‘What Was My War Like?’

References

• Agathangelou, A. M. 2000. ‘Nationalist Narratives and (Dis)appearing Women: State-Sanctioned Sexual Violence’, Canadian Woman Studies 19 (4): 12–21.
   Google Scholar
• Altınay, A. G. 2004. Myth of the Military Nation: Militarism, Gender, and Education in Turkey. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Anastasiou, H. 2008. The Broken Olive Branch: Nationalism vs. Europeanization. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, R. and Papadakis, Y. 2012. ‘Introduction: Modalities of Time, History and Memory in Ethnonational Conflicts’, in Bryant, R. and Papadakis, Y. (eds) Cyprus and the Politics of Memory: History, Community and Conflict, pp. 1–26. New York: I.B. Tauris & Co. Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• CMP. 2006. ‘Background Information’. Available at http://www.cmp-cyprus.org/media/attachments/CMP/CMP%20docs/CMP%20Fact%20Sheets/CMP_Fact_Sheet_Dec06.pdf (accessed 25 April 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Cockburn, C. 2004. The Line: Women, Partition and the Gender Order in Cyprus. London and New York: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Cockburn, C. 2010. ‘Gender Relations as Causal in Militarization and War’, International Feminist Journal of Politics 12 (2): 139–57. doi: 10.1080/14616741003665169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, P. H. 1990. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. London: Harper Collins Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Connel, R. W. and Messerschmidt, J. W. 2005. ‘Hegemonic Masculinity: Rethinking the Concept’, Gender and Society 19 (6): 829–59. doi: 10.1177/0891243205278639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connerton, P. 1989. How Societies Remember. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511628061
   Google Scholar
• Coulter, C. 2009. Bush Wives and Girl Soldiers: Women's Lives through War and Peace in Sierra Leone. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Diez, T. (ed.). 2002. The European Union and the Cyprus Conflict: Modern Conflict, Postmodern Union. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elshtain, J. B. 1987. Women and War. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Enloe, C. 1989. Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics. London: Pandora Press.
   Google Scholar
• Enloe, C. 2000. Maneuvers: The International Politics of Militarizing Women's Lives. Berkeley and London: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission of Human Rights. 1976. ‘Cyprus v. Turkey – Commission Report’. Available at http://cyprus-conflict.org/materials/echr/page12.html (accessed 25 April 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, M.S. 1995. Strategies for Interpreting Qualitative Data: Qualitative Research Methods Series 33. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 2003. ‘Society Must be Defended’: Lectures at the Collège de France 1975–1976. New York: Picador.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, L. 2000. ‘The Little Mermaid's Silent Security Dilemma and the Absence of Gender in the Copenhagen School’, Millennium - Journal of International Studies 29 (2): 285–306. doi: 10.1177/03058298000290020501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 2004. ‘Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective’, in Harding, S. G. (ed.) The Feminist Standpoint Theory Reader: Intellectual and Political Controversies, pp. 81–102. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, S. G. (ed.). 2004. The Feminist Standpoint Theory Reader: Intellectual and Political Controversies. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hartsock, N. 1983. ‘The Feminist Standpoint: Developing the Ground for a Specifically Feminist Historical Materialism’, in Harding, S. G. and Hintikka, M. B. (eds) Discovering Reality, pp. 283–310. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch, M. and Smith, V. 2002. ‘Feminism and Cultural Memory: An Introduction’, Signs 28 (1): 1–19. doi: 10.1086/340890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holstein, J. A. and Gubrium, J. F. 1995. The Active Interview: Qualitative Research Methods Series 37. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Jaggar, A. M. 2004. ‘Feminist Politics and Epistemology: The Standpoint of Women’, in Harding, S. G. (ed.) The Feminist Standpoint Theory Reader: Intellectual and Political Controversies, pp. 55–67. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, J. P. and Williams, K. P. 2004. ‘Who Belongs? Women, Marriage and Citizenship: Gendered Nationalism and the Balkan Wars’, International Feminist Journal of Politics 6 (3): 418–37. doi: 10.1080/1461674042000235591
   Google Scholar
• Kızılyürek, N. 2002. Miliyetçilik Kıskacında Kıbrıs. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
   Google Scholar
• Lacher, H. and Kaymak, E. 2005. ‘Transforming Identities: Beyond the Politics of Non-Settlement in North Cyprus’, Mediterrenean Politics 10 (2): 147–66. doi: 10.1080/13629390500124341
   Google Scholar
• Lacina, B. and Gleditsch, N. P. 2005. ‘Monitoring Trends in Global Combat: A New Dataset of Battle Deaths’, European Journal of Population 21: 145–66. doi: 10.1007/s10680-005-6851-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee-Koo, K. L. 2002. ‘Confronting a Disciplinary Blindness: Women, War and Rape in the International Politics of Security’, Australian Journal of Political Science 37 (3): 525–36. doi: 10.1080/1036114022000032744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning, P. K. 1992. Organizational Communication. New York: Aldine de Greyter.
