The anthropophagic studio: towards a critical pedagogy for interaction design

References

• Abdelnour-Nocera, Jose, Chris Csikszentmihályi, Torkil Clemmensen, and Christian Sturm. 2015. “Design, Innovation and Respect in the Global South.” In IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, edited by J Abascal, S Barbosa, M Fetter, T Gross, P Palanque, and M Winckler, 630–632. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Adams, Robin S., Tiago Forin, Mel Chua, and David Radcliffe. 2016. “Characterizing the Work of Coaching During Design Reviews.” Design Studies 45: 30–67. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2015.12.007.
   Google Scholar
• Alabdulqader, Ebtisam, Norah Abokhodair, and Shaimaa Lazem. 2017. “Human-computer interaction across the Arab world.” Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Andrade, Oswald de. 1928. “Manifesto Antropofágico.” Revista de Antropofagia 1 (1): 3–7. São Paulo.
   Google Scholar
• Andrade, Oswald de. 1929. “Introito da odysséazinha.” In Revista de Antropofagia, 10. São Paulo, Brazil: Diário de São Paulo.
   Google Scholar
• Andrade, Oswald de. 1970. Obras Completas VI: Do pau-brasil à antropofagia e às utopias. Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira.
   Google Scholar
• Aprile, W. A., and A. van der Helm. 2011. “Interactive technology design at the Delft University of Technology-a course about how to design interactive products.” In DS 69: Proceedings of E&PDE 2011, the 13th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education. London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Azevedo, Beatriz. 2018. Antropofagia-Palimpsesto Selvagem. São Paulo: Editora SESI-Serviço Social da Indústria.
   Google Scholar
• Baltazar dos Santos, Ana Paula, and Jose dos Santos Cabral Filho. 2011. “Antropofagia no Ensino Introdutório de Projeto Duas Décadas de Experiência.” In Proceedings of V Projetar. Processos de projeto: teorias e práticas. Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
   Google Scholar
• Baranauskas, M. Cecília C., Heiko H. Hornung, and M. Cecília Martins. 2008. “Design socialmente responsável: desafios de interface de usuário no contexto brasileiro.” In Proceedings of XXVIII Congresso da Sociedade Brasileira de Computação, 91–105. Belém, Brazil: Sociedade Brasileira de Computação.
   Google Scholar
• Barcelos, Valdo. 2013. Uma educação dos trópicos: contribuições da Antropofagia Cultural Brasileira. Petrópolis: Vozes.
   Google Scholar
• Barcelos, Valdo, and Ivete S. da Silva. 2008. “Antropofagia cultural brasileira e educação–contribuições ecologistas para uma pedagogia da ‘devoração’.” Poiésis - Revista do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Educação 1 (1): 20–41. doi:10.19177/prppge.v1e1200820-41.
   Google Scholar
• Bardzell, Jeffrey, and Shaowen Bardzell. 2016. “Humanistic HCI.” Interactions 23 (2): 20–29. doi:10.1145/2888576.
   Google Scholar
• Binder, Thomas, Jonas Löwgren, and Lone Malmborg. Eds. 2008. (Re) Searching The Digital Bauhaus. London: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Boal, Augusto. 2000. Theater of the Oppressed. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boal, Augusto. 2006. The Aesthetics of the Oppressed. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boess, Stella, Daniel Saakes, and Caroline Hummels. 2007. “When is Role Playing Really Experiential? Case Studies.” In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction, edited by Brygg Ullmer and Albert Schmidt, 279–282. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Bordin Rodrigues, Claudia. 2017. “Projetar para a Esperança: prática de pesquisa em Design de Interação sobre as concepções de esperança de Paulo Freire.” In I Workshop Culturas, Alteridades e Participações em IHC: Navegando ondas em movimento (CAPAihc 2017), 1–8. Joinville, Brazil: UTFPR. http://capaihc.dainf.ct.utfpr.edu.br/artigos/CAPA17_paper_13.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bordin Rodrigues, Claudia Bordin. 2019. “Consciência e ação em Design de Interação: Recursos e Práticas Educacionais Abertas para o Esperançar.” (Doctoral dissertation). Graduate Program in Technology and Society (PPGTE), Federal Technological University of Parana (UTFPR).
   Google Scholar
• Borrero, Alfredo Gutiérrez. 2015. “Resurgimientos: Sures Como Diseños y Diseños Otros.” Nómadas Col (43): 113–129.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre. 2013. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brandt, Eva, and Camilla Grunnet. 2000. “Evoking the Future: Drama and Props in User Centered Design.” In Proceedings of the 6th Participatory Design Conference (PDC 2000), edited by T Cherkasky, J Greenbaum, P Mambrey, and J.K. Pors, 11–20. Palo Alto, CA: CPSR.
   Google Scholar
• Bry, Theodor de. 1562. “The sons of Pindorama.” [engraving ].
   Google Scholar
• Buxton, Bill. 2010. Sketching User Experiences: Getting the Design Right and the Right Design. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Canclini, Néstor García. 1995. Hybrid Cultures: Strategies for Entering and Leaving Modernity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Canônica, Rosangela, Petrykowski Peixe Rita Inês, Adriane Shibata Santos, and Christia Kohls. 2014. “Relações entre o Design Participativo e princípios pedagógicos freirianos.” In Proceedings of the 11° Congresso Brasileiro de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento em Design, edited by F Teixeira, F. C. Xavier da Costa, and V Ribeiro, 1304–1315. São Paulo: Blucher. ISSN 2318-6968.
   Google Scholar
• Carlsson, Jan, Pelle Ehn, Barbo Erlander, Maja-Lisa Perby, and Åke Sandberg. 1978. “Planning and Control From the Perspective of Labour: A Short Presentation of the DEMOS Project.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 3 (3-4): 249–260.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho, André Luis Pires de. 2008. “Da película ao cartaz: uma análise do design do cartaz de ‘Deus e o diabo na terra do Sol’”. (Master thesis) Universidade Anhembi Morumbi, São Paulo, Brazil.
   Google Scholar
• Couldry, Nick, and Ulises Mejias. 2018. “Data Colonialism: Rethinking big Data’s Relation to the Contemporary Subject.” Television & New Media 20 (4): 336–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couto, Rita Maria de Souza. 2008. Escritos Sobre Ensino de Design no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Rio Books.
   Google Scholar
• Couto, Maria de Fátima Morethy. 2009. “Tupy or not Tupy, a Antropofagia Hoje.” Proceedings of XXIX Colóquio do Comitê Brasileiro de História da Arte 29: 340–348. Vitória. http://www.cbha.art.br/pdfs/cbha_2009_couto_maria_art.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Cruz, Crystian. 2003. Brasilêro. [typeface] https://crystiancruz.myportfolio.com/brasilero.
   Google Scholar
• Culén, Alma L., Henry N. Mainsah, and Sisse Finken. 2014. “Design Practice in Human Computer Interaction Design Education.” In Proceedings of ACHI 2014: The Seventh International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions, edited by M Miller, 300–306. Barcelona: International Academy, Research, and Industry Association ( IARIA ).
   Google Scholar
• de Luca Pretto, Nelson de, and Olga G. Bailey. 2011. “Digital Culture in Brazil: Building Peeracy?” International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics 6 (3): 265–281. doi:10.1386/mcp.6.3.265_1.
   Google Scholar
• Dorland, Anne Marie Rose Ennis. 2018. “Doing Design Thinking: An Ethnography of the Digital Graphic Design Studio”. (Unpublished doctoral thesis) University of Calgary, Calgary, AB.
   Google Scholar
• Dorst, Kess. 2006. “Design Problems and Design Paradoxes.” Design Issues 22 (3): 4–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dourish, Paul. 2001. Where the Action is. Cambridge: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Duarte, Rogério. 1964. “Black God, White Devil.” [poster].
   Google Scholar
• Duarte, Rogério. 1965. “Notas Sobre o Desenho Industrial.” Revista Civilização Brasileira 4: 227–247.
   Google Scholar
• Ehn, Pelle. 1998. “Manifesto for a Digital Bauhaus.” Digital Creativity 9 (4): 207–217. doi:10.1080/14626269808567128.
   Google Scholar
• Ehn, Pelle. 2017. “Learning in Participatory Design as I Found it (1970–2015).” In Participatory Design for Learning, edited by B DiSalvo, J Yip, and E Bonsignore, 7–21. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ehn, Pelle, and Richard Badham. 2002. “Participatory Design and the Collective Designer.” In Proceedings of the 7th Participatory Design Conference, edited by T Binder, J Gregory, and I Wagner, 1–10. Palo Alto, US.
   Google Scholar
• Ehn, Pelle, Elisabet M. Nilsson, and Richard Topgaard. Eds. 2014. Making Futures: Marginal Notes on Innovation, Design, and Democracy. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, Arturo. 2018. Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. Durhan/London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Faber-Ludens. 2012. Design Livre. Curitiba: Faber-Ludens. http://www.designlivre.org.
   Google Scholar
• Fabless Manifesto. 2017. “Fabless Manifesto: How to make almost anything with barely anything”. https://www.appropedia.org/Fabless_manifesto.
   Google Scholar
• Firmino, Rodrigo José, Bruno de Vasconcelos Cardoso, and Rafael Evangelista. 2019. “Hyperconnectivity and (Im)Mobility: Uber and Surveillance Capitalism by the Global South.” Surveillance & Society 17 (1/2): 205–212. doi:10.24908/ss.v17i1/2.12915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freire, Paulo. 1970. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, Paulo. 1972. Cultural Action for Freedom. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, Paulo. 1973. Extension or Communication? New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, Paulo. 1993. Pedagogy of the City. New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, Paulo. 1994. Pedagogy of Hope: Reliving Pedagogy of the Oppressed. London/New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, Paulo. 1998. Teachers as Cultural Workers: Letters to Those who Dare Teach. Boulder, CL: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, Paulo. 2016. Conscientização. São Paulo: Cortez.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, Paulo, and Sérgio Guimarães. 2013. Educar com a mídia: Novos diálogos sobre educação. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra.
   Google Scholar
• Fry, Tony. 2017. “Design for/by The Global South.” Design Philosophy Papers 15 (1): 3–37. doi:10.1080/14487136.2017.1303242.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, Luis Fellipe. 2020. “Only Anthropophagy Unites us – Oswald de Andrade's Decolonial Project.” Cultural Studies 34 (1): 122–142. doi:10.1080/09502386.2018.1551412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaver, Bill, Anthony Dunne, and Elena Pacenti. 1999. “Design: Cultural Probes.” Interactions 6 (1): 21–29. doi:10.1145/291224.291235.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, James J. 1986. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzatto, Rodrigo Freese. 2018. “Usuários e Produção da Existência: contribuições de Álvaro Vieira Pinto e Paulo Freire à Interação Humano-Computador”. (Doctoral thesis) Graduate Program in Technology and Society (PPGTE), Federal Technological University of Parana (UTFPR). http://repositorio.utfpr.edu.br/jspui/handle/1/3794.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzatto, Rodrigo Freese, and Frederick M. C. van Amstel. 2017. “Designing oppressive and libertarian interactions with the conscious body”. In Proceedings of the XVI Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems - IHC 2017. Joinville, Brazil. doi:10.1145/3160504.3160542.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, Colin M., Yubo Kou, Bryan Battles, Joseph Hoggatt, and Austin L. Toombs. 2018. “The Dark (Patterns) Side of UX Design.” In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ‘18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, paper 534.
   Google Scholar
• Guimarães, Tatiane G., and Raquel O. Prates. 2018. “HCI Education in Brazil in the light of Curricula Guidelines.” In Proceedings of XXVI Simpósio Ibero-Americano em Educação Superior em Computação at XLIV Conferência Latino-americana de Informática, São Paulo, Brazil.
   Google Scholar
• Islam, Gazi. 2012. “Can the Subaltern eat? Anthropophagic Culture as a Brazilian Lens on Post-Colonial Theory.” Organization 19 (2): 159–180. doi:10.1177/1350508411429396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jáuregui, Carlos. 2012. “Anthropophagy.” In Dictionary of Latin American Cultural Studies, edited by Robert McKee Irwin, and Mónica Szurmuk, 22–28. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Joshi, Anirudha. 2004. “Interaction design in India: past, present and future”. In CHI'04 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM. 1027-1028.
   Google Scholar
• Judice, Andrea Castello Branco. 2014. “Design for hope: Designing health information in Vila Rosário”. (Doctoral Dissertation) School of Arts, Design and Architecture, Aalto University.
   Google Scholar
• Korfmann, Michael, and Marcelo Nogueira. 2004. “Avant-garde in Brazil.” Dialectical Anthropology 28 (2): 125–145. https://www.jstor.org/stable/29790706.
   Google Scholar
• Kwet, Michael. 2019. “Digital Colonialism: US Empire and the New Imperialism in the Global South.” Race & Class 60 (4): 3–26. doi:10.1177/0306396818823172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazem, Shaimaa, and Susan Dray. 2018. “Baraza! Human-Computer Interaction Education in Africa.” Interactions 25 (2): 74–77. doi:18/baraza.
   Google Scholar
• Lazzarotti Filho, Ari, Ana Marcia Silva, Priscilla de Cesaro Antunes, Ana Paula Salles da Silva, and Jaciara Oliveira Leite. 2010. “The Term Bodily Practices in Brazilian Scientific Literature and its Impact on the Physical Education Field.” Movimento 16 (1): 11–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, Henri. 1991. The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lockton, Dan. 2013. “Design with intent: a design pattern toolkit for environmental and social behaviour change” (Doctoral thesis) Brunel University School of Engineering and Design.
   Google Scholar
• Lotz, Nicole, and Helen Sharp. 2020. “Challenges for Interaction Design Education in the South: a Case Study of Botswana.” Journal of International Development 32 (1): 62–84. doi:10.1002/jid.3451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löwgren, Jonas. 2001. “From HCI to Interaction Design.” In Human Computer Interaction: Issues and Challenges, edited by Q Chen, 29–43. IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-878289-91-9.ch002.
   Google Scholar
• Löwgren, Jonas. 2002. “How far Beyond Human-Computer Interaction is Interaction Design?” Digital Creativity 13 (3): 186–189. doi:10.1076/digc.13.3.186.7338.
   Google Scholar
• Löwgren, Jonas, and Erik Stolterman. 2004. Thoughtful Interaction Design: A Design Perspective on Information Technology. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malmborg, Lone. 2004. “The Digital Bauhaus: Vision or Reality?” Digital Creativity 15 (3): 175–181. doi:10.1080/14626260408520178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martins, Luiza Prado de O. 2014. “Privilege and Oppression: Towards a Feminist Speculative Design.” In Proceedings of DRS 2014: Design’s Big Debates. Design Research Society Biennial International Conference, edited by Y Lim, C Niedderer, and J Redström, 980–990. Umeä, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Martín-Barbero, Jésus. 1993. Communication, Culture and Hegemony: From the Media to Mediations. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Matos, Ecivaldo S. 2013. “Dialética da interação humano-computador: tratamento didático do diálogo midiatizado.” (Doctoral thesis) Faculdade de Educação, University of São Paulo, São Paulo. doi:10.11606/T.48.2013.tde-05062013-105842.
   Google Scholar
• Maurer, Luna, Jonathan Puckey, Roel Wouters, and Edo Paulus. 2013. Conditional Design Workbook. Amsterdam: Valiz.
   Google Scholar
• Moalosi, Richie, Vesna Popovic, and Anne R. Hickling-Hudson. 2007. “Product Analysis Based on Botswana's Postcolonial Socio-Cultural Perspective.” International Journal of Design 1 (2): 37–45. http://www.ijdesign.org/index.php/IJDesign/article/view/10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreira, Herivelto, and Luiz Gonzaga Caleffe. 2006. Metodologia da pesquisa para o professor pesquisador. Rio de Janeiro: DP&A.
   Google Scholar
• Netto, Sebastião Leal Ferreira Vargas. 2014. “Antropofagia cultural: momento do pensamento crítico latino-americano.” Revista Eletrônica da ANPHLAC 17. doi:10.46752/anphlac17%25y2117%25g282-303.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, Alan F., Alex Carmichael, M. Morgan, and Anna Dickinson. 2006. “The use of Theatre in Requirements Gathering and Usability Studies.” Interacting with Computers 18 (5): 996–1011. doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2006.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nold, Christian. 2018. “Practice-based Ontological Design for Multiplying Realities.” Strategic Design Research Journal 11 (2): 58–64. doi:10.4013/sdrj.2018.112.02.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, Donald A. 2002. The Design of Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Nunes, Benedito. 1979. Oswald Canibal. São Paulo: Editora Perspectiva.
   Google Scholar
• Penin, Lara, and Cameron Tonkinwise. 2009. “The Politics and Theatre of Service Design.” In Proceedings of International Association of Societies of Design Research 2009 - IASDR'09, 4327–4338. Seoul, Korea: Korean Society of Design Science.
   Google Scholar
• Pinto, Felipe Ribeiro. 2014. “A redução antropofágica: a poética de O. Andrade como método para transplantação acelerativa de tecnologias gerenciais.” In Proceedings of XXXVIII Encontro da ANPAD. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: ANPAD. http://www.anpad.org.br/admin/pdf/2014_EnANPAD_ESO2326.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Preece, Jennifer, Yvonne Rogers, and Helen Sharp. 2005. Design de Interação: além da interação homem-computador. São Paulo: Artmed.
   Google Scholar
• Quijano, Aníbal. 2007. “Coloniality and Modernity/Rationality.” Cultural Studies 21 (2-3): 22–32. doi:10.1080/09502380601164353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redström, Johan. 2017. Making Design Theory. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, Craig W. 1987. “Flocks, Herds and Schools: A Distributed Behavioral Model.” Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (SIGGRAPH ‘87) 21 (4): 25–34. New York, NY. doi:10.1145/37402.37406.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, Mark, Alan Newell, and M. Morgan. 2007. “Forum Theatre as a Requirements Gathering Methodology in the Design of a Home Telecommunication System for Older Adults.” Behaviour & Information Technology 26 (4): 323–331. doi:10.1080/01449290601177045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saffer, Dan. 2013. Microinteractions: Designing with Details. Champaign: O'Reilly Media.
   Google Scholar
• Sant'Anna, Hugo Cristo. 2013. Design sem Designer. Serra: Author's Edition. https://www.hugocristo.com.br/dist/design-sem-designer.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sant'Anna, Hugo Cristo, and Julio César Reis Alves. 2017. “Paulo Freire e o Design de Interação.” Incendiários 2 (2): 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. 2018. The End of the Cognitive Empire: The Coming of Age of Epistemologies of the South. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, Donald A. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic books.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, Tristan, Danah Abdulla, Ahmed Ansari, Ece Canlı, Mahmoud Keshavarz, Matthew Kiem, Luiza Prado de O. Martins, and Pedro J.S. Vieira de Oliveira. 2018. “What Is at Stake with Decolonizing Design? A Roundtable.” Design and Culture 10 (1): 81–101. doi:10.1080/17547075.2018.1434368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz, Ermelindo, Laura Sanchez Garcia, Laís Affornali Fernandes, Mateus Ribamar Paixão, Fernanda Kawasaki, and Roberto Pereira. 2020. “Cultivating Creative Coexistence(s): Towards a Critical Education for Creativity Praxis to Construct Fairer Human Coexistences.” In Proceedings of the 16th Participatory Design Conference 2020 - Participation(s) Otherwise, 1, edited by Chiara Gaudio Del, Leonardo Parra-Agudelo, Rachel Clarke, Joanna Saad-Sulonen, Andrea Botero, Felipe César Londoño, and Paula Escandón, 33–43. Manizales, Colombia: ACM. doi:10.1145/3385010.3385019.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarcz, Lilia Moritz. 2019. Sobre o autoritarismo brasileiro. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras.
   Google Scholar
• Serpa, Bibiana, Imaí­ra Portela, Mariana Costard, and Sâmia Silva. 2020. “Political-pedagogical Contributions to Participatory Design From Paulo Freire.” In Proceedings of the 16th Participatory Design Conference 2020 - Participation(s) Otherwise - Volume 2 (PDC ‘20), edited by C Gaudio Del, L Parra-Agudelo, S Agid, C Parra, G Poderi, D Duque, L Villeszcas, A Botero, and P Escandón, 170–174. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Shneiderman, Ben. 1987. Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Smyth, Thomas, and Jill Dimond. 2014. “Anti-oppressive Design.” Interactions 21 (6): 68–71. doi:10.1145/2668969.
   Google Scholar
• Souza, Michelle Andressa Alvarenga de. 2015. “Analysing Brazilian Modernism From a Postcolonial Perspective: the Importance of Anthropophagy in the Movement Towards a Decolonization of the Mind.” International Journal of Arts & Sciences 8 (7): 411–423. ISSN: 1944-6934. http://www.universitypublications.net/ijas/0807/html/U5K665.xml.
   Google Scholar
• Spence, Jocelyn, David Frohlich, and Stuart Andrews. 2013. “Performative Experience Design: Where Autobiographical Performance and Human–Computer Interaction Meet.” Digital Creativity 24 (2): 96–110. doi:10.1080/14626268.2013.808964.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staden, Hans. 2008. Hans Staden's True History: An Account of Cannibal Captivity in Brazil. Durhan: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Szaniecki, B. 2019. “Design-antropofagia: só me interessa o que não é meu.” POIÉSIS 20 (33): 183–200. doi:10.22409/poiesis.2033.183-200.
   Google Scholar
• Telier, A. 2011. Design Things. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomassen, Aukje, and Oguzhan Ozcan. 2010. “Standardizing Interaction Design Education.” Computers and Education 54 (4): 849–855. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiitta, Sauli, Katri Mehto, Tomi Kankainen, and Vesa Kantola. 2005. “Drama and User-Centered Methods in Design.” In Proceedings of Include 2005: International conference on inclusive design., edited by R Coleman and A McDonald, 34–65. London, UK: Helen Hamlyn Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Tlostanova, M. 2017. “On Decolonizing Design.” Design Philosophy Papers 15 (1): 51–61. doi:10.1080/14487136.2017.1301017.
   Google Scholar
• van Amstel, Frederick M. C. 2008. “Das interfaces às interações: design participativo do portal Broffice.org”. Master thesis. Graduate Program in Technology and Society (PPGTE), Federal Technological University of Parana (UTFPR). http://multimidia.usabilidoido.com.br/dissertacao/interfaces_interacoes_final_web.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• van Amstel, Frederick M. C., and Rodrigo Freese Gonzatto. 2016. “Design Livre: Designing Locally, Cannibalizing Globally.” XRDS 22 (4): 46–50. doi:10.1145/2930871.
   Google Scholar
• van Amstel, Frederick M. C., Rodrigo Freese Gonzatto, and Gláucio H. M. Moro. 2018. “Improvised Video as a Medium for Learning and Designing Interactions.” In Proceedings of the 17th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems (IHC 2018), edited by M Motta, B Serique, R. O. Prates, and H Candello. Belém, Brazil. doi:10.1145/3274192.3274220.
   Google Scholar
• van Amstel, Frederick M. C., Pedro Jatoba, and Rodrigo Freese Gonzatto. 2014. “Design Livre at Corais Platform: an Experience in Cultivating a Design Commons with Free Software.” In Workshop Designing commons – Commons for design. Umeä, Sweden. http://fredvanamstel.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/commons_design_corais_position_paper1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• van Amstel, Frederick M. C., Caio Vassão, and Gonçalo B. Ferraz. 2011. “Cannibalistic Interaction Design.” In Innovation in Design Education: Proceedings of the Third International Forum of Design as a Process, edited by Elena Formia and Umberto Alemandi, 442–456. Torino: Alemandi. https://research.utwente.nl/en/publications/design-livre-cannibalistic-interaction-design.
   Google Scholar
• Vassão, Caio Adorno. 2008. “Arquitetura livre: complexidade, metadesign e ciência nômade”. Doctoral dissertation, Faculdade de Arquitetura e Urbanismo, Universidade de São Paulo. doi:10.11606/T.16.2008.tde-17032010-140902.
   Google Scholar
• Verbeek, Peter-Paul. 2005. What Things do: Philosophical Reflections on Technology, Agency, and Design. University Park: Penn State Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vieira Pinto, Álvaro. 1960. Consciência e Realidade Nacional. Rio de Janeiro: Ministério da Educação e Cultura (MEC), Instituto Superior de Estudos Brasileiros (ISEB).
   Google Scholar
• Vieira Pinto, Álvaro. 2005. O Conceito de Tecnologia. Rio de Janeiro: Contraponto.
   Google Scholar
• Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo. 2012. “Immanence and Fear: Stranger-Events and Subjects in Amazonia.” HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 2 (1): 27–43.
   Google Scholar
• Vyas, Dhaval, and Anton Nijholt. 2012. “Artful Surfaces: an Ethnographic Study Exploring the use of Space in Design Studios.” Digital Creativity 23 (3-4): 176–195. doi:10.1080/14626268.2012.658522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wesson, Janet. 2009. “Teaching Creative Interface Design: Possibilities and Pitfalls.” In Creativity and HCI: From Experience to Design in Education, edited by P Kotzé, W Wong, J Jorge, A Dix, and P.A. Silva, 79–89. Boston, MA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Winograd, Terry, and Fernando Flores. 1987. Understanding “Computers and Cognition” a new Foundation for Design. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corp.
   Google Scholar
• Winschiers-Theophilus, Heike, and Nicola J. Bidwell. 2013. “Toward an Afro-Centric Indigenous HCI Paradigm.” International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 29 (4): 243–255. doi:10.1080/10447318.2013.765763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood Jr, Thomaz, and Miguel P. Caldas. 1998. “Antropofagia Organizacional.” Revista de Administração de Empresas 38 (4): 6–17. doi:10.1590/S0034-75901998000400002.
   Google Scholar
• Wyllys, Jean. 2020. “Borders of (il) Legality.” In Living (Il) Legalities in Brazil: Practices, Narratives and Institutions in a Country on the Edge, edited by Sara Brandellero, Derek Pardue, and Georg Wink. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Yildiz, Pelin. 2008. “Interactive Methods of Design Education as the Principles of Social Implications of Modern Communities.” International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering 2 (2): 95–100. doi:10.5281/zenodo.1061934.
   Google Scholar
• Young, Iris M. 2004. “Five Faces of Oppression.” In Oppression, Privilege, & Resistance. 290., edited by Lisa Heldke and Peg O'Connor270. Boston: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar