Advanced search
Publication Cover
International Journal of Cardiovascular Interventions Volume 4, 2001 - Issue 2
Journal homepage
6
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Provisional stenting in small vessels

Flavio Airoldi Interventional Cardiology Unit, Columbus Clinic and San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
,
Carlo Di Mario Interventional Cardiology Unit, Columbus Clinic and San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
,
Takuro Takagi Interventional Cardiology Unit, Columbus Clinic and San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
,
Goran Stankovic Interventional Cardiology Unit, Columbus Clinic and San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
,
Remo Albiero Interventional Cardiology Unit, Columbus Clinic and San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
&
Antonio Colombo Interventional Cardiology Unit, Columbus Clinic and San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
Pages 91-98 | Published online: 10 Jul 2009

  • Ellis S, Roubin G, King S, Douglas JS, Cox WR. Importance of stenosis morphology in the estimation of restenosis risk after elective percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. Am J Cardiol 1989; 63:30-34.
  • Kuntz RE, Safian RD, Carrozza JP, Fishman RF, Mansour M, Baim DS. The importance of acute lumen diameter in determining restenosis after coronary atherectomy or angioplasty. Circulation 1992; 86: 1827-1835.
  • Elezi S, Kastrati S, Neumann FJ, Hadamitzky M, Dirshinger J, Shomig A. Vessel size and long-term outcome after coronaiy stent placement. Circulation 1998; 98: 1875-1880.
  • Schunkert H, Harrell L, Palacios F. Implications of small reference vessel diameter in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 34: 40-48.
  • Akiyama T, Moussa l, Reimers B et al. Angiographie and clinical outcome following coronaiy stenting of small vessels. A comparison with coronary stenting of larger vessels. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 32: 1610-1618.
  • Serruys PW, de Jagere P, Kiemeneij F et al for the Benestent study group. A comparison of balloon expandable stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronaiy artery disease. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 489-495.
  • Fishman DE, Eeon MB, Baim DS et al for the STRESS study group. A randomized comparison of balloon expandable stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 496-501.
  • Savage MP, Fishman DE, Rake R et al. Efficacy of coronaiy stenting versus balloon angioplasty in small coronary arteries: stent restenosis study (STRESS investigators). J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 31: 307-311.
  • Azar AJ, Detre K, Goldberg S et al. A meta-analysis of the clinical and angiographie outcomes of stent vs PTCA in the different vessels sizes in the Benestent and Stress 1/11 trials. Circulation 1995; 92 (suppl I): 1-475 (abstr).
  • Sawada Y, Nokasa H, KimuraT, Nobuyoshi M. Initial and six months outcome of Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation: STRESS/BENESTENT equivalent vs non-equivalent lesions. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 27 (suppl): 252A (abstr).
  • Tilli FV, Aliabadi D, Kinn JW, Kaplan BM, Benzuly KH, Safian KD. Real life stenting: a comparison of target vessel revascularization in BENESTENT-STRESS lesions to nonBENESTENT-STRESS lesions. Circulation 1996; 94 (suppl I): 1-332 (abstr).
  • George C), Kennard ED, Holubkov R, Delre KM. Are STRESS results generizable? The NACI-PPS experience. Circulation 1997; 94 (suppl): 1-495 (abstr).
  • Schwarte E, Blew B, Bui S. lntracoronary stent placement for coronary artery disease. Lancet 1997; 350: 113-114.
  • Briguori C, Nishida T, Adamian M et al. Coronary stenting versus balloon angioplasty in small coronary arteries with complex lesions. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2000; 50: 390-397.
  • Title LM, Buller CE, Catellier D et al. Efficacy of stenting versus balloon angioplasty in small diameter (< 3.0 mm) total coronary occlusions: a total occlusion study of Canada sub-study (TOSCA). Circulation 1998; 98 (suppl I) 1-3362 (abstr).
  • Guyon P, Chevalier B, Mohamazaded R et al. The BESMART (Bestent in small arteries) study: a subgroup analysis according to the reference coronary artery diameter. Circulation 2000; 102 (suppl I): 1-645 (abstr).
  • Garcia E, Gomez-Rezio M, Moreno R et al. Stent reduces restenosis in small vessels: Results of the RAP study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37: 17A.
  • Doucet S, Schalij MJ, Hilton D et al., The SlSA Study: a randomized comparison of balloon angioplasty and stent to prevent restenosis in small arteries. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 35: 8A
  • Kastrati A, Shomig A, Dirchinger J) et al for the ISAR-SMART study investigators. A randomized trial comparing stenting with balloon angioplasty in small vessels in patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease. Circulation 2000; 102: 2593-2598.
  • Park SW, Eee MK, Hong JJ, Cho GY, Nah DY, Park S). Randomized comparison of coronary stenting with optimal balloon angioplasty for treatment of lesions in small coronary arteries. Eur Heart) 2000; 21:1785-1789.
  • Dussailant GP, Minte GS, Pichard AD et al. Small stent size and intimai hyperplasia contribute to restenosis: a volumetric intravascular ultrasound analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 26: 720-724.
  • Mudra H, Regar E, Klauss V et al. Serial follow-up after optimized ultrasound guided deployment of PalmazSchatz stents: in-stent neointimal proliferation without significant reference segment response. Circulation 1997; 95: 363-370.
  • Hoffmann R, Mintz GS, Dussaillant AD et al. Patterns and mechanism of in-stent restenosis. A serial intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation 1996; 94: 1247-1254.
  • Moussa 1, Moses J, De Gregorio J et al. The discrepancy between quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound in determining true vessel size: a homogeneous or a selective phenomena. J Am Cardiol 1999; 39 (suppl I): 1-1159 (abstr).
  • Fitzgerald PJ, Oshima A, Hayase M et al for the CRUISE Investigators. Final results of the can routine ultrasound influence stent expansion (CRUISE) study. Circulation 2000; 102: 523-530.
  • Russo RJ, Wong SC, Eucisano JE et al. Angiography versus intravascular ultrasound assessment of coronary stent placement: observation from the AVID study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 31 (suppl A): 387-A (abstr).
  • Frey AW, Hodgson JM, Muller C, Bestehorn HP, Roskamm H. Ultrasound-guided strategy for provisional stenting with focal balloon combination catheter: results from the randomized strategy for intracoronary ultrasound-guided PTCA and stenting (SIPS) trial. Circulation 2000; 102: 2497-2502.
  • Okabe T, Asakura Y, Ishikawa S, Asakura K, Mitamura H, Ogawa S. Determining appropriate small vessels for stenting by intravascular ultrasound. J Invas Cardiol 2000; 12: 625-630.
  • Stone GW, Bailey S, Roberts DK et al. A prospective multicenter trial of the safety, feasibility and efficacy of ultrasound guided maximal stenting to the media-adventitial border: final late clinical and angiographie results from the OSTI-2 study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 35 (suppl A): 1108 A (abstr).
  • Moussa I, De Gregorio J, Di Mario C, Colombo A. The use of intravascular ultrasound and spot stenting for the treatment of long lesion and small vessels. J Invas Cardiol 1999; 11: 47-55.
  • Kobayashi Y, De Gregorio J, Kobayashi N et al. Stented segment length as independent predictor of restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 34: 651-659.
  • Could KL, Kirkeeide RL, Buchi M. Coronaiy flow reserve as a physiologic measure of stenosis severity. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990; 15: 459-474.
  • Klocke FJ. Measurement of coronary flow reserve: defining pathophysiology versus making decisions about patient care. Circulation 1987; 76: 1183-1189.
  • Lafont A, Dubois-Rande JL, Steg PC et al. The French Randomized Optimal Stenting Trial: a prospective evaluation of provisional stenting guided by coronary velocity reserve and quantitative coronary angiography. F.R.O.S.T. Study Group. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 36: 404-409.
  • Serruys PW, de Bruyne B, Carlier S et al on behalf of the Doppler Endpoints Balloon Angioplasty Trial Europe (DEBATE) 11 Study Group. Randomized comparison of primary stenting and provisional balloon angioplasty guided by flow velocity measurement. Circulation 2000; 102: 2930-2937.
  • Di Mario C, Moses JW, Anderson TJ et al on behalf of the Doppler Endpoint STenting INternational Investigation (DESTlNl) Study Group. Randomized comparison of elective stent implantation and coronary balloon angioplasty guided by online quantitative angiography and intracoronaiy Doppler. Circulation 2000; 102: 2938-2945.
  • Cohen DJ, Taira D, Di Mario C et al. In-hospital and 6-months follow up costs of universal vs provisional stenting: results from the DESTlNl trial. Circulation 1998; 98 (suppl 1): 1-499 (abstr).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.