1,280
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Infrastructures of abstraction: how computer science education produces anti-political subjects

ORCID Icon &

References

  • ACM/AIS/IEEE-CS Joint Curriculum Task Force. 2005. Computing Curricula 2005, the Overview Report. New York: ACM Press.
  • Agre, P. 1997. “Toward a Critical Technical Practice: Lessons Learned in Trying to Reform AI.” In Social Science, Technical Systems, and Cooperative Work: Beyond the Great Divide, edited by Geoffrey Bowker, Geoffrey Bowker, Susan Leigh Star, Les Gasser, and William Turner. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis.
  • Allington, D., S. Brouillette, and D. Golumbia. 2016. “Neoliberal Tools (and Archives): A Political History of Digital Humanities.” LA Review of Books, 1.
  • Apperley, T., and J. Parikka. 2018. “Platform Studies’ Epistemic Threshold.” Games & Culture 13 (4): 349–369. doi: 10.1177/1555412015616509
  • Barad, K. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Bowker, Geoffrey C., and Susan Leigh Star. 1999. Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge: MIT.
  • Carrigan, C. 2018. “‘Different Isn’t Free’: Gender@ Work in a Digital World.” Ethnography 19 (3): 336–359. doi: 10.1177/1466138117728737
  • Chandra, V. 2014. Geek Sublime: The Beauty of Code, the Code of Beauty. Minneapolis, MN: Graywolf Press.
  • Clarke, A. E. 2005. Situational Analysis: Grounded Theory After the Postmodern Turn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Cook, William R. 2009. “On Understanding Data Abstraction, Revisited.” ACM SIGPLAN Notices 44 (10): 557–572. doi:10.1145/1639949 doi: 10.1145/1639949.1640133
  • Diakopoulos, N. 2016. “Accountability in Algorithmic Decision Making.” Communications of the ACM 59 (2): 56–62. doi: 10.1145/2844110
  • DuBois, W. E. B. 1965. The Souls of Black Folk. London: Longmans.
  • Eubanks, V. 2018. Automating Inequality: How High-tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor. New York, NY: St. Martin's Press.
  • Freire, P. 1968. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum.
  • Golumbia, D. 2009. The Cultural Logic of Computation. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Haraway, D. J. 2008. When Species Meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Haraway, D. J. 2018. Modest_Witness@ Second_Millennium. FemaleMan_Meets_OncoMouse: Feminism and Technoscience. Oxfordshire: Routledge.
  • Herkert, Joseph R. 2005. “Ways of Thinking About and Teaching Ethical Problem Solving: Microethics and Macroethics in Engineering.” Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (3): 373–385. doi:10.1007/s11948-005-0006-3.
  • Hoffman, A. L. 2019. “Where Fairness Fails: Data, Algorithms, and the Limits of Antidiscrimination Discourse.” Information, Communication & Society 22: 900–915. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2019.1573912
  • Irani, L., Janet Vertesi, Paul Dourish, Kavita Philip, and Rebecca E. Grinter. 2010. “Postcolonial Computing: A Lens on Design and Development.” CHI 2010, April 10–15, Atlanta, GA.
  • Irigaray, L., and E. Oberle. 1985. “Is the Subject of Science Sexed?” Cultural Critique (1): 73–88. doi:10.2307/1354281.
  • Janssen, T. 2017. “OOP Concept for Beginners: What is Abstraction?” Stackify. First Published November 23. Last Accessed July 29, 2019. https://stackify.com/oop-concept-abstraction/.
  • Jasanoff, S. 2004. States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and the Social Order. Oxfordshire: Routledge.
  • Keyes, O., J. Hutson, and M. Durbin. 2019. “A Mulching Proposal: Analysing and Improving an Algorithmic System for Turning the Elderly Into High-nutrient Slurry.” Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing systems, April, alt06. ACM.
  • Knorr Cetina, K. 1999. Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Malazita, J. 2018a. “Re: Configurations: A Shared Project for Literature and Science.” Configurations 26 (3): 269–275. doi: 10.1353/con.2018.0021
  • Malazita, J. 2018b. “Translating Critical Design: Agonism in Engineering Education.” Design Issues 34: 4. doi: 10.1162/desi_a_00514
  • Malazita, J. Forthcoming. “Epistemic Infrastructures, the Instrumental Turn, and the Digital Humanities.” In Debates in the Digital Humanities: Infrastructures, Institutions at the Interstices, edited by Angel Nieves, Siobhan Senier, and Anne McGrail. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • McCarthy, J., R. Brayton, D. Edwards, P. Fox, L. Hodes, D. Luckham, K. Maling, D. Park, and S. Russell. 1960. LISP I Programmers Manual. Boston, MA: Artificial Intelligence Group, M.I.T. Computation Center and Research Laboratory.
  • McPherson, Tara. 2012. “Why is the Digital Humanities So White? Or, Thinking the Histories of Race and Computation.” In Debates in the Digital Humanities, edited by Matthew K. Gold, 138–160. Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press.
  • McPherson, Tara. 2013. “U.S. Operating Systems at Mid-century: The Intertwining of Race and UNIX.” In Race After the Internet, edited by Lisa Nakamura and Peter Chow-White, 21–37. Oxfordshire: Taylor and Francis Group.
  • McPherson, T. 2014. “Designing for Difference.” Differences 25 (1): 177–188. doi: 10.1215/10407391-2420039
  • Murphy, M. 2017. The Economization of Life. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Peters, A. K., and J. O. Choi. 2018. “The Making of a Computer Scientist.” XRDS: Crossroads, The ACM Magazine for Students – The Computer Scientist 25 (1): 7–8. doi: 10.1145/3265907
  • Poirier, L. 2017. “Devious Design: Digital Infrastructure Challenges for Experimental Ethnography.” Design Issues 33 (2): 70–83. doi: 10.1162/DESI_a_00440
  • Riley, D. 2011. “Engineering Thermodynamics and 21st Century Energy Problems: A Textbook Companion for Student Engagement.” Synthesis Lectures on Engineering 6 (3): 1–97. doi: 10.2200/S00387ED1V01Y201110ENG016
  • Riley, D. 2017. “Rigor/Us: Building Boundaries and Disciplining Diversity with Standards of Merit.” Engineering Studies 9 (3): 249–265. doi: 10.1080/19378629.2017.1408631
  • Rorty, R. 1991. Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth: Philosophical Papers, Volume I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Star, S. L. 1999. “The Ethnography of Infrastructure.” American Behavioral Scientist 43 (3): 377–391. doi: 10.1177/00027649921955326
  • Star, S. L. 2010. “This is Not a Boundary Object: Reflections on the Origin of a Concept.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 35 (5): 601–617. doi: 10.1177/0162243910377624
  • Stewart, C., and W. Turner. 2016. Computer Science I Syllabus. Last Accessed July 15, 2019. https://www.cs.rpi.edu/academics/courses/spring16/cs1/course_notes/lec01_intro.html?fbclid=IwAR35WRr3GrFHT2jFNGak9_7dcVKY0a52f7wYQPPBm1RnsDYzU_wBvm-moJY#types-of-problems-we-will-study.
  • Varelas, M., D. B. Martin, and J. M. Kane. 2012. “Content Learning and Identity Construction: A Framework to Strengthen African American Students’ Mathematics and Science Learning in Urban Elementary Schools.” Human Development 55 (5–6): 319–339. doi: 10.1159/000345324
  • Velho, R. 2017. “Fixing the Gap: An Investigation Into Wheelchair Users’ Shaping of London Public Transport.” Doctoral diss., University College London.
  • Walsh, B. 2017. “Collaborative Writing to Build Digital Humanities Praxis.” Digital Humanities Conference, August 2017, Montreal, CA.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.