Publication Cover
Reflective Practice
International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives
Volume 17, 2016 - Issue 6
841
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Student responses to a reflexive course evaluation

, &
Pages 663-675 | Received 20 Jan 2016, Accepted 23 Jun 2016, Published online: 25 Jul 2016

References

  • Alderman, L., Towers, S., & Bannah, S. (2012). Student feedback systems in higher education: A focused literature review and environmental scan. Quality in Higher Education, 18, 261–280. doi:10.1080/13538322.2012.730714
  • Astin, A. W. (1999). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Development, 40, 518–529.
  • Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university (4th ed.). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
  • Briggs, A. R. J., Clark, J., & Hall, I. (2012). Building bridges: Understanding student transition to university. Quality in Higher Education, 18, 3–21. doi:10.1080/13538322.2011.614468
  • Cheng, M. (2011). ‘Transforming the learner’ versus ‘passing the exam’: Understanding the gap between academic and student definitions of quality. Quality in Higher Education, 17, 3–17. doi:10.1080/13538322.2011.554634
  • Christie, H., Tett, L., Cree, V. E., & McCune, V. (2016). ‘It all just clicked’: A longitudinal perspective on transitions within university. Studies in Higher Education, 41, 478–490. doi:10.1080/03075079.2014.942271
  • Edström, K. (2008). Doing course evaluation as if learning matters most. Higher Education Research & Development, 27, 95–106. doi:10.1080/07294360701805234
  • Freeman, R., & Dobbins, K. (2013). Are we serious about enhancing courses? Using the principles of assessment for learning to enhance course evaluation. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38, 142–151. doi:10.1080/02602938.2011.611589
  • Gibbs, G., & Dunbar-Goddet, H. (2007). The effects of programme assessment environment on student learning. York: Higher Education Academy.
  • Golding, C., & Adam, L. (2016). Evaluate to improve: Useful approaches to student evaluation. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41, 1–14. doi:10.1080/02602938.2014.976810
  • Harper, S. R., & Kuh, G. D. (2007). Myths and misconceptions about using qualitative methods in assessment. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2007(136), 5–14. doi:10.1002/ir.227
  • Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112. doi:10.3102/00346543066002099
  • Hodges, L. C., & Stanton, K. (2007). Translating comments on student evaluation into the language of learning. Innovative Higher Education, 31, 279–286. doi:10.1007/s10755-006-9027-3
  • Johnson, R. (2000). The authority of the student evaluation questionnaire. Teaching in Higher Education, 5, 419–434. doi:10.1080/713699176
  • Kember, D., & Leung, D. Y. P. (2006). Characterising a teaching and learning environment conducive to making demands on students while not making their workload excessive. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 185–198. doi:10.1080/03075070600572074
  • Kember, D., Leung, D. Y. P., & Kwan, K. P. (2002). Does the use of student feedback questionnaires improve the overall quality of teaching? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27, 411–425. doi:10.1080/0260293022000009294
  • Keränen, H., & Holm, E. (2014, November). Students’ role in quality enhancement – a reflexion of functional stupidity or an implication of ‘Quality as Practice’? Paper presented at the 9th European Quality Assurance Forum, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Lewis, K. G. (2001). Making sense of student written comments. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2001(87), 25–32.
  • McCulloch, A. (2009). The student as co-producer: learning from public administration about the student university relationship. Studies in Higher Education, 34, 171–83. doi:10.1080/03075070802562857
  • Olivares, O. J. (2003). A conceptual and analytic critique of student ratings of teachers in the USA with implications for teacher effectiveness and student learning. Teaching in Higher Education, 8, 233–245. doi:10.1080/1356251032000052465
  • Palmer, S. (2012). Student evaluation of teaching: keeping in touch with reality. Quality in Higher Education, 18, 297–311. doi:10.1080/13538322.2012.730336
  • Platt, M. (1993). What student evaluations teach. Perspectives on Political Science, 22, 29–40. doi:10.1080/10457097.1993.9944516
  • Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
  • Richardson, J. T. E. (2005). Instruments for obtaining student feedback: A review of the literature. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30, 387–415. doi:10.1080/02602930500099193
  • Schiekirka, S., & Raupach, T. (2015). A systematic review of factors influencing student ratings in undergraduate medical education course evaluations. BMC Medical Education, 15(1), 30. doi:10.1186/s12909-015-0311-8
  • Sellman, D. (2009). Practical wisdom in health and social care: Teaching professional phronesis. Learning in Health and Social Care, 8, 84–91. doi:10.1111/j.1473-6861.2009.00222.x
  • Spence, L., & Lenze, L. F. (2001). Taking student criticism seriously: Using student quality teams to guide critical reflection. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2001(87), 55–61. doi:10.1002/tl.28
  • Spooren, P., Brockx, B., & Mortelmans, D. (2013). On the validity of student evaluation of teaching: The state of the art. Review of Educational Research, 83, 598–642. doi:10.3102/0034654313496870
  • Stupans, I., McGuren, T., & Babey, A. M. (2016). Student evaluation of teaching: A study exploring student rating instrument free-form text comments. Innovative Higher Education, 41, 33–42. doi:10.1007/s10755-015-9328-5
  • Svinicki, M. D. (2001). Encouraging your students to give feedback. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2001(87), 17–24. doi:10.1002/tl.24
  • Zabaleta, F. (2007). The use and misuse of student evaluation of teaching. Teaching in Higher Education, 12, 55–76. doi:10.1080/13562510601102131
  • Zerihun, Z., Beishuizen, J., & Van Os, W. (2011). Conceptions and practices in teaching and learning: Implications for the evaluation of teaching quality. Quality in Higher Education, 17, 151–161. doi:10.1080/13538322.2011.582793.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.