The demonstration of reflection-in-action in maritime training

References

• Aebersold, M. (2016). The history of simulation and its impact on the future. AACN Advanced Critical Care, 27(1), 56–61. https://doi.org/10.4037/aacnacc2016436
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreifuerst, K. T. (2009). The essentials of debriefing in simulation learning: A concept analysis. Nursing Education Perspectives, 30(2), 109–114. https://journals.lww.com/neponline/Abstract/2009/03000/THE_ESSENTIALS_of_DEBRIEFING_in_Simulation.13.aspx
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dufrene, C., & Young, A. (2014). Successful debriefing—Best methods to achieve positive learning outcomes: A literature review. Nurse Education Today, 34(3), 372–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2013.06.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fanning, R. M., & Gaba, D. M. (2007). The role of debriefing in simulation-based learning. Simulation in Healthcare, 2(2), 115–125. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0b013e3180315539
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grushka, K., McLeod, J. H., & Reynolds, R. (2005). Reflecting upon reflection: Theory and practice in one Australian university teacher education program. Reflective Practice, 6(2), 239–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623940500106187
   Google Scholar
• Heath, C., Hindmarsh, J., & Luff, P. (2011). Video in qualitative research: Analyzing social interaction in everyday life. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Hébert, C. (2015). Knowing and/or experiencing: A critical examination of the reflective models of John Dewey and Donald Schön. Reflective Practice, 16(3), 361–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2015.1023281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husebø, S. E., Dieckmann, P., Rystedt, H., Søreide, E., & Friberg, F. (2013). The relationship between facilitators’ questions and the level of reflection in postsimulation debriefing. Simulation in Healthcare, 8(3), 135–142. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0b013e31827cbb5c
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johansson, E., Lindwall, O., & Rystedt, H. (2017). Experiences, appearances, and interprofessional training: The instructional use of video in post-simulation debriefings. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 12(1), 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-017-9252-z
   Google Scholar
• Kapur, M. (2015). Learning from productive failure. Learning: Research and Practice, 1(1), 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2015.1002195
   Google Scholar
• Kapur, M., & Bielaczyc, K. (2012). Designing for productive failure. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(1), 45–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2011.591717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kihlgren, P., Spanager, L., & Dieckmann, P. (2015). Investigating novice doctors’ reflections in debriefings after simulation scenarios. Medical Teacher, 37(5), 437–443. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2014.956054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoblauch, H., & Tuma, R. (2019). Videography and video analysis. In P. Atkinson, S. Delamont, A. Cernat, J. W. Sakshaug, & R. A. Williams (Eds.), SAGE research methods foundations (pp. 435–449). SAGE Publications Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526421036805699
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. A. (2014). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. FT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kolbe, M., Grande, B., & Spahn, D. R. (2015). Briefing and debriefing during simulation-based training and beyond: Content, structure, attitude and setting. Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology, 29(1), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpa.2015.01.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindwall, O., Lymer, G., & Greiffenhagen, C. (2015). The sequential analysis of instruction. In N. Markee (Ed.), The handbook of classroom discourse and interaction. John Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118531242
   Google Scholar
• Mavin, T. J., & Roth, M.-W. (2014). Between reflection on practice and the practice of reflection: A case study from aviation. Reflective Practice, 15(5), 651–665. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2014.944125
   Google Scholar
• Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nyström, S., Dahlberg, J., Edelbring, S., Hult, H., & Dahlgren, M. A. (2016). Debriefing practices in interprofessional simulation with students: A sociomaterial perspective. BMC Medical Education, 16(1), 148. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0666-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramage, M. (2017). Learning and change in the work of Donald Schön: Reflection on theory and theory on reflection. In D. Szabla, W. Pasmore, M. Barnes, & A. Gipson (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of organizational change thinkers (pp. 1159–1172). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49820-1_57-1
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, R., Singer, R., Dugmore, H., Seaman, K., & Lake, F. (2016). Nursing students’ reflections on an interprofessional placement in ambulatory care. Reflective Practice, 17(4), 393–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2016.1164686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawyer, T., Eppich, W., Brett-Fleegler, M., Grant, V., & Cheng, A. (2016). More than one way to debrief: A critical review of healthcare simulation debriefing methods. Simulation in Healthcare, 11(3), 209–217. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000148
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in practice. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Sellberg, C. (2018). From briefing, through scenario, to debriefing: the maritime instructor’s work during simulator-based training. Cognition, Technology & Work, 20, 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-017-0446-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellberg, C., & Lundin, M. (2017). Tasks and instructions on the simulated bridge: Discourses of temporality in maritime training. Discourse Studies, 20(2), 289–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2017.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellberg, C., & Lundin, M. (2018). Tasks and instructions on the simulated bridge: Discourses of temporality in maritime training. Discourse Studies, 20(2), 289–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445617734956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streeck, J., Goodwin, C., & LeBaron, C. (2011). Embodied interaction in the material world: An introduction. Embodied interaction: Language and body in the material world, 1, 26.
   Google Scholar