The obduracy of the detached single family house in Flanders

References

• Agentschap Wonen Vlaanderen. (2011). Debatnota Woonbeleidsplan Vlaanderen. Retrieved from http://www.wonenvlaanderen.be/uploads/documentenbank/e32dff72cc4f83777aa3a066648b1561.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Agentschap Wonen Vlaanderen. (2012). Wonen in Vlaanderen 2050: Krijtlijnen van een toekomstvisie. Retrieved from http://www.wonenvlaanderen.be/uploads/documentenbank/c9dbbc8ee62092f878b48d895560a4cb.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Akrich, M. (1992). The description of technical objects. In W.E. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society (pp. 205–224). Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Antoninetti, M. (2008). The difficult history of ancillary units: The obstacles and potential opportunities to increase the heterogeneity of neighbourhoods and the flexibility of households in the United States. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 22(4), 348–375.
   Google Scholar
• Architecture Workroom Brussels. (2012). Naar een visionaire woningbouw. Kansen en opgaven voor een trendbreuk in de Vlaamse woonproductie [Towards visionary housing. Opportunities and challenges for a shift in the Flemish housing production]. Brussel: Vlaams Bouwmeester.
   Google Scholar
• Bruegmann, R. (2000). The paradoxes of anti-sprawl reform. In R. Freestone (Ed.), Urban planning in a changing world: The twentieth century experience (pp. 158–174). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, A. (2011). Beyond foreclosure: The future of suburban housing. Retrieved from http://places.designobserver.com/feature/beyond-foreclosure-the-future-of-suburban-housing/29438/
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, N.J., & Howe, D.A. (2001). Accessory apartments: Are they a realistic alternative for ageing in place? Housing Studies, 16(5), 637–650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chevalier, S. (1998). From woollen carpet tot grass carpet: Bridging house and garden in an English suburb. In D. Miller (Ed.), Material cultures: Why some things matter (pp. 47–72). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chow, R. (2005). Ossified dwelling: Or why contemporary suburban housing can't change. Places, 17(2), 54–57.
   Google Scholar
• Cneut, C., Houthaeve, R., Durgun, S., De Rijcke, P., De Decker, P., Loopmans, M., … Vanneste, D. (2007). (Her)gebruik van de bestaande woningvoorraad in de klassieke woonwijken uit de jaren 1960-1980. Een verkennend onderzoek naar de ruimtelijke mogelijkheden en de uitdagingen voor het ruimtelijke beleid [(Re) use of the existing housing stock in residential neighbourhoods from the 1960–1980 period. An exploratory study of the spatial opportunities and challenges for spatial policy]. Brussel: Vlaamse Overheid, Departement RWO.
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, R.L., & Dvorak, S. (2000). Accessory dwelling units: Model state act and local ordinance. Washington: Public Policy Insititute.
   Google Scholar
• Coopmans, F., & Verraes, W. (2008). Kangoeroewonen. Een mens- en budgetvriendelijk woonidee [Kangaroo dwelling. A human and budget friendly housing concept]. De Pinte: Wolfgang Verraes.
   Google Scholar
• Davison, G. (1997). Suburban character. People and Place, 7(4), 26–31.
   Google Scholar
• De Block, G., & Polasky, J. (2011). Light railways and the rural-urban continuum: Technology, space and society in late nineteenth-century Belgium. Journal of Historical Geography, 37, 312–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Caigny, S. (2005). Catholicism and the domestic sphere: Working class women in interwar Flanders. Home Cultures, 2(1), 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• De Decker, P. (2011). Understanding housing sprawl: The case of Flanders, Belgium. Environment and Planning A, 43, 1634–1654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Decker, P., Ryckewaert, M., Vandekerckhove, B., Pisman, A., Vastmans, F., & Le Roy, M. (2010). Ruimte voor Wonen: Trends en uitdagingen [Space for living: Trends and challenges]. Antwerpen-Apeldoorn: Garant.
   Google Scholar
• De Meulder, B. (2006). De Belgische stedenbouw en de belofte van welvaart 1945–1975 – 10 punten over de veranderende productie van het wonen. In K. Van Herck & T. Avermaete (Eds.), Wonen in Welvaart [Living in Prosperity] (pp.128–145). Rotterdam: Uitgeverij 010.
   Google Scholar
• De Meulder, B., Schreurs, J., Cock, A., & Notteboom, B. (1999). Patching up the Belgian urban landscape. Oase, 52, 78–113.
   Google Scholar
• De Vos, E., & Heynen, H. (2007). Shaping popular taste: The Belgian farmers’ association and the fermette during the 1960s–1970s. Home Cultures, 4(3), 237–260.
   Google Scholar
• De Witte, N., Smetcoren, A-S., De Donder, L., Dury, S., Buffel, T., Kardol, T., … Verté, D. (2012). Een Huis? Een thuis! Over ouderen en wonen [A House? A home! About elderly and living]. Brugge: Vanden Broele.
   Google Scholar
• Dovey, K. (1985). Home and homelessness. In Altman, I. & Werner, C.M. (Eds.), Home environments: Human behaviour and environment (pp. 33–66). New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duff, S. (2012). The possibilities in neighborhoods – utilizing accessory apartments in existing homes to address social, environmental, and economic issues. Urban Design International, 17(1), 33–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunham-Jones, E., & Williamson, J. (2011). Retrofitting suburbia: Urban design solutions for redesigning suburbs. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Floré, F. (2004). Lessons in modern living: Home design exhibitions in Belgium 1945–1958. The Journal of Architecture, 9(4), 445–462.
   Google Scholar
• FOD Economie. (2013a). Bakstenen in cijfers. Kerncijfers bouw en vastgoed 2013 [Bricks in figures. Key figures on construction and real estate in 2013]. Brussel: Algemene Directie Statistiek en Economische Informatie.
   Google Scholar
• FOD Economie. (2013b). Bouwvergunningen 1996 – April 2013. Retrieved from http://statbel.fgov.be/nl/statistieken/cijfers/economie/bouw_industrie/bouwvergunning/.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, A. (2002). Planning the new suburbia: Flexibility by design. Vancouver: UBC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gellen, M. (1985). Accessory apartments in single-family housing. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• Hayden, D. (1984). Redesigning the American dream: The future of housing, work, and family life. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Heynen, H. (2010). Belgium and the Netherlands: Two different ways of coping with the housing crisis, 1945–1970. Home Cultures, 7(2), 159–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hommels, A. (2005). Studying obduracy in the city: Toward a productive fusion between technology studies and urban studies. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 30(3), 323–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe, D.A. (1990). The flexible house designing for changing needs. Journal of the American Planning Association, 56(1), 69–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, P. (2004). Private dwelling: Contemplating the use of housing. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Leinberger, C.B. (2008). The next slum. Atlantic Magazine, March, 70–75.
   Google Scholar
• Liebig, P.S., Koenig, T., & Pynoos, J. (2006). Zoning, accessory dwelling units, and family caregiving: Issues, trends, and recommendations. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 18(3–4), 155–172.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Loeckx, A. (2006). Wonen uit de fabriek – de vele levens van de bungalows van Danilith-Delmulle. In K. Van Herck & T. Avermaete (Eds.), Wonen in Welvaart [Living in prosperity] (pp.231–247). Rotterdam: Uitgeverij 010.
   Google Scholar
• Masnick, G.S. (2002). The new demographics of housing. Housing Policy Debate, 13(2), 491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meeus, B., & De Decker, P. (2012). De dynamiek van het niet-verhuizen in Vlaanderen. Ruimte en Maatschappij, 4(2), 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, D., & Gearin, E. (2001). Current preferences and future demand for denser residential environments. Housing Policy Debate, 12(4), 633–659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, D., & Pitkin, J. (2009). Demographic forces and turning points in the American City, 1950–2040. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 626(1), 91–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provincie Limburg. (2011). Woningopsplitsing. Richtlijnen voor de kwalitatieve opsplitsing van woningen in meerdere wooneenheden [House subdivision. Guidelines for a quality subdivision of dwellings in multiple units]. Hasselt: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Provincie Vlaams-Brabant. (2011). Woningdelen. Een volwaardig woonalternatief ? [Sharing properties. A valuable alternative housing type?]. Leuven: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Ryckewaert, M., De Decker, P., Winters, S., Vandekerckhove, B., Vastmans, F., Elsinga, M., … Heylen, K. (2012). Een woonmodel in transitie. Toekomstverkenning van het Vlaamse wonen [A housing model in transition. An exploration of the future of Flemish housing]. Antwerpen-Apeldoorn: Garant.
   Google Scholar
• Ryckewaert, M., & Theunis, K. (2006). Het lelijkste land, de mythe voorbij. Stedenbouw en verstedelijking in belgië sinds 1945. Stadsgeschiedenis, 1(2), 148–168.
   Google Scholar
• Scheer, B.C. (2001). The anatomy of sprawl. Places, 14(2), 28–37.
   Google Scholar
• SVR. (2011). SVR-projecties van de bevloking en de huishoudens voor Vlaamse steden en gemeenten, 2009–2030. Eerste resultaten [SVR projections of population and households for Flemish cities and municipalities, 2009–2030. First results]. Brussel: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Tachieva, G. (2010). Sprawl repair manuel. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Uytenhove, P. (1997). The Belgian back room, Archis, (2), 8–15.
   Google Scholar
• Vandenborne, K. (2012). Alternatieve vormen van woninggebruik in suburbane gebieden ( Unpublished master's thesis). Department of Architecture, Urbanism and Planning, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderleyen, L., & Vanden Boer, L. (2003). Ouderen en de Tweede demografische transitie. Een signalement vanuit het leefstudieOnderzoek Vlaamse Ouderen (LOVO-1). Bevolking en Gezin, 32(1), 45–64.
   Google Scholar
• Vandevyvere, H., & Neuckermans, H. (2005). From sustainable housing sciences to sustainable housing policies: Challenging the social responsibility of researchers and designers. Paper presented at the XXXIII IAHS World Congress on Housing, 27–30 September 2005, University of Pretoria. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2263/10359
   Google Scholar
• Vanneste, D., Thomas, I., & Goossens, L. (2007). Woning en woonomgeving in België. Monografie 2 [Home and living environment in Belgium. Monography 2]. Brussel: FOD Economie, K.M.O., Middenstand en Energie.
   Google Scholar
• Vanneste, D., Thomas, I., & Vanderstraeten, L. (2008). The spatial structure(s) of the Belgian housing stock. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, (23), 173–198.
   Google Scholar
• Verhetsel, A., Witlox, F., & Tierens, N. (2003). Jongeren en wonen in vlaanderen. woonsituatie, woonwensen en woonbehoeften [Young people and living in Flanders. Living arrangements, housing desires and housing needs]. Antwerpen: De Boeck.
   Google Scholar
• Vlaamse Overheid. (2012). Groenboek, Vlaanderen in 2050: mensenmaat in een metropool? Beleidsplan Ruimte Vlaanderen [Green paper, Flanders in 2050: Human scale in a metropolis?]. Brussel: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Vlaamse Woonraad. (2012). ‘Ruimte en wonen’. Aanbevelingen van de Vlaamse woonraad, advies 2012/11, 22 November 2012 [Space and living. Recommendations of the Flemish Housing Council, advice 2012/11]. Brussel: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Voets, J., De Peuter, B., Vandekerckhove, B., Broeckaert, D., Le Roy, M., Maes, P., … Blummel, P. (2010). Evaluerend onderzoek naar de effectiviteit van de uitvoering van het ruimtelijk beleid in Vlaanderen [Evaluative study on the effectiveness of the implementation of spatial policy in Flanders]. Brussel: Vlaamse Overheid, Departement RWO, Afdeling Ruimtelijke Planning.
   Google Scholar
• Vogels, M. (2012). Het nieuwe wonen. Vlaams woonbeleid op nieuwe sporen [New housing. The Flemish housing policy on new tracks]. Leuven: LannooCampus.
   Google Scholar
• Wegmann, J., & Nemirow, A. (2011). Secondary units and urban infill: A literature review. Working Paper 2011–2012. Berkeley: Berkeley Institute of Urban and Regional Development.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, G. (1991). Prescribing the model home. Social Research, 58(1), 213–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar