Lead, now, go! (LNG): the Shtokman field and Gazprom’s challenging partnership with Total and Statoil

References

• Abedal, R., Herrera, Y. M., Johnston, A. I., & McDermott, R. (2009). Measuring identity. A guide for social scientists. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511810909
   Google Scholar
• Bourmistrov, A., & Mineev, A. (2011). Differences in project management: Challenges for cooperation between Norwegian and Russian suppliers in the high north. In A. Buourmistrov, F. Mellemvik, & S. Vasiliev (Eds.), Perspectives on Norwegian-Russian energy cooperation (pp. 17–26). Oslo: Cappelen Damm Akademisk.
   Google Scholar
• Fortescue, S. (2016). Russia’s ‘turn to the east’: A study in policy making. Post-Soviet Affairs, 32(5), 423–454.10.1080/1060586X.2015.1051750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godzimirski, J. M. (2007). Energy and identity – Readings of Shtokman and NEGP. Oslo: Den norske atlanterhavskomité.
   Google Scholar
• Gustafson, T. (2013). The wheel of fortune. The battle for oil and power in Russia. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hedlund, S. (2014). Putin’s energy agenda. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, J., & Ferguson, A. (2014). International partnerships in Russia – Conclusions from the oil and gas industry. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, J., & Moe, A. (2016). Gazprom’s LNG offensive: A demonstration of monopoly strength or impetus for Russian gas sector reform? Post-Communist Economies 28(3). http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14631377.2016.1203206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, J., & Pirani, S. (Eds.). (2014). The Russian gas matrix – How markets are driving change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. (1993). Cultural constraints in management theories. The Executive, 7(1), 8–21.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Intercultural cooperation and its importance for survival. New York, NY: McGrawHill.
   Google Scholar
• Högselius, P. (2013). Red gas: Russia and the origins of european energy dependence. Palgrave Macmillan transnational history series. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137286154
   Google Scholar
• Hønneland, G. (2005). Barentsbrytninger: Norsk nordområdepolitikk etter den kalde krigen. Kristiansand: Høyskoleforlaget – Norwegian Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hønneland, G., & Jørgensen, A.-K. (2002). Vårt bilde av russerne: 25 debattinnlegg om samarbeidet i nord (114). Kristiansand: Høyskoleforlaget – Norwegian Academic Press
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, A. (2015). Process tracing the effects of ideas. In A. Bennett & J. T. Checkel (Eds.), Process tracing: From metaphor to analytic tool (pp. 41–73). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, V., & Overland, I. (2011). Et blikk på Sjtokman-prosjektets blindsone: Fransk-russiske relasjoner. Internasjonal Politikk, 69(3), 387–411. KKr.
   Google Scholar
• Kryukov, V. A., & Moe, A. (2013). The Russian natural gas sector. In A. Michael & W. Sholmo (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Russian Economy (Vol. 2013, pp. 341–362). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ledeneva, A. (2006). How Russia really works: The informal practices that shaped post-soviet politics and business. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ledeneva, A. (2011). Open secrets and knowing smiles. East European Politics and Societies, 25(4), 720–736.10.1177/0888325410388558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lunden, L. P., & Fjaertoft, D. (2013). Двaдцaть лeт ocвoeния, a нeфти дo cиx пop нeт: ПPиpaзлoмнoe – пepвый мyчитeльный apктичecкий шeльфoвый пpoeкт Poccии. [Twenty years of development and still no oil: Prirazlomnoye – Russia’s troublesome first Arctic offshore project]. Экo вcepoccииcкий экoнoмичecкий жypнaл, 4, 466.
   Google Scholar
• March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics. New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mineev, A. (2010). Development of Russian oil and gas regimes focusing on the Shtokman field: Institutional drivers. Journal of East-West Business, 16(4), 303–339.10.1080/10669868.2010.534020
   Google Scholar
• Mitrova, T. (2013). Russian LNG: The long road to export. Paris: IFRI Russia/NIS Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Mitrova, T. (2014). The political economy of Russian gas. In J. Henderson & S. Pirani (Eds.), The Russian Gas Matrix: How Markets Are Driving Change (Vol. 2014, pp. 6–38). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moe, A. (2006). Sjtokman-beslutningen: Forklaringer og implikasjoner. Nordisk Øst-Forum, 20(4), 389–403.
   Google Scholar
• Moe, A. (2010a). Russisk Rulett. In P. Arbo & B. Hersoug (Eds.), Oljevirksomhetens inntog i nord: Næringsutvikling, politikk og samfunn (pp. 282–304). Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk.
   Google Scholar
• Moe, A. (2010b). Russian and Norwegian petroleum strategies in the Barents Sea. Arctic Review on Law and Politics, 1(2), 225–248.
   Google Scholar
• Moe, A., Fjaertoft, D., & Øverland, I. (2011). Space and timing: Why was the Barents sea delimitation dispute resolved in 2010? Polar Geography, 34(3), 145–162.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, I. B., & Pouliot, V. (2011). Untimely Russia: Hysteresis in Russian-western relations over the past Millennium. Security Studies, 20, 105–137.10.1080/09636412.2011.549021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North, D. C., Wallis, J. J., & Weingast, B. R. (2009). Violence and social orders: A conceptual framework for understanding recorded human history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511575839
   Google Scholar
• Orttung, R. W., & Overland, I. (2011). A limited toolbox: Explaining the constraints on Russia’s foreign energy policy. Journal of Eurasian Studies, 2, 74–85.10.1016/j.euras.2010.10.006
   Google Scholar
• Overland, I. (2008). Shtokman and Russia’s arctic petroleum frontier. Russian Analytical Digest, 33(8), 8–12.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, G. (2012). Institutional theory in political science: The new institutionalism (3rd ed.). New York, NY: The Continuum International Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Pouliot, V. (2010). International security in practice: The politics of NATO-Russia diplomacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511676185
   Google Scholar
• Rutland, P. (2015). Petronation? Oil, gas, and national identity in Russia. Post-Soviet Affairs, 31(1), 66–89.10.1080/1060586X.2014.952537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, R. W. (2014). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests and identities (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: CA, Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Smetanina, K. (2014). Når Ivan møter Ivar: Å gjøre forretninger i Russland. Oslo: Arneberg Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, J. (2005). The future of Russian Gas and Gazprom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, J., & Henderson, J. (2014). Gazprom’s west-facing supply strategy to 2020. In J. Henderson & S. Pirani (Eds.), The Russian gas matrix – How markets are driving change (pp. 258–285). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tsygankov, A. P. (2016). Russia’s foreign policy: Change and continuity in national identity. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Weisser-Svendsen, H. N. (2007). Trenger Sjtokman Norge eller Norge Sjtokman? En diskursanalyse av petroleumsressurser i nordområdene ( Master’s thesis in political science). University of Tromsø. Retrieved from https://munin.uit.no/handle/10037/1348
   Google Scholar
• Wengle, S. (2015). Post-Soviet power: State-led development and Russia’s marketization. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zygar, M., & Panyushkin, V. (2008). Gazprom. Novoe Russkoe Oruzhie [Gazprom: The New Russian Weapon]. Moscow: Zakharov.
   Google Scholar