Multispecies methods, technologies for play

References

• Akrich, M. 1995. “User Representations: Practices, Methods and Sociology.” In Managing Technology in Society. The Approach of Constructive Technology Assessment, edited by A. Rip, T. J. Misa, and J. Schot, 167–184. London: Pinter Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Bateson, G. 1972. Steps to an Ecology of Mind. San Francisco, CA: Chandler.
   Google Scholar
• Bateson, P., and P. Martin. 2013. Play, Playfulness, Creativity and Innovation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bekoff, M., and J. Pierce. 2009. “Wild Justice: Honor and Fairness among Beasts at Play.” American Journal of Play 1 (4): 451–475.
   Google Scholar
• Burghardt, G. M. 2005. The Genesis of Animal Play: Testing the Limits. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burghardt, G. M. 2015. “Creativity, Play and the Pace of Evolution.” In Animal Creativity and Innovation, edited by A. B. Kaufman, and J. C. Kaufman, 129–154. Burlington, MA: Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• Caillois, R. 1961. Man, Play, and Games. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Clay, A. W., B. M. Perdue, D. E. Gaalema, F. L. Dolins, and M. A. Bloomsmith. 2011. “The Use of Technology to Enhance Zoological Parks.” Zoo Biology 30: 487–497. doi: 10.1002/zoo.20353
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., and F. Guatari. 1987. A Thousand Plateaus. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Driessen, C., K. Alfrink, M. Copier, and H. Lagerweij. 2014. “What Could Playing with Pigs Do To Us? Game Design as Multispecies Philosophy.” Antennae: The Journal of Nature in Visual Culture 30: 79–102.
   Google Scholar
• Ermi, L., and F. Mäyrä. 2005. “Player-Centred Game Design: Experiences In Using Scenario Study To Inform Mobile Game Design.” Game Studies 5 (1). Accessed February 3, 2015. http://www.gamestudies.org/0501/ermi_mayra/.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, A., M. Emmison, D. J. Haraway, and M. Travers. 2007. “Investigating the Therapeutic Benefits of Companion Animals: Problems and Challenges.” Qualitative Sociology Review 3 (1): 42–58.
   Google Scholar
• French, F., C. Mancini, and H. Sharp. 2014. “Designing Interactive Toys for Elephants.” Proceedings of ACE'14 Workshop on Animal Human Computer Interaction, ACM Press, 523–528.
   Google Scholar
• Fry, T. 2012. Becoming Human by Design. London: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Goode, D. 2007. Playing with My Dog Katie. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. J. 1988. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies 14 (3): 575–599. doi: 10.2307/3178066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. J. 2008. When Species Meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayles, K. N. 1999. How We Became Posthuman. Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature and Informatics. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huizinga, J. 1938. Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play Element in Culture. London: Routledge, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, J. C., and A. B. Kaufman. 2004. “Applying a Creativity Framework to Animal Cognition.” New Ideas in Psychology 22 (2): 143–155. doi: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2004.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman, A. B., and J. C. Kaufman. 2015. Animal Creativity and Innovation. Burlington, MA: Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• Kirksey, E., C. Schuetze, and S. Helmreich. 2014. “Tactics of Multispecies Ethnography.” In The Multispecies Salon, edited by E. Kirksey, 1–25. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kohn, E. 2013. How Forests Think. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koskinen, I. K., J. Zimmerman, T. Binder, J. Redstrom, and S. Wensveen. 2011. Design Research Through Practice. Waltham, MA: Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Leino, O. 2009. “ Understanding Games as Played: Sketch for a First-person Perspective for Computer Game Analysis.” The Philosophy of Computer Games Conference, History of Art and Ideas, University of Oslo, Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Mancini, C. 2011. “Animal-Computer Interaction: A Manifesto.” Interactions 18 (4): 69–73. doi: 10.1145/1978822.1978836
   Google Scholar
• Martinelli, D. 2010. A Critical Companion to Zoosemiotics. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mattelmäki, T., K. Vaajakallio, and I. K. Koskinen. 2014. “What Happened to Empatic Design?” Design Issues 30 (1): 67–77. doi: 10.1162/DESI_a_00249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, R. W. 2015. “Creativity in the Interaction: The Case of Dog-human Play.” In Animal Creativity and Innovation, edited by A. B. Kaufman, and J. C. Kaufman, 31–40. Burlington, MA: Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• Nacke, L. E., A. Drachen, K. Kuikkaniemi, J. Niesenhaus, H. J. Korhonen, W. M. van den Hoogen, K. Poels, and W. A. Ijsselsteijn. 2009. “Playability and Player Experience Research [Panel Abstracts].” Digra International Conference: Breaking New Ground: Innovation in Games, Play, Practice and Theory, Brunel University, London.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. 2013. The Design of Everyday Things: Revised and Expanded. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Noz, F., and J. An. 2011. “ Cat Cat Revolution: An Interspecies Gaming Experience.” SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM Press, New York, 2261–2664.
   Google Scholar
• Russon, A. E., P. Kuncoro, and A. Ferisa. 2015. “Tools for the Trees: Orangutan Arboreal Tool Use and Creativity.” In Animal Creativity and Innovation, edited by A. B. Kaufman, and J. C. Kaufman, 419–452. Burlington, MA: Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• Shumaker, R. V., K. R. Walkup, and B. B. Beck. 2011. Animal Tool Behavior. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spinuzzi, C. 2005. “The Methodology of Participatory Design.” Technical Communication 52 (2): 163–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuner, S. J. 2000. The Extended Organism. The Physiology of Animal-built Structures. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vanden Abeele, V. A., and V. Van Rompaey. 2006. “Introducing Human-centered Research to Game Design: Designing Game Concepts for and with Senior Citizens.” CHI 2006, ACM, New York, 1469–1474.
   Google Scholar
• Westerlaken, M., and G. Stefano. 2014. “Grounded Zoomorphism: An Evaluation Methodology for ACI Design.” Proceedings of ACE'14 Workshop on Animal Human Computer Interaction, Funchal, Portugal, November 11–14. ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wirman, H. 2014. “Games for/with Strangers: Captive Orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus) Touch Screen Play.” Antennae: The Journal of Nature in Visual Culture 30: 103–113.
   Google Scholar
• Wirman, H., W. Smits, G. Yu, and W. Yuen. 2011. “Defeated By An Orangutan? Approaching Cross-Species Gameplay.” Think Design Play – 5th International DiGRA Conference, Utrecht School of the Arts, Utrecht, September 14–17.
   Google Scholar