Artificial intelligence as relational artifacts in creative learning

References

• Altman, Sam. 2023. “Planning for AGI and Beyond.” Accessed March 20. https://openai.com/blog/planning-for-agi-and-beyond.
   Google Scholar
• Amabile, Teresa M. 1982. “Social Psychology of Creativity: A Consensual Assessment Technique.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 43 (5): 997–1013. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.43.5.997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, John R., Albert T. Corbett, Kenneth R. Koedinger, and Pelletier Ray. 1995. “Cognitive Tutors: Lessons Learned.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 4 (2): 167–207. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0402_2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, John R., C. Franklin Boyle, and Brian J. Reiser. 1985. “Intelligent Tutoring Systems.” Science 228 (April): 456–62. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.228.4698.456.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baer, John. 1998. “The Case for Domain Specificity of Creativity.” Creativity Research Journal 11 (2): 173–77. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1102_7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baer, John, and James C. Kaufman. 2019. “Assessing Creativity with the Consensual Assessment Technique.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Social Creativity Research, edited by Izabela Lebuda and Vlad Petre Glăveanu, 27–37. Palgrave Studies in Creativity and Culture. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95498-1_3.
   Google Scholar
• Baer, John, and Sharon McKool. 2009. “Assessing Creativity Using the Consensual Assessment Technique.” Handbook of Research on Assessment Technologies, Methods, and Applications in Higher Education, 65–77. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60566-667-9.ch004.
   Google Scholar
• Baidoo-Anu, David, and Leticia Owusu Ansah. 2023. “Education in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI): Understanding the Potential Benefits of ChatGPT in Promoting Teaching and Learning.” SSRN Scholarly Paper. Rochester, NY. doi:10.2139/ssrn.4337484.
   Google Scholar
• Beghetto, Ronald A. 2016. “Creative Learning: A Fresh Look.” Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology 15 (1): 6–23. https://doi.org/10.1891/1945-8959.15.1.6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, Lea. 2023. “A Computer Wrote This Paper: What ChatGPT Means for Education, Research, and Writing.” SSRN Scholarly Paper. Rochester, NY. doi:10.2139/ssrn.4338981.
   Google Scholar
• Boden, Margaret A. 1991. The Creative Mind: Myths & Mechanisms. The Creative Mind: Myths & Mechanisms. New York, NY, US: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, Kathy. 2014. Constructing Grounded Theory. 2nd ed. London ; Thousand Oaks, Calif: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Chiu, Thomas K. F., Qi Xia, Xinyan Zhou, Ching Sing Chai, and Miaoting Cheng. 2023. “Systematic Literature Review on Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Research Recommendations of Artificial Intelligence in Education.” Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence 4 (January): 100118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100118.
   Google Scholar
• Colton, Simon, and Geraint A. Wiggins. 2012. “Computational Creativity: The Final Frontier?” In ECAI 2012—20th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 27-31 August 2012, Montpellier, France - Including Prestigious Applications of Artificial Intelligence (PAIS-2012) System Demonstration, 21–26. IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-098-7-21.
   Google Scholar
• “Copy.Ai.” 2023. CopyAI, Inc. Accessed March 20. https://www.copy.ai/.
   Google Scholar
• Corbett, Albert T., and John R. Anderson. 1995. “Knowledge Tracing: Modeling the Acquisition of Procedural Knowledge.” User Modelling and User-Adapted Interaction 4 (4): 253–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01099821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotton, Debby R. E., Peter A. Cotton, and J. Reuben Shipway. 2023. “Chatting and Cheating: Ensuring Academic Integrity in the Era of ChatGPT.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, John W. 2014. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. 4th edition. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, N., Safat Siddiqui, Pegah Karimi, M. Maher, and Kazjon Grace. 2019. “Creative Sketching Partner: A Co-Creative Sketching Tool to Inspire Design Creativity.” In Tenth International Conference on Computational Creativity. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Creative-Sketching-Partner%3A-A-Co-Creative-Sketching-Davis-Siddiqui/5120afadd8d12d83e3d200014d255c1c989a5d9d.
   Google Scholar
• “D-ID Studio.” 2023. De-Identification Ltd. Accessed March 20. https://studio.d-id.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. Anders. 2002. “Attaining Excellence Through Deliberate Practice: Insights from the Study of Expert Performance.” In Teaching and Learning, 4–37. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470690048.ch1.
   Google Scholar
• Esser, Patrick, Robin Rombach, and Bjorn Ommer. 2021. “Taming Transformers for High-Resolution Image Synthesis.” In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 12873–83. https://openaccess.thecvf.com/content/CVPR2021/html/Esser_Taming_Transformers_for_High-Resolution_Image_Synthesis_CVPR_2021_paper.html.
   Google Scholar
• Eteläpelto, A., and J. Lahti. 2008. “The Resources and Obstacles of Creative Collaboration in a Long-Term Learning Community.” Thinking Skills and Creativity 3 (3): 226–240. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2008.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gajda, Aleksandra, Ronald A. Beghetto, and Maciej Karwowski. 2017. “Exploring Creative Learning in the Classroom: A Multi-Method Approach.” Thinking Skills and Creativity 24 (June): 250–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.04.002.
   Google Scholar
• Ghiasi, Golnaz, Honglak Lee, Manjunath Kudlur, Vincent Dumoulin, and Jonathon Shlens. 2017. “Exploring the Structure of a Real-Time, Arbitrary Neural Artistic Stylization Network.” In Procedings of the British Machine Vision Conference 2017, 114. London, UK: British Machine Vision Association. https://doi.org/10.5244/C.31.114.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., A. L. Strauss, and E. Strutzel. 1968. “The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research.” Nursing Research 17 (4): 364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glăveanu, Vlad Petre. 2013. “Rewriting the Language of Creativity: The Five A’s Framework.” Review of General Psychology 17 (1): 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glăveanu, Vlad Petre. 2015. “Creativity as a Sociocultural Act.” The Journal of Creative Behavior 49 (3): 165–80. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glăveanu, Vlad Petre, Ingunn Johanne Ness, Barbara Wasson, and Todd Lubart. 2019. “Sociocultural Perspectives on Creativity, Learning, and Technology.” In Creativity Under Duress in Education?, edited by Carol A. Mullen, 3:63–82. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90272-2_4.
   Google Scholar
• Goertzel, Ben. 2014. “Artificial General Intelligence: Concept, State of the Art, and Future Prospects.” Journal of Artificial General Intelligence 5 (1): 1–48. https://doi.org/10.2478/jagi-2014-0001.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, Biyang, Xin Zhang, Ziyuan Wang, Minqi Jiang, Jinran Nie, Yuxuan Ding, Jianwei Yue, and Yupeng Wu. 2023. How Close Is ChatGPT to Human Experts? Comparison Corpus, Evaluation, and Detection.” arXiv. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2301.07597.
   Google Scholar
• Hennessey, B.A., T.M. Amabile, and J.S. Mueller. 2011. “Consensual Assessment.” In Encyclopedia of Creativity, 253–60. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-375038-9.00046-7.
   Google Scholar
• Howells, K. 2018. “The Future of Education and Skills: Education 2030: The Future We Want.” Working paper. Paris: OECD. http://www.oecd.org/education/2030/E2030%20Position%20Paper%20(05.04.2018).pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, James C., and Robert J. Sternberg, eds. 2019. The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity. 2nd ed. Cambridge Handbooks in Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316979839.
   Google Scholar
• Khan, Sal. 2023. “HArnessing GPT-4 so That All Students Benefit. A Nonprofit Approach for Equal Access!” Khan Academy Blog. March 14. https://blog.khanacademy.org/harnessing-ai-so-that-all-students-benefit-a-nonprofit-approach-for-equal-access/.
   Google Scholar
• Kissinger, Henry, Eric Schmidt, and Daniel Huttenlocher. 2023. “Opinion | ChatGPT Heralds an Intellectual Revolution.” Wall Street Journal, February 24, sec. Opinion. https://www.wsj.com/articles/chatgpt-heralds-an-intellectual-revolution-enlightenment-artificial-intelligence-homo-technicus-technology-cognition-morality-philosophy-774331c6.
   Google Scholar
• Kozbelt, Aaron, Ronald A. Beghetto, and Mark A. Runco. 2010. “Theories of Creativity.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity, edited by James C. Kaufman and Robert J. Sternberg, 1st ed., 20–47. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511763205.004.
   Google Scholar
• Leinonen, Teemu. 2010. Designing Learning Tools. Methodological Insights. Aalto University. https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi:443/handle/123456789/11661.
   Google Scholar
• Lemmetty, Soila, and Kaija Collin. 2021. “Self-Directed Learning in Creative Activity: An Ethnographic Study in Technology-Based Work.” The Journal of Creative Behavior 55 (1): 105–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemmetty, Soila, Kaija Collin, Vlad Petre Glăveanu, and Panu Forsman, eds. 2021. Creativity and Learning: Contexts, Processes and Support. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Liapis, Antonios, Georgios N. Yannakakis, Constantine Alexopoulos, and Phil Lopes. 2016. “Can Computers Foster Human Users’ Creativity? Theory and Praxis of Mixed-Initiative Co-Creativity.” Digital Culture & Education 8 (2). http://www.digitalcultureandeducation.com/uncategorized/liapis-html/.
   Google Scholar
• Lubart, Todd. 2005. “How Can Computers Be Partners in the Creative Process: Classification and Commentary on the Special Issue.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 63 (4-5): 365–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHugh, Mary L. 2012. “Interrater Reliability: The Kappa Statistic.” Biochemia Medica 22 (3): 276–82. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2012.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Midjourney.” 2023. Midjourney, Inc. Accessed March 20. https://www.midjourney.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Ouyang, Fan, and Pengcheng Jiao. 2021. “Artificial Intelligence in Education: The Three Paradigms.” Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence 2 (January): 100020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100020.
   Google Scholar
• Radford, Alec, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh, Gabriel Goh, Sandhini Agarwal, Girish Sastry, et al. 2021. “Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision.” ArXiv:2103.00020 [Cs], February. http://arxiv.org/abs/2103.00020.
   Google Scholar
• Reddy, Anuradha. 2022. “Artificial Everyday Creativity: Creative Leaps with AI through Critical Making.” Digital Creativity 33 (4). 295–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2022.2138452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, Mel. 1961. “An Analysis of Creativity.” The Phi Delta Kappan 42 (7): 305–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittel, Horst W. J., and Melvin M. Webber. 1973. “Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning.” Policy Sciences 4 (2): 155–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawyer, Keith. 2015. “A Call to Action: The Challenges of Creative Teaching and Learning.” Teachers College Record 117 (10).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawyer, Keith. 2021. “The Iterative and Improvisational Nature of the Creative Process.” Journal of Creativity 31 (December): 100002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjoc.2021.100002.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, Keith. 2022. “The Dialogue of Creativity: Teaching the Creative Process by Animating Student Work as a Collaborating Creative Agent.” Cognition and Instruction 40 (4): 459–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2021.1958219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sefton-Green, Julian, Pat Thomson, Ken Jones, and Liora Bresler, eds. 2011. The Routledge International Handbook of Creative Learning. 1st ed. Abingdon, Oxon ; NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stappers, P. J. 2014. “Prototypes as a Central Vein for Knowledge Development.” In Prototype: Design and Craft in the 21st Century, edited by L. Valentine, 85–97. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, Robert J., and Todd I. Lubart. 1999. “The Concept of Creativity: Prospects and Paradigms.” In Handbook of Creativity, 3–15. New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. Paul. 1972. “Can We Teach Children To Think Creatively?*.” The Journal of Creative Behavior 6 (2): 114–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1972.tb00923.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truman, Sylvia. 2014. “A Generative Framework for Creative Learning: A Tool for Planning Creative-Collaborative Tasks in the Classroom.” Border Crossing 1 (1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.33182/bc.v1i1.518.
   Google Scholar
• Turkle, Sherry. 1982. “The Subjective Computer: A Study in the Psychology of Personal Computation.” Social Studies of Science 12 (2): 173–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631282012002001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turkle, Sherry, Will Taggart, Cory D. Kidd, and Olivia Dasté. 2006. “Relational Artifacts with Children and Elders: The Complexities of Cybercompanionship.” Connection Science 18 (4): 347–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540090600868912.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vartiainen, Henriikka, and Matti Tedre. 2023. “Using Artificial Intelligence in Craft Education: Crafting with Text-to-Image Generative Models.” Digital Creativity, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2023.2174557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veale, Tony, and F. Amílcar Cardoso. 2019. Computational Creativity: The Philosophy and Engineering of Autonomously Creative Systems. 1st ed. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S., and Michael Cole. 1978. Mind in Society: Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar