Understanding the complexities of validity using reflective practice

References

• Campbell, D., & Stanley, J. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago, IL: Rand-McNally.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, H.T. (2010). The bottom-up approach to integrative validity: A new perspective for program evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 33(1), 205–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, H.T., & Garbe, P. (2011). Assessing program outcomes from the bottom-up approach: An innovative perspective to outcome evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 130, 93–106.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, T.D., & Campbell, D.T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. (1982). Designing evaluations of educational and social programs. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Cureton, E.E. (1951). Validity. In E.F. Lindquist (Ed.), Educational measurement (pp. 621–694). Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
   Google Scholar
• DeLuca, C. (2010). Validating complex program aims: Constructing a framework for the validation of one teacher education program’s aim to promote inclusivity as a fundamental pedagogical principle ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston, MA: D.C. Heath.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, D. (2011). Why reflect? Recognising the link between learning and reflection, Reflective Practice: International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives, 12, 583–584.
   Google Scholar
• Hubley, A.M., & Zumbo, B.D. (1996). A dialectic on validity: Where we have been and where we are going. The Journal of General Psychology, 123(3), 207–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, W. (1950). The principles of psychology. New York, NY: Dover Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Jonson, J. L., & Plake, B.S. (1998). A historical comparison of validity standards and validity practices. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58(5), 736–753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane, M.T. (2006). Validation. In R.L. Brennan (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed.). (pp. 17–64). Westport, CT: American Council on Education/Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Kelchtermans, G. (2009). Who I am in how I teach is the message: Self-understanding, vulnerability and reflection. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15, 257–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, M., & DeLuca, C. (2012). Narrative case description: An approach to validation in the context of high-stakes assessments. Special issue: High-stakes assessments. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 19(1), 99–116.
   Google Scholar
• Landy, F.J., & Farr, J.L. (1980). Performance rating. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 72–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R.L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed.). (pp. 13–103). New York, NY: American Council on Education/Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M.Q. (2012). Essentials of utilization-focused evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, L.R., Kim, Y., & Lucio, J. (2012). An empirical examination of validity in evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 33(3), 350–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scriven, M. (1987). Validity in personnel evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1, 9–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shadish, W., Cook, T., & Campbell, D. (2002). Experimental and quasi experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. (1976). A theoretical statement of responsive evaluation. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 2(1), 19–22.
   Google Scholar
• Yarbrough, D.B., Shulha, L.M., Hopson, R.K., & Caruthers, F.A. (2011). The program evaluation standards: A guide for evaluators and evaluation users (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Yeates, P., O’Neill, P., Mann, K., & Eva, K. (2013). Seeing the same thing differently: Mechanisms that contribute to assessor differences in directly-observed performance assessments. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 18, 325–341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar