–53.
   Google Scholar
• Buckalew, J. 1969. “News Elements and Selection by Television News Editors.” Journal of Broadcasting 14 (1): 47–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgoon, J. K., M. Burgoon, and C. Atkin. 1982. The World of the Working Journalist. New York: Newspaper Advertising Bureau.
   Google Scholar
• Chung, D. S., and S. Nah. 2009. “The Effects of Interactive News Presentation on Perceived User Satisfaction of Online Community Newspapers.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 14 (4): 855–874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crigler, A. N., M. Just, and W. R. Neuman. 1994. “Interpreting Visual versus Audio Messages in Television News.” Journal of Communication 44 (4): 132–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dörr, K. N. 2016. “Mapping the Field of Algorithmic Journalism.” Digital Journalism 4 (6): 700–722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drew, D. G., and R. Cadwell. 1985. “Some Effects of Video Editing on Perceptions of Television News.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 62 (4): 828–849.
   Google Scholar
• Drew, D., and T. Grimes. 1987. “Audio-Visual Redundancy and TV News Recall.” Communication Research 14 (4): 452–461.
   Google Scholar
• English, K., K. D. Sweetser, and M. Ancu. 2011. “YouTube-ification of Political Talk: An Examination of Persuasion Appeals in Viral Video.” American Behavioral Scientist 55 (6): 733–748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey, J. H., and A. Fontana. 1991. “The Group Interview in Social Research.” The Social Science Journal 28 (2): 175–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furnham, A., S. De Siena, and B. Gunter. 2002. “Children's and Adults’ Recall of Children's News Stories in both Print and Audio-Visual Presentation Modalities.” Applied Cognitive Psychology: The Official Journal of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 16 (2): 191–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaskell, G. 2000. “Individual and Group Interviewing.” In Qualitative Researching with Text, Image and Sound, edited by M. W. Bauer, and G. Gaskell, 39–56. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Gass, R. H., and J. S. Seiter. 2018. Persuasion: Social Influence and Compliance Gaining. 6th ed. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gavin, H.. 2008. Understanding Research Methods and Statistics in Psychology, 273–281. London: SAGE Publications Ltd
   Google Scholar
• Gaziano, C., and K. McGrath. 1986. “Measuring the Concept of Credibility.” Journalism Quarterly 63 (3): 451–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gladney, G. 1996. “How Editors and Readers Rank and Rate the Importance of Eighteen Traditional Standards of Newspaper Excellence.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 73 (2): 319–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gladney, G., I. Shapiro, and J. Castaldo. 2007. “Online Editors Rate Web News Quality Criteria.” Newspaper Research Journal 28 (1): 55–69.
   Google Scholar
• Golding, P., and P. Elliott. 1979. Making the News. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Gunter, B. 1979. “Recall of Brief Television News Items: Effects of Presentation Mode, Picture Content and Serial Position.” Journal of Educational Television 5 (2): 57–61.
   Google Scholar
• Gunter, B. 2015. The Cognitive Impact of Television News: Production Attributes and Information Reception. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hanimann, A., A. Heimann, L. Hellmueller, and D. Trilling. 2020. The Credibility of Credibility Measures: A Review of Credibility Measurement Scales in Media Research from 1951 to 2018. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Hilligoss, B., and S. Rieh. 2008. “Developing a Unifying Framework of Credibility Assessment: Construct, Heuristics, and Interaction in Context.” Information Processing and Management 44 (4): 1467–1484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovland, C. I., I. L. Janis, and H. Kelley. 1959. Communication and Persuasion: Psychological Studies of Opinion Change. 3rd ed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jenks, C. 2002. “The Centrality of the Eye in Western Culture: An Introduction.” In Visual Culture, edited by C. Jenks, 1–25. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kiousis, S. 2001. “Public Trust or Mistrust? Perceptions of Media Credibility in the Information Age.” Mass Communication and Society 4 (4): 381–403.
   Google Scholar
• Kohring, M., and J. Matthes. 2007. “Trust in News Media: Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Scale.” Communication Research 34 (2): 231–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ksiazek, T., L. Peer, and K. Lessard. 2016. “User Engagement with Online News: Conceptualizing Interactivity and Exploring the Relationship between Online News Videos and User Comments.” New Media & Society 18 (3): 502–520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacy, S. 1989. “A Model of Demand for News: Impact of Competition on Newspaper Content.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 66 (1): 40–48.
   Google Scholar
• Lacy, S., and F. Fico. 1990. “Newspaper Quality & Ownership: Rating the Groups.” Newspaper Research Journal 11 (2): 42–56.
   Google Scholar
• Lacy, S., and T. Rosenstiel. 2015. Defining and Measuring Quality Journalism. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers School of Communication and Information.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, A., P. Bolls, R. F. Potter, and K. Kawahara. 1999. “The Effects of Production Pacing and Arousing Content on the Information Processing of Television Messages.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 43 (4): 451–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, A., J. Newhagen, and B. Reeves. 1996. “Negative Video as Structure: Emotion, Attention, Capacity, and Memory.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 40 (4): 460–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latulipe, C., E. A. Carroll, and D. Lottridge. 2011. “Love, Hate, Arousal and Engagement: Exploring Audience Responses to Performing Arts.” In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1845–1854.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, A. M., and H. I. Chyi. 2014. “When Newsworthy Is Not Noteworthy: Examining the Value of News from the Audience's Perspective.” Journalism Studies 15 (6): 807–820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, E.-J., and E. C. Tandoc. 2017. “When News Meets the Audience: How Audience Feedback Online Affects News Production and Consumption.” Human Communication Research 43 (4): 436–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsa, K. E. 2018. “Most Western Europeans Prefer TV News while Use of Print Outlets Lags.” Pew Research Center, 27 September. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/09/27/most-western-europeans-prefer-tv-news-while-use-of-print-outlets-lags/.
   Google Scholar
• McQuail, D. 2013. Journalism and Society. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Meijer, I. C. 2003. “What Is Quality Television News? A Plea for Extending the Professional Repertoire of Newsmakers.” Journalism Studies 4 (1): 15–29.
   Google Scholar
• Meijer, I. C., and H. P. Bijleveld. 2016. “Valuable Journalism.” Journalism Studies 17 (7): 827–839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merrill, J. C. 1968. The Elite Press: Great Newspapers of the World. New York: Pitman.
   Google Scholar
• Merrill, J. C., and R. L. Lowenstein. 1971. Media, Messages, and Men: New Perspectives in Communication. New York: David McKay & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Metzger, M. J., A. J. Flanagin, K. Eyal, D. R. Lemus, and R. M. McCann. 2003. “Credibility for the 21st Century: Integrating Perspectives on Source, Message, and Media Credibility in the Contemporary Media Environment.” Annals of the International Communication Association 27 (1): 293–335.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, P. 1988. “Defining and Measuring Credibility of Newspapers: Developing an Index.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 65 (3): 567–574.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, A. 2018. “Americans Still Prefer Watching to Reading the News – and Mostly Still through Television.” Pew Research Center, 3 December. Retrieved from https://www.journalism.org/2018/12/03/americans-still-prefer-watching-to-reading-the-news-and-mostly-still-through-television/.
   Google Scholar
• Neuberger, C. 2014. “The Journalistic Quality of Internet Formats and Services: Results of a User Survey.” Digital Journalism 2 (3): 419–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newhagen, J., and C. Nass. 1989. “Differential Criteria for Evaluating Credibility of Newspapers and TV News.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 66 (2): 277–284.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, N., R. Fletcher, D. A. L. Levy, and R. K. Nielsen, eds. 2016. Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2016. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, N., R. Fletcher, A. Schulz, S. Andı, and R. K. Nielsen, eds. 2020. Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, A. 2012. “The Effect of Soft News on Public Attachment to the News.” Journalism Studies 13 (5–6): 706–717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohanian, R. 1990. “Construction and Validation of a Scale to Measure Celebrity Endorsers’ Perceived Expertise, Trustworthiness, and Attractiveness.” Journal of Advertising 19 (3): 39–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, D. J. 2002. Persuasion: Theory and Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Philo, G. 1990. Seeing and Believing: The Influence of Television. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Prochazka, F., P. Weber, and W. Schweiger. 2018. “Effects of Civility and Reasoning in User Comments on Perceived Journalistic Quality.” Journalism Studies 19 (1): 62–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rieh, S. Y. 2002. “Judgment of Information Quality and Cognitive Authority in the Web.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 53 (2): 145–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rieh, S. Y., and D. R. Danielson. 2007. “Credibility: A Multidisciplinary Framework.” Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 41 (1): 307–364.
   Google Scholar
• Roper, B. 1985. Public Attitudes toward Television and Other Media in a Time of Change: The Fourteenth Report in a Series. New York, NY: Television Information Office.
   Google Scholar
• Schlesinger, P. 1987. Putting Reality Together: BBC News. London: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Schrøder, K. C. 2015. “News Media Old and New: Fluctuating Audiences, News Repertoires and Locations of Consumption.” Journalism Studies 16 (1): 60–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, I. 2010. “Evaluating Journalism: Towards an Assessment Framework for the Practice of Journalism.” Journalism Practice 4 (2): 143–162.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, I., P. Albanese, and L. Doyle. 2006. “What Makes Journalism ‘Excellent’? Criteria Identified by Judges in Two Leading Awards Programs.” Canadian Journal of Communication 31 (2006): 425–445.
   Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S. 1999. “Exploring Receivers’ Criteria for Perception of Print and Online News.” Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 76 (2): 373–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsfati, Y., O. Meyers, and Y. Peri. 2006. “What Is Good Journalism? Comparing Israeli Public and Journalists’ Perspectives.” Journalism 7 (2): 152–173.
   Google Scholar
• Urban, J., and W. Schweiger. 2014. “News Quality from the Recipients’ Perspective: Investigating Recipients’ Ability to Judge the Normative Quality of News.” Journalism Studies 15 (6): 821–840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Wurff, R., and K. Schönbach. 2014. “Audience Expectations of Media Accountability in the Netherlands.” Journalism Studies 15 (2): 121–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanta, W., and Y.-W. Hu. 1994. “The Effects of Credibility, Reliance, and Exposure on Media Agenda-Setting: A Path Analysis Model.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 71 (1): 90–98.
   Google Scholar
• Wibbitz. 2020. “Wibbitz.” Retrieved on 5 March from https://www.wibbitz.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Wise, K., P. Bolls, J. Myers, and M. Sternadori. 2009. “When Words Collide Online: How Writing Style and Video Intensity Affect Cognitive Processing of Online News.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 53 (4): 532–546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wochit. 2020. “Wochit.” Retrieved on 5 March from https://www.wochit.com/.
   Google Scholar