Feminist trajectories from Peru to Colombia: taking violence experienced by women into account in truth commissions

References

• ACHR (American Convention on Human Rights). 1969. “Pact of San José, Costa Rica.” July 18. O.A.S.T.S. 36, 1144 U.N.T.S. 123. Accessed September 26, 2022. http://www.oas.org/juridico/english/treaties/b-32.html.
   Google Scholar
• Alencar, Emanuela. 2011. “La violencia sexual contra las mujeres en los conflictos armados: un análisis de la jurisprudencia de los tribunales ad hoc para la Ex-Yugoslavia y Ruanda.” InDret: Revista para el Análisis del Derecho 4: 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Álvarez, Victoria. 2020. “Memorias y marcos sociales de escucha sobre la violencia sexual del terrorismo de estado.” Clepsidra 7 (14): 12–27.
   Google Scholar
• Bueno-Hansen, Pascha. 2015. Feminist and Human Rights Struggles in Peru: Decolonizing Transitional Justice. Urbana, IL: Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cabnal, Lorena. 2010. “Acercamiento a la construcción de la propuesta de pensamiento epistémico de las mujeres indígenas feministas comunitarias de Abya Yala.” In Feminista siempre, feminismos diversos: el feminismo comunitario, edited by Lorena Cabnal and Acsur, 11–25. Las Segovias: ACSUR.
   Google Scholar
• Cabnal, Lorena. 2019. Talk presented at Defensoras de Cuerpo y Territorios, Aprendizajes, Desafíos y Resisencias, Lima, Peru, April 12.
   Google Scholar
• CEV (Comisión de la Verdad Colombia). 2019. La Comisión de la Verdad Al Aire. Accessed September 26, 2022. https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/la-comisi%C3%B3n-de-la-verdad-al-aire/id1483008587.
   Google Scholar
• CEV. n.d. “Enfoque de género.” Comisión de la Verdad Colombia. Accessed September 26, 2022. https://comisiondelaverdad.co/en-los-territorios/enfoques/de-genero.
   Google Scholar
• Charlesworth, Hilary, and Christine Chinkin. 2017. “El género del jus cogens.” Revista Latinoamericana de Derecho Internacional 7: 31–46.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, Rebecca J., and Simone Cusack. 2011. Gender Stereotyping: Transnational Legal Perspectives. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crosby, Alison, and M. Brinton Lykes. 2019. Beyond Repair? Mayan Women’s Protagonism in the Aftermath of Genocidal Harm. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Oliveira, Marta. 2020. “‘Eu não passei. Eu vivi’: memórias de uma ex-guerrilheira no Brasil.” Clepsidra 7 (14): 38–155.
   Google Scholar
• Enloe, Cynthia. 2017. The Big Push: Exposing and Challenging the Persistence of Patriarchy. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Espinosa, Yuderkys, Diana Gómez, and Karina Ochoa. 2014. Tejiendo de otro modo: feminismo, epistemología y apuestas descoloniales en Abya Yala. Cauca: Editorial Universidad del Cauca.
   Google Scholar
• Facio, Alda. 1999. “Hacia otra teoría crítica del derecho.” In Género y derecho, edited by Lorena Fries and Alda Facio, 15–44. Santiago: LOM Ediciones.
   Google Scholar
• Francke, Marfil. 1990. “Género, clase y etnia: la trenza de la dominación.” In Tiempos de ira y amor, edited by Carlos Iván Degregori, Marfil Francke, and José López Ricci, 77–106. Lima: Desco.
   Google Scholar
• Fulchiron, Amandine. 2016. “La violencia sexual como genocidio memoria de las mujeres mayas sobrevivientes de violación sexual durante el conflicto armado en Guatemala.” Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales 61 (228): 391–422.
   Google Scholar
• González et al. (“Cotton Field”) v. Mexico. 2009. Preliminary Objections, Merits, Reparations and Costs. Inter-Am. Ct H. R. (ser. C) No. 205, November 16. Accessed September 26, 2022. https://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_205_ing.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• González Villamar, Juliana, and Pascha Bueno-Hansen. 2021. “The Promise and Perils of Mainstreaming Intersectionality in the Colombian Peace Process.” International Journal of Transitional Justice 15 (3): 553–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government of Colombia, Ministry of the Environment and Sustainable Development. 2016. “Sentencia T-622 de 2016: Río Atrato como sujeto de derechos.” Minambiente. Accessed January 30, 2023. https://archivo.minambiente.gov.co/index.php/component/content/article/3573-sentencia-t-622-de-2016-rio-atrato-como-sujeto-de-derechos.
   Google Scholar
• Gómez, Diana. 2016. “El encantamiento de la justicia transicional en la actual coyuntura Colombiana: entre disputas ontológicas en curso.” In Víctimas, memoria y justicia: aproximaciones Latinoamericanas al caso Colombiano, edited by Neyla Graciela Pardo Abril and Juan Ruiz Celis, 125–166. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
   Google Scholar
• Gómez, Diana. 2021. “De la inclusión del género a la estructuración de la paz feminista: aportes de los feminismos decoloniales al proceso transicional en Colombia.” In Comisiones de la verdad y género en países del sur global: miradas decoloniales, retrospectivas y prospectivas de la justicia transicional, edited by Diana Gómez, Angélica Bernal, Juliana González, Diana Montealegre, and María Manjarrés, 268–310. Bogotá: CIDER Uniandes.
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez Hernández et al. v. Guatemala. 2017. Preliminary Objections, Merits, Reparations and Costs. Inter-Am. Ct H. R. (ser. C) No. 339, August 24. Accessed September 26, 2022. http://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_339_esp.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, Donna. 1988. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies 14 (3): 575–599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaramillo, Isabel Cristina. 2000. “La crítica feminista al derecho, estudio preliminar.” In Género y teoría del derecho, edited by Robin West, 25–60. Bogota: Siglo del Hombre Editores.
   Google Scholar
• López Soto et al. v. Venezuela. 2019. Interpretation of the Judgment on Merits, Reparations, and Costs. Inter-Am. Ct H. R. (ser. C) No. 379, May 14. Accessed September 26, 2022. http://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_362_esp.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lugones, Maria. 2008. “The Coloniality of Gender.” Worlds & Knowledges Otherwise 2 (2): 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Mantilla, Julissa. 2006. “La perspectiva de género en la búsqueda de la verdad, la justicia y la reconciliación: el caso del Perú.” In Más allá del derecho: justicia y género en América Latina, edited by Luisa Cabal and Cristina Motta, 415–445. Bogota: Siglo del Hombre Editores.
   Google Scholar
• Massacre Plan de Sánchez v. Guatemala. 2004. Judgment on the Merits. Inter-Am. Ct H. R. (ser. C) No. 105, April 29. Accessed September 26, 2022. https://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_105_ing.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Miguel Castro-Castro Prison v. Peru. 2006. Merits, Reparations and Costs. Inter-Am. Ct H. R. (ser. C) No. 160, November 25. Accessed September 26, 2022. https://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_160_ing.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Moser, Caroline, and Fiona Clark. 2001. Victims, Perpetrators or Actors? Gender, Armed Conflict and Political Violence. New York: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ní Aoláin, Fionnuala. 2012. “Advancing Feminist Positioning in the Field of Transitional Justice.” International Journal of Transitional Justice 6 (2): 205–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ní Aoláin, Fionnuala, Naomi Cahn, Dina Francesca Haynes, and Nahla Valji. 2018. Oxford Handbook of Gender and Conflict. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• OAS (Organization of American States). 1992. Inter-American Convention on the Prevention, Punishment, and Eradication of Violence against Women (Belem do Pará Convention). June 9. Accessed September 26, 2022. https://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b38b1c.html.
   Google Scholar
• Paredes, Julieta. 2008. Hilando fino desde el feminismo comunitario. La Paz: Cooperativa el Rebozo.
   Google Scholar
• Segato, Rita. 2011. “Género y colonialidad: en busca de claves de lectura y de un vocabulario estratégico descolonial.” In Feminismos y poscolonialidad: descolonizando el feminismo desde y en América Latina, edited by Karina Bidaseca and Vanesa Vazquez Laba, 69–99. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Godot.
   Google Scholar
• Theidon, Kimberly S. 2004. Entre prójimos: el conflicto armado interno y la política de la reconciliación en el Perú. Lima: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.
   Google Scholar
• Theidon, Kimberly S. 2013. Intimate Enemies: Violence and Reconciliation in Peru. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Theidon, Kimberly. 2022. Legacies of War: Violence, Ecologies and Kin. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) of Peru. 2003. “La violencia sexual contra la mujer.” In Final Report, Vol. VI, Chap. 1. Accessed September 25, 2022. www.cverdad.org.pe.
   Google Scholar
• UN CEDAW (UN Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women). 1992. CEDAW General Recommendation No. 19: Violence against Women. Accessed September 26, 2022. https://www.refworld.org/docid/52d920c54.html.
   Google Scholar
• UN CEDAW. 2017. General Recommendation No. 35: Gender-Based Violence against Women, Updating General Recommendation No. 19. CEDAW/C/GC/35, July 26. Accessed September 26, 2022. https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N17/231/54/PDF/N1723154.pdf?OpenElement.
   Google Scholar
• UNCHR (UN Commission on Human Rights). 2006. Report of the Special Rapporteur on Violence against Women, Its Causes and Consequences on the Due Diligence Standard as a Tool for the Elimination of Violence against Women. E/CN.4/2006/61, January 20. Geneva: UNCHR. Accessed February 13, 2023. https://www.refworld.org/docid/45377afb0.html.
   Google Scholar
• UNHRC (United Nations Human Rights Council). 2011. Resolution 18/7: Special Rapporteur on the Promotion of Truth, Justice, Reparation and Guarantees of Non-Recurrence. A/HRC/RES/18/7, October 13. Accessed September 26, 2022. https://www.right-docs.org/doc/a-hrc-res-18-7/.
   Google Scholar
• UNHRC. 2012. Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Promotion of Truth, Justice, Reparation and Guarantees of Non-Recurrence. A/HRC/21/46, August 9. Geneva: UNHRC. Accessed September 25, 2022. https://www.refworld.org/docid/5051ba982.html.
   Google Scholar
• Unidad para la Atención y la Reparación Integral a las Víctimas y Programa Presidencial para la Formulación de Estrategias y Acciones para el Desarrollo Integral de los Pueblos Indígenas de Colombia. 2012. Decreto Ley de Víctimas No. 4633 de 2011. Bogotá: Imprenta Nacional de Colombia. Accessed March 22, 2023. https://www.centrodememoriahistorica.gov.co/descargas/registroEspecialArchivos/Decreto4633-2011-ley-de-victimas.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Velázquez Rodríguez v. Honduras. 1987. Judgment on Preliminary Objections. Inter-Am. Ct H. R. (ser. C) No. 4, June 26. Accessed September 26, 2022. https://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_01_ing.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Véliz Franco et al. v. Guatemala. 2014. Preliminary Objections, Merits, Reparations and Costs. Inter-Am. Ct H. R. (ser. C) No. 277, May 19. Accessed March 1, 2023. https://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_277_ing.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Vidaurrázaga, Tamara, María Olga Ruiz, and Marisa Ruiz. 2020. “Compórtate como una mujer: la tortura génerico-sexual como dispositivo de control dictatorial en Chile y Uruguay.” Clepsidra 7 (14): 12–27.
   Google Scholar