   Google Scholar
• McGranahan, C. 2010. Arrested Histories: Tibet, the CIA, and Memories of a Forgotten War. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Cyprus. 2006. ‘Historical Review’. Available at http://www.mfa.gov.cy/mfa/mfa2006.nsf/cyprus01_en/cyprus01_en?OpenDocument (accessed 15 January 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Nagel, J. 1998. ‘Masculinity and Nationalism: Gender and Sexuality in the Making of Nations’, Ethnic and Racial Studies 21 (2): 242–69. doi: 10.1080/014198798330007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noma, E. 2007. ‘“Women Cannot Cry Anymore”: Global Voices Transforming Violent Conflict’, Critical Half, Bi-Annual Journal of Women for Women International 5 (2): 8–13.
   Google Scholar
• North Cyprus Foreign Ministry. n.d. ‘Historical Background’. Available at http://www.kktcenf.org/en/index.asp?sayfa=cms&dmid=0&cmsid=195&ssid=638926909 (accessed 15 January 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Ozveren, E. (2002/2003). ‘Geo-Strategic Significance of Cyprus: Long Term Trends and Prospects’, Perceptions 7 (4): 35–50.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, E. 2007. ‘Women's Truth Narratives: The Power of Compassionate Listening’, Critical Half, Bi-Annual Journal of Women for Women International 5 (2): 20–5.
   Google Scholar
• Reinharz, S. 1992. Feminist Methods in Social Research. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sadrazam, H. 2012. Kıbrıs'ın Savaş Tarihi: Tarihsel Süreçte Kıbrıs'ın Jeopolitik Önemi. İlk Silah Sesleri. Cilt 1. Lefkoşa: Söylem Yayınları.
   Google Scholar
• Serter, V. Z. 2001. Kıbrıs Tarihi (Cyprus History). Lefkoşa: Kemal Matbaacılık Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Sjoberg, L. 2007. ‘Agency, Militarized Femininity and Enemy Others: Observations from the War in Iraq’, International Feminist Journal of Politics 9 (1): 82–101. doi: 10.1080/14616740601066408
   Google Scholar
• Sjoberg, L. 2010. ‘Women Fighters and the “Beautiful Soul” Narrative’, International Review of the Red Cross 92 (877): 53–68. doi: 10.1017/S181638311000010X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprague, K. 2005. The Gendered Lens: Feminist Methodologies for Critical Researchers: Bridging Differences. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, M. 2005. Naming Security – Constructing Identity: ‘Mayan-Women’ in Guatemala on the Eve of ‘Peace’. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stiehm, J. H. 1982. ‘The Protected, the Protector, the Defender’, Women's Studies International Forum 5 (3/4): 367–76. doi: 10.1016/0277-5395(82)90048-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoetzler, M. and Yuval-Davis, N. 2002. ‘Standpoint Theory, Situated Knowledge and the Situated Imagination’, Feminist Theory 3 (3): 315–34. doi: 10.1177/146470002762492024
   Google Scholar
• Sylvester, C. 2010. ‘War, Sense, and Security’, in Sjoberg, L. (ed.) Gender and International Security: Feminist Perspective, pp. 24–37. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tickner, J. A. 2005. ‘What Is Your Research Program? Some Feminist Answers to International Relations Methodological Questions’, International Studies Quarterly 49 (1): 1–22. doi: 10.1111/j.0020-8833.2005.00332.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wadley, J. 2010. ‘Gendering the State: Performativity and Protection in International Security’, in Sjoberg, L. (ed.) Gender and International Security: Feminist Perspectives, pp. 38–58. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wibben, A. T. R. 2011. Feminist Security Studies: A Narrative Approach. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. 2005. ‘The Logic of Masculinist Protection: Reflection on the Current Security State’, in Friedman, M. (ed.) Women and Citizenship, pp. 15–34. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yuval-Davis, N. 1997. Gender & Nation. London and California: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar