The public career of the ‘gene’—trends in public sentiments from 1946 to 2002

References

• Bauer, M., 1998. The medicalisation of science news: from the rocket-scalpel to the gene-meteorite complex, Social Science Information 37 (1998), pp. 731–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, M., 2000. "‘Science in the media’ as cultural indicator: contextualising surveys with media analysis". In: Dierkes, M., and von Grote, C., eds. Between Understanding and Trust: The Public, Science and Technology. Reading: Harwood Academics Publisher; 2000. pp. 157–78.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, M. W., 2002a. Controversial medical and agri-food biotechnology: a cultivation analysis, Public Understanding of Science 11 (2) (2002a), pp. 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, M. W., 2002b. Arenas, platforms and the biotechnology movement, Science Communication 24 (2002b), pp. 144–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, M. W., 2005. Distinguishing GREEN from RED-biotechnology-cultivation effects of the elite press, International Journal of Public Opinion Research 17 (1) (2005), pp. 63–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, M. W., 2005. Distinguishing GREEN from RED biotechnology—cultivation effects of the elite press, International Journal of Public Opinion Research 17 (1) (2005), pp. 63–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, M. W., 2006. "Resistance to ‘transgenicos’ in Brazil". In: Gaskell, G., and Bauer, M. W., eds. Genomic Society and its Public. Vol. 15. London: Earthscan; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, M. W., Durant, J., Gaskell, G., et al., 1998. "United Kingdom". In: Durant, J., Bauer, M. W., and Gaskell, G., eds. Biotechnology in the Public Sphere. A European Sourcebook. London: Science Museum; 1998. pp. 162–76.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, M. W., and Gaskell, G., 1999. Towards a paradigm for research on social representations, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 29 (2) (1999), pp. 163–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, M. W., and Gaskell, G., 2002. "The biotechnology movement". In: Bauer, M. W., and Gaksell, G., eds. Biotechnology—The Making of a Global Controversy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002. pp. 379–404.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, M. W., and Howard, S., 2004. "Biotechnology and the public media module Europe, North America and Japan". In: Integrated Codebook. London: The Elite Press 1973–2002; 2004, LSE Methodology Institute, February.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, M. W., Howard, S., Hagenhoff, V., et al., 2006a. "The BSE and CJD crisis in the press". In: Dora, C., ed. Health, Hazard and Public Debate: Lessons for Risk Communication from the BSE/CJD Saga. Geneva: WHO; 2006a. pp. 125–64, (chapter 6).
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, M. W., Petkova, K., Boyadjieva, P., and Gornev, G., 2006b. Long-term trends in the public representations of science across the iron curtain: Britain and Bulgaria, 1946–95, Social Studies of Science 36 (1) (2006b), pp. 97–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, M., Ragnarsdottir, A., Rudolfsdottir, A., and Durant, J., 1995. "Science and technology in the British press, 1946–1990. A systematic content analysis". In: Technical Report Vols. 1–4. London: Science Museum and Wellcome Trust for the History of Medicine; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, P., et al., 1974. Potential biohazards of recombinant DNA molecules, Science (1974), p. 303, 1985.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, N., and Michael, M., 2003. A sociology of expectations: retrospecting prospects and prospecting retrospects, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 15 (1) (2003), pp. 4–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, K., 1945. A Grammar of Motives. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1945.
   Google Scholar
• Cadarevian, S. de, 2003. Portrait of a discovery, Watson, Crick and the Double Helix, ISIS, 94 (2003), pp. 90–105.
   Google Scholar
• Einsiedel, E., 2001. Citizen voices: public participation on biotechnology, Noticie di Politeia 17 (63) (2001), pp. 94–104.
   Google Scholar
• Einsiedel, E., et al., 2002. "Brave new sheep – the clone named Dolly". In: Bauer, M. W., and Gaksell, G., eds. Biotechnology—The Making of Global Controversy. Cambridge: CUP; 2002. pp. 313–549.
   Google Scholar
• Durant, J., Bauer, M., and Gaskell, G., 1998. Durant, J., Bauer, M., and Gaskell, G., eds. Biotechnology in the Public Sphere: an European Sourcebook. London: Science Museum; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Durant, J., Hansen, A., and Bauer, M., 1996. "Public understanding of human genetics". In: Marteau, T., and Richards, M., eds. The Troubled Helix: Social and Psychological Implications of the New Human Genetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996. pp. 235–48.
   Google Scholar
• Farr, R., and Moscovici, S., 1984. Farr, R., and Moscovici, S., eds. Social Representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Fassnacht, G., 2000. "Bemetology: towards continuous observation and personality assessment". In: Bauer, M. W., and Gaskell, G., eds. Qualitative Researching with Text, Image and Sound. London: Sage; 2000. pp. 108–29.
   Google Scholar
• Gaskell, J., and Bauer, M. W., 2001. Gaskell, J., and Bauer, M. W., eds. Biotechnology 1996–2000—The Years of Controversy. London: Science Museum; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Gaskell, G., et al., 1997. Europe ambivalent on biotechnology, Nature 387 (1997), pp. 345–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gould, S. J., 1996. The Mismeasure of Man. The Definitive Refutation of the Argument of The Bell Curve, . New York: W.W. Norton & Company; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Haber, E., 1996. Industry and the university, Nature Biotechnology 14 (1996), p. 441.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Habermas, J., 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1989, (German original published in 1962).
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, A., 1994. Journalistic practices and science reporting in the British Press, Public Understanding of Science 3 (1994), pp. 111–34.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S., 2005. Designs on Nature. Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Joss, S., and Durant, J., 1995. Public Participation in Science. The Role of Consensus Conferences in Europe. London: Science Museum Press; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Jovchelovitch, S., 1996. In defence of representation, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 26 (1996), pp. 121–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kevles, D. J., 1995. In the Name of Eugenics. Genetics and the Uses of Human Heredity. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Koch, L., 2004. The meaning of eugenics. Reflections on the government of genetic knowledge in the past and in the present, Science in Context 17 (2004), pp. 315–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K., 1980. Content Analysis. Beverly Hills: Sage; 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Langer, M., 1995. Why the atom is our friend: Disney, General Dynamics and NSS Nautilus, Art History 18 (1995), pp. 63–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lassen, L., Allansdottir, A., Liakopoulos, M., et al., 2002. "Testing times—the reception of Round-up Ready soya in Europe". In: Bauer, M. W., and Gaskell, G., eds. Biotechnology—The Making of a Global Controversy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002. pp. 279–312.
   Google Scholar
• Martineau, G., 2001. First Fruit. The Creation of the Flavr Savr Tomato and the Birth of Biotech Food. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Neidhardt, F., 1993. The public as a communication system, Public Understanding of Science 2 (1993), pp. 339–50.
   Google Scholar
• Philips, D. P., et al., 1991. Importance of the lay press in the transmission of medical knowledge to the scientific community, The New England Journal of Medicine 325 (16) (1991), pp. 1180–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, N., 2001. The politics of life itself, Theory, Culture and Society 18 (6) (2001), pp. 1–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royal Society of London, 1985. The Public Understanding of Science. London: Royal Society of London; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Schudson, M., 2003. The Sociology of News. New York: W.W. Norton; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Seifert, F., 2003. Beinahe-Gleichzeitigkeit. Die europaeische Ani-Gentechnik-Welle und das Oeffentlichkeitsdefizit der EU, Berliner Journal fuer Soziologie 4 (2003), pp. 545–64.
   Google Scholar
• Sheingate, A., 2006. Promotion versus precaution: the evolution of biotechnology policy in the United States, British Journal of Political Science 36 (2006), pp. 243–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TenEyck, T., Thompson, P. B., and Priest, S. H., 2001. "Biotechnology in the USA: mad or moral science?". In: Gaskell, G., and Bauer, M. W., eds. Biotechnology 1996–2000: The Years of Controversy. London: Science Museum; 2001. pp. 307–18.
   Google Scholar
• Thom, D., and Jennings, M., 1996. "Human pedigree and the ‘best stock’: from eugenics to genetics?". In: Marteau, T., and Richards, M., eds. The Troubled Helix. Social and Psychological Implications of the New Human Genetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996. pp. 211–34.
   Google Scholar
• Turney, J., 1998. Frankenstein's Footsteps: Science, Genetics and Popular Culture. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, W., and Hayes, N., 2005. Everyday Discourse and Common Sense. The Theory of Social Representations. London: Palgrave; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Weart, S. R., 1988. Nuclear Fear. A History of Images. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, L., 2003. Atoms for peace, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientist 59 (6) (2003), at <http://www.mindfully.org/Nucs/2003/Atoms-For-Peace1nov03.htm>(accessed 30 January 2006).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilmut, I., Schneike, A. E., McWeir, J., et al., 1997. Viable offspring from fetal and adult mammalian cells, Nature 385 (1997), pp. 810–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoxen, E., 1983. The Gene Business. Who Should Control Biotechnology?. London: Pan Books; 1983.
   Google Scholar