More about strategies to improve the quality of joint reflection based on the theory-practice relationship during practicum seminars

References

• Chitpin, S., Simon, M., & Galipeau, J. (2008). Pre-service teachers’ use of the objective knowledge framework for reflection during practicum. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 2049–2058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarà, M. (2015). What is reflection? Looking for clarity in an ambiguous notion. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(3), 261–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarà, M., & Mauri, T. (2010). El conocimiento práctico: Cuatro conceptualizaciones constructivistas de las relaciones entre conocimiento teórico y práctica educativa. Infancia Y Aprendizaje, 33(2), 131–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarà, M., Mauri, T., Colomina, R., & Onrubia, J. (2019). Supporting collaborative reflection in teacher education: A case study. European Journal of Teacher Education, 42(2), 175–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, A. E. (2005). Situational analysis: Grounded theory after the postmodern turn. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, P., Boufi, A., McClain, K., & Whitenack, J. (1997). Reflective discourse and collective reflection. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(3), 258–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coll, C., Colomina, R., Onrubia, J., & Rochera, M. J. (1992). Actividad conjunta y habla: Una aproximación al estudio de los mecanismos de influencia educativa. Infancia Y Aprendizaje, 15(59–60), 189–232.
   Google Scholar
• Collin, S., & Karsenti, T. (2011). The collective dimension of reflective practice: The how and why. Reflective Practice: International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives, 12(4), 569–581.
   Google Scholar
• Colomina, R., Onrubia, J., & Rochera, M. J. (2001). Interactividad, mecanismos de influencia educativa y construcción del conocimiento en el aula. In C. Coll, J. Palacios, & A. Marchesi (Eds.), Desarrollo psicológico y educación II. Psicología de la educación escolar (pp. 437–458). Madrid: Alianza.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. L. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cubero, R., Cubero, M., & Bascón, M. J. (2019). The reflective practicum in the process of becoming a teacher: The tutor’s discursive support. Education Sciences, 9(2), 96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. Chicago: Henry Regnery.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1938). Logic: The theory of inquiry. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, F., & Schultz, J. (1997). When is a context? Some issues and methods in the analysis of social competence. Quarterly Newsletter of the Institute for Comparative Human Development, 1, 5–10.
   Google Scholar
• Erlandson, P., & Beach, D. (2008). The ambivalence of reflection – Rereading Schön. Reflective Practice, 9(4), 409–421.
   Google Scholar
• Foong, L. Y. Y., Nor, M. B. M., & Nolan, A. (2018). The influence of practicum supervisors’ facilitation styles on student teachers’ reflective thinking during collective reflection. Reflective Practice: International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives, 19(2), 225–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelfuso, A. (2016). A framework for facilitating video-mediated reflection: Supporting preservice teachers as they create warranted assertabilities about literacy teaching and learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 58, 68–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelfuso, A., & Dennis, D. V. (2014). Getting reflection off the page: The challenges of developing support structures for pre-service teacher reflection. Teaching and Teacher Education, 38, 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelfuso, A., Dennis, D. V., & Parker, A. (2015). Turning teacher education upside down: Enacting the inversion of teacher preparation through the symbiotic relationship of theory and practice. Professional Educator, 39(2). Retrieved from http://wp.auburn.edu/educate/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/gelfuso-fall_15.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hanuscin, D. L. (2013). Critical incidents in the development of pedagogical content knowledge for teaching the nature of science: A prospective elementary teacher’s journey. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(6), 933–956.
   Google Scholar
• Khanam, A. (2015). A practicum solution through reflection: An iterative approach. Reflective Practice, 16(5), 688–699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korthagen, F. (2001). Linking practice and theory. The pedagogy of realistic teacher education. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content analysis. An introduction to its methodology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lantolf, J. P. (2000). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, K. (2017). Creating a dialogic space for prospective teacher critical reflection and transformative learning. Reflective Practice, 18(6), 805–820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lortie, D. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. London: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maaranen, K., & Stenberg, K. (2017). Portraying reflection: The contents of student teachers’ reflection on personal practical theories and practicum experience. Reflective Practice: International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives, 18(5), 699–712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mälkki, K. (2012). Rethinking disorienting dilemmas within real-life crises: The role of reflection in negotiating emotionally chaotic experiences. Adult Education Quarterly, 62(3), 207–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez, A., Agirre, N., López-de-Arana, E., & Bilbatua, M. (2019). Analysis of interaction patterns and tutor assistance in processes of joint reflection in pre-service teacher education. Journal of Education for Teaching, 45(4), 389–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauri, T., Clarà, M., Colomina, R., & Onrubia, J. (2015). Naturaleza de la interacción en procesos de reflexión conjunta sobre situaciones de la práctica por estudiantes de maestro. Papeles De Trabajo Sobre Cultura, Educación Y Desarrollo Humano, 11(2), 105–109.
   Google Scholar
• Mauri, T., Clarà, M., Colomina, R., & Onrubia, J. (2016). Educational assistance to improve reflective practice among student teachers. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 14(2), 287–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauri, T., Clarà, M., Colomina, R., & Onrubia, J. (2017). Patterns of interaction in the processes of joint reflection by student teachers. Journal of Education for Teaching, 43, 427–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, N. (2008). The seeds of time: Why classroom dialogue needs a temporal analysis. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17(1), 33–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Moore-Russo, D. A., & Wilsey, J. N. (2014). Delving into the meaning of productive reflection: A study of future teachers’ reflections on representations of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 37, 76–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, S. (1999). Constructing and critiquing reflective practice. Educational Action Research, 7(1), 145–163.
   Google Scholar
• Pareja Roblin, N., & Margalef, L. (2013). Learning from dilemmas: Teacher professional development through collaborative action and reflection. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 19(1), 18–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, D. D. (1989). First steps in developing a reflective approach. Journal of Teacher Education, 40, 22–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruffinelli, A. (2017). Formación de docentes reflexivos: Un enfoque en construcción y disputa. Educação E Pesquisa, 43(1), 97–111.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz, P., Sánchez, L., & Mateu, R. (2018). La innovación pedagógica de la mano de la investigación-acción para mejorar la calidad de las prácticas externas de los Grados de Maestro/a en Educación Primaria y Educación Infantil. Revista Electrónica Interuniversitaria De Formación Del Profesorado, 21(1), 33–49.
   Google Scholar
• Sagasta, P., & Pedrosa, B. (2019). Learning to teach through video playback: Student teachers confronting their own practice. Reflective Practice, 20(1), 13–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Shapira-Lishchinsky, O. (2010). Teachers’ critical incidents: Ethical dilemmas in teaching practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 648–656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Valencia, S. W., Martin, S. D., Place, N. A., & Grossman, P. (2009). Complex interactions in student teaching: Lost opportunities for learning. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(3), 304–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher-student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 271–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Manen, M. (1977). Linking ways of knowing with ways of being practical. Curriculum Inquiry, 6(3), 205–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Westrick, J. M., & Morris, G. A. (2016). Teacher education pedagogy: Disrupting the apprenticeship of observation. Teaching Education, 27(2), 156–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. (1984). Case study research: Design and methods, applied social research methods series. Newbury Park: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Yoon, H. G., & Kim, M. (2010). Collaborative reflection through dilemma cases of science practical work during practicum. International Journal of Science Education, 32(3), 283–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar