Interfacing practices: domain theory emerges via collaborative reflection

References

• Abelson, H., & diSessa, A. A. (1986). Turtle geometry. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Abrahamson, D. (2009a). A student's synthesis of tacit and mathematical knowledge as a researcher's lens on bridging learning theory. In M. Borovcnik & R. Kapadia (Eds.), Research and developments in probability education [Special Issue]. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 4, 195‒226. Retrieved January 19, 2010 from http://www.mathedujournal.com/dosyalar/IJEM_v4n3_3.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Abrahamson, D. (2009b). Embodied design: Constructing means for constructing meaning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70(1), 27–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrahamson, D. (2014). Building educational activities for understanding: An elaboration on the embodied-design framework and its epistemic grounds. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 2, 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Abrahamson, D., & Chase, K. (2015). Leveling algebra transparency: Giant steps towards a new approach to learning? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL, April 16‒20.
   Google Scholar
• Akkerman, S. F., & Bakker, A. (2011). Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Review of Educational Research, 81, 132–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artigue, M., Cerulli, M., Haspekian, M., & Maracci, M. (2009). Connecting and integrating theoretical frames: The TELMA contribution. In M. Artigue (Ed.), Connecting approaches to technology enhanced learning in mathematics: The TELMA experience [Special issue]. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 14, 217‒240.
   Google Scholar
• Bakker, A., & Hoffmann, M. H. G. (2005). Diagrammatic reasoning as the basis for developing concepts: a semiotic analysis of students' learning about statistical distribution. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 60, 333–358.
   Google Scholar
• Barab, S., Zuiker, S., Warren, S., Hickey, D., Ingram-Goble, A., Kwon, E.-J., et al. (2007). Situationally embodied curriculum: relating formalisms and contexts. Science Education, 91, 750–782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergman, M., Lyytinen, K., & Mark, G. (2007). Boundary objects in design: an ecological view of design artifacts. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8, 546–568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. S. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, T. P., Franke, M. L., & Levi, L. (2003). Thinking mathematically: integrating arithmatic and algebra in elementary school. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Chase, K., & Abrahamson, D. (2013). Rethinking transparency: constructing meaning in a physical and digital design for algebra. In J. P. Hourcade, E. A. Miller, & A. Egeland (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th Annual Interaction Design and Children Conference (IDC 2013) (Vol. ‘Short Papers’, pp. 475‒478). New York, NY: The New School & Sesame Workshop.
   Google Scholar
• Chase, K., & Abrahamson, D. (under review). Reverse scaffolding: A pedagogical orientation to the design of educational technology. ZDM ‒ The International Journal on Mathematics Education.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, A. (1992). Towards a design science of education. In E. Scanlon & T. O'Shea (Eds.), New directions in educational technology (pp. 15–22). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dickinson, P., & Eade, R. (2004). Using the number line to investigate solving linear equations. For the Learning of Mathematics, 24, 41–47.
   Google Scholar
• diSessa, A. A., & Cobb, P. (2004). Ontological innovation and the role of theory in design experiments. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 77–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelson, D. C. (2002). Design research: What we learn when we engage in design. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(1), 105–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, G. (2000). Symmetry of ignorance, social creativity, and meta-design. Knowledge-Based Systems, 13, 527–537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, G., & Ostwald, J. (2005). Knowledge communication in design communities. In R. Bromme, F. Hesse, & H. Spada (Eds.), Barriers and biases in computer-mediated knowledge communication – and how they may be overcome (pp. 152–161). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Gravemeijer, K. P. E. (1999). How emergent models may foster the constitution of formal mathematics. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1, 155–177.
   Google Scholar
• Herscovics, N., & Linchevski, L. (1996). Crossing the cognitive gap between arithmetic and algebra. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 30, 39–65.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, I., Inglis, M., Gilmore, C., & Evans, R. (2013). Teaching the substitutive conception of the equals sign. Research in Mathematics Education, 15(1), 34–49.
   Google Scholar
• Knuth, E. J., Stephens, A. C., McNeil, N. M., & Alibali, M. W. (2006). Does understanding the equal sign matter? Evidence from solving equations. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37, 297–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koschmann, T., LeBaron, C., Goodwin, C., & Feltovich, P. (2011). “Can you see the cystic artery yet?” A simple matter of trust. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 521–541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mamykina, L., Candy, L., & Edmonds, E. (2002). Collaborative creativity. Communications of the ACM, 45, 96–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, T., & Schwartz, D. L. (2005). Physically distributed learning: Adapting and reinterpreting physical environments in the development of fraction concepts. Cognitive Science, 29, 587–625.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meira, L. (1998). Making sense of instructional devices: The emergence of transparency in mathematical activity. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29, 129–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merz, A. H. (2002). A journey through an emergent design and its path for understanding. Reflective Practice, 3, 141–152.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, D., Griffin, P., & Cole, M. (1989). The construction zone: working for cognitive change in school. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Radford, L. (2000). Signs and meanings in students' emergent algebraic thinking: A semiotic analysis. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 42, 237–268.
   Google Scholar
• Resnick, L. B. (1991). Shared cognition: Thinking as social practice. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 1–20). Washington, DC: APA.
   Google Scholar
• Rittel, H. (1984). Second-generation design methods. In N. Cross (Ed.), Developments in design methodology (pp. 317–327). New York, NY: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, G. (2006). Supporting group cognition in an online math community: A cognitive tool for small-group referencing in text chat. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35, 103–122.
   Google Scholar
• Star, S. L. (1989). The structure of ill-structured solutions: Boundary objects and heterogenous distributed problem solving. In L. Gasser & M. N. Huhns (Eds.), Distributed artificial intelligence (pp. 37–54). San Mateo: Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Star, S. L. (2010). This is not a boundary object: Reflections on the origin of a concept. Science, Technology & Human Values, 35, 601–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. (1989). Institutional ecology, ‘translations’, and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–1939. Social Studies of Science, 19, 387–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streefland, L. (1993). The design of a mathematics course: A theoretical reflection. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 25, 109–135.
   Google Scholar
• Tracey, M., Hutchinson, A., & Grzebyk, T. (2014). Instructional designers as reflective practitioners: Developing professional identity through reflection. Educational Technology Research and Development, 62, 315–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vagle, M. D. (2010). Re-framing Schön's call for a phenomenology of practice: A post-intentional approach. Reflective Practice, 11, 393–407.
   Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. (G.E.M. Anscombe, Trans.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Yerushalmy, M. (2013). Designing for inquiry curriculum in school mathematics. Educational Designer, 2, Retrieved June 1, 2013 from http://www.educationaldesigner.org/ed/volume2/issue6/article22/index.htm
   Google Scholar