In defense of unresolved attachment: re-modelling intergenerational transmission of attachment

References

• Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Ariav-Paraira, I., Oppenheim, D., & Sagi-Schwartz, A. (2022). Disrupted affective communication characterizes mothers of infants with disorganized but also ambivalent attachments: An Israeli study. Child Development. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13679
   Google Scholar
• Belsky, J., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2017). Genetic differential susceptibility to the effects of parenting. Current Opinion in Psychology, 15, 125–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernaards, C. A., & Jennrich, R. I. (2005). Gradient projection algorithms and software for arbitrary rotation criteria in factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65(5), 676–696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggiogera, J., Boateng, G., Hilpert, P., Vowels, M. J., Bodenmann, G., Neysari, M., Nussbeck, F. W., & Kowatsch, T. (2021). BERT meets LIWC: Exploring state-of-the-art language models for predicting communication behavior in couples’ conflict interactions. Companion Publication of the 2021 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction, Montréal, QC, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Booth LaForce, C., Roisman, G. I., & Ruscio, J. (2014). The adult attachment interview: Psychometrics, stability and change from infancy, and developmental origins. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 79(3), 1–167. https://doi.org/10.1111/mono.12120.l
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carroll, J. B. (1953). An analytical solution for approximating simple structure in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 18(1), 23–38.
   Google Scholar
• Cudeck, R., & O’dell, L. L. (1994). Applications of standard error estimates in unrestricted factor analysis: Significance tests for factor loadings and correlations. Psychological Bulletin, 115(3), 475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dagan, O., Facompré, C. R., Nivison, M. D., Roisman, G. I., & Bernard, K. (2020). Preoccupied and dismissing attachment representations are differentially associated with anxiety in adolescence and adulthood: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychological Science, 8(4), 614–640. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702620917455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1993). An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman & Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Forslund, T., Granqvist, P., van IJzendoorn, M. H., Sagi-Schwartz, A., Glaser, D., Steele, M., Hammarlund, M., Schuengel, C., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., Steele, H., Shaver, P. R., Lux, U., Simmonds, J., Jacobvitz, D., Groh, A. M., Bernard, K., Cyr, C., Hazen, N. L., Foster, S. … Duschinsky, R. (2022). Attachment goes to court: Child protection and custody issues. Attachment & Human Development, 24(1), 1–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraley, R. C., & Spieker, S. J. (2003). Are infant attachment patterns continuously or categorically distributed? A taxometric analysis of strange situation behavior. Developmental Psychology, 39(3), 387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granqvist, P., Sroufe, L. A., Dozier, M., Hesse, E., Steele, M., van IJzendoorn, M. H., Solomon, J., Schuengel, C., Fearon, P., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M., Steele, H., Cassidy, J., Carlson, E., Madigan, S., Jacobvitz, D., Foster, S., Behrens, K., Rifkin-Graboi, A., Gribneau, N. … Duschinsky, R. (2017). Disorganized attachment in infancy: A review of the phenomenon and its implications for clinicians and policy-makers. Attachment & Human Development, 19(6), 534–558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenacre, M. (2006). From simple to multiple correspondence analysis. In M. Greenacre & J. Blasius (Eds.), Multiple correspondence analysis and related methods (pp. 41–76). CRC press.
   Google Scholar
• Groh, A. M., Fearon, R. M. P., van IJzendoorn, M. H., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & Roisman, G. I. (2017). Attachment in the early life course: Meta-analytic evidence for its role in socioemotional development. Child Development Perspectives, 11(1), 70–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groh, A. M., Propper, C., Mills‐koonce, R., Moore, G. A., Calkins, S., & Cox, M. (2019). Mothers’ physiological and affective responding to infant distress: Unique antecedents of avoidant and resistant attachments. Child Development, 90(2), 489–505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haltigan, J. D., Roisman, G. I., & Haydon, K. C. (2014). II. The latent structure of the adult attachment interview: Exploratory and confirmatory evidence. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 79(3), 15–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamaker, E. L., Mulder, J. D., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2020). Description, prediction and causation: Methodological challenges of studying child and adolescent development. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 46, 100867. ISSN 1878-9293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse, E. (2016). The adult attachment interview: Protocol, method of analysis, and empirical studies: 1985-2015. In J. Cassidy & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (3rd ed., pp. 553–597). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, H., Tomiuk, M. A., & Takane, Y. (2009). Correspondence analysis, multiple correspondence analysis, and recent developments. In R. E. Millsap & A. Maydeu-Olivares (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of quantitative methods in psychology (pp. 243–263). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Knop, J., Van IJzendoorn, M. H., Bakermans- Kranenburg, M. J., Joëls, M., & Van der Veen, R. (2021). Retrieving the other mother to the nest in a communal nesting paradigm: unraveling a new type of social behavior (pp. 113–135–167). In J. Knop, Differential susceptibility to rearing conditions in mice. PhD dissertationUtrecht University. UMC Utrecht Brain Center, volume 347, pp. 1–167.
   Google Scholar
• Main, M., Kaplan, N., & Cassidy, J. (1985). Security in infancy, childhood, and adulthood: A move to the level of representation. In I. Bretherton & E. Waters (Eds.), Monographs of the society for research in child development (Vol. 50, pp. 66–106).
   Google Scholar
• Makino, N. (2022). Rotation in correspondence analysis from the canonical correlation perspective. Psychometrika, 87(3), 1045–1063. Preprint published online.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2016). Attachment in adulthood. structure, dynamics, and change (2 ed.). Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Raby, K. L., Verhage, M. L., Fearon, R., Fraley, R. C., Roisman, G. I., van IJzendoorn, M. H., Schuengel, C., Madigan, S., Oosterman, M., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., Bernier, A., Ensink, K., Hautamäki, A., Mangelsdorf, S., Priddis, L. E., Wong, M. S., & Collaboration on Attachment Transmission Synthesis. (2020). The latent structure of the adult attachment interview: Large sample evidence from the collaboration on attachment transmission synthesis. Development and Psychopathology, 34(1), 1–13, Advance online publication.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Satomura, H., & Adachi, K. (2013). Oblique rotation in canonical correlation analysis reformulated as maximizing the generalized coefficient of determination. Psychometrika, 78(3), 526–537.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shakiba, N., & Raby, K. L. (2021). Attachment dimensions and cortisol responses during the strange situation among young children adopted internationally. Attachment & Human Development, 25(1), 89–103. Advance online publication.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sroufe, L. A. (2003). Attachment categories as reflections of multiple dimensions: Comment on Fraley and Spieker. Developmental Psychology, 39(3), 413–416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steele, H., & Steele, M. (2021). Categorical assessments of attachment: On the ontological relevance of group membership. In R. A. Thompson, J. A. Simpson, & L. J. Berlin (Eds.), Attachment: The fundamental questions (pp. 63–69). Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Van IJzendoorn, M. H. (1995). Adult attachment representations, parental responsiveness, and infant attachment: A meta-analysis on the predictive validity of the adult attachment interview. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 387–403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van IJzendoorn, M. H., & Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J. (2014). Confined quest for continuity: The categorical versus continuous nature of attachment. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 79(3), 157–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van IJzendoorn, M. H., & Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J. (2019). Bridges across the intergenerational transmission of attachment gap. Current Opinion in Psychology, 25, 31–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhage, M. L., Fearon, R. M. P., Schuengel, C., van IJzendoorn, M. H., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., Madigan, S., Roisman, G. I., Oosterman, M., Behrens, K. Y., Wong, M. S., Mangelsdorf, S., Priddis, L. E., Brisch, K. H., & Collaboration on Attachment Transmission Synthesis. (2019). Constraints on the intergenerational transmission of attachment via individual participant data meta-analysis. Child Development, 89(6), 2023–2037.
   Google Scholar
• Verhage, M. L., Schuengel, C., Madigan, S., Fearon, R. M. P., Oosterman, M., Cassibba, R., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J. & Van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2016). Narrowing the transmission gap: A synthesis of three decades of research on intergenerational transmission of attachment. Psychological Bulletin, 142(4), 337–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, G., Preacher, K. J., & Luo, S. (2010). Bootstrap confidence intervals for ordinary least squares factor loadings and correlations in exploratory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 45(1), 104–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar