Lakota experiences of (in)security: cosmology and ontological security

References

• Ackerly, B., M. Stern, and J. True. 2006. Feminist Methodologies for International Relations. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ackerly, B., and J. True. 2008. “Reflexivity in Practice: Power and Ethics in Feminist Research on International Relations.” International Studies Review 10: 693–707. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2486.2008.00826.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alfred, G. A. 2009. Peace, Power, Righteousness: An Indigenous Manifesto. Toronto: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aradau, C. 2004. “Security and the Democratic Scene: Desecuritization and Emancipation.” Journal of International Relations and Development 7: 388–413. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jird.1800030
   Google Scholar
• Baaz, M. E., and M. Stern. 2009. “Why do Soldiers Rape? Masculinity, Violence, and Sexuality in the Armed Forces in the Congo (DRC).” International Studies Quarterly 53: 495–518. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2478.2009.00543.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, M., and R. Duvall. 2005. “Power in International Politics.” International Organizations 59 (1): 39–75. doi: 10.1017/S0020818305050010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayard de Volo, L. 2001. Mothers of Heroes and Martyrs: Gender Identity Politics in Nicaragua, 1979–1999. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bedford, D., and T. Workman. 1997. “The Great Law of Peace: Alternative Inter-Nation(al) Practices and the Iroquoian Confederacy.” Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 22 (1): 87–111. doi: 10.1177/030437549702200104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beier, J. M. 2003. “Beyond Hegemonic State(Ment)s of Nature: Indigenous Knowledge and Non-State Possibilities in International Relations.” In Power, Postcolonialism and International Relations: Reading Race, Gender and Class, edited by C. Geeta and S. Nair, 82–114. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Beier, J. M. 2005. International Relations in Uncommon Places: Indigeneity, Cosmology, and the Limits of International Theory. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Beier, J. M. 2009. Indigenous Diplomacies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Beier, J. M. 2013. “Beyond Hegenomic State(Ment)s of Nature: Indigenous Knowledge and non-State Possibilities in International Relations.” In Power, Postcolonialism and International Relations: Reading Race, Gender and Class, edited by G. Chowdhry and S. Nair, 82–115. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Belkin, A. 2012. Bring Me Men: Military Masculinity and the Benign Façade of American Empire, 1898–2001. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, R. 2016. “Catching Our Breath: Critical Race STS and the Carceral Imagination.” Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 2: 145. doi: 10.17351/ests2016.70
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berenskoetter, F., and B. Giegerich. 2010. “From NATO to ESDP: A Social Constructivist Analysis of German Strategic Adjustment After the End of the Cold War.” Security Studies 19 (3): 407–452. doi: 10.1080/09636412.2010.505128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilge, S. 2013. “Intersectionality Undone: Saving Intersectionality from Feminist Intersectionality Studies.” Du Bois Review 10 (2): 405–424. doi: 10.1017/S1742058X13000283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanchard, E. M. 2003. “Gender, International Relations, and the Development of Feminist Security Theory.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 28 (4): 1289–1312. doi: 10.1086/368328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boldt, M. 1993. Surviving as Indians: The Challenge of Self-Government. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boldt, M., and J. A. Long. 1985. The Quest for Justice: Aboriginal Peoples and Aboriginal Rights. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyce, D. 2014. “Booming Oil Fields May Be Giving Sex Trafficking a Boost.” National Public Radio. February 1. Accessed May 21, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. E. 1992. Animals of the Soul: Sacred Animals of the Oglala Sioux. Rockport: Element Books Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. E., and E. Cousins. 2001. Teaching Spirits: Understanding Native American Religious Traditions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burawoy, M. 1991. “Introduction.” In Ethnography Unbound: Power and Resistance in the Modern Metropolis, edited by Burawoy et al., 1–8. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 1997. The Psychic Life of Power: Theories in Subjugation. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buzan, B., et al. 1998. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• CASE Collective. 2006. “Critical Approaches to Security in Europe: A Networked Manifesto.” Security Dialogue 37 (4): 443–487. doi: 10.1177/0967010606073085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, P. 1986. Nationalist Thought and the Colonial World: A Derivative Discourse? London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, P. 1993. The Nation and its Fragments: Colonial and Postcolonial Histories. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cockburn, C. 2004. “The Continuum of Violence: A Gender Perspective on War and Peace.” In Found in Sites of Violence, edited by W. Giles and J. Hyndman, 24–44. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cockburn, C., and D. Zarkov. 2002. The Postwar Moment: Militaries, Masculinities, and International Peacekeeping. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
   Google Scholar
• Cohn, C. 2006. “Motives and Methods: Using Multi-Sited Ethnography to Study US National Security Discourses.” In Feminist Methodologies for International Relations, edited by B. A. Ackerly, M. Stern, and J. True, 91–107. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, L. M., and D. Rosenow. 2016. “Security (Studies) and the Limits of Critique: Why We Should Think Through Struggle.” Critical Studies on Security 4 (2): 202–220. doi: 10.1080/21624887.2016.1174807
   Google Scholar
• Coulthard, G. S. 2014. Red Skin, White Masks: Rejecting the Colonial Politics of Recognition. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, N. 1994. “A Security Regime among Democracies: Cooperation among Iroquois Nations.” International Organization 48 (3): 345. doi: 10.1017/S002081830002823X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, N. 2006. “The Long Peace Among Iroquois Nations.” In War and Peace in the Ancient World, edited by K. A. Raaflaub, 348–368. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Croft, S. 2012. “Constructing Ontological Insecurity: The Insecuritisation of Britain’s Muslims.” Contemporary Security Policy 33 (2): 219–235. doi: 10.1080/13523260.2012.693776
   Google Scholar
• D’Costa, B. 2006. “Marginalized Identity: New Frontiers of Research for IR?” In Feminist Methodologies for International Relations, edited by B. A. Ackerly, M. Stern and J. True. New York: Cambridge Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Costa, R. 2009. “Indigenous Diplomacies Before the Nation-State.” In Indigenous Diplomacies, edited by J. M. Beier, 61–78. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Delehanty, W. K., and B. J. Steele. 2009. “Engaging the Narrative in Ontological (In)Security Theory: Insights from Feminist IR.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 22 (3): 523–540. doi: 10.1080/09557570903104024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deloria, V. Jr. 1969. Custer Died For Your Sins: An Indian Manifesto. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deloria, V. Jr. 1995. Red Earth, White Lies: Native Americans and the Myth of Scientific Fact. Golden: Fulcrum Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Deloria, E. C. 1998. Speaking of Indians. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deloria, V. Jr., and C. Lytle. 1983. American Indian, American Justice. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duncanson, C. 2013. Forces for Good? Military Masculinities and Peacebuilding in Afghanistan and Iraq. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Elshtain, J. B. 1987. Women and War. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Enloe, C. 1987. “Feminist Thinking About War, Militarism and Peace.” In Analyzing Gender: A Handbook Of Social Science Research, edited by B. B. Hess and M. M. Ferree, 526–547. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Enloe, C. 1989. Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Enloe, C. 1998. “All the Men Are in the Militias and All the Women Are Victims: The Politics of Masculinity and Femininity in Nationalism Wars.” In Found in The Women and War Reader, edited by L. A. Lorentzen and J. Turpin, 50–62. New York: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Enloe, C. 2000. “How do They Militarize a Can of Soup.” In Maneuvers: The International Politics of Militarizing Women’s Lives, edited by Cynthia Enloe, 1–34. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Epp, R. 2000. “At the Wood’s Edge: Towards a Theoretical Clearing for the Indigenous Diplomacies in International Relations.” In International Relations: Still an American Social Science?, edited by R. M. A. Crawford and D. S. L. Jarvis, 299–324. Albany: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. 2005. Pedagogies of the Oppressed. Trans. M. B. Ramos. New York: Continuun Press. (Original work published in 1968).
   Google Scholar
• Fujii, L. A. 2010. “Shades of Truth and Lies: Interpreting Testimonies of war and Violence.” Journal of Peace Research 47 (2): 231–241. doi: 10.1177/0022343309353097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujikane, C., and J. Y. Okamura. 2008. Asian Settler Colonialism: From Local Governance to the Habits of Everyday Life in Hawaii. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gad, U., and K. L. Peterson. 2011. “Concepts of Politics in Securitization Studies.” Security Dialogue 42 (4-5): 315–328. doi: 10.1177/0967010611418716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geeta, C., and S. Nair. 2004. Power, Postcolonialism and International Relations: Reading Race, Gender and Class. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. 1959. Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday Anchor Books.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, R. 1992. Lakota Star Knowledge: Studies in Lakota Stellar Theology. 2nd ed. Rosebud: Sinte Gleska University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, J. 1993. Fundamental Feminism: Contesting the Core Concepts of Feminist Theory. New York: Routledge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haq, F. 2007. “Militarism and Motherhood: The Women of the Lashkar-i-Tayyabia in Pakistan.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 32 (4): 1023–1046. doi: 10.1086/512729
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbert, M. S. 1998. Camouflage Isn’t Only for Combat: Gender, Sexuality and Women in the Military. New York: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, J. 2001. “Guests in Somebody Else’s House: Pondering Asian American Experience Today.” Yale-China Journal of American Studies 2: 15.
   Google Scholar
• Huysmans, J. 1995. “Migrants as a Security Problem: Dangers of ‘Securitizing’ Societal Issues.” In Found in Migration and European Integration: The Dynamics of Inclusion and Exclusion, edited by R. Miles, and D. Thraenhardt, 53–72. London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Huysmans, J. 1998. “Security! What Do You Mean? From Concept to Thick Signifier.” European Journal of International Relations 4 (2): 226–255. doi: 10.1177/1354066198004002004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivison, D., et al. 2000. Political Theory and the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, P. T. 2011. The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations: Philosophy of Science and its Implications for the Study of World Politics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jaimes, A. M. 1992. The State of Native America: Genocide, Colonization, and Resistance. Boston: South End Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kauanui, J. K., and P. Wolfe. 2012. “Settler Colonialism Then and Now.” Politica & Società 2: 235–258.
   Google Scholar
• Kinnvall, C. 2004. “Globalization and Religious Nationalism: Self, Identity, and the Search for Ontological Security.” Political Psychology 25 (5): 741–767. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00396.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krolikowski, A. 2008. “State Personhood in Ontological Security Theories of International Relations and Chinese Nationalism: A Sceptical View.” The Chinese Journal of International Politics 2 (1): 109–133. doi: 10.1093/cjip/pon003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuokkanen, R. 2009. “Achievements of Indigenous Self-Determination. The Case of the Sami Parliaments in Finland and Norway.” In Found in Indigenous Diplomacies, edited by J. M. Beier, 97–114. New York: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Kuokkanen, R. 2011. “Indigenous Economies, Theories of Subsistence, and Women: Exploring the Social Economy Model for Indigenous Governance.” The American Indian Quarterly 35 (2): 215–240. doi: 10.5250/amerindiquar.35.2.0215
   Google Scholar
• Kymlicka, W. 1989. Liberalism, Community and Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kymlicka, W. 1995. Multicultural Citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laing, R. D. 1969. The Divided Self. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Lightfoot, S. 2008. “Indigenous Rights in International Politics: the Case of ‘Overcompliant’ Liberal States.” Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 33 (1): 83–104. doi: 10.1177/030437540803300105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lightfoot, S. 2016. Global Indigenous Politics: A Subtle Revolution. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lightfoot, S., and D. MacDonald. Forthcoming. “Treaty Relations Between Indigenous Peoples: Advancing Global Understandings of Self-Determination.” New Diversities.
   Google Scholar
• Lupovici, A. 2012. “Ontological Dissonance, Clashing Identities, and Israel’s Unilateral Steps Towards the Palestinians.” Review of International Studies 38 (4): 809–833. doi: 10.1017/S0260210511000222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makes Good, S. 2009. “Sioux is Not Even a Word.” Lakota Times Country. 12 March.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, J. M. III. 2001. The Lakota Way: Stories and Lessons for Living. New York: Viking Compass.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, J. M. III. 2005. Walking with Grandfather: The Wisdom of Lakota Elders. Boulder: Sounds True.
   Google Scholar
• Melody, M. E. 1980. “Lakota Myth and the Government: The Cosmos as the State.” American Indian Culture and Research Journal 4 (3): 1–19. doi: 10.17953/aicr.04.3.w25n87180911320k
   Google Scholar
• Mitzen, J. 2006. “Ontological Security in World Politics: State Identity and the Security Dilemma.” European Journal of International Relations 12 (3): 341–370. doi: 10.1177/1354066106067346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohanty, C. T. 2003. Feminism Without Borders: Decolonizing Theory, Practicing Solidarity. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mrsevic, Z. 2001. “The Opposite of War is Not Peace – It is Creativity.” In Found in Frontline Feminisms: Women, War, and Resistance, edited by M. R. Waller and J. Rycenga, 41–55. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nandy, A. 1983. The Intimate Enemy: Loss and Recovery of Self Under Colonialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pachirat, T. 2011. Every Twelve Seconds: Industrialized Slaughter and the Politics of Sight. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parisi, L., and J. Corntassel. 2009. “A ‘Revolution within a Revolution’: Indigenous Women’s Diplomacies.” In Indigenous Diplomacies, edited by J. M. Beier, 79–96. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Penn, M. L., and A. Malik. 2010. “The Protection and Development of the Human Spirit: An Expanded Focus for Human Rights Discourse.” Human Rights Quarterly 32: 666–690. doi: 10.1353/hrq.2010.0001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratelle, J. 2013. “How Participant Observation Contributes to the Study of (In)Security Practices in Conflict Zones.” In Research Methods in Critical Security Studies, edited by M. B. Salter and C. E. Mutlu, 76–79. London: Routledge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Regan, P. 2010. Unsettling the Settler Within: Indian Residential Schools, Truth Telling, and Reconciliation in Canada. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roe, P. 2008. “The Value of Positive Security.” Review of International Studies 34 (4): 777–794. doi: 10.1017/S0260210508008279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumelili, B. 2015. “Identity and Desecuritisation: The Pitfalls of Conflating Ontological and Physical Security.” Journal of International Relations and Development 18: 52–74. doi: 10.1057/jird.2013.22
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatz, E. 2009. Political Ethnography: What Immersion Contributes to the Study of Power. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz-Shea, P., and D. Yanow. 2012. Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes. New York: Routledge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, K. 2008. Indigeneity and Political Theory: Sovereignty and the Limits of the Political. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shehata, S. 2006. “Ethnography, Identity, and the Production of Knowledge.” In Interpretation and Method: Empirical Research Methods and the Interpretive Turn, edited by D. Yanow and P. Schwartz-Shea, 244–263. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Shepherd, L. 2008. Gender, Violence and Security Discourse as Practice. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Shouse, E. 2005. “Feeling, Emotion, Affect.” M/C Journal 8 (6): 15 pars.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, L. 2011. Dancing on Our Turtle’s Back: Stories of Nishnaabeg Re-Creation, Resurgence and a New Emergence. Winnipeg: Arbeiter Ring Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, L. 2017. As We Have Always Done: Indigenous Freedom Through Radical Resistance. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L. T. 2012. Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. London: Zed Books. (Original work published in 1999).
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, T. 2013. “Attachment, Tautology, and Ontological Security.” Critical Studies on Security 1 (1): 130–132. doi: 10.1080/21624887.2013.790228
   Google Scholar
• Steele, B. J. 2005. “Ontological Security and the Power of Self-Identity: British Neutrality and the American Civil War.” Review of International Studies 31 (3): 519–540. doi: 10.1017/S0260210505006613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steele, B. J. 2008. Ontological Security in International Relations: Self-Identity and the IR State. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, M. 2005. Naming Security – Constructing Identity: Mayan Women in Guatemala on the Eve of Peace. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, M. 2006a. “We the Subject: The Power and Failure of (In)Security.” Security Dialogue 37 (2): 187–205. doi: 10.1177/0967010606066171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, M. 2006b. “Racism, Sexism, Classism, and Much More: Reading Security-Identity in Marginalized Sites.” In Feminist Methodologies for International Relations, edited by B. A. Ackerly, M. Stern, and J. True, 174–198. New York: Cambridge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart-Harawira, M. 2009. “Responding to a Deeply Bifurcated World.” In Indigenous Diplomacies in the 21st Century, edited by J. M. Beier, 207–224. New York: SUNY Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Tickner, J. A. 2005. “What Is Your Research Program? Some Feminist Answers to International Relations Methodological Questions.” International Studies Quarterly 49 (1): 1–22. doi: 10.1111/j.0020-8833.2005.00332.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• True, J. 2012. The Political Economy of Violence Against Women. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tuck, E. 2009. “Suspending Damage: A Letter to Communities.” Harvard Educational Review 79 (3): 409–428. doi: 10.17763/haer.79.3.n0016675661t3n15
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tully, J. 1995. Strange Multiplicity: Constitutionalism in an Age of Diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vrasti, W. 2008. “The Strange Case of Ethnography and International Relations.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 37 (2): 279–301. doi: 10.1177/0305829808097641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrasti, W. 2013. “Travelling with Ethnography.” In Research Methods in Critical Security Studies, edited by M. B. Salter and C. E. Mutlu, 59–62. London: Routledge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waever, O. 1995. “Securitization and Desecuritization.” In On Security, edited by R. D. Lipschutz, 46–86. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waever, O. 1998. “Insecurity, Security, and Asecurity in the West European Non-war Community.” In Security Communities, edited by E. Adler, and M. Barnett, 69–118. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weaver, J. 2010. Notes from a Miner’s Canary: Essays on the State of Native America. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wedeen, L. 2010. “Reflections on Ethnographic Work in Political Science.” Annual Review of Political Science 13: 255–272. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.052706.123951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendt, A. 1994. “Collective Identity Formation and the International State.” The American Political Science Review 88 (2): 384–396. doi: 10.2307/2944711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitworth, S. 2004. Men, Militarism and UN Peacekeeping. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Wibben, A. T. R. 2011. Feminist Security Studies: A Narrative Approach. London: Routledge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wibben, A. T. R. 2016. “Debates in Feminist Security Studies.” In Routledge Handbook of Security Studies, edited by M. D. Cavelty and T. Balzacq, 85–94. London: Routledge PRESS.
   Google Scholar
• Wildcat, M., et al. 2014. “Learning From the Land: Indigenous Land Based Pedagogy and Decolonization.” Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society 3 (3): I–XV.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, M. C. 2003. “Words, Images, Enemies: Securitization and International Politics.” International Studies Quarterly 47 (4): 511–531. doi: 10.1046/j.0020-8833.2003.00277.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilmer, F. 1993. The Indigenous Voice in World Politics. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, S. 2008. Research is Ceremony: Indigenous Research Methods. Nova Scotia: Fernwood Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe, P. 2006. “Settler Colonialism an the Elimination of the Native.” Journal of Genocide Research 8 (4): 387–409. doi: 10.1080/14623520601056240
   Google Scholar
• Woollacott, A. 1998. “Women Munition Makers, War, and Citizenship.” In The Women and War Reader, edited by L. A. Lorentzen, and J. Turpin, 126–131. New York: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yuval-Davis, N. 1997. Gender and Nation. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Zarakol, A. 2010. “Ontological (In)Security and State Denial of Historical Crimes: Turkey and Japan.” International Relations 24 (1): 3–23. doi: 10.1177/0047117809359040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaretsky, E. 2002. “Trauma and Dereification: September 11 and the Problem of Ontological Security.” Constellations (Oxford, England) 9 (1): 98–105.
   Google Scholar
• Žižek, S. 1989. The Sublime Object of Ideology. London and New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar