An ethnographic expose of Mithun-human interrelationship among the Kuki community of Northeast India

Bibliography

• Ali, A. N. M. I., and I. Das. “Tribal Situation in North East India.” Studies of Tribes and Tribals 1, no. 2 (2003): 141–148. doi:10.1080/0972639x.2003.11886492.
   Google Scholar
• Bharracharyya, H., B. Goswami, R. Biswas, and B. Deka. “First Record Case of Seminal Vesiculitis in Mithun (Bos Frontalis).” Research & Reviews: Journal of Zoological Sciences 4 (2016): 38–39. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309160182.
   Google Scholar
• Blackburn, S. “Oral Stories and Culture Areas: From Northeast India to Southwest China.” South Asia: Journal of South Asia Studies 30, no. 3 (2007): 419–437. doi:10.1080/00856400701714054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blascovich, J., and J. Tomaka. “Presence of Human Friends and Pet Dogs as Moderators of Autonomic Responses to Stress in Women.” Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 61, no. 4 (1991): 582–589. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.61.4.582.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brosius, P., G. W. Lovelace, and G. G. Marten. “Ethnoecology: An Approach to Understanding Traditional Agricultural Knowledge.” Traditional Agriculture in Southeast Asia: A Human Ecology Perspective (1986): 187–198.
   Google Scholar
• Chaurasia, R. K. “Mithun (Bos Frontalis): Animal with a Difference.” Technical Extension Bulletin 06, 2012. (Issue January 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Chongloi, L. “Impact of Christianity on the Thadou-Kuki Marriage.” In The Kukis of Northeast India: Politics and Culture, edited by T. Haokip, 1st ed., 205–217. Bookwell, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Damian, C. “The Anthropocene Epoch: Scientists Declare Dawn of Human-Influenced Age.” The Guardian, ((2016, August 29)). https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/aug/29/declare-anthropocene-epoch-experts-urge-geological-congress-human-impact-earth
   Google Scholar
• Dorji, T., J. Wangdi, Y. Shaoliang, N. Chettri, and K. Wangchuk. “Mithun (Bos Frontalis): The Neglected Cattle Species and Their Significance to Ethnic Communities in the Eastern Himalaya - a Review.” Animal Bioscience 34, no.11 ( Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies 2021): 1727–1738. doi:10.5713/ab.21.0020.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Friedmann, E., H. Son, and M. Saleem. “The Animal–Human Bond.” In Handbook on Animal-Assisted Therapy”, edited by. A. H. Fine, 73–88. 4th. Elsevier, 2015. 10.1016/b978-0-12-801292-5.00007-9.
   Google Scholar
• Gahrton, P. Green Parties, Green Future: From Local Groups to the International Stage. London: Pluto Press, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Gangte, P. M. “Evolution of Kuki Chieftainship Through Customary Laws – Its Modern Conceptuality.” Kuki International Forum (2010). http://kukiforum.com/2010/12/evolution-of-kuki-chieftainship-through-customary-laws-its-modern-conceptuality/.
   Google Scholar
• Gangte, T. S. The Kukis of Manipur: A Historical Analysis (Second). Delhi: Gyan Publishing House, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Gough, N. “Healing the Earth within Us: Environmental Education as Cultural Criticism.” The Journal of Experiential Education 13, no. 3 (1990): 12–17. doi:10.1177/105382599001300303.
   Google Scholar
• Grierson, G. A. “Tibeto-Burman Family. Specimens of the Kuki-Chin and Burma Groups.” Linguistic Survey of India. III, no. Part III 1904: 3.
   Google Scholar
• Hangshing, P. “Understanding the Politics of the Stateless Kukis: Was It by Choice?” In The Kukis of Northeast India: Politics and Culture, edited by T. Haokip, 1st ed., 11–25. Bookwell, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Haokip, D. L. “These Crafty Jungle Fighters: Tactics, Technology and Symbols of Kuki War.” In The Anglo-Kuki War, 1917-1919: A Frontier Uprising Against Imperialism During the First World War, edited by Guite Jangkhomang and Haokip Thongkholal, 118–153. 2nd ed. London & New York: Routledge, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Haokip, D. M. K. “The Role of Oral Tradition with Special Reference to the Thadou-Kuki Society.” Journal of North East India Studies 6, no. 1 (2016): 62–75.
   Google Scholar
• Haokip, P. L. Relevance of Thempu in Pastoral Ministry. New Delhi: Bethesda Khankho Institute & Christian World Imprints, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Hurn, S. “Intersubjectivity.” In Humans and Other Animals Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Human-Animal Interactions, 125–138. Pluto Press, 2012a. https://about.jstor.org/terms/
   Google Scholar
• Hurn, S. “Why Look at Human-Animal Interactions?” In Humans and Other Animals: Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Human-Animal Interactions, edited by S. Hurn, 1–11. Pluto Press, 2012b. https://about.jstor.org/terms.
   Google Scholar
• Keulartz, J., and B. Bovenkerk. “Changing Relationships with Non-Human Animals in the Anthropocene - an Introduction.” In Animal Ethics in the Age of Humans Blurring Boundaries in Human-Animal Relationships, edited by B. Bovenkerk and J. Keulartz, 1–24. Springer, 2016. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-44206-8.
   Google Scholar
• Kipgen, N. “Revisiting the ‘Military’ Role of Som Institution in the Anglo-Kuki War.” In The Anglo-Kuki War, 1917-1919: A Frontier Uprising Against Imperialism During the First World War, edited by J. Guite and T. Haokip, 1st 211–233. London & New York: Routledge, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Kirksey, S. E., and S. Helmreich. ““The Emergence of Multispecies Ethnography.” Cultural Anthropology 25, no. 4 (2020): 545–576. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1360.2010.01069.x.
   Google Scholar
• Lunkim, J. J. “Traditional Kuki Chieftainship: It’s Evolution with Special Reference to Custom, Beliefs and Practices in Establishing a Village.” Mukt Shabd Journal IX, no. IV (2020): 3668–3679.
   Google Scholar
• Oma, K. A. “Between Trust and Domination: Social Contracts Between Humans and Animals.” World Archaeology 42, no. 2 (2010): 175–187. doi:10.1080/00438241003672724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritchard, E. E. E. The Nuer: A Description of the Modes of Livelihood and Political Institutions of a Nilotic People. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1940.
   Google Scholar
• Rappaport, R. A. “Ritual Regulation of Environmental Relations Among a New Guinea People.” Ethnology 6, no. 1 (1967): 17–30. doi:10.2307/3772735.
   Google Scholar
• Rivers, W. H. R. The Todas. New York: Macmillan and Co. Limited, 1906.
   Google Scholar
• Sections, A. “The Manipur Land Revenue and Land Reforms Act, 1960 .“ Arrangement of Sections. (1960): 7.
   Google Scholar
• Shanklin, E. Donegal’s Changing Traditions: An Ethnographic Study. New York: Routledge: Taylor & Francis, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, W. The Thadou Kukis. 3rd ed. New Delhi: Gyan Publishing House, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Simoons, F. J., and E. S. Simoons. “The Ceremonial Ox of India: The Mithan in Nature, Cultures, and History with Notes on the Domestication of Common Cattle, Eds. F. J. Simoons & E. S. Simoons. ”: University of Wisconsin Press, 1968.
   Google Scholar
• Tiwari, B. K. “Biodiversity.” In The Routledge Companion to Northeast India, edited by J. J. P. Wouters and T. B. Subba, 35–40. Taylor & Francis Group, 2022. doi:10.4324/9781003285540.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, A. R. “On the Origins, Customs and Changing Lifestyle of the Tribal Community in the Nilgiris.” Frontline 21, (2004): 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, D. Q. H., and M. C. Carey. “Therapeutic Uses of Animal Biles in Traditional Chinese Medicine: An Ethnopharmacological, Biophysical Chemical and Medicinal Review.” World Journal of Gastroenterology 20, no. 29 (2014): 9952–9975. doi:10.3748/wjg.v20.i29.9952.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yadav, D. S., S. Nanavati, R. Choudhary, and M. S. Jamara. “Mithun - an Animal of Indian Pride: A Review.” Raksha Technical Review 1, September (2021): 32–36.
   Google Scholar