Progress towards the implementation of the European Water Framework Directive (2000–2012)

References

• Basset, A., 2010. Aquatic science and the water framework directive: a still open challenge towards ecogovernance of aquatic ecosystems. Aquat. Conserv.: Mar. Freshwat. Ecosyst. 20, 245–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battarbee, R. W. and Bennion, H., 2012. Using palaeolimnological and limnological data to reconstruct the recent history of European lake ecosystems: introduction. Freshwat. Biol. 57, 1979–1985.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, C., Owen, R., Birk, S., Buffagni, A., Erba, S., Mengin, N., Murray-Bligh, J., Ofenböck, G., Pardo, I., van de Bund, W., Wagner, F. and Wasson, J.-G., 2011. Bringing European river quality into line: an exercise to intercalibrate macro-invertebrate classification methods. Hydrobiologia 667, 31–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birk, S. and Hering, D., 2009. A new procedure for comparing class boundaries of biological assessment methods: A case study from the Danube Basin. Ecol. Indicators 9, 528–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birk, S. and Willby, N., 2010. Towards harmonization of ecological quality classification: establishing common grounds in European macrophyte assessment for rivers. Hydrobiologia 652, 149–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birk, S., Bonne, W., Borja, A., Brucet, S., Courrat, A., Poikane, S., Solimini, A., van de Bund, W., Zampoukas, N. and Hering, D., 2012. Three hundred ways to assess Europe's surface waters: An almost complete overview of biological methods to implement the Water Framework Directive. Ecol. Indicators 18, 31–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borja, A., Bricker, S. B., Dauer, D. M., Demetriades, N. T., Ferreira, J. G., Forbes, A. T., Hutchings, P., Jia, X., Kenchington, R., Marques, J. C. and Zhu, C., 2008. Overview of integrative tools and methods in assessing ecological integrity in estuarine and coastal systems worldwide. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 56, 1519–1537.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buffagni, A., Erba, S. and Furse, M. T., 2007. A simple procedure to harmonize class boundaries of assessment systems at the pan-European scale. Environmental Science & Policy 10, 709–724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canada-United States, 1978. Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement, amended by Protocol 1987. International Joint Commission, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho, L., Miller, C., Spears, B. M., Gunn, I. D. M., Bennion, H., Kirika, A. and May, L., 2012. Water quality of Loch Leven: responses to enrichment, restoration and climate change. Hydrobiologia 681, 35–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CIS, 2009. Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC). Guidance Document No. 23: Guidance document on eutrophication assessment In the context of European water policies. European Commision, Luxembourg.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, R., 2012. Estimating confidence of European WFD ecological status class and WISER Bioassessment Uncertainty Guidance Software (WISERBUGS). Hydrobiologia 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, S. P. and Jackson, S. K., 2006. The biological condition gradient: a descriptive model for interpreting change in aquatic ecosystems. Ecol. Appl. 16, 1251–1266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downing, J. A., Watson, S. B. and McCauley, E., 2001. Predicting Cyanobacteria dominance in lakes. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 58, 1905–1908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudley, B., Dunbar, M., Penning, E., Kolada, A., Hellsten, S., Oggioni, A., Bertrin, V., Ecke, F. and Søndergaard, M., 2012. Measurements of uncertainty in macrophyte metrics used to assess European lake water quality. Hydrobiologia 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Dworak, T. and Leipprand, A., 2007. Climate Change and the EU Water Policy. Ecologic http://www.ecologic.eu/download/projekte/1850-1899/1877/1877_climate_change_and_eu_water_policy.pdf,dateaccessed,19January2014
   Google Scholar
• European Environment Agency (EEA), 2012, European waters - assessment of status and pressures. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 of establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy. Official Journal of the European Communities 22-12-2000.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, 2005. Guidance Document No 14: Guidance document on the intercalibration process 2004-2006. European Commision, Luxembourg.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, 2010. Guidance Document No 14: Guidance document on the intercalibration process 2008-2011. European Commision, Luxembourg.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, 2012. River Basin Management Plans, Report on the Implementation of the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC). European Commission: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/water-framework/pdf/COM-2012-670_EN.pdf (accessed 15 December 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Everard, M., 2012. Why does ‘good ecological status’ matter? Water and Environment Journal 26, 165–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, T. K. and Boyd, D., 2007. Limitations on the Development of Quantitative Monitoring Plans to Track the Progress of Beneficial Use Impairment Restoration at Great Lakes Areas of Concern. J. Great Lakes Res. 33, 686–692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellsten, S., Willby, N., Mjelde, M., Ecke, F., Free, G. and Phillips, G., 2012. Final results of intercalibration of NGIG macrophyte methods for assessing ecological status of Northern European lakes. Intercalibration report, milestone 6. https://circabc.europa.eu/w/browse/c48010c0-863b-49e6-8f1a-22da029cd93b (accessed 15 December 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Hering, D., Borja, A., Carstensen, J., Carvalho, L., Elliott, M., Feld, C. K., Heiskanen, A.-S., Johnson, R. K., Moe, J., Pont, D., Lyche-Solheim, A. and de Bund, W.v., 2010. The European Water Framework Directive at the age of 10: A critical review of the achievements with recommendations for the future. Sci. Total Environ. 408, 4007–4019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hering, D., Borja, A., Carvalho, L. and Feld, C., 2013. Assessment and recovery of European water bodies: key messages from the WISER project. Hydrobiologia 704, 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobæk, A., Løvik, J. E., Rohrlack, T., Moe, S. J., Grung, M., Bennion, H., Clarke, G. and Piliposyan, G. T., 2012. Eutrophication, recovery and temperature in Lake Mjøsa: detecting trends with monitoring data and sediment records. Freshwat. Biol. 57, 1998–2014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoornbeek, J. A., 2004. Policy-making institutions and water policy outputs in the European Union and the United States: a comparative analysis. Journal of European Public Policy 11, 461–496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeppesen, E., Søndergaard, M., Jensen, J. P., Havens, K. E., Anneville, O., Carvalho, L., Coveney, M. F., Deneke, R., Dokulil, M. T., Foy, B. O.B., Gerdeaux, D., Hampton, S. E., Hilt, S., Kangur, K., Köhler, J. A.N., Lammens, E. H.H. R., Lauridsen, T. L., Manca, M., Miracle, M. R., Moss, B., Nöges, P., Persson, G., Phillips, G., Portielje, R. O.B., Romo, S., Schelske, C. L., Straile, D., Tatrai, I., Willén, E. V.A. and Winder, M., 2005. Lake responses to reduced nutrient loading – an analysis of contemporary long-term data from 35 case studies. Freshwat. Biol. 50, 1747–1771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeppesen, E., Kronvang, B., Meerhoff, M., Søndergaard, M., Hansen, K. M., Andersen, H. E., Lauridsen, T. L., Liboriussen, L., Beklioglu, M., Özen, A. and Olesen, J. E., 2009. Climate Change Effects on Runoff, Catchment Phosphorus Loading and Lake Ecological State, and Potential Adaptations All rights reserved. No part of this periodical may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. J. Environ. Qual. 38, 1930–1941.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeppesen, E., Meerhoff, M., Holmgren, K., González-Bergonzoni, I., Teixeira-de Mello, F., Declerck, S., De Meester, L., Søndergaard, M., Lauridsen, T., Bjerring, R., Conde-Porcuna, J., Mazzeo, N., Iglesias, C., Reizenstein, M., Malmquist, H., Liu, Z., Balayla, D. and Lazzaro, X., 2010. Impacts of climate warming on lake fish community structure and potential effects on ecosystem function. Hydrobiologia 646, 73–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, M., 2012. The semiotics of slime: visual representation of phytobenthos as an aid to understanding ecological status. Freshwater Reviews 5, 105–119.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, M., Juggins, S., Guthrie, R., Pritchard, S., Jamieson, J., Rippey, B., Hirst, H. and Yallop, M., 2008. Assessment of ecological status in U.K. rivers using diatoms. Freshwat. Biol. 53, 403–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, M., King, L. and Ní Chatháin, B., 2009. The conceptual basis of ecological-status assessments using diatoms. Biology & Environment: Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy 109, 175–189.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, M. G., Gómez-Rodríguez, C., Kahlert, M., Almeida, S. F.P., Bennett, C., Bottin, M., Delmas, F., Descy, J.-P., Dörflinger, G., Kennedy, B., Marvan, P., Opatrilova, L., Pardo, I., Pfister, P., Rosebery, J., Schneider, S. and Vilbaste, S., 2012. Establishing expectations for pan-European diatom based ecological status assessments. Ecol. Indicators 20, 177–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyche-Solheim, A., Rekolainen, S., Moe, S. J., Carvalho, L., Phillips, G., Ptacnik, R., Penning, W. E., Toth, L., O’Toole, C., Schartau, A.-K. and Hesthagen, T., 2008. Ecological threshold responses in European lakes and their applicability for the Water Framework Directive (WFD) implementation: synthesis of lakes results from the REBECCA project. Aquat. Ecol. 42, 317–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyche-Solheim, A., Feld, C., Birk, S., Phillips, G., Carvalho, L., Morabito, G., Mischke, U., Søndergaard, M., Hellsten, S., Kolada, A., Bőhmer, J., Miler, O., Pusch, M., Argillier, C., Jeppesen, E., Lauridsen, T., Poikane, S. and Mjelde, M., 2013. Ecological status assessment of European lakes: a comparison of metrics for phytoplankton, macrophytes, benthic invertebrates and fish. Hydrobiologia 704, 57–74
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Middelboe, A. L. and Markager, S., 1997. Depth limits and minimum light requirements of freshwater macrophytes. Freshwat. Biol. 37, 553–568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millenium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005. Ecosystems & Human Well-Being: Synthesis report. Island Press, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Moss, B., 2008. The Water Framework Directive: Total environment or political compromise? Sci. Total Environ. 400, 32–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nõges, P., van de Bund, W., Cardoso, A., Solimini, A. and Heiskanen, A.-S., 2009. Assessment of the ecological status of European surface waters: a work in progress. Hydrobiologia 633, 197–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD, 1982. Eutrophication of Waters Monitoring, Assessment and Control. Final Report. OECD, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Pardo, I., Gómez-Rodríguez, C., Wasson, J.-G., Owen, R., van de Bund, W., Kelly, M., Bennett, C., Birk, S., Buffagni, A., Erba, S., Mengin, N., Murray-Bligh, J. and Ofenböeck, G., 2012. The European reference condition concept: A scientific and technical approach to identify minimally-impacted river ecosystems. Sci. Total Environ. 420, 33–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penning, W., Dudley, B., Mjelde, M., Hellsten, S., Hanganu, J., Kolada, A., van den Berg, M., Poikane, S., Phillips, G., Willby, N. and Ecke, F., 2008. Using aquatic macrophyte community indices to define the ecological status of European lakes. Aquat. Ecol. 42, 253–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, G. L., Eminson, D. and Moss, B., 1978. A mechanism to account for macrophyte decline in progressively eutrophicated freshwaters. Aquat. Bot. 4, 103–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, G., Carvalho, L., Maberly, S. C., Reynolds, C. S. and Willby, N., 2003. The assessment of ecological quality of lakes in the Great Britain ecoregion: an update on current thinking and a possible approach for phytoplankton. TeemaNord 547, 35–39.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, G., Kelly, A., Pitt, J.-A., Sanderson, R. and Taylor, E., 2005. The recovery of a very shallow eutrophic lake, 20 years after the control of effluent derived phosphorus. Freshwat. Biol. 50, 1628–1638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, G., Mischke, U., Van Wichelen, J., Søndergaard, M., Karottki, I., Ott, I., Maileht, K., Laplace-Treyture, C., Free, G., Portielje, R. O. B., and Pasztaleniec, A., 2012. WFD Intercalibration phase 2, milestone 6 report on Cenral Baltic GIG lakes phytoplankton. https://circabc.europa.eu/sd/d/c7332ca8-ca89-4c0d-90f9-59198f1d2bd1/PHYTO_CB%20_Lake_TechnicalReport_6marchb_CIRCA.doc (accessed 15 December 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, G., Lyche-Solheim, A., Birger, S., Ute, M., Stina, D., Free, G., Jävinen, M., Caridad, D.H., Giuseppe, M., Sandra, P. and Laurence, C., 2013. A phytoplankton trophic index to assess the status of lakes for the European Water Framework Directive. Hydrobiologia 704, 75–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poikane, S., 2009. Framework Directive intercalibration technical report. Part 2: Lakes. European Commission, Luxembourg.
   Google Scholar
• Poikane, S., Berg, M.V.D., Ortiz-Casas, J., Phillips, G., Lyche-Solheim, A., Tierney, D. and Wolfram, G., 2009. Lake assessment strategy in European Union (EU): Case study of European large lakes. Verh. Internat. Verein. Limnol. 30, 1007–1012.
   Google Scholar
• Poikāne, S., Alves, M., Argillier, C., van den Berg, M., Buzzi, F., Hoehn, E., de Hoyos, C., Karottki, I., Laplace-Treyture, C., Lyche-Solheim, A., Ortiz-Casas, J., Ott, I., Phillips, G., Pilke, A., Pádua, J., Remec-Rekar, S., Riedmüller, U., Schaumburg, J., Serrano, M., Soszka, H., Tierney, D., Urbanič, G. and Wolfram, G., 2010. Defining Chlorophyll-a Reference Conditions in European Lakes. Environ. Manage. 45, 1286–1298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poikane, S., van den Berg, M., Hellsten, S., de Hoyos, C., Ortiz-Casas, J., Pall, K., Portielje, R., Phillips, G., Lyche-Solheim, A., Tierney, D., Wolfram, G. and van de Bund, W., 2011. Lake ecological assessment systems and intercalibration for the European Water Framework Directive: Aims, achievements and further challenges. Procedia Environmental Sciences 9, 153–168.
   Google Scholar
• Portielje, R., Phillips, G., Schaumburg, J. and Denys, L., 2012. Final results of intercalibration of CBGIG macrophyte methods for assessing the ecological status of Central Baltic European lakes. Intercalibration report, milestone 6. European Commission: https://circabc.europa.eu/w/browse/c48010c0-863b-49e6-8f1a-22da029cd93b,dateaccessed,15December2012
   Google Scholar
• Ptacnik, R., Lepistö, L., Willén, E., Brettum, P., Andersen, T., Rekolainen, S., Lyche-Solheim, A. and Carvalho, L., 2008. Quantitative responses of lake phytoplankton to eutrophication in Northern Europe. Aquat. Ecol. 42, 227–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ptacnik, R., Solimini, A. and Brettum, P., 2009. Performance of a new phytoplankton composition metric along a eutrophication gradient in Nordic lakes. Hydrobiologia 633, 75–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rippey, B. and McSorley, C., 2009. Oxygen depletion in lake hypolimnia. Limnol. Oceanogr. 54, 905–916.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaumburg, J., C, S., G, H., D, S., S, S. and U, S. J.E., 2004. Macrophytes and phytobenthos as indicators of ecological status in German lakes - a contribution to the implementation of the Water Framework Directive. Limnologica 34, 302–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schindler, D. W., 2006. Recent Advances in the Understanding and Management of Eutrophication. Limnol. Oceanogr. 51, 356–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, V. H. and Schindler, D. W., 2009. Eutrophication science: where do we go from here? Trends Ecol. Evol. 24, 201–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solimini, A. G., Ptacnik, R. and Cardoso, A. C., 2009. Towards holistic assessment of the functioning of ecosystems under the Water Framework Directive. TrAC 28, 143–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Søndergaard, M., Jeppesen, E., Lauridsen, T. L., Skov, C., Van Nes, E. H., Roijackers, R., Lammens, E. and Portielje, R. O.B., 2007. Lake restoration: successes, failures and long-term effects. J. Appl. Ecol. 44, 1095–1105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soranno, P. A., Cheruvelil, K. S., Stevenson, R. J., Rollins, S. L., Holden, S. W., Heaton, S. and Torng, E., 2008. A Framework for Developing Ecosystem-Specific Nutrient Criteria: Integrating Biological Thresholds with Predictive Modeling. Limnol. Oceanogr. 53, 773–787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thackeray, S., Nõges, P., Dunbar, M., Dudley, B., Skjelbred, B., Morabito, G., Carvalho, L., Phillips, G. and Mischke, U., 2011. Uncertainty in lake phytoplankton metrics.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO, 2000. Solving the puzzle: the ecosystem approach and biosphere reserves. UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Willby, N. J., 2011. From metrics to Monet: the need for an ecologically meaningful guiding image. Aquat. Conserv.: Mar. Freshwat. Ecosyst. 21, 601–603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willby, N., Pitt, J. and Phillips, G., 2010. The ecological classification of UK lakes using aquatic macrophytes. Environment Agency, Bristol, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Wilby, R. L., Orr, H. G., Hedger, M., Forrow, D. and Blackmore, M., 2006. Risks posed by climate change to the delivery of Water Framework Directive objectives in the UK. Environ Int 32, 1043–1055.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar